YU Dun,LIANG Zhenbao,XIAO Zhijuan,et al.Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Land Ecological Risk in Nanchang City Based on Landscape Ecology[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):213-220.
基于景观生态思维的南昌市土地生态风险时空特征分析
- Title:
- Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Land Ecological Risk in Nanchang City Based on Landscape Ecology
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)01-0213-08
- Keywords:
- land ecological; spatial distribution pattern; risk; Nanchang City
- 分类号:
- F301.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 评估不同土地利用方式下生态风险程度并揭示其时空演变规律,对于优化土地利用方式、加强生态保护具有重要意义。借助遥感影像解译得到土地利用数据,以行政村为研究单元,基于景观生态学思想构建生态风险评价体系对南昌市2005—2017年土地利用生态风险进行评估。在此基础上,在Geoda,GS+平台的支持下对生态风险的时空演变特征展开剖析。结果发现:(1)南昌市土地利用生态风险以中低风险为主,但是各风险等级总体呈上升趋势,高风险区主要位于西南边陲和濒临鄱阳湖区域,中心城区生态风险有逐渐增长趋势;(2)2005—2017年,模型拟合基台值由0.713下降至0.604,生态风险具有一定的空间变异性,在45°方向上,变异程度最大;(3)生态风险空间Moran’s I值分别为0.451 9,0.424 3,0.401 0,呈正相关性,局部以HH和LL型聚集为主,HH型以组团状分布于新建区的石岗镇与松湖镇、濒临鄱阳湖区域,LL型以带状分布于城市远郊及交错地带。研究结果可为南昌市城市景观生态建设和土地利用优化提供参考依据。
- Abstract:
- Assessing the degree of ecological risk under different land use patterns and revealing its temporal and spatial evolution processes are of great significance for optimizing land use patterns and strengthening ecological protection. In this paper, the land use data were obtained by remote sensing image interpretation. The administrative village is taken as the research unit. The ecological risk assessment system is constructed based on the landscape ecology theory to evaluate the ecological risk of land use in Nanchang City from 2005 to 2017. On this basis, with the support of Geoda and GS+ platform, the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of ecological risk are analyzed. The results show that:(1)the ecological risk of land use in Nanchang City is mainly low and medium risk, but the area of each risk grade is generally rising; the high-risk area is mainly located in the southwestern border and the Poyang Lake area, the ecological risk in the central urban area is gradually increasing;(2)from 2005 to 2017, the model fitting base value decreased from 0.713 to 0.604, and the ecological risk had a certain spatial variability, in the 45° direction, the degree of variation was the largest;(3)the ecological risk space Moran’s I values are 0.451 9, 0.424 3, and 0.401 0, respectively, showing a positive correlation; the HH and LL types mainly distribute in the local area; the HH type distribution in the group of Shigang Town and Songhu Town in the Xinjian District, and near the Poyang Lake area; the LL type distributes in the outer suburbs and the interlaced areas of the city. The research results can provide reference for urban landscape ecological construction and land use optimization in Nanchang.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王甫园,王开泳.城市化地区生态空间可持续利用的科学内涵[J].地理研究,2018,37(10):1899-1914.
[2] 邱硕,王宇欣,王平智,等.基于MCR模型的城镇生态安全格局构建和建设用地开发模式[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(17):257-265,302.
[3] 宋戈,王盼盼.松嫩高平原县域土地利用空间格局地形梯度特征分析:以巴彦县为例[J].地理科学,2017,37(8):1218-1225.
[4] 赵丽,张贵军,朱永明,等.基于土地利用转型的土地多功能转变与特征分析:以河北省唐县为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(6):42-50,97.
[5] Munns W R. Assessing risks to wildlife populations from multiple stressors: Overview of the problem and research needs[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(1):709-723.
[6] 于松延,徐宗学,武玮,等.北洛河流域水质空间异质性及其对土地利用结构的响应[J].环境科学学报,2014,34(5):1309-1315.
[7] 曾辉,陈利顶,丁圣彦.景观生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2017.
[8] 任志远,孙艺杰,吴林筱.1990—2012年榆林市土地生态风险综合评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(5):656-664.
[9] Bartolo R E, Dam R A V, Bayliss P. Regional ecological risk assessment for Australia’s tropical rivers: application of the relative risk model[J]. Human & Ecological Risk Assessment, 2012,18(1):16-46.
[10] 沈珍瑶,肖月晨,马晔,等.外来植物入侵生态风险评价[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,52(2):189-195.
[11] 杨阳,黄义雄,李潇,等.海坛岛景观生态风险评价及时空分异[J].福建师范大学学报:自然科学版,2018,34(2):74-81.
[12] 汪翡翠,汪东川,张利辉,等.京津冀城市群土地利用生态风险的时空变化分析[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4307-4316.
[13] 吕乐婷,张杰,孙才志,等.基于土地利用变化的细河流域景观生态风险评估[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5952-5960.
[14] 徐兰,罗维,周宝同.基于土地利用变化的农牧交错带典型流域生态风险评价:以洋河为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(4):580-590.
[15] 彭建,党威雄,刘焱序,等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(4):664-677.
[16] 虎陈霞,郭旭东,连纲,等.长三角快速城市化地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:以嘉兴市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(3):333-340.
[17] 周汝佳,张永战,何华春.基于土地利用变化的盐城海岸带生态风险评价[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1017-1028.
[18] 曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,等.景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架:ESRISK[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):843-855.
[19] 王涛,张超,于晓童,等.洱海流域土地利用变化及其对景观生态风险的影响[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(7):2003-2009.
[20] 李雅婷,赵牡丹,张帅兵,等.基于景观结构的眉县土地利用生态风险空间特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):220-225,233.
[21] 张晗,欧阳真程,赵小敏,等.江西省油菜土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学空间变异性及影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):269-277,301.
[22] Fernandes C, Bateira A, Costa B, et al. Electrical resistivity and spatial variation in agriculture terraces: statistical correlation between ert and flow direction algorithms[J]. Open Agriculture, 2017,2(1):329-340.
[23] 谢花林.基于景观结构的土地利用生态风险空间特征分析:以江西兴国县为例[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(4):688-695.
[24] 刘迪,陈海,张行,等.黄土侵蚀沟谷土地生态系统健康评价:以杜家石沟为例[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):100-106.
[25] 潘彦江,方朝阳,缪理玲,等.基于交通状态分析的南昌市区区际联系通达性研究[J].地理研究,2014,33(12):2325-2334.
[26] 黄木易,何翔.巢湖流域土地景观格局变化及生态风险驱动力研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(5):743-750.
[27] 傅丽华,谢炳庚,张晔.长株潭核心区土地利用生态风险多尺度调控决策[J].经济地理,2012,32(7):118-122.
[28] 刘迪,陈海,梁小英,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区生态风险动态变化及其地形梯度分析:以陕西省米脂县为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(23):8592-8592.
[29] 苏浩,吴次芳.基于景观结构的农林交错带土地利用生态风险时空分异研究[J].经济地理,2017,37(5):158-165.
[30] 余敦,高群,欧阳龙华.鄱阳湖生态经济区土地生态安全警情研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(6):678-683.
相似文献/References:
[1]袁磊,雷国平,张小虎.大庆油田区土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):216.
YUAN Lei,LEI Guo-ping,ZHANG Xiao-hu.Evaluation on Land Ecological Security of the Daqing Oil Field Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):216.
[2]余敦,陈文波.鄱阳湖生态经济区土地生态安全研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):107.
YU Dun,CHEN Wen-bo.Research for Land Ecological Security in Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):107.
[3]张茹,戴文婷,刘兆顺,等.我国北方农牧交错区土地生态安全评价——以白城市为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):259.
ZHANG Ru,DAI Wenting,LIU Zhaoshun,et al.Evaluation of Land Ecological Security in Agro-Pastoral Zone of Northern China—A Case Study of Baicheng City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):259.
[4]毕海洋,李波,南箔,等.土地功能调控与生态政绩考核研究——以华阳河湖群地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):171.
BI Haiyang,LI Bo,NAN Bo,et al.Study on Land Function Regulation and Ecological Performance Evaluation System of Huayang Lake Group[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):171.
[5]秦伟霞,王新闯,马守臣,等.基于功能分区的土地生态质量障碍因子诊断——以新乡市为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):148.
QIN Weixia,WANG Xinchuang,MA Shouchen,et al.Obstacle Factors Diagnosis of Land Ecological Quality Based on Functional Partition—A Case Study of Xinxiang City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):148.
[6]方相林,冯凤英,于斌,等.河南省东北部农用地肥力分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(04):49.
FANG Xiang-lin,FENG Feng-ying,YU Bin,et al.Soil Fertility Analysis of Agricultural Land in the Northeast of He’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):49.
[7]刘凌冰,李世平.西北荒漠化地区土地生态安全评价——以酒泉市为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):190.
LIU Ling-bing,LI Shi-ping.Evaluation on Land Ecological Security in Desertification Areas of Northwest China—A Case Study of Jiuquan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):190.
[8]葛亮,高扬,陆春锋,等.京杭大运河江苏段沿线土地生态空间差异及响应[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(01):330.
GE Liang,GAO Yang,LU Chunfeng,et al.The Spatial Difference and Response of the Land Ecological Space Along Jiangsu Section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):330.
[9]张驭航,李 玲,王秀丽,等.基于模糊伽马模型的河南省生态空间辨识与格局优化[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):211.
ZHANG Yuhang,LI Ling,WANG Xiuli,et al.Ecological Spatial Identification and Pattern Optimization in Henan Province Based on Fuzzy Gamma Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):211.
[10]侯 蕊,李红波,高艳丽.基于景观格局的武汉市江夏区土地利用生态风险评价[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(01):323.
HOU Rui,LI Hongbo,GAO Yanli.Ecological Risk Assessment of Land Use in Jiangxia District of Wuhan Based on Landscape Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(01):323.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-04-24 修回日期:2019-06-15
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41561107);江西省自然科学基金项目(20151BAB203039)
第一作者:余敦(1975—),男,江西安义人,副教授,博士,主要从事土地利用/覆被变化研究。E-mail:jxauyd@163.com
通信作者:孙聪康(1992—),男,江西吉安人,硕士,主要从事土地资源利用/土地经济等研究。E-mail:943568578@qq.com