LIN Junqiu,YANG Daming,FANG Nufang,et al.Variation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics in the Process of Rill Erosion on the Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(01):1-7.
坡面细沟侵蚀过程中的水动力特性变化
- Title:
- Variation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics in the Process of Rill Erosion on the Slope
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)01-0001-07
- Keywords:
- Lou soil; rill; scour; soil erosion; hydrodynamic characteristics
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为定量揭示坡面细沟水流侵蚀过程中的水动力特征,开展不同流量(2 L/min,4 L/min,8 L/min)、不同坡度(5°,10°,15°,20°,25°)下的放水冲刷试验,对坡面细沟发育过程中的水动力学参数变化规律进行了研究。结果表明:在试验的流量和坡度范围内,平均流速随冲刷历时的延长和细沟形态的发展呈迅速递减—略有起伏—缓慢减小并最终趋于稳定的变化趋势,径流深随冲刷历时的增大而增大; 坡面细沟水流的雷诺数变化范围为237～1 090,在小流量时,雷诺数随冲刷历时增大而略有增大,在大流量时,雷诺数随冲刷历时增大而减小; 在整个冲刷过程中,弗劳德数始终大于1,表明该试验条件下的坡面流属于急流范畴; 坡面细沟水流的阻力系数随冲刷持续而增大; 弗劳德数随阻力系数的增大而减小,且具有良好的负向幂函数关系。该研究结果初步表明了土坡面的细沟侵蚀特征和水动力学特性,为土侵蚀动力学机制的进一步研究提供理论基础。
- Abstract:
- This study aims to quantitatively study the hydrodynamic characteristics of rill flow. Three different flow discharges(2 L/min, 4 L/min, 8 L/min)and five slope gradients(5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°)of controlled slope experiments were conducted. The results show that the average velocity decreases with the increase of scoring duration and the development of rill morphology; the runoff depth increases with the increase of scouring duration. The Reynolds number varies from 237 to 1 090. At the large flow discharge, the Reynolds number decreases with the increase of scouring duration; by contrast, the small flow capacity increases. During the whole scouring process, the Froude number keeps greater than 1, indicating that the overland flow belongs to the category of jet stream. Darcy resistance coefficient of the slope rill flow increases with the continuously scouring, while the Froude number decreases with the increase of the Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient. A negative power function relationship is found between the resistance coefficient and the Froude number.
参考文献/References:
[1] Omidwar E, Hajizadeh Z, Ghasemieh H. Sediment yield, runoff and hydraulic characteristics in straw and rock fragment covers [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2019,194:1-12.[2] 吴发启,张洪江.土壤侵蚀学[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.[3] Shen H O, Zheng F L, Wen L L, et al. Impacts of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on rill erosion processes at loessial hillslope [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2016,155:429-436.[4] 郑粉莉,唐克丽,周佩华.坡耕地细沟侵蚀影响因素的研究[J].土壤学报,1989,26(2):109-116.[5] Zhang G H, Liu G B, Tang K M, et al. Flow detachment of soils under different land uses in the loess plateau of china[J]. Tasabe, 2008,51(3):883-890.[6] Yang D M, Gao P L, Zhao Y D, et al. Modeling sediment concentration of rill flow [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018,561:286-294.[7] Wirtz S, Seeger M, Ries J B. Field experiments for understanding and quantification of rill erosion processes[J]. Catena, 2012,91:21-34.[8] 杨大明,高佩玲,张晴雯,等.黄土坡面细沟水动力学特性试验研究[J].泥沙研究,2018,43(4):49-56.[9] 王龙生,蔡强国,蔡崇法,等.黄土坡面细沟与细沟间水流水动力学特性研究[J].泥沙研究,2013(6):45-52.[10] 张科利.黄土坡面发育的细沟水动力学特征的研究[J].泥沙研究,1999(1):57-62.[11] Wang G Y, Sun G R, Li J K, et al. The experimental study of hydrodynamic characteristics of the overland flow on a slope with three-dimensional Geomat [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018,30(1):153-159.[12] 李占斌,秦百顺,亢伟,等.陡坡面发育的细沟水动力学特性室内试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(6):64-68.[13] 丁文峰,李占斌,丁登山.坡面细沟侵蚀过程的水动力学特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3):72-75.[14] 张海东.砾石含量对崩积体坡面细沟侵蚀的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2019.[15] 孙立全.梁峁坡面土壤侵蚀演化过程及水动力学特性模拟试验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.[16] 丁文峰,李亚龙,王一峰,等.人工模拟降雨条件下紫色土坡面流水动力学参数特征[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(2):66-69.[17] 施明新,李陶陶,吴秉校,等.地表粗糙度对坡面流水动力学参数的影响[J].泥沙研究,2015(4):59-65.[18] Dunkerley D. Estimating the mean speed of laminar overland flow using dye injection-uncertainty on rough surfaces[J]. Earth Surface Process and Landforms, 2001,26:363-374.[19] Ali M, Sterk G, Seeger M, et al. Effect of flow discharge and median grain size on mean flow velocity under overland flow[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012,452/453:150-160.[20] Abrantes J R, Moruzzi R B, Silveira A, et al. Comparison of thermal, salt and dye tracing to estimate shallow flow velocities:Novel triple-tracer approach[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018,557:362-377.[21] Yang D M, Fang N F, Shi Z H. Correction factor for rill flow velocity measured by the dye tracer method under varying rill morphologies and hydraulic characteristics[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020,591:125560.[22] Zhang G H, Luo R T, Ying C, et al. Correction factor to dyemeasured flow velocity under varying water and sediment discharges[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010,389(1/2):205-213.[23] Pan C Z, Shangguan Z P, Ma L. Assessing the dye-tracer correction factor for doc-umenting the mean velocity of sheet flow over smooth and grassed surfaces[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2015,29(26):5369-5382.[24] 王龙生,蔡强国,蔡崇法,等.黄土坡面发育平稳的细沟流水动力学特性[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(8):1117-1124.[25] 罗榕婷,张光辉,曹颖.坡面含沙水流水动力学特性研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(4):567-574.[26] 雷廷武,张晴雯,闫丽娟.细沟侵蚀物理模型[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.[27] 汪孟尧,姚原,宗芯伊.不同地表糙度下坡面流水动力学特性试验研究[J].科技通报,2019,35(4):180-184.[28] 蒋昌波,隆院男,胡世雄,等.坡面流阻力研究进展[J].水利学报,2012,43(2):189-197.[29] 刘敏,方如康.现代地理科学词典[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.[30] An J, Zheng F, Lu J, et al. Investigating the Role of Raindrop Impact on Hydrodynamic Mechanism of Soil Erosion Under Simulated Rainfall Conditions [J]. Soil Science, 2012,177(8):517-526.[31] 张攀,姚文艺,魏鹳举,等.黄丘区坡面细沟流速分布特征试验研究[J].水利学报,2017,48(11):1334-1340.[32] 张光辉,卫海燕,刘宝元.坡面流水动力学特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):58-61.[33] Jiang F S, Zhan Z Z, Chen J L, et al. Rill erosion processes on a steep colluvial deposit slope under heavy rainfall in flume experiments with artificial rain [J]. Catena, 2018,169:46-58.[34] 李鹤.坡面细沟横断面形态演化规律研究[D].陕西杨陵:西北农林科技大学,2015.[35] Zheng F L, Tang K L. Rill erosion process on steep slope land of the loess plateau [J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 1997,12(1):52-59.[36] 张乐涛,高照良,田红卫.工程堆积体陡坡坡面径流水动力学特性[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):34-38.[37] 张翔,高照良,袁雪红,等.工程堆积体坡面细沟流水力学参数特性研究[J].泥沙研究,2016(4):34-40.[38] 陈培济.集中水流冲刷条件下土石混合崩积物坡面侵蚀机理研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2016.
相似文献/References:
[1]朱显谟.中国土壤科学复兴之道──献给我国土壤地理工作者[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(01):1.
Zhu Xianmo.On the Renaissance Way of Soil Science in China─Present to Workers of Soil Geography[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(01):1.
[2]王蕊,王百群,王昊,等.长期施用氮磷肥对土钾素的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):53.
WANG Rui,WANG Baiqun,WANG Hao,et al.Effects of Long-term Application of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers on Potassium of Lu Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):53.
[3]柳媛媛,孙本华,皮小敏,等.有机物料输入对关中土碳氮影响的后效作用[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(04):71.
LIU Yuanyuan,SUN Benhua,PI Xiaomin,et al.Post-Effects of Organic Material Input on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen on Anthropogenic Loess Soil in Guanzhong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):71.
[4]张翔,高照良,卢茜.(土娄)土堆积体坡面细沟形态及其沿程分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(05):53.
ZHANG Xiang,GAO Zhaoliang,LU Xi.Rill Morphological Characteristics and Distribution Characteristics on Lou Soil Mound[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):53.
[5]牛耀彬,吴 旭,高照良,等.工程堆积体坡面细沟侵蚀形态空间变化[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(06):32.
NIU Yaobin,WU Xu,GAO Zhaoliang,et al.Spatial Variation of Rill Erosion Morphology on the Slope of Engineering Accumulation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(01):32.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-01-20 修回日期:2021-02-06资助项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目(41930755); 西部青年学者A类(XAB2018A03)第一作者:林俊秋(1996—),女,四川宜宾人,硕士生,研究方向为土壤侵蚀。E-mail:junqiul0@nwafu.edu.cn通信作者:方怒放(1985—),男,安徽铜陵人,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:fnf@ms.iswc.ac.cn