FU Wenbing,YAN Youjin,WANG Kai,et al.Effects of Control Measures on Soil Quality Evolution in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area in Southwestern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):27-32.
喀斯特石漠化区治理措施对土壤质量演变的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Control Measures on Soil Quality Evolution in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area in Southwestern China
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)02-0027-06
- Keywords:
- karst rocky desertification; soil nutrient; ecological stoichiometric characteristics; soil quality
- 分类号:
- S714.8
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为进一步探明喀斯特石漠化综合治理区不同治理措施对土壤质量演变的影响,选取3种治理措施:封山育林、人工造林和坡改梯,并以撂荒地为对照,通过长期定点监测,探索了治理措施与时间对土壤理化性质、土壤质量演变的影响特征。结果表明:治理措施和治理时间对土壤理化性质有明显的影响。封山育林、人工造林和坡改梯均能显著改善土壤理化性质,提高土壤肥力质量。随着时间的推移,土壤养分含量和土壤质量指数亦得到显著的改善。封山育林和人工造林对土壤质量的改善效果总体上优于坡改梯。此外,封山育林和人工造林能够明显优化土壤碳氮比例。但是这两种措施中土壤碳磷比(C/P)相对较高,且土壤碳磷比(C/P)随时间的推移逐渐增大,这反映出封山育林和人工造林的土壤面临土壤磷素缺乏的风险。石漠化综合治理措施中封山育林和人工造林对土壤质量的改善效果最佳。但是随着时间的推移,这两种措施可能会因土壤磷素缺乏导致植被恢复效果不佳。石漠化治理是一个漫长的过程,在其过程中需要通过人工干预以实现石漠化治理的可持续发展。
- Abstract:
- The long-term stationary monitor was conducted to investigate the effects of different control measures on soil quality evolution in the karst rocky desertification areas. Three kinds of measures were selected: closed forest, artificial afforestation, and terracing, and the abandoned measure was taken as the control. The results showed that both of the measures and time had obvious effects on the soil physicochemical properties. The soil physicochemical properties and the soil quality fertility had been significantly improved by closed forest, artificial afforestation, and terracing. The effects of closed forest and artificial afforestation on soil quality were better than that of terracing. In addition, closed forest and artificial afforestation could significantly optimize the soil C/N. The soil C/P of these two measures was higher than that of terracing, and the soil C/P of closed forest and artificial afforestation increased with time, which reflected that closed forest and artificial afforestation suffered from the risk of soil phosphorus deficiency. Closed forest and artificial afforestation had better effect on improving soil quality. However, these two measures may lead to poor effect of vegetation restoration with the time due to the lack of soil phosphorus. Rocky desertification control is a long process, in which human intervention is needed to achieve sustainable development.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王世杰.喀斯特石漠化:中国西南最严重的生态地质环境问题[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2003(2):120-126.
[2] 赵其国,黄国勤.论广西生态安全[J].生态学报,2014,34(18):5125-5141.
[3] 袁道先.我国岩溶资源环境领域的创新问题[J].中国岩溶,2015,34(2):98-100.
[4] 王克林,岳跃民,陈洪松,等.喀斯特石漠化综合治理及其区域恢复效应[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7432-7440.
[5] 王克林,岳跃民,马祖陆,等.喀斯特峰丛洼地石漠化治理与生态服务提升技术研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7098-7102.
[6] 张信宝,王克林.西南碳酸盐岩石质山地土壤—植被系统中矿质养分不足问题的思考[J].地球与环境,2009,37(4):337-341.
[7] Hua F, Wang X, Zheng X, et al. Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world's largest reforestation programme[J]. Nature Communications, 2016,7(1):1-11.
[8] 白义鑫,盛茂银,胡琪娟,等.西南喀斯特石漠化环境下土地利用变化对土壤有机碳及其组分的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(5):1607-1616.
[9] Yan Y, Dai Q, Wang X, et al. Response of shallow karst fissure soil quality to secondary succession in a degraded karst area of southwestern China[J]. Geoderma, 2019,348:76-85.
[10] 李建明,王志刚,王爱娟,等.退耕还林恢复年限对岩溶槽谷区石漠化土壤物理性质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(1):99-108.
[11] 孙建,刘子琦,朱大运,等.石漠化治理区不同生态恢复模式土壤质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):222-228.
[12] 杨丹丽,喻阳华,钟欣平,等.干热河谷石漠化区不同土地利用类型的土壤质量评价[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(6):1234-1240.
[13] 刘娜,喻理飞,赵庆,等.喀斯特高原石漠化区次生林叶片—枯落物—土壤连续体碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2020,26(3):681-688.
[14] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2002.
[15] 靳正忠,雷加强,徐新文,等.塔里木沙漠公路防护林地土壤肥力质量变化与评价[J].科学通报,2008(S2):112-122.
[16] 赵刚,尤文忠,邢兆凯,等.退蚕还林对枯落物储量和持水性能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):82-85.
[17] 申家朋,张文辉.黄土丘陵区退耕还林地刺槐人工林碳储量及分配规律[J].生态学报,2014,34(10):2746-2754.
[18] 王绍强,于贵瑞.生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3937-3947.
[19] Han W, Fang J, Guo D, et al. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China[J]. New Phytologist, 2005,168(2):377-385.
[20] 谭玉兰,杨丰,陈超,等.喀斯特山区土地利用方式对土壤质量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(5):1133-1138.
相似文献/References:
[1]周 萍,方 珂,赵 楠,等.保水剂施用量对西南紫色土水分和养分特征及烟叶品质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):53.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.031]
Zhou Ping,Fang Ke,Zhao Nan,et al.Influence of the Condition of Different Dosages of Water Retaining Agent Application on Soil Water Content and Soil Nutrients and the Indices of the Flue-Cured Tobacco Quality in Purple Soils of Southwest of China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):53.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.031]
[2]张兹箕,王启鑫,赵振宇,等.鲁中南地区不同经济林种植模式的改良土壤效应[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):102.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.021]
Zhang Ziji,Wang Qixin,Zhao Zhenyu,et al.Soil Improvement Effect of Different Economic Forest Planting Modes in South-central Shandong Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):102.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.021]
[3]刘子琦,张乾柱,熊康宁.洞穴环境替代指标研究现状及其石漠化记录研究问题探究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(04):293.
LIU Zi-qi,ZHANG Qian-zhu,XIONG Kang-ning.The Progress of Environmental Proxy Indexes in Cave System and the Research for Its Application to Karst Rocky Desertification[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(02):293.
[4]李 懿,杨子松.岷江流域不同土地利用方式下的土壤微生物特征及其与土壤养分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):33.
LI Yi,YANG Zisong.Soil Nutrients and Soil Microbial Characteristics and Their Relationships Under Different Land Use Types in Minjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):33.
[5]赵满兴,杨 帆,马文全,等.黄土丘陵区沙棘人工林土壤养分及酶活性季节变化[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(02):58.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.032]
ZHAO Manxing,YANG Fan,MA Wenquan,et al.Seasonal Change of Soil Nutrient and Enzyme Activities in Hippophae rhamnoides Plantation with Different Stand Ages in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):58.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.032]
[6]陈佳钰,李永梅,廖学圆,等.基施缓释肥等氮替代化肥对径流氮素流失和青贮玉米生长的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):188.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.035]
CHEN Jiayu,LI Yongmei,LIAO Xueyuan,et al.Effects of Base Application Slow-Release Fertilizer Substituting Nitrogen Fertilizers on Nitrogen Loss Along with Runoff and Silage Maize Growth[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):188.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.035]
[7]逯金鑫,高 飞,周荣磊,等.不同植被类型下草本群落与土壤因子的关系[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):310.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.032]
LU Jinxin,GAO Fei,ZHOU Ronglei,et al.Relationship Between Herbaceous Communities and Soil Nutrients Under Different Vegetation Types[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):310.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.032]
[8]高连炜,张红丽,查同刚.晋西黄土区不同植被恢复阶段土壤生态化学计量特征[J].水土保持研究,2025,32(01):30.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.01.026]
Gao Lianwei,Zhang Hongli,Zha Tonggang.Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil in different vegetation restoration stages in loess region of western Shanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,32(02):30.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.01.026]
[9]安 乐,何 静,刘艳梅,等.荒漠灌丛对生物土壤结皮下土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2025,32(02):83.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.02.019]
An Le,He Jing,Liu Yanmei,et al.Effects of desert shrubs on soil nutrients under biocrusts[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,32(02):83.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.02.019]
[10]盛 丰,沈新霞,盛鑫斌.不同粉碎程度的秸秆还田对红壤理化性质和水流运动特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2025,32(02):131.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.02.029]
Sheng Feng,Shen Xinxia,Sheng Xinbin.Effects of the returned straws with different crushing degrees on the physical and chemical properties and water flow characteristics of red soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,32(02):131.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.02.029]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-04-27 修回日期:2020-05-28
资助项目:贵州省科技厅项目“贵州大学林学院博士后流动站建设”(黔科合博士站[2015]4002)
第一作者:伏文兵(1988—),男,陕西扶风人,工程师,硕士,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:2824561677@qq.com
通信作者:严友进(1990—),男,贵州威宁人,博士后,博士,主要从事水土保持与生态修复研究。E-mail:gs.yanyj16@gzu.edu.cn