GUO Kai,LI Xuantian,ZHANG Fengbao,et al.Influence of Rainfall Patterns and Slope Lengths on the Characteristics of Eroded Sediment Particle Sizes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):50-57,66.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.054]
雨型和坡长对侵蚀泥沙粒径特征的影响
- Title:
- Influence of Rainfall Patterns and Slope Lengths on the Characteristics of Eroded Sediment Particle Sizes
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)02-0050-08
- Keywords:
- rainfall pattern; slope length; particle size distribution; Loess Plateau; sediment transport
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为揭示降雨和坡长对侵蚀泥沙粒径特征的影响,以不同坡长野外观测试验小区为对象,结合82场降雨资料,以降雨量(P,mm)、最大30 min雨强(I30,mm/h)和降雨侵蚀力〔R,MJ·mm/(hm2·h)〕为降雨特征指标,利用系统聚类法进行雨型划分(A雨型:大雨量、高雨强、高侵蚀力; B雨型:中雨量、小雨强、中等侵蚀力; C雨型:低雨量、中雨强、中低等侵蚀力),分析了11场降雨事件中侵蚀泥沙的粒径分布特征。结果表明:(1)研究区侵蚀泥沙粒径特征受不同雨型影响,有效黏粒和最终黏粒含量在C雨型下最高,有效砂粒和最终砂粒含量在B雨型下最高,而有效粉粒和最终粉粒含量分别在A和C雨型下最高。(2)坡长对侵蚀泥沙粒径特征的影响存在临界坡长效应(14 m),小于临界坡长时,黏粒级和粉粒级颗粒含量随坡长增加而降低; 超过临界坡长后,黏粒级和粉粒级颗粒含量随坡长增加而增加,该效应在最终粒径下更为显著。(3)有效砂粒输移形式受雨型和坡长影响较大,在B雨型下主要以团粒形式输移,在A,C雨型下达临界坡长时以单粒形式输移。侵蚀泥沙的有效粒径颗粒比原坡面土壤细,而最终粒径颗粒则比原坡面土壤粗。整体上,降雨类型和坡长对侵蚀泥沙粒径特征产生显著影响,侵蚀泥沙有效粒径颗粒呈细化趋势,而最终粒径颗粒呈粗化趋势,坡长对泥沙颗粒影响存在临界效应。
- Abstract:
- To illustrate the influence of different rainfall patterns and slope lengths on the dispersion of soil particles, we took field plots with different slope lengths as the research objects and combined with data of 82 rainfall events to classify rainfalls as 3 types(type A: heavy rainfall, high rain intensity, high erodibility; type B: medium rainfall, light rain intensity, medium erodibility; type C: low rainfall, medium rain strong, medium and low erosion)by using hierarchy cluster based on rainfall(P, mm), maximum 30 min rainfall intensity(I30, mm/h), and rainfall erodibility 〔R, MJ·mm/(hm2·h)〕. The particle size distribution characteristics of eroded sediments in 11 rainfall events were analyzed. The results showed that:(1)the composition of eroded sediment particles was affected by different rainfall patterns; the contents of effective and ultimate clay were the highest under type C, and the contents of effective and ultimate sand were the highest under type B, the content of effective silt was the highest under type A, and the content of ultimate silt was the highest under type C;(2)there was a critical slope length effect(14 m)on the distribution of sediment particles; when the slope length was shorter than the threshold, the contents of clay and silt particles decreased with the increase of slope length; and it would increase with the slope length while the slope length was longer than the threshold; the effect on the ultimate particle size was even more significant;(3)the transport of sand particle was greatly affected by the rainfall type and slope length; under the rainfall type B, the transport of effective sand was mainly in the form of aggregated particle, while in the rainfall types A and C, it was transported in the form of single particle at the critical slope length. The effective particles of eroded sediment are finer compared with the original soil, while the ultimate particles were coarser. On the whole, the particle size characteristics of eroded sediment are affected by different rainfall types and slope lengths significantly. The effective particle size of eroded sediment tends to be finer, while the ultimate particle size tends to coarsen, and there is a threshold effect for the slope length on sediment particles.
参考文献/References:
[1] Gregorich E G, Greer K J, Anderson D W, et al. Carbon distribution and losses: erosion and deposition effects[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 1998,47(3):291-302.
[2] 吴凤至,史志华,岳本江,等.坡面侵蚀过程中泥沙颗粒特性研究[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1235-1240.
[3] 张科利,唐克丽.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀能力的水动力学试验研究[J].土壤学报,2000,37(1):9-15.
[4] Kadlec V, Procházková E, Urbanová J, et al. Soil organic carbon dynamics and its influence on the soil erodibility factor[J]. Soil & Water Research, 2012,7(3):97-108.
[5] Pan Z, Wy A, Gl B, et al. Experimental study of sediment transport processes and size selectivity of eroded sediment on steep Pisha sandstone slopes[J]. Geomorphology,2020,363(5):169-178.
[6] 杨帆,张洪江,程金花,等.华北土石山区坡面溅蚀和片蚀泥沙颗粒特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):71-77,243.
[7] Abu-Hamdeh N H, Abo-Qudais S A, Othman A M. Effect of soil aggregate size on infiltration and erosion characteristics[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2010,57(5):609-616.
[8] Durnford D, King J P. Experimental study of processes and particle-size distributions of eroded soil[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1993,119(2):383-398.
[9] 徐加盼,李继洪,魏玉杰,等.不同母质类型发育土壤颗粒组成分形特征[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1197-1205.
[10] Naser, A, Al-Shayea. The combined effect of clay and moisture content on the behavior of remolded unsaturated soils[J]. Engineering Geology, 2001,62(4):319-342.
[11] 肖培青,郑粉莉.上方来水来沙对细沟侵蚀泥沙颗粒组成的影响[J].泥沙研究,2003,48(5):64-68.
[12] Elisabet, Nadeu, Joris, et al. Exploring particle size distribution and organic carbon pools mobilized by different erosion processes at the catchment scale[J]. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 2011,11(4):667-678.
[13] Wang Z, Govers G, Oost K V, et al. Soil organic carbon mobilization by interrill erosion:Insights from size fractions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface, 2013,118(2):348-360.
[14] Warrington D N, Mamedov A I, Bhardwaj A K, et al. Primary particle size distribution of eroded material affected by degree of aggregate slaking and seal development[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2009,60(1):84-93.
[15] Bradford J M, Ferris J E, Remley P A. Interrill soil erosion processes: I. Effect of surface sealing[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1987,51(6):1566-1571.
[16] Hao H X, Wang J G, Guo Z L, et al. Water erosion processes and dynamic changes of sediment size distribution under the combined effects of rainfall and overland flow[J]. Catena, 2019,173:494-504.
[17] 曹媛,孟明,王磊,等.宁夏中部干旱带天然草地土壤颗粒空间分布特征[J].中国水土保持,2021,42(2):56-59.
[18] 邱捷,王洪德,郑一鹏,等.海涂围垦区不同土地利用类型土壤颗粒分形特征[J].农业现代化研究,2020,41(5): 882-888.
[19] 董雪,迟悦春,许德浩,等.西鄂尔多斯荒漠灌丛土壤粒径分形特征与养分的耦合关系[J].草业科学,2020,37(12):2403-2413.
[20] Kinnell P. Raindrop-impact-induced erosion processes and prediction:a review[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2010,19(14):2815-2844.
[21] 郝燕芳,刘宝元,杨扬,等.中国5种典型土壤的侵蚀泥沙粒径分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):150-159.
[22] Berhe A A, Harden J W, Torn M S, et al. Linking soil organic matter dynamics and erosion-induced terrestrial carbon sequestration at different landform positions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 2015,113(G4):39-51.
[23] 刘冉,余新晓,蔡强国,等.坡长对坡面侵蚀,搬运,沉积过程影响的研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(6):140-146.
[24] 付兴涛,张丽萍.坡长对红壤侵蚀影响人工降雨模拟研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(3):474-483.
[25] 陈晓安,蔡强国,张利超,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同雨强下坡长对坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J].土壤通报,2011,42(3):721-725.
[26] 汪晓勇,郑粉莉.黄土坡面坡长对侵蚀-搬运过程的影响研究[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(3):1-4.
[27] 任瑞雪.降雨侵蚀的分离与输移过程对泥沙中有机碳特征的影响研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.
[28] 郝燕芳,佟帆.侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(1):1-7.
[29] Martinez-Mena M, Rogel J A, Albaladejo J, et al. Influence of vegetal cover on sediment particle size distribution in natural rainfall conditions in a semiarid environment[J]. Catena, 2000,38(3):175-190.
[30] 吴凤至,史志华,方怒放,等.不同降雨条件下侵蚀泥沙黏粒含量的变化规律[J].环境科学,2012,33(7):2497-2502.
[31] 付兴涛,姚璟.降雨条件下坡长对陡坡产流产沙过程影响的模拟试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):20-24.
[32] 周梦玲,郭建斌,崔明,等.喀斯特坡地侵蚀泥沙养分流失与粒径分布的关系[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):54-60,71.
[33] 廖义善,蔡强国,程琴娟.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面侵蚀产沙地形因子的临界条件[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(2):32-38.
[34] 郭新亚,张兴奇,顾礼彬,等.坡长对黔西北地区坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):540-44.
[35] 刘和平,王秀颖,刘宝元.短坡条件下侵蚀产沙与坡长的关系[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):1-5,77.
[36] Kinnell P I A. The Effect of Slope Length on Sediment Concentrations Associated with Side-Slope Erosion[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000,64(3):1004-1008.
相似文献/References:
[1]苟俊菲,甘凤玲,刘春红.紫色土坡面细沟形态变化及其对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):61.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.013.]
GOU Junfei,GAN Fengling,LIU Chunhong.Variation of Rill Morphology and Its Effect on Runoff and Sediment Yield on Purple Soil Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):61.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.013.]
[2]陈 昱,刘方平,吴彩云,等.雨型和种植模式对鄱阳湖平原区农田水土流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):18.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.016]
Chen Yu,Liu Fangping,Wu Caiyun,et al.Effects of Rain Patterns and Planting Patterns on Soil and Water Losses in Farmland in the Poyang Lake Plain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):18.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.016]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-01-10 修回日期:2022-03-16
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41877080,42177338,41907054); 陕西省林业科学院黄土高原生态修复创新团队(SXLK2020-03-02)
第一作者:郭凯(1994—),男,山西长治人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向:土壤侵蚀。E-mail:17636315371@163.com
通信作者:张风宝(1980—),男,宁夏彭阳人,博士,研究员,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:fbzhang@nwsuaf.edu.cn