REN Jingyu,QIAO Yuning,YAN Luyao,et al.Dynamic Changes and Influencing Factors of Soil Moisture of Main Tree Species in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):73-80,89.
黄土丘陵区主要树种土壤水分动态变化特征及影响因子
- Title:
- Dynamic Changes and Influencing Factors of Soil Moisture of Main Tree Species in Loess Hilly Region
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)06-0073-08
- Keywords:
- soil moisture; temporal and spatial dynamics; meteorological factors; fitting model; Loess Hilly region
- 分类号:
- S154.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为揭示黄土丘陵区土壤贮水状况与植被生长的关系,得到该区最优适生树种,以4类树种作为研究对象,基于ECH2O-5TM监测系统和U30-NRC气象站2019—2020年每30 min数据,采用Excel和SPSS对土壤体积含水量、降雨、空气温度、空气相对湿度进行月、季节尺度处理,运用多重差异性比较和曲线估算阐释了该区土壤水分时间变化特征及其与影响因子的关系。结果表明:(1)刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia)、辽东栎(Quercus wutaishanica)、侧柏(Platycladus orientalis)土壤水分分为耗损期(5—10月)、衰退期(10月—次年1月)、提升期(2—4月)及低位期(3—5月),油松(Pinus tabuliformis)和撂荒地对照(CK)在1—5月则表现为稳升期,各树种土壤水分和降雨存在约30 d的滞后时差。(2)50—80 cm土壤剖层处于水分高峰,随着深度的增加,不同树种土壤水分存在正负变化趋势; 油松土壤水分在表层(20 cm)变异程度最弱。(3)全年与非生长季时期辽东栎土壤水分状况最佳,生长季时期辽东栎、撂荒地对照和油松土壤水分显著大于其余树种,同树种不同时期土壤水分未表现出显著差异。(4)不同树种土壤水分与温度呈负相关性,与降雨和湿度表现为正相关关系,土壤水分与降雨量之间存在阈值(约70 mm)。综上,黄土丘陵区主要树种土壤水分在生长季时期变化最为显著,辽东栎和油松土壤水分在不同时间阶段均较为充沛,可作为当地贮水保水树种选择。
- Abstract:
- In order to reveal the relationship between the soil-water storage status and vegetation growth in the Loess Hilly Area, and obtain optimal suitable tree species in the area, four types of tree species were taken as research objects. Based on the ECH2O-5TM monitoring system and the U30-NRC weather station's data every 30 min from 2019 to 2020, the temporal variation characteristics of soil-water in this area and its relationship with the influencing factors were explained by using Excel and SPSS in order to process the soil volume water content, rainfall, air temperature, air relative humidity on monthly and seasonal scales, and multiple difference comparisons and curve estimation. The results showed that:(1)Soil moisture of Robinia pseudoacacia, Quercus wutaishanica and Platycladus orientalis was divided into a loss period(May—October), a recession period(October—January of the following year), an ascending period(February—April)and low-level period(March—May), Pinus tabuliformis and abandoned land control(CK)showed a steady ascending period from January to May, and there was a 30-day lag time difference between soil moisture and rainfall for each tree species.(2)The 50—80 cm soil section was at the peak of water content. With the increase of depth, the soil water content of different tree species had a positive and negative trend. The soil water content of Pinus tabuliformis had the weakest variation in the surface layer(20 cm).(3)The soil moisture status of Quercus wutaishanica was the best in whole year and non-growing season. During the growing season, the soil moisture of Quercus wutaishanica, CK and Pinus tabuliformis was significantly higher than that of other tree species. There was no significant difference in soil moisture of the same tree species in different periods.(4)The soil moisture of different tree species was negatively correlated with temperature, and positively correlated with rainfall and humidity. There was a threshold(about 70 mm)between soil moisture and rainfall. In conclusion, the soil moisture of the main tree species in the Loess Hilly Area changed most significantly during the growing season, and the soil moisture of Quercus wutaishanic and Pinus tabuliformis were abundant in different time periods, which can be selected as local water-storage and water-retention tree species.
参考文献/References:
[1] 沈晗悦,信忠保,王志杰.北京山区侧柏林坡面土壤水分时空动态及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2676-2686.
[2] 张晓梅.陇东黄土高原中沟小流域刺槐人工林土壤水分特征研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2019.
[3] Wei X, Zhou Q, Cai M, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on regional soil moisture content in the humid Karst Areas: A case study of Southwest China[J]. Water, 2021,321(13):1-16.
[4] 赵丹阳,毕华兴,侯贵荣,等.晋西黄土区典型林地土壤水分变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):181-187.
[5] Jost G, Schume H, Hager H, et al. A hillslope scale comparison of tree species influence on soil moisture dynamics and runoff processes during intense rainfall[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012,420:112-124.
[6] Rodríguez-Iturbe I, Porporato A. Ecohydrology of Water-controlled Ecosystems: Soil Moisture and Plant Dynamics[M].London: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[7] Pan N, Wang S, Liu Y, et al. Global surface soil moisture dynamics in 1979—2016 observed from ESA CCI SM dataset[J]. Water, 2019,11(5):1-16.
[8] Western A W, Grayson R B, Blöschl G, et al. Scaling Methods in Soil Physics [M]. Los Angeles: Crc-Press, 2003.
[9] 祁栋灵,孙瑞,谢贵水,等.海南西部低割龄橡胶林土壤水分季节变化特征及其对气象因子响应研究初报[J].生态科学,2017,36(6):44-48.
[10] 艾宁,张智勇,宗巧鱼,等.水蚀风蚀交错区典型人工林土壤水分亏缺特征[J].森林与环境学报,2021,41(3):272-280.
[11] 刘博,穆彪,谷晓平.贵州喀斯特地区不同降水状况下土壤水分垂直变化特征[J].广东农业科学,2013,40(2):46-49.
[12] 常译方,毕华兴,高路博,等.晋西黄土区刺槐和油松林地土壤水分动态变化[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(4):21-27.
[13] 胡波,陈丽华.黄土高原不同林地土壤水分特征及影响因子通径分析[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(1):79-86.
[14] Huang T, Yu D, Cao Q, et al. Impacts of meteorological factors and land use pattern on hydrological elements in a semi-arid basin[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,690:932-943.
[15] Wei X, Liang W. Regulation of stand density alters forest structure and soil moisture during afforestation with Robinia pseudoacacia L. and Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. On the Loess Plateau[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021,491:1-14.
[16] 王进鑫,王迪海,刘广全.刺槐和侧柏人工林有效根系密度分布规律研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(12):2208-2214.
[17] 韦兰英,上官周平.黄土高原白羊草、沙棘和辽东栎细根比根长特性[J].生态学报,2006,26(12):4164-4170.
[18] 王勋曜,孙宏彦,于辉,等.天坛公园油松、侧柏大树根系分布特征[J].北京农学院学报,2018,33(1):89-98.
[19] 戴军杰,章新平,吕殿青,等.南方红壤丘陵区樟树林土壤水分动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(4):123-131.
[20] 王志杰.北京山区坡面土壤水分时空变化及影响因素[D].北京:北京林业大学,2017.
[21] Qiu Y, Fu B, Wang J, et al. Soil moisture variation in relation to topography and land use in a hillslope catchment of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001,240(3):243-263.
[22] 殷地迟,王立,蔡国军,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区不同植被类型的土壤水分特征及其稳定性[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):65-71.
[23] 田璐.不同覆盖措施对干化土壤水分的影响研究[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院大学(中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2019.
[24] 孔凌霄,毕华兴,周巧稚,等.晋西黄土区不同立地刺槐林土壤水分动态特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):163-169.
[25] 黄琳琳.黄土丘陵区人工油松林土壤水分动态研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011.
[26] Yang L, Wei W, Chen L, et al. Response of temporal variation of soil moisture to vegetation restoration in semi-arid Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2014,115:123-133.
[27] 朱海,胡顺军,刘翔,等.不同龄阶梭梭根区土壤水分时空变化特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(3):860-867.
[28] 邱德勋,赵佰礼,尹殿胜,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤水分垂直变异及影响因素[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(3):72-80.
[29] 丁爱强,徐先英,刘江,等.民勤绿洲自然稀疏人工梭梭林土壤水分动态[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):192-198.
[30] 陈丽艳,王城城,赵从举,等.海南西部桉树林地土壤水分多时间尺度变化特征分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(1):163-170.
[31] Singh J, Milchunas D, Lauenroth W. Soil water dynamics and vegetation patterns in a semiarid grassland[J]. Plant Ecology, 1998,134(1):77-89.
[32] Hawley M E, Jackson T J, Mccuen R H. Surface soil moisture variation on small agricultural watersheds[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1983,62(4):179-200.
[33] Mall R K, Gupta A, Singh R, et al. Water resources and climate change: An Indian perspective[J]. Current Science, 2006,90(12):1610-1626.
[34] 陈媛媛.杉木人工林土壤水分与环境因子关系研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2013.
[35] 韩湘云,景元书,李根.低丘红壤坡面土壤水分变化的气象因素冗余分析[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(9):2368-2374.
[36] 徐勇峰,郭俨辉,季淮,等.洪泽湖湿地杨树林土壤水分变化及其与气象因子的关系[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(1):20-28.
[37] 黄晓宇,韩永贵,韩磊.宁夏河东沙区人工林土壤水分时空变化及其与气象因子之间的关系[J].东北林业大学学报,2020,48(5):29-34.
相似文献/References:
[1]苏嫄,焦菊英,马祥华.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要群落地上生物量季节变化及其与土壤水分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):7.
SU Yuan,JIAO Ju-ying,MA Xiang-hua.Seasonal Variation of Aboveground Biomass of Main Plant Communities and Its Relationship with Soil Moisture in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):7.
[2]王巧利,贾燕锋,王宁,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区自然恢复坡面植物根系的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):16.
WANG Qiao-li,JIA Yan-feng,WANG Ning,et al.Distribution of Root on Vegetation Recovery Slope in the Hilly and Gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):16.
[3]姚志宏,杨勤科,王粉萍,等.黄土丘陵区影响土壤水分的非气候因子之定量标征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):23.
YAO Zhi-hong,YANG Qing-ke,WANG Feng-ping,et al.Quantitative Marking of Non-climatic Factors Influencing Soil Moisture in Loess Hilly Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):23.
[4]许浩,蒋齐,潘占兵,等.黄土丘陵区降雨、土壤水分和苗木成活率的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):202.
XU Hao,JIANG Qi,PAN Zhan-bing,et al.Relationship of Rainfall, Soil Moisture and Seedling Survival Rate in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):202.
[5]奚同行,左长清,尹忠东,等.红壤坡地土壤水分亏缺特性分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):30.
XI Tong-hang,ZUO Chang-qing,YIN Zhong-dong,et al.Analysis on Characteristic of Soil Water Deficit on Red Soil Slope Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):30.
[6]邝高明,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区微地形对土壤水分及生物量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):74.
KUANG Gao-ming,ZHU Qing-ke,LIU Zhong-qi,et al.Effect of Microrelief on the Soil Water and Vegetation Arrangement in Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):74.
[7]鲁瑞洁,唐清亮,桑艳礼,等.青海湖克土沙区不同类型沙丘土壤水分的动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):111.
LU Rui-jie,TANG Qing-liang,SANG Yan-li,et al.Dynamic Changes of Soil Moisture in Different Dunes of Ketu Sand Land in Qinghai Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):111.
[8]宋淑亚,刘文兆,王俊,等.覆盖方式对玉米农田土壤水分、作物产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):210.
SONG Shu-ya,LIU Wen-zhao,WANG Jun,et al.Effects of Different Mulching Modes on Soil Moisture, Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency in a Corn Field[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):210.
[9]展秀丽,严平,王宁,等.青海湖防沙工程措施区土壤水分及入渗特征初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):33.
ZHAN Xiu-li,YAN Ping,WANG Ning,et al.Preliminary Study on Soil Water and Permeability Characteristics of Desertification Combating Areas Exerted by Engineering Measures around Qinghai Lake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):33.
[10]邵明安,陈志雄.SPAC中的水分运动[J].水土保持研究,1991,(01):3.
Shao Mingan,Chen Zhixiong.WATER MOVEMENT IN SPAC[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(06):3.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-08-11 修回日期:2021-09-28
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(4177012305); 国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC0501703)
第一作者:任婧宇(1992—),女,陕西渭南人,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事水土保持监测研究。E-mail:405264565@qq.com
通信作者:陈云明(1967—),男,陕西渭南人,博士,研究员,主要从事植被生态与水土保持研究。E-mail:ymchen@ms.iswc.ac.cn