LI Jingfang,PENG Tao,DONG Xiaohua,et al.Hydrological Drought Risk in the Hanjiang River Basin Based on Copula Function[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):179-188.
基于Copula函数的汉江流域水文干旱风险研究
- Title:
- Hydrological Drought Risk in the Hanjiang River Basin Based on Copula Function
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)03-0179-10
- Keywords:
- hydrological drought; standardized runoff index; Copula function; run theory; return period; Hanjiang River Basin
- 分类号:
- P333.3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 研究汉江流域水文干旱风险及驱动因素,为区域干旱预警和水资源管理提供参考。选用1964—2016年汉江流域白河、黄家港和沙洋3个水文站逐月实测径流资料,采用标准化径流指数SRI进行水文干旱分析,基于游程理论进行干旱特征变量识别,运用Copula函数计算干旱特征变量之间的联合累积概率,分析了联合重现期和同现重现期。结果表明:(1)在1964—2016年,白河站共发生水文干旱事件54次,干旱发生频繁但旱情较轻; 黄家港和沙洋站分别发生干旱事件34,32次,发生频次相对较少但旱情较重,旱情总体呈现从上游向下游加重的趋势;(2)随着干旱特征变量值增大,联合累积概率值也增大,但增大趋势变缓;(3)两变量重现期随着单变量取值增大而增大,但在相同增幅情况下,同现重现期的增幅要明显高于联合重现期;(4)当白河站干旱历时和烈度达到最大时,水文干旱事件的联合重现期为50 a左右,同现重现期为1 600 a左右,黄家港与沙洋站呈现出与白河站大致相同的趋势;(5)人类活动是1991年以来汉江流域径流减少的主要原因,对白河和沙洋站径流变化的贡献率分别为59.6%和69.2%,是汉江流域水文干旱加重的主导因素。研究显示汉江流域下游旱情较上游重,且持续受人类活动影响,应增强变化环境下区域干旱风险应对能力。
- Abstract:
- The study on the risk and driving factors of hydrological drought in the Hanjiang River Basin can provide reference for regional drought warning and water resources management. The monthly runoff data from 1964—2016 at Baihe, Huangjiagang and Shayang stations in the Hanjiang River Basin were selected, and the standardized runoff index(SRI)was used for hydrological drought analysis. Drought characteristic variables were identified based on the run theory. The joint cumulative probability between the drought characteristic variables was calculated by using Copula function, and the joint return period and co-occurrence return period were analyzed. The results showed that:(1)from 1964 to 2016, there were 54 drought events at Baihe station, indicating that the droughts were frequent but mild; there were 34 and 32 drought events at Huangjiagang and Shayang stations, respectively, indicating that the droughts were relatively less frequent but more severe; the drought situation in the Hanjiang River Basin showed an aggravating trend from upstream to downstream;(2)with the increase of the value of drought characteristic variables, the joint cumulative probability value also increased, but the increasing trend was slow;(3)the bivariate return period increased with the increase of univariate return period, but the increase of co-occurrence return period was significantly higher than that of joint return period under the same increase condition;(4)at Baihe station, when the drought duration and severity reached the maximum, the joint return period of the drought event was approximately 50 years, and the co-occurrence return period was about 1600 years; the same phenomena were found at Huangjiagang and Shayang stations;(5)human activities have been the main cause for runoff reduction in the Hanjiang River Basin since 1991, contributing 59.6% and 69.2% to runoff change at Baihe and Shayang stations, respectively, indicating that they are the dominant factors for the aggravation of hydrological drought in this basin. The results show that the droughts in the lower reaches of the Hanjiang River Basin are heavier than those in the upper reaches and are continuously affected by human activities. Therefore, the ability to cope with regional drought risk should be enhanced under the changing environment.
参考文献/References:
[1] 闫昕旸,张强,闫晓敏,等.全球干旱区分布特征及成因机制研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2019,34(8):826-841.
[2] Liu Y J, Chen J. Future global socioeconomic risk to droughts based on estimates of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability in a changing climate[J]. the Science of the Total Environment, 2021,751(9):142159-142171.
[3] 袁星,马凤,李华,等.全球变化背景下多尺度干旱过程及预测研究进展[J].大气科学学报,2020,43(1):225-237.
[4] Wilhite D A, Glantz M H. Understanding:the drought phenomenon:The role of definitions[J]. Water International, 1985,10(3):111-120.
[5] Nalbantis I, Tsakiris G. Assessment of hydrological drought revisited[J]. Water Resource Management, 2009,23(5):881-897.
[6] Shukla S, Wood A W. Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008,35(2):41-46.
[7] Vicente-Serrano S M, López-Moreno J I, Beguería S, et al. Accurate computation of a streamflow drought index[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2012,17(2):318-332.
[8] 王劲松,冯建英.甘肃省河西地区径流量干旱指数探讨[J].气象,2000,26(6):3-7.
[9] 周玉良,袁潇晨,金菊良,等.基于Copula的区域水文干旱频率分析[J].地理科学,2011,31(11):1383-1388.
[10] 翟家齐,蒋桂芹,裴源生,等.基于标准水资源指数的流域水文干旱评估:以海河北系为例[J].水利学报,2016,46(6):687-698.
[11] Feng P, Han S, Li S F. Method of distinguishing hydrologic drought for water supply system[J]. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2005,11(5):371-375.
[12] 周玉良,周平,金菊良,等.基于供水水源的干旱指数及在昆明干旱频率分析中应用[J].水利学报,2014,45(9):1038-1047.
[13] Shiau J T. Fitting drought duration and severity with two dimensional copulas[J]. Water Resources Management, 2006,20(5):795-815.
[14] 杨星星,杨云川,邓思敏,等.基于SPEI的广西干旱综合特征及农业旱灾风险研究[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(4):113-121.
[15] 肖名忠,张强,陈晓宏.基于多变量概率分析的珠江流域干旱特征研究[J].地理学报,2012,67(1):83-92.
[16] 涂新军,陈晓宏,赵勇,等.变化环境下东江流域水文干旱特征及缺水响应[J].水科学进展,2016,27(6):810-821.
[17] 陶新娥,陈华,许崇育.基于SPI/SPEI指数的汉江流域1961—2014年干旱变化特征分析[J].水资源研究,2015,4(5):404-415.
[18] 陈燕飞,熊刚,刘伟.基于标准化降水指数的汉江流域干旱时空分布特征[J].中国农村水利水电,2016,58(4):82-88.
[19] 田晶,郭生练,刘德地,等.气候与土地利用变化对汉江流域径流的影响[J].地理学报,2020,75(11):2307-2318.
[20] 李敏,李建柱,冯平,等.变化环境下时变标准化径流指数的构建与应用[J].水利学报,2018,49(11):1386-1395.
[21] 邵进,李毅,宋松柏.标准化径流指数计算的新方法及其应用[J].自然灾害学报,2014,23(6):79-87.
[22] Edwards D C, McKee T B. Characteristics of 20 th century drought in the United States at multiple time scales[R]. Fort Collins: Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, 1997,18-21.
[23] Yevjevich V. Objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts[D]. Fort Collins: Colorado State University, 1967.
[24] Zhang L, Singh V P. Bivariate rainfall frequency distributions using Archimedean copulas[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007,332(26):93-109.
[25] 王晓峰,张园,冯晓明,等.基于游程理论和Copula函数的干旱特征分析及应用[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(10):206-214.
[26] 龙瑞昊,畅建霞,张鸿雪,等.基于Copula的澜沧江流域气象干旱风险分析[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2020,56(2):265-274.
[27] 姚曼飞,党素珍,孟美丽,等.基于Copula函数的泾河流域水沙丰枯遭遇频率分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):192-202.
[28] 李计,李毅,宋松柏,等.基于Copulas函数的二维干旱变量联合分布[J].水文,2012,32(1):43-49.
[29] 代萌,黄生志,黄强,等.干旱多属性风险动态评估与驱动力分析[J].水力发电学报,2019,38(8):15-26.
[30] 马建琴,和鹏飞,彭高辉,等.基于三维Copula函数的沙颍河流域水文干旱频率分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(9):102-107.
[31] 穆兴民,张秀勤,高鹏,等.双累积曲线方法理论及在水文气象领域应用中应注意的问题[J].水文,2010,30(4):47-51.
相似文献/References:
[1]郑越馨,吴燕锋,潘小宁,等.三江平原气象水文干旱演变特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(04):177.
ZHENG Yuexin,WU Yanfeng,PAN Xiaoning,et al.Evolution Characteristics of Meteorological and Hydrological Drought in Sanjiang Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(03):177.
[2]杨铭珂,贺中华,任荣仪.黔中地区气象水文干旱演变特征及其响应关系[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):264.
YANG Mingke,HE Zhonghua,REN Rongyi.Evolution Characteristics of Meteorological and Hydrological Drought and Their Response Relations in Central Guizhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):264.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-04-18 修回日期:2021-06-13
资助项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0401005, 2016YFA0601703); 国家自然科学基金项目(52009065); 宜昌市自然科学研究项目(A21-3-004)
第一作者:李京芳(2000—),女,湖北襄阳人,本科生,从事水文与水资源方面的研究。E-mail:3264203823@qq.com
通信作者:彭涛(1973—),男,湖南保靖人,副教授,博士,从事水文水资源与生态水文方面的研究。E-mail:pengtao306@163.com