CHEN Long,LIU Chunlan,PEI Sha,et al.Evaluation of the Effect Terrain Gradient of Ecosystem Services in the Transitional Zone of Beijing Bay[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):247-255.
北京湾过渡带生态系统服务地形梯度效应评价
- Title:
- Evaluation of the Effect Terrain Gradient of Ecosystem Services in the Transitional Zone of Beijing Bay
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)04-0247-09
- Keywords:
- gradient effect; altitude; slope; locally weighted regression; change point
- 分类号:
- X171.1; X826
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了掌握过渡带区域生态系统服务的变化规律,促进当地可持续发展,以北京湾过渡带为研究区,以公里网格为研究单元,结合局部加权回归和突变点识别,识别各服务随海拔和坡度因子变化的突变点,揭示了该区域生态系统服务的地形梯度效应。结果表明:(1)除休闲游憩服务外,其他服务均随地形因子的变化表现出一定的梯度效应。各服务随海拔因子和坡度因子的梯度效应表现基本一致。(2)海拔梯度方面,休闲游憩和土壤质量调节无关键突变点,其他服务的关键突变点位于海拔300 m左右,趋势变化可以归为5类。(3)坡度梯度方面,水质净化、土壤保持、休闲游憩和土壤质量调节无关键突变点,10°和15°是部分服务趋势发生逆转的临界点,趋势变化可以分为6类。研究建议在关键突变点附近区域可通过调整土地利用结构、提升生态系统质量等手段,促进生态系统服务效益最大化。
- Abstract:
- In order to understand the variation of ecosystem services in the transition zone and promote local sustainable development, the topographic gradient effects of major ecosystem services in the Beijing Bay were revealed at 1 km×1 km pixel level by using the methods of locally weighted regression and change point identification, followed by the identification of change points of ecosystem services in varying altitudes and slopes. The results show that:(1)except the recreational service, other ecosystem services typically show terrain gradient effects to some extent, displaying consistent changes along the increase of altitude and slope;(2)in terms of altitude gradient, no key change point was detected in the services of recreation and soil quality regulation; however, a key change point for other ecosystem services was seen at an altitude of about 300 m; the trend changes can be classified into five categories;(3)in terms of slope gradient, no key change point was observed in the services of water purification, soil conservation, recreation and soil quality regulation; however, the critical change points for the reversal of some services were seen at the slopes with 10° and 15°, respectively; the trend changes can be divided into six categories. Based on the above findings, land use structure in the adjacent area of key change points is recommended to make some adjustment to improve the ecosystem quality and maximize the benefits of ecosystem services.
参考文献/References:
[1] 哈凯,丁庆龙,门明新,等.山地丘陵区土地利用分布及其与地形因子关系:以河北省怀来县为例[J].地理研究,2015,34(5):909-921.
[2] 张静静,朱文博,赵芳,等.山地平原过渡带地形起伏特征及其对景观格局的影响:以太行山淇河流域为例[J].中国科学:地球科学,2018,48(4):476-486.
[3] 马建华,千怀遂,管华,等.秦岭—黄淮平原交界带自然地理若干特征分析[J].地理科学,2004,24(6):666-673.
[4] 王纪武.山地平原生态交错带城镇生态格局研究[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(12):56-62.
[5] 王凤珍,周志翔,郑忠明.城郊过渡带湖泊湿地生态服务功能价值评估:以武汉市严东湖为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1946-1954.
[6] 张超,张建明,王鹏龙,等.基于遥感和GIS的农牧交错带生态资产定量评估:以宁夏盐池县为例[J].干旱区研究,2013,30(2):356-363.
[7] 董丽君.基于景观格局的山地平原过渡带生态系统服务价值评估及其驱动力研究[D].成都:四川师范大学,2017.
[8] 张帅普,邵明安,李丹凤.绿洲—荒漠过渡带土壤蓄水量的空间分布及其时间稳定性[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(8):2509-2516.
[9] Herrero-Jáuregui C, Arnaiz-Schmitz C, Herrera L, et al. Aligning landscape structure with ecosystem services along an urban-rural gradient. trade-offs and transitions towards cultural services[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2019,34(7):1525-1545.
[10] McDonnell M J, Pickett S T A, Groffman P, et al. Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 1997,1(1):21-36.
[11] Radford K, James P. Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural-urban gradient: A case study of Greater Manchester, UK[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013,109(1):117-127.
[12] Ye Y, Zhang J, Bryan B A, et al. Impacts of rapid urbanization on ecosystem services along urban-rural gradients: a case study of the Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area, South China[J]. Ecoscience, 2018,25(3),235-247.
[13] Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, et al. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics[J]. Land Use Policy, 2012,29(3):521-535.
[14] Larondelle N, Haase D. Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: A cross-analysis of European cities[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013,29:179-190.
[15] Stoll S, Frenzel M, Burkhard B, et al. Assessment of ecosystem integrity and service gradients across Europe using the LTER Europe network[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2015,295:75-87.
[16] Guy P, Heinz S K, Frank K. Connectivity in heterogeneous landscapes: Analyzing the effect of topography[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2006,21(1):47-61.
[17] Zhang B P, Yao Y H. Implications of mass elevation effect for the altitudinal patterns of global ecology[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016,26(7):871-877.
[18] 王晓峰,薛亚永,张园.基于地形梯度的陕西省生态系统服务价值评估[J].冰川冻土,2016,38(5):1432-1439.
[19] 赵艳霞,武爱彬,刘欣,等.浅山丘陵区土地利用地形梯度特征与生态服务价值响应[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):141-145.
[20] 杨锁华,胡守庚,瞿诗进.长江中游地区生态系统服务价值的地形梯度效应[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(3):976-986.
[21] 陈奕竹,肖轶,孙思琦,等.基于地形梯度的湘西地区生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].中国生态农业学报,2019,27(4):623-631.
[22] 石垚,袁大鹏,赵雪杉,等.基于地形梯度的冀西北间山盆地生态系统服务价值评估:以河北省怀来县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):184-190.
[23] Hou J. An Historical Geography of Peiping[D]. Liverpool, England: University of Liverpool, 1949.
[24] 俞孔坚,袁弘,李迪华,等.北京市浅山区土地可持续利用的困境与出路[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(11):3-8.
[25] 俞孔坚,许立言,游鸿,等.北京市浅山区农村社会经济发展类型区划分:基于二步聚类法[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(12):66-71.
[26] Li B, Chen D, Wu S, et al. Spatio-temporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services: Case study of Nanjing City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016,71: 416-427.
[27] 符素华,王红叶,王向亮,等.北京地区径流曲线数模型中的径流曲线数[J].地理研究,2013,32(5):797-807.
[28] Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S A, et al. InVEST 3.3.3 User's Guide[M/OL].2017.http:∥releases.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest-userguide/latest/.
[29] 耿润哲,王晓燕,焦帅,等.密云水库流域非点源污染负荷估算及特征分析[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(5):1484-1492.
[30] Nowak D J, Crane D E, Stevens J C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States[J]. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2006,4(3/4):115-123.
[31] Escobedo F J, Nowak D J. Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009,90(3/4):102-110.
[32] Tallis M, Taylor G, Sinnett D, et al. Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011,103(2):129-138.
[33] 陈龙,刘春兰,潘涛,等.基于干沉降模型的北京平原区造林削减PM2.5效应评估[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(11):2897-2904.
[34] 戴晓兵.怀柔山区荆条灌丛生物量的季节动态[J].植物学报,1989,31(4):307-315.
[35] 许广岐,王凤霞,李秋梅.樟子松的苗龄型与苗木质量的关系[J].东北林业大学学报,1992,20(3):20-25.
[36] 方精云,刘国华,徐嵩龄.我国森林植被的生物量和净生产量[J].生态学报,1996,16(5):497-508.
[37] 黄晓强.北京山区典型流域人工林碳密度及其影响因素分析[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
[38] 刘宝元,毕小刚,符素华.北京土壤流失方程[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[39] 陈龙,谢高地,裴厦,等.澜沧江流域生态系统土壤保持功能及其空间分布[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(8):2249-2256.
[40] Anastasiou A, Fryzlewicz P. Detecting multiple generalized change-points by isolating single ones[J/OL].(2019-1-30)[2019-08-09].https:∥arxiv.org/pdf/1901.10852.pdf.
[41] 朱昌丽,张继飞,赵宇鸾,等.青藏高原东缘典型流域生态系统服务的地形梯度效应:以岷江上游为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(10):1687-1699.
相似文献/References:
[1]金章利,刘高鹏,周明涛,等.喀斯特山地草地土壤酶活性及土壤微生物碳代谢活性研究[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):37.
JIN Zhangli,LIU Gaopeng,ZHOU Mingtao,et al.Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Carbon Metabolism Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Grasslands of Karst Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):37.
[2]苟天雄,刘 韩,帅 伟,等.川西高寒山地不同海拔高度土壤团聚体特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):47.
GOU Tianxiong,LIU Han,SHUAI Wei,et al.Characteristics of Soil Aggregate at Different Altitude Gradients in High-Frigid Mountain of West Sichuan Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):47.
[3]高家勇,李 瑞,杨坪坪,等.贵州省土壤可蚀性K值空间分布特征及主要影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(05):77.
GAO Jiayong,LI Rui,YANG Pingping,et al.Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Main Influencing Factors of Soil Erodibility K Values in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):77.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-08-19 修回日期:2019-09-03
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41501607,41901260,41801186); 北京市自然科学基金(5204033); 北京市环境保护科学研究院资助项目(2019B01)
第一作者:陈龙(1984—),男,山西临汾人,博士,副研究员,主要从事生态系统服务研究。E-mail:bryum@163.com
通信作者:刘晓娜(1986—),女,山东临沂人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事土地利用与土地覆被变化、生态系统服务功能评价研究。E-mail:xnliu1986@163.com