ZHU Shengnan,LIU Weilin,WAN Yifan,et al.Temporal and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Drought and Its Correlation with ENSO in Fuhe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):131-138.
抚河流域干旱时空分布特征及其与ENSO的相关性
- Title:
- Temporal and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Drought and Its Correlation with ENSO in Fuhe River Basin
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)06-0131-08
- Keywords:
- Fuhe River Basin; SPI; drought; ENSO events
- 分类号:
- P426.616; P732
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了分析干旱时空分布特征,并结合ENSO事件探究其相关性,基于抚河流域9个气象站点1960—2005年的逐月降水资料,根据计算出的SPI指数,利用M-K趋势检验、相关性分析等方法分析了1960—2005年抚河流域月、四季、年干旱及空间变化特征,并研究了ENSO事件与该区域的关系。结果表明:流域春季有干旱化趋势,冬季有变湿态势,20世纪60,70年代干旱次数多,强度大,在1990—2005年,流域整体上的干旱次数程度和次数有增加的趋势。空间变化上,各季节干旱高频分别集中在流域东北部:春季在崇仁地区,夏季在南丰和黎川地区,秋季在抚州和金溪地区,冬季在东乡地区。抚河流域春季SSTA指数与SPI指数的相关性最明显,秋、夏季随之减弱。ENSO事件发生强度与抚河流域SPI影响因子的多项式拟合关系表明,ENSO事件暖事件年份的降水下降非常明显,其发生干旱的可能性大于冷事件年份,即ENSO暖事件强度越大,研究区越有可能发生严重的干旱事件。干旱对El Niño事件和La Niña事件的响应分别在滞后1～2个月、3～4个月的响应最为显著。
- Abstract:
- In order to analyze the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of drought and to explore its correlation with ENSO events, based on the monthly precipitation data from 1960 to 2005 in 9 meteorological stations in the Fuhe River Basin, according to the calculated SPI, the MK trend test and correlation analysis were used to analyze the characteristics of monthly, four seasons, annual droughts and spatial changes in Fuhe River Basin from 1960 to 2005, and to study the relationship between ENSO events and the region. The results showed that there was a tendency of drought in the spring in the watershed and a trend of humidification in the winter; in the 1960s and 1970s, there were many droughts with high intensity; from 1990 to 2005, the degree and frequency of droughts in the river basin as a whole increased. In terms of spatial changes, the high frequency of drought in each season concentrated in the northeast of the basin: in the Chongren in spring, Nanfeng and Lichuan in summer, Fuzhou and Jinxi in autumn, and Dongxiang in winter. The correlation between the SSTA index and the SPI index in the Fuhe River Basin in spring was the most obvious, and then decreased in autumn and summer. The polynomial fitting relationship between the intensity of the ENSO event and the SPI influencing factors of the Fuhe River Basin showed that the precipitation of the ENSO event in the warm event year was very obvious, and the possibility of drought was greater than that in the cold event year, the greater the intensity of the ENSO warm event, the more likely a severe drought event will occur in the study area. The response of the drought to the El Niño and La Niña events was the most significant after lagging by 1 to 2 months and 3 to 4 months, respectively.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王东,张勃,安美玲,等.基于SPEI的西南地区近53 a干旱时空特征分析[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(6):1003-1016.
[2] Reinman S L. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC)[J]. Reference Reviews, 2013,26(2):41-42.
[3] 徐泽华,韩美,张广彩,等.山东降水时空分布变化及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):272-278.
[4] 吴绍飞,张翔,王俊钗,等.基于站点降雨量最优拟合函数的SPI指数计算[J].干旱区地理:汉文版,2016,39(3):555-564.
[5] 肖丽英.基于SPI的鄱阳湖流域多尺度旱涝变化规律的研究[J].南昌工程学院学报,2017,36(3):24-27.
[6] Timilsena J, Piechota T, Tootle G, et al. Associations of interdecadal/interannual climate variability and long-term colorado river basin streamflow[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2009,365(3):289-301.
[7] 洪兴骏,郭生练,马鸿旭,等.基于SPI的鄱阳湖流域干旱时空演变特征及其与湖水位相关分析[J].水文,2014,34(2):25-31.
[8] 赵茹欣,王会肖,杨会彩,等.基于标准降水指数的黑龙江省气象干旱特征分析[J].节水灌溉,2017(12):56-62,67.
[9] Dai A. Drought under global warming: a review[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 2011,2(1):45-65.
[10] Mishra A K, Singh V P. A review of drought concepts[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010,391(1):202-216.
[11] 孙建奇,袁薇,高玉中.阿拉伯半岛—北太平洋型遥相关及其与亚洲夏季风的关系[J].中国科学 D辑:地球科学, 2008,38(6): 750-762.
[12] 刘卫林,刘丽娜,查思慧,等.抚河临水流域径流量变化及其对降雨的响应[J].南昌工程学院学报,2017,36(6):24-30.
[13] 曾钦文,殷美祥,曾思亮,等.近57 a河源地区降水变化特征及其与ENSO事件的关系[J].广东水利水电,2018(3):38-42.
[14] 刘卫林,刘丽娜.修河流域洪水变化特征及其对气候变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):316-322.
[15] 罗剑锋,陈敏,李煜,等.两类ENSO事件对长江中下游地区季节降水的影响[J].南水北调与水利科技,2018,16(4):82-89.
[16] 中国气象科学研究院,国家气象中心,中国气象局预测减灾司.气象干旱等级GB/T20481—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[17] 魏凤英.现代气候统计诊断与预测技术[M].北京:气象出版社,2007.
[18] 赵永平,陈永利.一百多年来ENSO事件分类和ENSO循环研究[J].海洋湖沼通报,1998(3):7-12.
[19] 孙秋慧,徐国宾,马超,等.基于SPI干旱指数的海口市干旱变化特征研究[J].南水北调与水利科技,2018,16(4):58-65.
[20] 徐泽华,韩美.山东省降雨侵蚀力与气候指数关系研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(10):18-27.
[21] 李晓燕,翟盘茂,任福民.气候标准值改变对ENSO事件划分的影响[J].热带气象学报,2005,21(1):72-78.
[22] 钮智旺.南海表层水温的长周期变化及其与埃尔尼诺的耦合关系[D].山东青岛:中国海洋大学,2005.
[23] 李崇银.关于ENSO本质的进一步研究[J].气候与环境研究,2002,7(2):160-174.
[24] 信忠保,谢志仁.宁夏气候变化对ENSO事件的响应[J].干旱区地理,2005,28(2):239-243.
[25] 李芬,张建新,郝智文,等.山西降水与ENSO的相关性研究[J].地理学报,2015,70(3):420-430.
相似文献/References:
[1]肖军仓,罗定贵,王忠忠.基于SWAT模型的抚河流域土壤侵蚀模拟[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(01):14.
XIAO Jun-cang,LUO Ding-gui,WANG Zhong-zhong.Soil Erosion Simulation in Fuhe Basin Based on SWAT Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):14.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-11-29 修回日期:2019-12-28
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41761058,51309130); 江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ170980,GJJ161098); 江西省优势科技创新团队建设计划项目(20171BCB24012); 江西省科技厅科技计划项目(20192BAB206047); 南昌工程学院研究生创新资助项目(YJSCX20180006)
第一作者:朱圣男(1995—),男,安徽蚌埠人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水文水资源。E-mail:shengnanzhu0719@163.com
通信作者:刘卫林(1978—),男,江西新余人,教授,博士,主要从事水文水资源研究。E-mail:weilin_liu@nit.edu.cn