YANG Zhenqi,GUO Jianying,QIN Fucang,et al.Effects of Artificial Vegetation on Runoff and Sediment Reduction by in Exposed Feldspathic Sandstone Region Under Natural Rainfall[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(01):100-104+112.
天然降雨条件下裸露砒砂岩区人工植被的减流减沙效应
- Title:
- Effects of Artificial Vegetation on Runoff and Sediment Reduction by in Exposed Feldspathic Sandstone Region Under Natural Rainfall
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)01-0100-05
- Keywords:
- exposed feldspathic sandstone region; rainfall characteristics; artificial vegetation; effects of runoff and sediment reduction
- 分类号:
- S718
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 裸露砒砂岩区是黄土高原上侵蚀最为剧烈的地区之一,研究裸露砒砂岩区天然降雨下人工植被的减流减沙效应,对于提升砒砂岩区水土流失治理成效与质量有重要意义。以裸露砒砂岩区鲍家沟小流域的典型人工植被为研究对象,运用系统聚类和线性回归相结合的方法,划分裸露砒砂岩区降雨类型,研究不同降雨类型下坡面产流产沙的特征,分析不同人工植被的减流减沙效应。结果表明:(1)裸露砒砂岩的自然降雨可以分为长历时暴雨、长历时的中到大雨、短历时暴雨以及短历时的小到中雨4种类型。(2)天然降雨的降雨量(P)、最大30 min雨强(I30)和最大10 min雨强(I10)与各植被类型坡面的产流量、产沙量间呈y=ax1+bx2+cx3+d的多元线性关系。(3)各植被类型的减流能力依次为沙棘林>油松林>山杏林>柠条林>草地; 减沙能力依次为沙棘林>山杏林>油松林>柠条林>草地。营造人工植被可以有效防治裸露砒砂岩区坡面的水土流失问题,现有的人工植被类型中以沙棘林的抗蚀能力最强。
- Abstract:
- The exposed feldspathic sandstone region is one of the areas susceptible to most severe soil and water losses in the Loess Plateau. Studying the effects of artificial vegetation on runoff and sediment reduction in exposed feldspathic sandstone region under natural rainfall has great significance to improve the effectiveness and quality of soil erosion control. In this research, through hierarchical clustering method and linear regression method, we divided the types of rainfall and studied their effects on soil erosion, and also analyzed the erodibility under different typies of artificial vegetation in Baojiagou watershed of Feldspathic sandstone region. The results showed that:(1)the natural rainfall types in exposed feldspathic sandstone region could be conceptually divided into four categories: long-duration heavy rain, long-duration moderate to heavy rain, short-duration heavy rain, short-duration light to moderate rain;(2)multiple linear function relation could describe the relation between P, I30, I10 of rainfall and runoff yield, sediment yield under differernt artificial vegetation types(y=ax1+bx2+cx3+d);(3)the runoff reduction ability of different vegetation types followed the order: Hippophae rhamnoides>Pinus tabuliformis>Prunus armeniaca>Caragana korshinskii>grass land;(3)it was also found that sediment reduction capacity decreased in the order: Hippophae rhamnoides>Prunus armeniaca>Pinus tabuliformis>Caragana korshinskii>grass land. Construction of artificial vegetation can effectively prevent and control soil and water loss on the slope of exposed feldspathic sandstone area. Among the existing artificial vegetation types, Hippophae rhamnoides forest has the strongest ability to control erosion.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张攀,姚文艺,刘国彬,等.土壤复合侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(24):154-161.[2] 殷水清,薛筱婵,岳天雨,等.中国降雨侵蚀力的时空分布及重现期研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(9):105-113.[3] Mark A N, Yin S Q, Pasquale B, et al. Rainfall erosivity:A historical review[J]. Catena, 2017,157:357-362.[4] Alavinia M, Saleh F N, Asadi H, et al. Effects of rainfall patterns on runoff and rainfall-induced erosion[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2019,34(3):270-278.[5] Dakhlalla A O, Parajuli P B. Evaluation of the best management practices at the watershed scale to attenuate peak streamflow under climate change scenarios[J]. Water Resources Management, 2016,30(3):963-982.[6] 林庆明,丁文峰,张长伟,等.模拟降雨条件下红壤坡面侵蚀产沙水动力学特征[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):16-21.[7] 陈戎欣,吕锡芝,倪用鑫,等.人工降雨下草被对黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面径流的调控及临界阈值[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(1):122-128.[8] 刘晓燕,李晓宇,高云飞,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域产沙的降雨阈值变化[J].水利学报,2019,50(10):1177-1188.[9] 沈海鸥,刘健,王宇,等.降雨强度和坡度对黑土区土质道路路面侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):123-126.[10] Emeh C, Igwe O. Variations in soils derived from an erodible sandstone formation and factors controlling their susceptibility to erosion and landslide[J]. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2017,90(3):362-370.[11] Bruthans J, Soukup J, Vaculikova J, et al. Sandstone landforms shaped by negative feedback between stress and erosion[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2014,7(8):597-601.[12] Vecchio J D, Dibiase R A, Denn A R, et al. Record of coupled hillslope and channel response to Pleistocene erosion and deposition in a sandstone headwater valley, central Pennsylvania[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2018,130(11/12):1903-1917.[13] 王愿昌,吴永红,寇权,等.砒砂岩分布范围界定与类型区划分[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):14-18.[14] 张汉雄.黄土高原的暴雨特性及其分布规律[J].地理学报,1983,83(4):416-425.[15] 谢云,刘宝元,章文波.侵蚀性降雨标准研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(4):6-11.[16] 王万忠,焦菊英.中国的土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5):1-20.[17] 杨振奇,秦富仓,李旻宇,等.砒砂岩区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素研究[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(4):733-739.[18] 杨振奇,秦富仓,李龙,等.砒砂岩区小流域土壤有机质空间分布特征及其影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(17):154-161.[19] 高光耀,傅伯杰,吕一河,等.干旱半干旱区坡面覆被格局的水土流失效应研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(1):12-22.[20] 于国强,李占斌,李鹏,等.不同植被类型的坡面径流侵蚀产沙试验研究[J].水科学进展,2010,21(5):593-599.[21] 余新晓,张晓明,武思宏,等.黄土区林草植被与降水对坡面径流和侵蚀产沙的影响[J].山地学报,2006,24(1):19-26.[22] 陈丽华,张艺,余新晓,等.北京山区典型森林植被林冠截留特征及模拟[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2013,21(3):423-431.[23] 王改玲,王青杵,石生新.晋北黄土区降雨特征及其对坡地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):1-5.
相似文献/References:
[1]普隽泽,吕锡芝,张秋芬,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型草被产流产沙特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(02):1.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.015]
PU Junze,Lv Xizhi,ZHANG Qiufen,et al.Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Runoff and Sediment Yield of Typical Grassland in Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(01):1.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.015]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-12-14 修回日期:2021-01-11资助项目:内蒙古自治区科技兴蒙行动重点专项“十大孔兑综合治理与水资源集约高效利用集成示范”(KJXM-EEDS-2020005); 内蒙古自治区科技计划项目“黄河十大孔兑流域生态修复空间精准识别与智慧水土保持技术”(2021GG0052)第一作者:杨振奇(1993—),男,内蒙古赤峰市人,博士,工程师,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治方面的研究。E-mail:843296578@qq.com通信作者:郭建英(1979—),男,内蒙古呼和浩特市人,高级工程师,硕士生导师,主要从事水土保持、矿区生态修复等方面的科研工作。E-mail:guojianying1980@126.com