ZHANG Binyan,XIONG Donghong,LIU Lin,et al.Spatial and Temporal Variability of Soil Moisture in Gully Bed of Dry-Hot Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(01):83-90.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.01.002]
干热河谷冲沟沟床土壤水分时空分异特征
- Title:
- Spatial and Temporal Variability of Soil Moisture in Gully Bed of Dry-Hot Valley
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)01-0083-08
- 分类号:
- S152.7
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为探究干热河谷冲沟沟床土壤水分时空分异特征,选取了元谋干热河谷1条典型冲沟,对其不同分段(沟头、上游、中游、下游)下10,20,30,40,60,100 cm土层的土壤水分开展定位监测。结果表明:(1)沟床不同分段各土层(除100 cm土层外)含水量整体变化趋势一致,均表现为明显的干湿季特征; 湿季(5—10月)土壤水分相对较高(7.64%～28.91%),受降雨影响大; 干季(11—次年4月)则长期处于较低水平(6.11%～11.97%)。(2)沟床土壤水分从沟头至下游沿程变化在干湿季有明显差异,湿季表现为先减小后增加,下游(17.36%)显著高于沟头(15.46%)和上游(12.19%); 干季则是先减小后增加再减小,沟头(10.64%)显著高于上游(6.74%)和下游(9.10%)。不同土层深度上,浅层(10—20 cm)和深层(60—100 cm)土壤水分含量在干湿季均较高,水分最小值出现在30—60 cm土层,其中干季30 cm土层水分亏缺严重。(3)沟床土壤水分最高日期通常出现在7日内累积降雨达76.1 mm以上的年最大降雨月当月; 最低日期通常出现在持续无降雨条件下,如干季末期,直至雨季初期出现首次有效降雨(>2 mm)。综上,应充分考虑沟床干湿季、不同分段及剖面土壤水分变化规律,因时因地对冲沟沟床进行植被恢复。
- Abstract:
- A typical gully in the dry-hot valley of Yuanmou County was selected to study the spatiotemporal variation of soil moisture in the gully bed, and the soil moisture in soil layers of 10,20,30,40,60 and 100 cm from different plots(gully head, upstream, midstream and downstream)was monitored. The results showed that:(1)the water contents of all soil layers(except 100 cm soil layer)in different plots of the gully bed showed obvious characteristics of dry and wet seasons; the soil water contents during wet season(May to October)were high(7.64%～28.91%)and greatly influenced by rainfall, while those during dry season(November to April of the next year)were low(6.11%～11.97%);(2)the soil moisture from the gully head to the downstream of the gully bed decreased firstly and then increased in wet season, and the water content in the downstream(17.36%)was significantly higher than those in the gully head(15.46%)and the upstream(12.19%); in dry season, the soil moisture in the gully head(10.64%)was significantly higher than that in the upstream(6.74%)and downstream(9.10%); the water contents in the soil layers of 10—20 cm and 60—100 cm were higher both in dry and wet seasons, while those in the soil layers of 30—60 cm was low, and the most severe water deficit was observed in the 30 cm soil layer in dry season;(3)the max value of soil moisture in gully bed usually occurred in the month with the largest rainfall and the accumulated rainfall more than 76.1 mm within 7 days, and the min value usually occurred under continuous no rainfall conditions, such as from the end of dry season to the beginning of the rainy season with the occurrence of first effective rainfall(>2 mm). In conclusion, the soil water characteristics of dry and wet seasons, different positions of the stable gully beds and profile water distribution should be taken into account to select planting vegetation.
参考文献/References:
[1] 肖德安,王世杰.土壤水研究进展与方向评述[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(3):1182-1188.
[2] McColl K A, Alemohammad S H, Akbar R, et al. The global distribution and dynamics of surface soil moisture[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2017,10(2):100-104.
[3] Xia J, Ning L, Wang Q, et al. Vulnerability of and risk to water resources in arid and semi-arid regions of West China under a scenario of climate change[J]. Climatic Change, 2017,144(3):549-563.
[4] 冯博.黄土高原北部两种典型草地土壤水分时空分异及对降雨的响应[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2020.
[5] 李祥东.西北干旱区土壤水分时空变异特征及其影响因素研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学:中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心,2019.
[6] 邱野.北方坡耕地不同耕作模式产流产沙及土壤水分分布研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2019.
[7] 刘艳.喀斯特峰丛洼地不同土地利用方式下表层土壤水分的时空规律研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2016.
[8] 张明忠,朱红业,张映翠,等.云南干热河谷旱坡地两种覆盖措施对土壤水分的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(3):37-40.
[9] 吴汉,熊东红,张宝军,等.金沙江干热河谷冲沟发育区不同部位土壤水分的时空变化特征[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(2):384-392.
[10] 韩姣姣,段旭,赵洋毅.金沙江干热河谷不同植被坡面土壤水分时空分布特征[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(1):121-129.
[11] 谷丽萍,裴艳辉,郑科,等.整地方式对元谋干热河谷人工林土壤水分的影响[J].西部林业科学,2017,46(6):71-76.
[12] 韩姣姣,段旭,赵洋毅,等.元谋干热河谷不同土地利用类型下土壤水分特征及其主控因子[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(1):168-173.
[13] 赵和琼,谷丽萍,郑科,等.不同集水保水措施对金沙江干热河谷区林地土壤储水量的影响[J].西部林业科学,2018,47(6):85-89,100.
[14] 杨丹,熊东红,张宝军,等.沟床草被对干热河谷冲沟产沙特性影响的野外模拟试验[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(15):124-132.
[15] 南岭,郭芬芬,王小丹,等.云南元谋干热河谷区典型植被恢复模式的水土保持效应[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(9):5168-5171,5225.
[16] 何毓蓉,黄成敏.云南省元谋干热河谷的土壤系统分类[J].山地研究,1995,13(2):73-78.
[17] 羊秀娟.元谋干热河谷土壤类型与侵蚀沟形态关系[D].四川南充:西华师范大学,2019.
[18] 吴世祥.元谋干热河谷干湿季侵蚀沟形态与植被关系研究[D].四川南充:西华师范大学,2020.
[19] 王晨.元谋干热河谷不同发育阶段侵蚀沟与植被关系研究[D].四川南充:西华师范大学,2019.
[20] 张宝军,熊东红,杨丹,等.跌水高度对元谋干热河谷冲沟沟头侵蚀产沙特征的影响初探[J].土壤学报,2017,54(1):48-59.
[21] 贺玉晓.元谋干热河谷土壤水分胁迫对典型恢复草种的影响机制[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2013.
[22] 邱扬,傅伯杰,王军,等.土壤水分时空变异及其与环境因子的关系[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(1):100-107.
[23] Joshua J. Melliger, Jeffrey D. Niemann. Effects of gullies on space-time patterns of soil moisture in a semiarid grassland[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010,389(3/4):289-300.
[24] 陈明玉,邵明安,李同川,等.黄土高原典型切沟土壤水分时空分布特征及其影响因素[J].土壤学报,2021,58(2):381-390.
[25] 杨宁,邹冬生,李建国.衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地土壤水分变化动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(6):16-21.
[26] 杨新民.黄土高原灌木林地水分环境特性研究[J].干旱区研究,2001,18(1):8-13.
[27] 王云强,邵明安,刘志鹏.黄土高原区域尺度土壤水分空间变异性[J].水科学进展,2012,23(3):310-316.
[28] 赵元蛟,苏文华,张光飞,等.云南元谋干热河谷土壤水分季节动态[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(8):3593-3594,3598.
[29] 穆军,李占斌,李鹏,等.干热河谷干季土壤水分动态研究[J].长江科学院院报,2009,26(12):22-25.
[30] 张宝军,熊东红,郭敏,等.干热河谷冲沟侵蚀劣地不同坡位草被生长和土壤水分关系研究[J].草业科学,2015,32(5):686-693.
相似文献/References:
[1]史彦江,宋锋惠,罗青红,等.伊犁河流域油葵种植地产流产沙试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):40.
SHI Yan-jiang,SONG Feng-hui,LUO Qing-hong,et al.Experimental Study on Generation of Runoff and Sediment on the Slope Grown Oil Sunflower in Ili River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):40.
[2]苏嫄,焦菊英,马祥华.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要群落地上生物量季节变化及其与土壤水分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):7.
SU Yuan,JIAO Ju-ying,MA Xiang-hua.Seasonal Variation of Aboveground Biomass of Main Plant Communities and Its Relationship with Soil Moisture in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):7.
[3]王巧利,贾燕锋,王宁,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区自然恢复坡面植物根系的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):16.
WANG Qiao-li,JIA Yan-feng,WANG Ning,et al.Distribution of Root on Vegetation Recovery Slope in the Hilly and Gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):16.
[4]许浩,蒋齐,潘占兵,等.黄土丘陵区降雨、土壤水分和苗木成活率的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):202.
XU Hao,JIANG Qi,PAN Zhan-bing,et al.Relationship of Rainfall, Soil Moisture and Seedling Survival Rate in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):202.
[5]邝高明,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区微地形对土壤水分及生物量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):74.
KUANG Gao-ming,ZHU Qing-ke,LIU Zhong-qi,et al.Effect of Microrelief on the Soil Water and Vegetation Arrangement in Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):74.
[6]鲁瑞洁,唐清亮,桑艳礼,等.青海湖克土沙区不同类型沙丘土壤水分的动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):111.
LU Rui-jie,TANG Qing-liang,SANG Yan-li,et al.Dynamic Changes of Soil Moisture in Different Dunes of Ketu Sand Land in Qinghai Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):111.
[7]展秀丽,严平,王宁,等.青海湖防沙工程措施区土壤水分及入渗特征初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):33.
ZHAN Xiu-li,YAN Ping,WANG Ning,et al.Preliminary Study on Soil Water and Permeability Characteristics of Desertification Combating Areas Exerted by Engineering Measures around Qinghai Lake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):33.
[8]邵明安,陈志雄.SPAC中的水分运动[J].水土保持研究,1991,(01):3.
Shao Mingan,Chen Zhixiong.WATER MOVEMENT IN SPAC[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(01):3.
[9]刘向东,吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,等.黄土丘陵区油松人工林和山杨林林冠对降水的再分配及其对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):9.
Liu Xiangdong,Wu Qinxiao,Zhao Hongyan,et al.REDISTRIBUTION OF PRECIPITATION BY CANOPIES OF ARTIFICIAL CHINESE PINES AND MOUNTAIN POPLARS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SOIL MOISTURE IN LOESS HILLY REGION[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(01):9.
[10]杨新民,杨文治,马玉玺.纸坊沟流域人工刺槐林生长状况与土壤水分条件研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):31.
Yang Xinmin,Yang Wenzhi,Ma Yuxi.Study on the condition growing of the man-made Locust Woodland and moisture eco-environment in the small watershed of Zhifanggou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(01):31.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-11-10 修回日期:2021-12-07
资助项目:中国科学院战略性先导科技(A类)专项(XDA20020401); 中国科学院“西部之光”西部青年学者B类项目(2019); 中科院成都山地所青年基金(SDS-QN-2103)
第一作者:张斌艳(1996—),女,云南曲靖人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤水分与水土保持研究。E-mail:zhangbinyan@swfu.edu.cn
通信作者:熊东红(1974—),男,江西奉新人,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持、土壤生态方面研究。E-mail:dhxiong@imde.ac.cn