ZHANG Ruoxi,QIN Fucang,LI Long,et al.Responses of Slope Micro-geomorphology to Erosion and Sediment Yield in Arsenic Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):21-27,35.
砒砂岩区坡面微地貌变化与侵蚀产沙的响应关系
- Title:
- Responses of Slope Micro-geomorphology to Erosion and Sediment Yield in Arsenic Sandstone Area
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)06-0021-07
- Keywords:
- pisha sandstone areas; slope; micro geomorphology; erosion sediment
- 分类号:
- S157
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了定量描述坡面微地貌变化与侵蚀的响应关系,通过三维激光扫描仪,以严重侵蚀的砒砂岩区裸露坡面为研究对象,在自然降雨条件下进行野外原位监测,试验分析了两个雨季13次有效降雨下坡面微地貌与坡面侵蚀的空间变化特征。结果表明:(1)13次降雨中,重度侵蚀3次、中度侵蚀5次、轻度侵蚀3次、微度侵蚀2次,且均与降雨强度密切相关。(2)各地形因子均在R4降雨时达到变化峰值,且其变化规律因坡位不同而有所差异,其中坡中与坡下变化规律基本一致,而上坡部地形因子波动起伏较为明显。(3)各地形因子间均存在一定的相关性,且坡位不同与产流产沙关系也不尽相同,其中产流量与微坡度相关性显著,随着坡位越靠下相关性越强。产沙量则在坡上及坡中与地表粗糙度表现为极显著相关,在下坡部与地表起伏度呈现出极显著相关。综上,坡面微地貌的变化一定程度上可以反映坡面侵蚀强度。
- Abstract:
- In order to quantitatively describe the response relationship between slope micro-geomorphology change and erosion, based on the 3D laser scanner, this paper takes the exposed slope in the arsenic sandstone area which is severely eroded as the research object. The situ field monitoring was carried out under the condition of natural rainfall, the spatial variation characteristics of slope micro-topography and slope erosion were analysed under 13 effective rainfall in two rainy seasons. The results showed that:(1)There were 3 times more severe erosion, 5 times more moderate erosion, 3 times more light erosion and 2 times more slight erosion, and all of them were closely related to rainfall intensity.(2)All the topographic factors reached their peak values during R4 rainfall, and the change rules varied with different slope positions. The change rules of the middle slope and the lower slope were basically the same, while the fluctuation of the topographic factors on the upper slope was more obvious.(3)There is a certain correlation among all the topographic factors, and different slope positions have different relationships with sediment yield, abortion and sediment yield. The correlation between runoff yield and gradient is significant, and the correlation is stronger with the lower slope position. The sediment yield was significantly correlated with surface roughness on the upper slope and on the middle slope, and with surface relief on the lower slope. To sum up, the change of slope micro-geomorphology can reflect the intensity of slope erosion to a certain extent.
参考文献/References:
[1] Sun W Y, Shao Q Q, Liu J Y, et al. Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Catena, 2014,121:151-163.
[2] 张青峰,王健,赵龙山,等.基于M-DEM黄土人工锄耕坡面微地形特征研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(9):149-153.
[3] 张若曦,秦富仓,李龙,等.水力侵蚀对砒砂岩区土壤有机碳空间变异性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(6):117-124.
[4] Zhao L S, Liang X L, Wu F Q. Soil surface roughness change and its effect on runoff and erosion on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2014,6(4):400-409.
[5] 张文博.土壤结构体对工程堆积体坡面侵蚀产沙及微地形的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2020.
[6] Darboux F, Huang C. Does soil surface roughness increase or decrease water and particle transfers[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005,69(3):748-756.
[7] 梁心蓝.水蚀过程中地表糙度变化及侵蚀响应[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.
[8] Gómez J A, Nearing M A. Runoff and sediment losses from rough and smooth soil surfaces in a laboratory experiment[J]. Catena, 2005,59(3):253-266.
[9] Römkens M, Helming K, Prasad S. Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities, surface roughness, and soil water regimes[J]. Catena, 2002,46(2):103-123.
[10] 李清溪,丁文峰,朱秀迪,等.雨强和地表糙度对坡面微地形及侵蚀的影响[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(1):41-47.
[11] 张建文,李鹏,高海东,等.覆沙坡面微地形变化与侵蚀产沙的响应关系[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(3):757-764.
[12] 高玄娜,肖培青,张攀,等.复合侵蚀作用下砒砂岩坡面侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):44-49.
[13] 杨吉山,姚文艺,郑明国,等.原状砒砂岩坡面产流产沙规律试验研究[J].人民黄河,2017,39(1):98-101,109.
[14] 胡剑汝,饶良懿,申震洲.基于WEPP的砒砂岩坡面复合侵蚀治理生态水文效应评价[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):123-129,238.
[15] 陈鹏,张铁钢,董智,等.灌草格局对砒砂岩区产流产沙特征的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(9):116-121.
[16] 汤珊珊.覆沙坡面水蚀产沙动力过程与微地貌变化的响应研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2018.
[17] 郑粉莉,高学田.坡面汇流汇沙与侵蚀—搬运—沉积过程[J].土壤学报,2004,41(1):134-139.
[18] 吴发启,赵西宁,崔卫芳.坡耕地耕作管理措施对降雨入渗的影响[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):115-117.
[19] 赵龙山,张青峰,王健,等.黄土坡面不同微坡位上糙度对降雨侵蚀的响应[J].土壤学报,2013,50(4):637-642.
[20] 唐辉,李占斌,李鹏,等.模拟降雨下坡面微地形量化及其与产流产沙的关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):127-133.
[21] 赵斯琦,王晓红,舒天竹,等.喀斯特地区区域尺度土壤侵蚀地形因子研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(5):97-103.
相似文献/References:
[1]康熠,侯华敏,秦新平.建立砒砂岩区坝系相对稳定规模模型的探讨——以内蒙古皇甫川西黑岱沟小流域坝系为例[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):22.
KANG Yi,HOU Hua-min,QIN Xin-ping.Exploration on Founding the Pattern in Scale of a Relatively Stable Dam System in Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(06):22.
[2]王举位,张征,邹伟,等.砒砂岩区沙棘人工林生态系统服务功能价值变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(03):263.
WANG Ju-wei,ZHANG Zheng,ZOU Wei,et al.Study on Dynamic Change of Ecosystem Service Value of Seabuckthorn Plantation in the Soft Rock Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):263.
[3]盛艳,秦富仓,张艳杰.砒砂岩区小流域土地利用格局变化与优化研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(02):76.
SHENG Yan,QIN Fu-cang,ZHANG Yan-jie.Study on Land-use Change and Pattern Optimization of Small Watershed in Soft Rock Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):76.
[4]于国强,贾莲莲,朱冰冰,等.不同坡位的植被缓冲带对坡面侵蚀产沙来源的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):9.
YU Guoqiang,JIA Lianlian,ZHU Bingbing,et al.Effect of Vegetation Buffers of Different Positions on Sediment Source in the Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):9.
[5]李 龙,张尚轩,高鑫宇,等.次降雨下砒砂岩坡面细沟形态发育及其对侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):1.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.008]
LI Long,ZHANG Shangxuan,HE Jun,et al.Development of Rill Morphology on Sandstone Slopes Under Individual Rainfall Event and Its Effect on Erosion and Sediment Production[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(06):1.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.008]
[6]朱志卓,李 龙,张 鹏,等.水力侵蚀下砒砂岩区植被格局对微地形和侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):10.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.040]
ZHU Zhizhuo,LI Long,ZHANG Peng,et al.Influence of Vegetation Pattern on Microtopography and Erosion Under Hydraulic Erosion in Feldspathic Sandstone Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(06):10.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.040]
[7]杜睿哲,李文栋,高文浩,等.气候、地表覆被变化对砒砂岩区风蚀时空变化的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):31.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.050.]
DU Ruizhe,LI Wendong,GAO Wenhao,et al.Influence of Climate and Surface Cover Changes on Spatiotemporal Changes of Wind Erosion in Pisha Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(06):31.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.050.]
[8]马郡粒,杨振奇,郭建英,等.砒砂岩区坡面产流产沙对土地利用方式的响应[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(01):136.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.021]
Ma Junli,Yang Zhenqi,Guo Jianying,et al.Response of Slope Runoff and Sediment Yield to Land Use in the Pisha Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(06):136.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.021]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-09-23 修回日期:2021-10-06
资助项目:内蒙古自治区研究生科研创新项目(SZ2020085); 中央引导地方科技发展资金项目(2021ZY0023); 内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(2020GG0075); 内蒙古自治区自然科学基金重大项目(2021ZD07); 2022年度内蒙古自治区高校青年科技英才项目(NJYT22046)
第一作者:张若曦(1997—),女,内蒙古乌兰察布人,在读硕士,研究方向为水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail:15624746723@163.com
通信作者:李龙(1989—),男,吉林桦甸人,博士,副教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀及水土保持研究。E-mail:lilongdhr@126.com