[1]张 斌,李 璐,夏秋月,等.基于土地利用的武汉城市圈生态系统服务权衡/协同分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):377-386+393.
　ZHANG Bin,LI Lu,XIA Qiuyue,et al.Trade off/Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in Wuhan City Circle Based on Land Use[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):377-386+393.
点击复制

基于土地利用的武汉城市圈生态系统服务权衡/协同分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 29 期数: 2022年04期 页码: 377-386+393 栏目: 出版日期: 2022-06-20
Title:
Trade off/Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in Wuhan City Circle Based on Land Use
文章编号:
1005-3409(2022)04-0377-10
作者:
张 斌1, 李 璐2, 夏秋月1, 李嘉成1, 董 捷1
(1.华中农业大学 公共管理学院, 武汉 430070; 2.湖南工商大学 公共管理与人文地理学院, 长沙 410205)
Author(s):
ZHANG Bin1, LI Lu2, XIA Qiuyue1, Li Jiacheng1, DONG Jie1
(1.School of Public Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2.School of Public Administration and Human Geography, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)
关键词:
土地利用变化;  生态系统服务;  权衡与协同;  武汉城市圈;  情景模拟分析
Keywords:
land use change;  ecosystem services;  trade off and coordination;  Wuhan city circle;  scenario simulation analysis
分类号:
X171.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究生态系统服务间的权衡/协同关系,以对区域可持续发展提供决策参考。在分析和模拟土地利用变化的基础上,对武汉城市圈39个区县的食物供给服务、碳储量服务和生境质量服务进行了评估,探究其时空演变特征和权衡/协同关系。结果表明:(1)武汉城市圈2005—2018年建设用地和水域面积不断增加,而耕地、林地、草地和未利用地持续减少。2035年综合发展情景下耕地减少趋势得到缓解,林地面积有所增加,建设用地实现有序扩张。(2)武汉城市圈食物供给服务持续提高,碳储量服务不断下降,生境质量总体上也呈下降趋势。多重服务重要区识别表明,各年份中度重要区域面积最大,而极其重要区域面积最小。(3)相关系数法和双变量空间自相关法均表明多尺度下不同情景的生态系统服务间权衡/协同关系是一致的,但程度有所区别。由此可得,区域3种生态系统服务间以权衡关系为主,且不同情景下权衡/协同关系的程度不同。
Abstract:
To explore the trade-off/synergy between ecosystem services to provide decision-making reference for regional sustainable development, based on the analysis and simulation of land use change, the food supply service, carbon storage service and habitat quality service of 39 districts and counties in Wuhan city circle were evaluated to explore their temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and trade-off/synergy. The results show that:(1)from 2005 to 2018, the construction land and water area of Wuhan City circle continued to increase, while the cultivated land, forestland, grassland and unused land continued to decrease; under the comprehensive development scenario in 2035, the decreasing trend of cultivated land will be alleviated, the area of forestland will increase, and the construction land will expand orderly;(2)the food supply service in Wuhan City circle continues to improve, the carbon storage service continues to decline, and the habitat quality also shows a downward trend on the whole; the identification of multiple service important areas shows that the area of moderately important areas is the largest and the area of extremely important areas is the smallest in each year;(3)both correlation coefficient method and bivariate spatial autocorrelation method show that the trade-off/synergy relationship between ecosystem services in different scenarios is consistent at multiple scales, but the degree is different. It can be seen that the trade-off relationship is dominant among the three ecosystem services in the region, and the degree of trade-off/synergy relationships are different in different scenarios.

参考文献/References:

[1] Wang C, Tang C, Fu B, et al. Determining critical thresholds of ecological restoration based on ecosystem service index: A case study in the Pingjiang catchment in southern China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022,303(2):114-125.
[2] Yee S H. Contributions of ecosystem services to human well-being in Puerto Rico[J]. Sustainability, 2020,12(22):96-112.
[3] Rolo V, Roces-Diaz J V, Torralba M, et al. Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2021,50(8):101-113.
[4] Cabral P, Campos F S, David J, et al. Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,126(7):107-116.
[5] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis[R]. Washington DC: Island Press,2005.
[6] 王川,刘春芳,乌亚汗,等.黄土丘陵区生态系统服务空间格局及权衡与协同关系:以榆中县为例[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):521-531.
[7] Adelisardou F, Jafari H R, Malekmohammadi B, et al. Impacts of land use and land cover change on the interactions among multiple soil-dependent ecosystem services(case study: Jiroft plain, Iran)[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2021,43(3):1-20.
[8] 巩杰,柳冬青,高秉丽,等.西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系:以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1278-1288.
[9] 徐建英,陈吉星,刘焱序,等.“一带一路”地区生态系统服务关系的时空分异与区域响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(10):3258-3270.
[10] Gao J, Yu Z, Wang L, et al. Suitability of regional development based on ecosystem service benefits and losses: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2019,107(11):105-116.
[11] 张静静,朱文博,朱连奇,等.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(5):975-988.
[12] 李龙,吴大放,王芳,等.中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究:以佛山市为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(24):9023-9036.
[13] Liu Y, Hou X, Li X, et al. Assessing and predicting changes in ecosystem service values based on land use/cover change in the Bohai Rim coastal zone[J]. Ecological Indicators,2020,111(4):106-119.
[14] 陈心盟,王晓峰,冯晓明,等.青藏高原生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].地理研究,2021,40(1):18-34.
[15] 祁宁,赵君,杨延征,等.基于服务簇的东北地区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].生态学报,2020,40(9):2827-2837.
[16] 高艳丽,李红波,侯蕊.汉江流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(7):1619-1630.
[17] 赵育恒,曾晨.武汉城市圈生态服务价值时空演变分析及影响因素[J].生态学报,2019,39(4):1426-1440.
[18] 姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.
[19] Peng K, Jiang W, Ling Z, et al. Evaluating the potential impacts of land use changes on ecosystem service value under multiple scenarios in support of SDG reporting: A case study of the Wuhan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,307(7):127-140.
[20] 王晓萌,潘佩佩,王晓旭,等.基于土地利用的河北省生态系统服务权衡/协同关系研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(1):80-88.
[21] 曹世雄,刘玉洁,苏蔚,等.中国陆地生态系统服务净价值评估[J].中国科学:地球科学,2018,48(3):331-339.
[22] 陈洪波.协同推进长江经济带生态优先与绿色发展:基于生物多样性视角[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2020,10(3):79-87.
[23] 郝梦雅,任志远,孙艺杰,等.关中盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系动态分析[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):592-602.
[24] 于媛,韩玲,李明玉,等.哈长城市群生态系统服务时空特征及其权衡/协同关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):293-300.
[25] 吴佩君,刘小平,黎夏,等.基于InVEST模型和元胞自动机的城市扩张对陆地生态系统碳储量影响评估:以广东省为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2016,32(5):22-28.
[26] 申嘉澍,梁泽,刘来保,等.雄安新区生态系统服务簇权衡与协同[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):79-91.
[27] Jopke C, Kreyling J, Maes J, et al. Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns[J]. Ecological Indicators,2015,49(2):46-52.
[28] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡-协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
[29] 吴晶晶,田永中,许文轩,等.基于CA-Markov模型的乌江下游地区土地利用变化情景分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):133-139.
[30] 徐彩仙,巩杰,李焱,等.基于地形梯度的甘肃白龙江流域典型生态系统服务分布特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4291-4301.

相似文献/References:

[1]安 彬,肖薇薇,崔晓明.汉江生态经济带土地利用格局的地形梯度效应特征[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):288.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.002]
　An Bin,Xiao Weiwei,Cui Xiaoming.Topographic Gradient Effect of Land Use Pattern in Hanjiang River Ecological Economic Belt[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):288.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.002]
[2]侯美亭,毛任钊,李红军,等.华北平原城郊类型区土地利用及景观格局变化研究——以衡水市桃城区为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):58.
　HOU Mei-ting,MAO Ren-zhao,LI Hong-jun,et al.Changes of Land Use and Landscape Patterns in Rural-urban Interaction——A Case Study：Taocheng District, Hengshui City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):58.
[3]梁伟,杨勤科.基于RS的黄河中游多沙粗沙区土地利用变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):90.
　LIANG Wei,YANG Qin-ke.Land Use Change Analysis in Coarse Sandy Hilly Catchments of Yellow River Based on the Remote Sensing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):90.
[4]邢容容,马安青,张小伟,等.基于Logistic-CA-Markov模型的青岛市土地利用变化动态模拟[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):111.
　XING Rong-rong,MA An-qing,ZHANG Xiao-wei,et al.Dynamic Simulation of Land Use Change in Qingdao City Based on Logistic-CA-Markov Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):111.
[5]付梦娣,妙旭华,全占军,等.庆阳市土地利用变化的景观生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):240.
　FU Meng-di,MIAO Xu-hua,QUAN Zhan-jun,et al.Land Use Change and Its Ecological Effect in Qingyang City of Gansu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):240.
[6]张万萍,雒占福,孟越男,等.资源型城市土地利用变化及生态环境效应研究——以白银市区为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):251.
　ZHANG Wan-ping,LUO Zhan-fu,MENG Yue-nan,et al.Land Use Change and Ecological Environment Effects of Resources-based Cities—A Case Study of Baiyin City in Gansu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):251.
[7]高奇,师学义,王子凌,等.深圳市碳收支与土地利用变化的协整分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):277.
　GAO Qi,SHI Xue-yi,WANG Zi-ling,et al.Co-integration Analysis between Carbon Budget and Land Use Change in Shenzhen City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):277.
[8]彭越,宋戈,王盼盼,等.基于土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值研究——以宁安市为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):302.
　PENG Yue,SONG Ge,WANG Pan-Pan,et al.Study on Ecosystem Service Values Based on Land Use Change—Taking Ning’an City As an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):302.
[9]谢颖颖,邵争,兰小机,等.喀斯特山区土地利用变化与土壤侵蚀耦合关系研究——以毕节试验区为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):1.
　XIE Yingying,SHAO Zheng,LAN Xiaoji,et al.Relationship Between Land Use and Soil Erosion in Karst Area-A Case Study of Bijie Experimental Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):1.
[10]孙丽娜,梁冬梅.东辽河流域未来土地利用变化对水文影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):164.
　SUN Lina,LIANG Dongmei.Effect of Future Land Use Change on Hydrology in Dongliaohe Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):164.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2021-06-08 修回日期:2021-06-28
资助项目:国家自然科学基金“土地发展空间异质性与跨区域碳排放权交易及补偿机制研究——以武汉城市圈为例”(71774064)
第一作者:张斌(1997—),男,湖北武汉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为土地经济与管理。E-mail:1480992336@qq.com
通信作者:董捷(1960—),女,湖北武穴人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土地资源经济研究。E-mail:dongjie@mail.hzau.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-20