[1]于国强,贾莲莲,朱冰冰,等.不同坡位的植被缓冲带对坡面侵蚀产沙来源的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):9-13.
　YU Guoqiang,JIA Lianlian,ZHU Bingbing,et al.Effect of Vegetation Buffers of Different Positions on Sediment Source in the Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):9-13.
点击复制

不同坡位的植被缓冲带对坡面侵蚀产沙来源的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 27 期数: 2020年06期 页码: 9-13 栏目: 目次 出版日期: 2020-10-20
Title:
Effect of Vegetation Buffers of Different Positions on Sediment Source in the Slope
文章编号:
1005-3409(2020)06-0009-05
作者:
于国强1, 贾莲莲2, 朱冰冰3, 张 霞4
(1.中国地质调查局 干旱—半干旱区地下水与生态重点实验室, 西安 710054; 2.黄河水利委员会 黄河上中游管理局, 西安710021; 3.陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院, 西安 710061; 4.西安理工大学 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室, 西安 710048)
Author(s):
YU Guoqiang1, JIA Lianlian2, ZHU Bingbing3, ZHANG Xia4
(1.Key Laboratory on Groundwater and Ecology in Arid and Semiarid Regions, CGS, Xi'an 710054, China; 2.Upper and Middle Yellow River Bureau, Yellow River Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources, Xi'an 710021, China; 3.School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710061, China; 4.State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China)
关键词:
植被缓冲带;  坡面;  泥沙来源;  产沙率
Keywords:
vegetation buffer;  slope;  sediment source;  sediment yield rate
分类号:
S157.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了研究植被对坡面侵蚀输沙的影响机制,采用模拟降雨试验,结合激光扫描方法,分析了不同坡位植被缓冲带下坡面产沙来源的变化特征。结果表明:没有植被覆盖时,坡面侵蚀最严重的区域位于下坡下部到中部,侵蚀产沙多来源于此。当植被种植于上坡中下部和下部时,坡面产沙主要来源于下坡中下部到中部,且侵蚀发育程度有所降低。随着植被缓冲带种植的位置上移,泥沙和径流的侵蚀和运动具有了更大的范围,坡面侵蚀最严重的区域也逐渐向上扩展,从下坡下部扩展到上坡中部,产沙量达到峰值,侵蚀严重程度增长24%～45%。植被布设于上坡长度60%时,其调控范围可覆盖整个坡面,产沙范围和侵蚀程度与裸坡相比分别降低33%,53%,甚至改变了侵蚀方式,细沟侵蚀已经开始向片蚀转变,具有较好的侵蚀输沙调控作用。研究结果揭示了不同坡位的植被植被缓冲带可以通过影响侵蚀方式来调控坡面侵蚀产沙来源。
Abstract:
In order to study the effect mechanisms of vegetation on erosion and sediment transport, the artificial rainfall simulator and three-dimensional scanning technology were used to investigate the character of sediment sources in different positions of vegetation buffers. The results show that the main source of sediment yield is in section from the middle to the lower part of the downslope area where there is no vegetation, and the most serious erosion distributes in this area; the main region of sediment source is located in the middle lower part of the downslope and the whole downslope as the grass strip is laid in the lower part of the upslope and the middle lower part of the upslope where the erosion is alleviated; when the grass strip moves to the upper part of upslope, runoff flows longer and sediment yield has more sources, the main source area of erosion moves up simultaneously, which even extends from the lower part of the downslope area to the middle part of the upslope; the main erosion range increases by 2～3 times, and the degree of erosion increases by 24%～45%, the erosion sediment yield reaches the peak within the test range; when the planted grass strip occupies 60% of the upslope length, its regulation range can cover the entire slope, effectively controlling the main erosion range and degree are 33% and 53% lower than those of bare slope, respectively, which better controls the mechanism of erosion and sediment transport, more importantly, transforms the main erosion pattern from rill erosion into sheet erosion; the regulation of vegetation on the processes of erosion and sediment transport is realized in the slope. The information indicated that vegetation in different positions of slope can regulate sediment source in a slope by affecting the erosion patterns.

参考文献/References:

[1] 唐克丽.中国水土保持[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
[2] Fu B J, Chen L, Ma K, et al. The relationships between land use and soil conditions in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau in northern Shanxi, China[J]. Catena, 2000,39(1):69-78.
[3] García-Ruiz J M, Lana-Renault N, Begueria S, et al. From plot to regional scales: Interactions of slope and catchment hydrological and geomorphic processes in the Spanish Pyrenees[J]. Geomorphology, 2010,120(3):248-257.
[4] García-Ruiz J M. The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain: a review[J]. Catena, 2010,81(1):1-11.
[5] Nadal-Romero E, Lasanta T, Regüés D, et al. Hydrological response and sediment production under different land cover in abandoned farmland fields in a Mediterranean mountain environment[J]. Boletíndde La Asociación De Geógrafosespañoles, 2011,101(55):303-323.
[6] Pan C Z, Shangguan Z P. The effects of ryegrass roots and shoots on loess erosion under simulated rainfall[J]. Catena, 2007,70(3):350-355.
[7] Jin K, Cornelis W M, Gabriels D, et al. Residue cover and rainfall intensity effects on runoff soil organic carbon losses[J]. Catena, 2009,78(1):81-86.
[8] 张琪琳,王占礼,王栋栋,等.黄土高原草地植被对土壤侵蚀影响研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2017,32(10):1093-1101.
[9] 秦伟,曹文洪,郭乾坤,等.植被格局对侵蚀产沙影响的研究评述[J].生态学报,2017,37(14):4905-4912.
[10] 游珍,李占斌,蒋庆丰.植被在坡面的不同位置对降雨产沙量影响[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(6):28-31.
[11] 丁文峰,李勉.不同坡面植被空间布局对坡沟系统产流产沙影响的试验[J].地理研究,2010,29(10):1870-1878.
[12] Best A C. The size distribution of raindrops[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1950,76(327):16-36.
[13] Zhang X, Yu G Q, Li Z B, et al. Experimental study on slope runoff erosion and sediment under different vegetation types[J]. Water Resources Management, 2014,28(9):2415-2433.
[14] Zhou J, Fu B J, Gao G Y, et al. Effects of precipitation and restoration vegetation on soil erosion in a semi-arid environment in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2016,137:1-11.
[15] Rey F. Effectiveness of vegetation barriers for marly sediment trapping[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2004,29(9):1161-1169.
[16] Darboux F, Davy Ph, Gascuel-Odoux C, et al. Evolution of soil surface roughness and flowpath connectivity in overland flow experiments[J]. Catena, 2002,46(2):125-139.
[17] 王龙生,蔡强国,蔡崇法,等.黄土坡面细沟形态变化及其与流速之间的关系[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(11):110-117.
[18] Shen H O, Zheng F L, Wen L L, et al. An experimental study of rill erosion and morphology[J]. Geomorphology, 2015,231(15):193-201.
[19] 张霞.黄土区地貌与植被格局的侵蚀动力过程试验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2018.
[20] Nearing M A, Simanton R, Norton D, et al. Soil erosion by surface water flow on a stony, semiarid hillslope[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1999,24(8):677-686.

相似文献/References:

[1]张禹洋,聂世豪,蔡国强,等.植被缓冲带对地表径流阻控效果调查及模拟[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):36.
　ZHANG Yuyang,NIE Shihao,CAI Guoqiang,et al.Investigation and Simulation on the Effect of Vegetative Filter Strip on Surface Runoff[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):36.
[2]张若曦,秦富仓,李 龙,等.砒砂岩区坡面微地貌变化与侵蚀产沙的响应关系[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(06):21.
　ZHANG Ruoxi,QIN Fucang,LI Long,et al.Responses of Slope Micro-geomorphology to Erosion and Sediment Yield in Arsenic Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):21.
[3]李 龙,张尚轩,高鑫宇,等.次降雨下砒砂岩坡面细沟形态发育及其对侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):1.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.008]
　LI Long,ZHANG Shangxuan,HE Jun,et al.Development of Rill Morphology on Sandstone Slopes Under Individual Rainfall Event and Its Effect on Erosion and Sediment Production[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(06):1.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.008]

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2019-12-03 修回日期:2020-03-11
资助项目:陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2015JQ4099); 陕西省创新能力支撑计划(2019TD-040); 中国地质调查局项目(DD20190504); 国家自然科学基金(51779204,41601285)
第一作者:于国强(1979—),男,内蒙古包头人,博士,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:yuguoqiang23@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-20