TIAN Pei,QIU Haoran,FENG Yu,et al.Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Production and Erosion Dynamic Process on Red Soil Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):1-8.
雨强和坡度对红壤坡面产流产沙及侵蚀动力过程影响
- Title:
- Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Production and Erosion Dynamic Process on Red Soil Slope
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)06-0001-08
- Keywords:
- red soil sloping land; rainfall intensity; slope gradient; runoff and sediment yield; hydrodynamic parameters; temporal and spatial variation
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 采用人工模拟降雨试验,研究不同雨强(40,66,80 mm/h)和坡度(5°,10°,15°)条件下,湖北省武汉市蔡甸区红壤坡面流速、产流产沙时空变化及水动力学过程。使用长2.5 m,宽0.5 m,高0.3 m的可调坡度径流土槽,每场降雨试验在槽子底端出口开始产流后持续60 min,每3 min收集一次径流泥沙样品。结果表明:相同坡度下,坡面平均产流率和产沙率均随雨强增加而增大; 产流率在降雨初期波动增长,随降雨时间延长而逐渐稳定; 产沙率在降雨初期急剧上升,随后稍有下降并逐渐趋于平稳。坡度从5°增加到15°,雨强为40,66,80 mm/h下的平均产流率依次增加24%,22%和15%,平均产沙率依次增加89%,60%和84%。随雨强或坡度增加,流速均增大,且雨强对流速的影响较坡度更大; 流速沿坡长方向呈增大趋势,且细沟流速是细沟间的1.33～2.10倍。66 mm/h,10°条件下,坡面形成细沟并发生明显下切和溯源侵蚀。相同雨强下,径流剪切力随坡度增加而增大、达西—韦斯巴赫阻力系数随坡度增加而减小。坡面径流属于层流且为急流,水动力学参数和侵蚀产沙率的拟合方程表明,弗劳德数和流速可以较好地模拟坡面产沙率。研究结果可为南方红壤区水土流失治理提供参考。
- Abstract:
- The overland flow velocity, temporal and spatial variations of runoff and sediment yield, and hydrodynamic processes on the red soil slope in Caidian, Wuhan, Hubei Province were studied under different simulated rainfall intensities(40 mm/h, 66 mm/h, 80 mm/h)and slope gradients(5°, 10° and 15°). The soil sample was filled in a steel trough(2.5 m in length, 0.5 m in width, and 0.3 m in height)with adjustable slope gradient. Each rainfall simulation lasted for 60 minutes after the generation of runoff at the outlet of the trough, and runoff and sediment samples were collected every 3 minutes. The results showed that under the same slope gradient, the average runoff and sediment yield increased with the increase of rainfall intensity; the runoff increased with fluctuation in the early stage of the rainfall, and gradually became stable, while the sediment yield rate increased sharply at the beginning of the rainfall, then decreased slightly, and gradually stabilized; with the slope gradient increasing from 5° to 15°, the average runoff rates at rainfall intensities of 40 mm/h, 66 mm/h and 80 mm/h increased by 24%, 22% and 15%, and the mean sediment yields increased by 89%, 60% and 84%, respectively; with the increase of rainfall intensity or slope, runoff velocity increased, and the effect of rainfall intensity on velocity was greater than that of slope gradient; mean flow velocity increased along the downslope direction, and the velocity in rills was 1.33～2.10 times of that in the interrill; under the condition of 66 mm/h and 10°, rills formed on the slope surface and obvious downcutting erosion and headward erosion occurred; under the same rainfall intensity, the runoff shear force increased and the Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient decreased with increase of slope gradient. Under the experimental conditions, the overland flow belonged to laminar flow and supercritical flow. The fitting equation of hydrodynamic parameters and sediment yield rate indicates that Froude number and flow velocity can well simulate the sediment production rate. The results of this study can provide the reference for the control of soil erosion in the red soil area of southern China.
参考文献/References:
[1] 吴遵雄.改革开放40年湖北省水土保持成效综述[J].中国水土保持,2018(12):35-37.
[2] 陶荣,孔雪松,陈翠芳,等.“二调”以来湖北省耕地变化的时空特征及其驱动因子识别[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):290-295.
[3] 张锐波,张丽萍,付兴涛.坡面径流含沙量随雨强和坡长的动态过程[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):80-84,90.
[4] 付兴涛,姚璟.降雨条件下坡长对陡坡产流产沙过程影响的模拟试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):20-24.
[5] Shi Zhihua, Fang Nufang, Wu Fengzhi, et al. Soil erosion processes and sediment sorting associated with transport mechanisms on steep slopes[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012,454/455(3):123-130.
[6] Asadi H, Ghadiri H, Rose C W, et al. Interrill soil erosion processes and their interaction on low slopes[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2010,32(5):711-724.
[7] 张祖莲,洪斌,黄英,等.降雨作用下红土型坡面径流特性与土壤侵蚀的关系研究[J].山地学报,2017,35(4):535-542.
[8] 田培,潘成忠,许新宜,等.坡面流速及侵蚀产沙空间变异性试验[J].水科学进展,2015,26(2):178-186.
[9] 田野.不同宽度条件下坡面流水动力学特性研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2019.
[10] 林庆明,丁文峰,张长伟,等.模拟降雨条件下红壤坡面侵蚀产沙水动力学特征[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):16-21.
[11] 郝好鑫,杜一凡,曹丹妮,等.红壤缓坡水流动力学特性及其对侵蚀影响的试验研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(2):1-8.
[12] 王添,任宗萍,李鹏,等.模拟降雨条件下坡度与地表糙度对径流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):1-6.
[13] 王爱娟,丁文峰,王万君.人工降雨和放水冲刷条件下紫色土坡面产流产沙特征分析[J].长江科学院院报,2015,32(3):31-34.
[14] Zhao Xining, Wu Pute, Chen Xiaoli, et al. Runoff and sediment yield under simulated rainfall on hillslopes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Soil Research, 2013,51(1):50-58.
[15] 洪斌,张祖莲,黄英,等.人工降雨条件下云南红土坡面土壤侵蚀特性[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):118-123.
[16] 常松涛,黄少燕,查轩,等.雨强和植被覆盖度对红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):58-63.
[17] 徐铭泽,杨洁,刘窑军,等.不同母质红壤坡面产流产沙特征比较[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):34-39.
[18] 胡尧,侯雨乐,李懿.模拟降雨入渗对岷江流域红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(2):62-67,72.
[19] 王蕙,胡秀君,山成菊.雨强和坡度对嵌套砾石红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):24-29.
[20] 杨恒,黄英,周丹,等.干湿循环对云南红土渗透性的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2019,19(27):289-297.
[21] 齐升吉,李志忠,陈秀玲,等.福建东南部第四纪红土沉积粒度特征及成因分析[J].华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,044(4):696-701.
[22] 张会茹,郑粉莉.不同降雨强度下地面坡度对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):40-43.
[23] 赵莎.武汉市蔡甸区生态功能区划研究[D].武汉:湖北大学,2014.
[24] Donjadee S, Chinnarasri C. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on the application of vetiver grass mulch in soil and water conservation[J]. International Journal Sediment Research, 2012,27(2):168-177.
[25] 梁志权,张思毅,卓慕宁,等.不同雨强及坡度对华南红壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):1-6.
[26] 王丽园,查轩,黄少燕,等.不同雨强条件下坡度对红壤坡面侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):40-44.
[27] 钟壬琳,张平仓.人工降雨和放水冲刷试验下红壤坡面径流与泥沙特征分析[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(2):33-38.
[28] 杨大明,高佩玲,刘小媛,等.坡面薄层水流流速研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):72-80.
[29] 吴桐嘉,潘成忠,罗明杰,等.降雨和汇流条件下浅沟侵蚀过程试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):22-29.
[30] 白永会,查轩,查瑞波,等.秸秆覆盖红壤径流养分流失效益及径流剪切力影响研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):94-99.
相似文献/References:
[1]何长高,姚毅臣.留兰香在低丘红壤侵蚀坡地引种的适应性研究[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(01):194.
He Changgao,Yao Yichen.Research on the Adaptability of Metha spicata L. in the Erosion Hill Slope of Red Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(06):194.
[2]唐翔宇,杨浩,赵其国,等.红砂岩母质红壤侵蚀作用的137Cs法初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):121.
TANG Xiang-yu,YANG Hao,ZHAO Qi-guo,et al.Preliminary Estimate of Soil Erosion Rate on Red Soil Developed From Red Sandstone Using 137Cs Measurements[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(06):121.
[3]涂国平,贾仁安.红壤丘陵区生态系统反馈结构研究[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):84.
TU Guo-ping,JIA Ren-an.Study of Feedback Structure on Ecosystem in Intervale Region of South China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(06):84.
[4]谢锦升,杨玉盛,解明曙.亚热带花岗岩侵蚀红壤的生态退化与恢复技术[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):154.
XIE Jin-sheng,YANG Yu-sheng,XIE Ming-shu.Ecological Restoration Technology and Degradation of Eroded Granite Red Soil in Subtropical Regions in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(06):154.
[5]马逸麟,麻志姜,唐春花.鄱阳湖及周边经济区的红壤开发利用[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(02):113.
MA Yi-lin,MA Zhi-jiang,TANG Chun-hua.Exploitation of Red Soil of the Poyang Lake and Surrounding Economic Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(06):113.
[6]彭珍宝,袁正科,旷建军,等.植被恢复过程对丘岗红壤侵蚀量变化的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):380.
PENG Zhen-bao,YUAN Zheng-ke,KUANG Jian-jun,et al.The Influence of Vegetation Resume Process on Erosive Volume of Red Soil in the Hill[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):380.
[7]马志阳,查轩.南方红壤区侵蚀退化马尾松林地生态恢复研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(03):188.
MA Zhi-yang,ZHA Xuan.Research on Ecological Recovering of Erosive Degraded Pinus massonian Woodland in Red Soil Region of Southern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):188.
[8]彭亿,李裕元,李忠武,等.红壤坡地生态系统土壤入渗特征比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):205.
PENG Yi,LI Yu-yuan,LI Zhong-wu,et al.Comparison Study on Soil Infiltration Characteristics in Red Soil Slope Ecosystems[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(06):205.
[9]罗旭辉,詹杰,李秀峰,等.植草恢复对侵蚀红壤重组有机质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):194.
LUO Xu-hui,ZHAN Jie,LI Xiu-feng,et al.Effects of Planting Forage on Soil Organic Matter of Heavy Fraction in Eroded Red Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):194.
[10]李文庆.红壤的水分状况及其与物理性质的关系[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(01):15.
Li Wenqing.A Relationship between Soil Moisture of Red Soil and Its Physical Properties[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1995,2(06):15.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-04-03 修回日期:2020-04-28
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41907061; 41701323); 长江科学院水利部山洪地质灾害防治工程技术研究中心开放基金(CKWV2019761/KY); 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室基金课题(A314021402-2005)
第一作者:田培(1988—),男,湖北大悟人,博士,讲师,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持、水文水资源研究。E-mail:tianpei@mail.ccnu.edu.cn