[1]何 刚,王莹莹,阮 君,等.基于Dagum基尼系数的生态安全区域差异及收敛度研究——以淮河生态经济带安徽段为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(06):348-355.
　HE Gang,WANG Yingying,RUAN Jun,et al.Study on Regional Differences and Convergence of Ecological Security Based on Dagum Gini Coefficient[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):348-355.
点击复制

基于Dagum基尼系数的生态安全区域差异及收敛度研究——以淮河生态经济带安徽段为例

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 28 期数: 2021年06期 页码: 348-355 栏目: 出版日期: 2021-10-10
Title:
Study on Regional Differences and Convergence of Ecological Security Based on Dagum Gini Coefficient
文章编号:
1005-3409(2021)06-0348-08
作者:
何 刚，王莹莹，阮 君，赵杨秋
(安徽理工大学 经济与管理学院，安徽 淮南 232001)
Author(s):
HE Gang，WANG Yingying，RUAN Jun，ZHAO Yangqiu
(School of Economics and Management，Anhui University of Science & Technology，Huainan，Anhui 232001，China)
关键词:
生态安全;  区域差异;  Dagum基尼系数分解;  淮河生态经济带
Keywords:
ecological security;  regional differences;  Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition;  Huaihe Eco-economic Belt
分类号:
X826
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了探究淮河生态经济带安徽段生态安全区域差异及其收敛性，实现各区域高质量协同发展。通过构建生态安全评价指标体系，运用熵值法对2010—2018年安徽段生态安全水平进行测度，并采用Dagum基尼系数分解法分析区域差异贡献及差异来源，利用变异系数法检验了生态安全区域差异的收敛性。结果表明:(1)2010—2018年淮河生态经济带安徽段生态安全水平呈逐年上升趋势，年均综合指数为0.259，0.265，0.299，0.447，0.345，0.323，0.432，0.478;(2)安徽段生态安全水平发展的空间差异明显，区域间差异与区域内差异对总体差异的平均贡献率分别为48.7%，46.1%;(3)淮河以北和淮河以南区域均存在σ收敛特征。总之，淮河生态经济带安徽段生态安全水平不容乐观，且区域间及区域内差异明显，提高生态安全水平，因地制宜、缩小生态安全区域差异是其主要发展方向。
Abstract:
In order to explore the regional differences and convergence of ecological security in Anhui section of Huaihe Eco-economic Belt，and realize high-quality coordinated development of each region，by constructing the evaluation index system of ecological security，entropy method was used to measure the level of ecological security in Anhui section from 2010 to 2018，and Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition method was used to analyze the contribution and source of regional differences. The convergence of regional differences in ecological security was tested by coefficient of variation method. The results show that:(1)from 2010 to 2018，the level of ecological security in Anhui section of Huaihe Eco-economic Belt kept increase year by year，and the average annual composite indices were 0.259，0.265，0.299，0.447，0.345，0.323，0.432，0.478;(2)the spatial difference of ecological security level development in Anhui section was obvious; the average contribution rate of regional difference and regional difference to the overall difference was 48.7% and 46.1%，respectively;(3)both north of Huaihe River and south of Huaihe River had σ convergence characteristics. In summary，the level of ecological security in Anhui section of Huaihe Eco-economic Belt is not optimistic，and there are obvious differences between and within regions. Therefore，the main development direction is to improve the level of ecological security，to take measures according to local conditions，and to reduce the regional differences of ecological security.

参考文献/References:

[1] 金贵，吴锋，李兆华，等.快速城镇化地区土地利用及生态效率测算与分析[J].生态学报，2017，37(23):8048-8057.
[2] 杨雪荻，白永平，车磊，等.甘肃省生态安全时空演变特征及影响因素解析[J].生态学报，2020，40(14):4785-4793.
[3] Islam M S，Ahmed M K，Mamun M H A，et al. Potential ecological risk of hazardous elements in different land-use urban soils of Bangladesh[J]. Science of the Total Environment，2014，512/513:94-102.
[4] Irish O. Identifying ecological hotspots in the United States and Norway: Turning ecosystem-based management into practice[J]. Marine Policy，2018，98:65-76.
[5] Yin Z，Dekker S C，Rietkerk M，et al. Network based early warning indicators of vegetation changes in a land-atmosphere model[J]. Ecological Complexity，2016，26:68-78.
[6] Nixdorf E，Chen M，Lin H，et al. Monitoring and modeling of water ecologic security in large river-lake systems[J]. Journal of Hydrology，2020，519(12).DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125576.
[7] 张云兰.人类命运共同体背景下西南喀斯特地区生态安全评价[J].安全与环境学报，2019，19(6):2226-2234.
[8] 熊建华，唐将伟.基于情景分析法的城市土地生态安全预警研究:以深圳为例[J].安全与环境学报，2018，18(3):1215-1219.
[9] 鲍超，邹建军.基于人水关系的京津冀城市群水资源安全格局评价[J].生态学报，2018，38(12):4180-4191.
[10] 赵文力，刘湘辉，鲍丙飞，等.长株潭城市群县域生态安全评估研究[J].经济地理，2019，39(8):200-206.
[11] 刘婷婷，孔越，吴叶，等.基于熵权模糊物元模型的我国省域森林生态安全研究[J].生态学报，2017，37(15):4946-4955.
[12] 杨嘉怡，曾旗.基于组合模型的煤炭城市生态安全预警研究:以焦作市为例[J].地域研究与开发，2018，37(3):113-119.
[13] 魏黎灵，李岚彬，林月，等.基于生态足迹法的闽三角城市群生态安全评价[J].生态学报，2018，38(12):4317-4326.
[14] 杨晓俊，方传珊，侯叶子.基于生态足迹的西安城市生态游憩空间优化研究[J].地理研究，2018，37(2):281-291.
[15] 雷勋平，Robin Q，刘勇.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].农业工程学报，2016，32(13):243-253.
[16] 王千，金晓斌，周寅康.河北省耕地生态安全及空间聚集格局[J].农业工程学报，2011，27(8):338-344.
[17] 严超，张安明，石仁蓉，等.重庆市黔江区土地生态安全评价及时空变化分析[J].水土保持通报，2016，36(4):262-268.
[18] 张利国，王占岐，柴季，等.湖北省耕地多功能地区差异及综合分区研究[J].地域研究与开发，2019，38(5):125-130.
[19] Dagum C. A new approach to the decomposition of the Gini income inequality ratio[J]. Empirical Economics，1997，22(4):515-531.
[20] 邓宗兵，何若帆，陈钲，等.中国八大综合经济区生态文明发展的区域差异及收敛性研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究，2020，37(6):3-25.
[21] Barro R J，Sala-I-Martin X. Convergence across states and regions[J].Brooking Papers on E-conomic Activity，1991，22(1):107-182.
[22] 刘兴凯，张诚.中国服务业全要素生产率增长及其收敛分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究，2010，27(3):55-67，95.

相似文献/References:

[1]符 蓉,梁玉洁,谢治国,等.汉江流域生态安全时空变化及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(06):139.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.06.004]
　Fu Rong,Liang Yujie,Xie Zhiguo,et al.Spatial and Temporal Changes in the Ecological Security of the Hanjiang River Basin and Its Influencing Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(06):139.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.06.004]
[2]郜红娟,蔡广鹏,罗绪强,等.基于能值分析的贵州省2000—2010年耕地生态安全预警研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):307.
　GAO Hong-juan,Cai Guang-peng,LUO Xu-qiang,et al.Study on Warning of Farmland Ecological Security in Guizhou from 2000 to 2010 Based on the Energy Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):307.
[3]王宏卫,段魏魏,塔西甫拉提·特依拜.新疆干旱区于田绿洲生态安全评价及影响因子研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):247.
　WANG Hongwei,DUAN Weiwei,Taxifulati·Teyibai.Assessment on Ecological Security and Research for the Affecting Factors in Yutian Oasis of Arid Area in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):247.
[4]梁二敏,张军民.新疆玛纳斯河流域景观格局变化的生态安全分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):170.
　LIANG Ermin,ZHANG Junmin.Analysis of Ecological Security of Landscape Pattern in Manas River Watershed of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):170.
[5]盛东,李桂元,徐义军.湖南省小流域生态安全综合评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(02):58.
　SHENG Dong,LI Gui-yuan,XU Yi-jun.Evaluation Index System of Ecological Security in the Watershed of Hu’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):58.
[6]高桂芹,韩美.区域土地资源生态安全评价——以山东省枣庄市中区为例[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(05):271.
　GAO Gui-qin,HAN Mei.Evaluation on Ecological Security of Regional Land Resource——A Case Study of Center District of Zaozhuang, Shandong Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(06):271.
[7]李苏楠,赵延治,史培军.西藏高原生态安全评价方法与应用—以西藏自治区曲松县为例[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):142.
　LI Su-nan,ZHAO Yan-zhi,SHI Pei-jun.Method and Application of Ecological Security Analysis in Tibet Plateau——A Case Study in Qusum County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(06):142.
[8]陈 斌,徐尚昭,周阳阳,等.“三生空间”视角下宜昌市景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):344.
　CHEN Bin,XU Shangzhao,ZHOU Yangyang,et al.Evaluation and Coupling Coordination Analysis of Landscape Ecological Security of Yichang from the Perspective of Production-Life-Ecological Space[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):344.
[9]王燕辉,陈卓,曹禺,等.河北省近20年耕地生态安全动态变化及阻力分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):194.
　WANG Yanhui,CHEN Zhuo,CAO Yu,et al.Analysis on the Dynamic Change and Resistance of Cultivated Land Ecological Security in the Past 20 Years in Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):194.
[10]刘勤,王宏卫,贡璐.新疆渭干河-库车河绿洲生态安全及演变趋势评价[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(02):179.
　LIU Qin,WANG Hong-wei,GONG Lu.Analysis on Ecological Security and Evolution Tendency of the Ugan-Kuqa River Delta Oasis in Xinjiang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):179.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-11-23 修回日期:2020-12-30
资助项目:安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目“淮河生态经济带产业转型升级与生态环境的耦合协调发展研究”(AHSKY2019D026)
第一作者:何刚(1966—)，男，安徽淮南人，研究员，博士生导师，主要从事生态安全管理研究。E-mail:hgang0111@163.com
通信作者:王莹莹(1995—)，女，安徽合肥人，硕士研究生，研究方向为生态安全评价。E-mail:862599165@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-10