ZHANG Zixia,LIU Peng,WANG Yan,et al.Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Eco-Chemometric Characteristics of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Surface Sediments of Different Karst Wetlands[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):23-30.
不同类型岩溶湿地表层沉积物碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征时空分布
- Title:
- Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Eco-Chemometric Characteristics of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Surface Sediments of Different Karst Wetlands
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)04-0023-08
- 分类号:
- X171
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了厘清湿地生态系统碳汇潜力和生态系统对环境变化的响应。以滇东南典型岩溶流域普者黑为研究对象,将岩溶湿地划分为河流湿地、湖泊湿地、沼泽湿地和库塘湿地4种类型,研究湿地沉积物碳、氮和磷的平衡关系,探讨了丰水期、枯水期和平水期不同水期湿地表层沉积物碳、氮、磷的分布及生态化学计量学特征。结果表明:(1)普者黑流域不同类型湿地表层沉积物SOC,TN-S,TP-S含量在不同时期的变化规律不一致,SOC含量在平水期的库塘湿地最高,为47.81 g/kg,丰水期的沼泽湿地最低,为12.77 g/kg; TN-S含量在枯水期的沼泽湿地最高,为2.93 g/kg,丰水期的库塘湿地最低,为1.22 g/kg; TP-S含量在河流湿地最高,为1.32 g/kg,丰水期的沼泽湿地最低,分别为0.43 g/kg; 且不同类型湿地表层沉积物SOC,TN-S,TP-S之间呈显著正相关(p<0.05);(2)不同类型湿地表层沉积物C/N-S,C/P-S和N/P-S在不同时期下的变化规律基本一致,从枯水期、丰水期至平水期除湖泊湿地外均呈上升趋势,C/N-S和C/P-S在平水期的库塘湿地最高,分别为25.43,94.49,N/P-S在平水期的沼泽湿地最高,为4.04; C/N-S,C/P-S和N/P-S在枯水期的河流湿地最低,分别为9.17,14.85,1.62,且不同类型湿地表层沉积物C/N-S,C/P-S,N/P-S与TN-S,TP-S及水质N/P-W之间呈显著正相关(p<0.05);(3)总体上看,丰水期的SOC,TN-S,TP-S含量均低于枯水期和平水期,平水期的C/N-S,C/P-S和N/P-S值均高于枯水期。
- Abstract:
- To clarify the carbon sink potential of wetland ecosystem and the ecosystem response to environmental change, taking Puzhehei karst watershed in Southeast Yunnan as the research site, we divided the karst wetlands in this watershed into 4 types: river wetland, lake wetland, swamp wetland and reservoir wetland. The balance relationship of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in wetland sediments was studied, and the distribution and eco-chemical characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in surface sediments of wetland in wet season, dry season and peaceful season were discussed. The results show that:(1)the changes of contents of SOC, TN-S and TP-S in surface sediments of different types of wetlands in Puzhehei watershed are different in different periods, the SOC content(47.81 g/kg)in reservoir pond wetlands is the highest in average period, the SOC content(12.77 g/kg)is the lowest in marsh wetland in wet period, and the SOC content(2.93 g/kg)is the highest in Marsh wetlands in dry period(2.93 g/kg), the lowest SOC content in reservoir pond wetland is 1.22 g/kg in wet period; the content of TP-S(1.32 g/kg)is the highest in river wetlands and the content of TP-S(0.43 g/kg)is the lowest in marsh wetlands, respectively; there are the significant positive correlations among SOC, TN-S and TP-S in surface sediments of different types of wetlands(p<0.05);(2)the changes of C/N-S, C/P-S and N/P-S in surface sediments of different types of wetlands are basically the same in different hydrological periods; except for Lake wetlands, from dry season, wet season to average season, C/N-S and C/P-S in average season are the highest, which are 25.43 and 94.49, respectively, and N/P-S in average season is the highest, C/N-S, C/P-S and N/P-S are the lowest in dry season, which are 9.17, 14.85 and 1.62, respectively; there are the significant positive correlations between C/N-S, C/P-S, N/P-S and TN-S, TP-S and N/P-W in surface sediments of different types of wetlands (p<0.05);(3)generally speaking, the contents of SOC, TN-S and TP-S in wet season are lower than those in dry season and average season, and the C/N-S, C/P-S and N/P-S values in average season are higher than those in dry season.
参考文献/References:
[1] Wang S J, Liu Y G, Zhang C, et al. Distribution and pollution risk assessment of nitrogen, phosphorus and organic matter in inlet rivers of Erhai Basin[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2017,29(1):69-77.
[2] 蒋宇霞,刘有胜,应光国.沉积物质量综合评价及应用证据权重法的案例分析[J].生态毒理学报,2015,10(3):71-82.
[3] 张友,徐刚,高丽,等.黄河三角洲新生湿地土壤碳氮磷分布及其生态化学计量学意义[J].地球与环境,2016,44(6):647-653.
[4] 邢伟,吴昊平,史俏,等.生态化学计量学理论的应用、完善与扩展[J].生态科学,2015,34(01):190-197.
[5] 刘珮,马慧,智颖飙,等.9种典型荒漠植物生态化学计量学特征分析[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(1):207-216.
[6] Elser J J, Sterner R W, Gorokhova E, et al. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters,2008,3(6):540-550.
[7] 闫玉琴,解刚,项宇,等.毛乌素沙地湖滨带沉积物碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):223-228.
[8] 杨伟华,郝倩,夏少攀,等.湖泊—流域系统硅循环及其对碳和养分循环的影响[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(3):624-633.
[9] Yang Y H, Luo Y Q. Carbon:nitrogen stoichiometry in forest ecosystems during stand development[J]. Global Ecology and Bioge-Ography, 2011,20(2):354-361.
[10] Iost S, Landgraf D, Makeschin F. Chemical soil properties of reclaimed marsh soil from Zhejiang Province P.R. China[J]. Geo-derma, 2007,142(3/4):245-250.
[11] 张剑,宿力,王利平,等.植被盖度对土壤碳、氮、磷生态化学计量比的影响:以敦煌阳关湿地为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):580-589.
[12] 杨婷.坡向对土壤微生物特征与生态化学计量特征的影响研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.
[13] 王丹,王奥博,龙高飞,等.湿地生态系统中植硅体与植硅体碳的研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(12):3602-3609.
[14] Hobbie S E, Nadelhoffer K J, Hgberg P. A synthesis:The role of nutrients as constraints on carbon balances in boreal and arcticregions[J]. Plant and Soil, 2002,242(1):163-170.
[15] 葛晓改,曾立雄,肖文发,等.三峡库区森林凋落叶化学计量学性状变化及与分解速率的关系[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):779-787.
[16] 邹雨璇,程静,刘康,等.黄河故道盐沼土壤碳、氮含量和氨氧化微生物分布特征[J].湿地科学,2015,13(6):752-758.
[17] Elser J J, Bracken M E S, Cleland E E, et al. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2007,10(12):1135-1142.
[18] 林永静,武梦娟,卢同平,等.中国生态化学计量学研究热点的可视化分析[J].生物学杂志,2018,35(2):63-66.
[19] 程瑞梅,王娜,肖文发,等.陆地生态系统生态化学计量学研究进展[J].林业科学,2018,54(7):130-136.
[20] Liptzin C D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: Is there a “redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007,85(3):235-252.
[21] 王雁,黄佳聪,闫人华,等.湖泊湿地的水质净化效应:以太湖三山湿地为例[J].湖泊科学,2016,28(1):124-131.
[22] 王书锦,刘云根,王妍,等.洱海入湖河口湿地干湿季沉积物氮、磷、有机质垂向分布特征及污染风险差异性[J].环境科学,2016,37(12):4615-4625.
[23] 杨文焕,崔亚楠,李卫平,等.冰封期湿地沉积物碳、氮、磷分布及污染评价[J].环境化学,2018,37(2):287-295.
[24] 刘媛媛,马进泽,卜兆君,等.地理来源与生物化学属性对泥炭地植物残体分解的影响[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(7):713-722.
[25] 叶碧碧,李丹,侯泽英,等.调蓄经济植物湿地技术在农田径流污染控制中的工程应用及评价[J].环境科学研究,2019,32(3):415-422.
[26] Wang S R, Jin X C, Zhao H C, et al. Phosphorus release characteristics of different trophic lake sediments under simulative disturbing conditions[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009,161(2/3):1551-1559.
[27] 李学刚,宋金明,李宁,等.胶州湾沉积物中氮与磷的来源及其生物地球化学特征[J].海洋与湖沼,2005,36(6):562-571.
[28] 王绍强,于贵瑞.生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2007,28(8):3937-3947.
[29] Wang W Q, Zeng C S, Zhong C Q, et al. Effect of human disturbance on ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Minjiang River estuarine wetland[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2010,31(10):2411-2416.
[30] 张仲胜,吕宪国,薛振山,等.中国湿地土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征研究[J].土壤学报,2016,53(5):1160-1169.
[31] Zhang Z, Lu X, Song X, et al. Soil C, N and P stoichiometry of Deyeuxia angustifolia and Carex lasiocarpa wetlands in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2012,12(9):1309-1315.
[32] 崔保山,杨志峰.湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系:Ⅰ.理论[J].生态学报,2002,22(7):1005-1011.
[33] 崔保山,杨志峰.湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系:Ⅱ.方法与案例[J].生态学报,2002,22(8):1231-1239.
[34] 银晓瑞,梁存柱,王立新,等.内蒙古典型草原不同恢复演替阶段植物养分化学计量学[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):39-47.
相似文献/References:
[1]李晖,蒋忠诚,尹辉,等.基于生态服务功能价值的会仙岩溶湿地生态补偿研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):267.
LI Hui,JIANG Zhong-cheng,YIN Hui,et al.Study on Eco-compensation of Huixian Karst Wetland Based on Ecosystem Service Function Value[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):267.
[2]詹乃才,王妍,刘云根,等.滇东南典型岩溶湿地底泥钙形态分布[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(02):374.
ZHAN Naicai,WANG Yan,LIU Yungen,et al.Distribution Characteristics of Different Calcium Speciation in the Sediment of Typical Karst Wetland in Southeast Yunnan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):374.
[3]崔 健,党晓宏,汪 季,等.不同规格可降解沙障铺设5年后土壤粒度及有机质特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):92.
CUI Jian,DANG Xiaohong,WANG Ji,et al.Characteristics of Soil Particle Size and Organic Matter After Five Years of Laying Different Specifications of Degradable Sand Barriers[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):92.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-08-22 修回日期:2019-09-21
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(31760245,31560237)
第一作者:张紫霞(1994—),女,云南楚雄人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水土保持生态修复。E-mail:zzx14787488329@126.com
通信作者:王妍(1980—),女,河北承德人,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事脆弱生态系统修复研究。E-mail:wycaf@126.com