[1]高磊,杨现坤,胡海珠,等.重庆市退耕还林工程实施的生态和经济效益分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):353-358.
　GAO Lei,YANG Xiankun,HU Haizhu,et al.Analysis on Ecological and Economic Benefits of Implementing the Project of Returning Farmlands to Forests in Chongqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(06):353-358.
点击复制

重庆市退耕还林工程实施的生态和经济效益分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 26 期数: 2019年06期 页码: 353-358 栏目: 出版日期: 2019-10-17
Title:
Analysis on Ecological and Economic Benefits of Implementing the Project of Returning Farmlands to Forests in Chongqing City
作者:
高磊1, 杨现坤2, 胡海珠1, 吕喜玺1,3, 侯国龙4, Claudio Delang4, 王晓燕5, 陈方鑫5
1. 内蒙古大学 生态与环境学院 内蒙古河流与湖泊生态重点实验室, 呼和浩特 010021;
2. 广州大学 地理科学学院, 广州 510006;
3. 新加坡国立大学, 新加坡 117570;
4. 香港浸会大学 社会科学院地理系, 香港 999077;
5. 西南大学 资源环境学院, 重庆 400716
Author(s):
GAO Lei1, YANG Xiankun2, HU Haizhu1, Lü Xixi1,3, HOU Guolong4, Claudio Delang4, WANG Xiaoyan5, CHEN Fangxin5
1. Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of River and Lake Ecology, School of Ecology & Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
2. School of Geographical Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China;
3. National University of Singapore, 117570, Singapore;
4. Faculty of Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong 999077, China;
5. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
关键词:
退耕还林; 重庆市; 生态效益; 经济效益
Keywords:
returning farmland to forest; Chongqing City; ecological benefits; economic benefits
分类号:
F326.2
摘要:
为了给进一步推动退耕还林工程的实施提供科学的理论依据，以西南地区重庆市为研究区域，通过收集退耕还林相关监测数据、重庆市历年统计年鉴资料和历年环境状况公报等，并结合野外参与式农户调查，对该区域退耕还林的生态和经济效益两个方面进行了分析与探讨。结果表明：退耕还林不仅明显提高植被覆盖率，也对水土保持、改善土壤质量状况、净化大气和固碳释氧起到积极作用。生态林在此次退耕还林中为主要林木类型，但经济林生长势和覆盖度整体上要好于生态林。乔灌混交林所占比例较低；退耕还林后，耕地面积减少，但粮食产量逐渐恢复到原有水平。人均收入显著增长，年均增长率达31.9%。林业产值也在逐年增加。退耕还林的实施对生态环境、当地经济兼具有促进作用，但相关部门还需进一步提高乔灌混交林的比例，并加强对生态林的管护。另外，采取有效措施来提高林业产值。
Abstract:
In order to provide a scientific theoretical basis for further promoting the implementation of the project, the ecological and economic benefits of returning farmlands to forests in Chongqing City were studied. Chongqing City in the southwest was taken as a research area. The ecology and economic aspects were analyzed and discussed based on the monitoring data related to returning farmlands to forests, Chongqing historical yearbook data and past year environmental status bulletins, and field-involved household surveys. The following results have been obtained. The project not only significantly improved vegetation coverage, but also played the positive role in soil and water conservation, improving soil quality, purifying the atmosphere and sequestrating carbon and releasing oxygen. At the same time, the ecological forest is the main type of forest in the project of returning farmlands to forests, but the growth potentials and coverage of the economic forests are better than the ecological forests as a whole. The proportion of the mixed forest of arbor and shrub is extremely low; after returning farmland to forest, the area of cultivated land reduced, but the grain output gradually returns to the original level. Per capita income has increased significantly, with an average annual growth rate of 31.9%. Meanwhile, the output value of forestry is also increasing year by year. The implementation of returning farmlands to forests will promote the ecological environment and local economy. However, the proportion of mixed forests of arbor and shrubs should be further increased, and the management and protection of ecological forests should be strengthened. In addition, effective measures should be taken to increase the output value of forestry.

参考文献/References:

[1] 宋富强.黄土高原退耕还林(草)综合效益评价指标体系研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.
[2] 刘黎明,李蕾,赖敏.西部地区生态退耕的"效益问题"及其评价方法探讨[J].生态环境学报,2005,14(5):794-797.
[3] 李忠峰,李学梅.重庆市气候因子变化及其与植被活动的相关性[J].山地学报,2014,32(6):717-724.
[4] 张勃,王东,王桂钢,等.西南地区近14 a植被覆盖变化及其与气候因子的关系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(6):956-964.
[5] 薛兰兰,王轶浩,徐卓,等.重庆市退耕还林工程社会经济效益研究[J].四川林业科技,2015,36(6):69-73.
[6] 重庆市统计局.2014年重庆市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[Z].重庆:重庆市统计局,2015.
[7] 徐卓,刘访兵,汪进,等.重庆市前一轮退耕地还林综合效益评价报告(2000-2015年)[R].重庆:重庆市林业科学研究院,2015.
[8] 成六三,高晓东,陈小莉,等.黄土丘陵区榆林南部退耕还林(草)工程综合效益评价[J].西南林业大学学报,2016,36(4):88-96.
[9] 陈晓光,李剑萍,韩颖娟,等.宁夏近20年来植被覆盖度及其与气温降水的关系[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(9):1375-1383.
[10] 王耀宗.陕北黄土高原退耕还林还草工程生态效益评价[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010.
[11] 贾晓娟,常庆瑞,薛阿亮,等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区退耕还林生态效应评价[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(3):182-185.
[12] 王引乾,孙保平,赵岩,等.黎平县退耕还林地草本层物种组成与多样性[J].山西农业科学,2011,39(8):846-849.
[13] 许智超,张岩,刘宪春,等.半干旱黄土区退耕还林十年植被恢复变化分析:以陕西吴起县为例[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(1):91-96.
[14] 李宗杰,杨彩红,马瑞,等.会宁县退耕还林还草工程实施后植被状况调查[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(1):214-219.
[15] 杨亚娟,刘政鸿.陕北地区退耕还林十年植被恢复变化分析:以子长县为例[J].中国水土保持,2013(2):54-56.
[16] Yang Z, Han H, Zhao Q. Soil erosion control degree of the project of converting farmland to forest in mountainous areas at China’s Southwest border:A case study in Mangshi, Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2011,8(6):845-854.
[17] 吴婕,李楠,陈智,等.深圳特区城市植被的固碳释氧效应[J].中山大学学报:自然科学版,2010,49(4):86-92.
[18] 方精云,陈安平.中国森林植被碳库的动态变化及其意义[J].植物学报,2001,43(9):967-973.
[19] 钟晓娟,赵岩,孙保平,等.盐池县退耕还林生态效益评价[J].中国水土保持,2010(9):34-38.
[20] 谢红霞,任志远,李锐.陕北黄土高原土地利用/土地覆被变化中植被固碳释氧功能价值变化[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(3):319-322.
[21] 马新辉,孙根年,任志远.西安市植被净化大气物质量的测定及其价值评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002,16(4):83-86.
[22] 范建忠,李登科,周辉.陕西省退耕还林固碳释氧价值分析[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(4):874-881.
[23] 孟庆香,武斌,贺鹏飞,等.陕北地区退耕还林草工程社会经济效益分析:以志丹县和子洲县为例[J].水土保持通报,2009(4):159-163.

相似文献/References:

[1]裴新富.黄河流域退耕还林途径研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):122.
　PEI Xin-fu.Study on the Approach to Returning Farmland to Forests in the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(06):122.
[2]唐治诚,钟冰.云阳县旱地土壤退化及防治[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):133.
　TANG Zhi-cheng,ZHONG Bing.Degradation of Upland Fields in Yunyang County and Its Control[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(06):133.
[3]孔繁德.秦皇岛北部山区水土流失的特点及形成因素与防治对策[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(02):52.
　KONG Fande.Characteristics, Formative Cause of Soil and Water Loss in North Mountain Area of Qinhuangdao and Controlling Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(06):52.
[4]赵杨,危锋.陕南秦巴山区退耕还林与可持续发展研究——以汉中市为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(03):200.
　ZHAO Yang,WEI Feng.Research of Converting Cropland to Forest and Grassland and Sustainable Development in Qingling-Bashan Mountains——An Example From Hanzhong City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):200.
[5]杨光,丁国栋,常国梁,等.黄土高原不同退耕还林地森林植被改良土壤特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(03):204.
　YANG Guang,DING Guo-dong,CHANG Guo-liang,et al.Study on Improving Soil Properties of Forest Vegetation in Different Land Where Returning Farmland to Forests in Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):204.
[6]李世荣,李文忠,李福源,等.青海大通退耕还林生态功能综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(03):252.
　LI Shi-rong,LI Wen-zhong,LI Fu-yuan,et al.Study on Evaluation of Afforestation Ecological Functions in Returning Farmland to Forest Project Area in Datong County of Qinghai Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):252.
[7]胡华科,郑春燕.“3S”技术及其在退耕还林中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):54.
　HU Hua-ke,ZHENG Chun-yan.3S Technology and Its Application in Converting Cultivated Land to Forest[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):54.
[8]文雯,周宝同,黄勇,等.重庆市农村居民点整理优先性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):289.
　WEN Wen,ZHOU Bao-tong,HUANG Yong,et al.Research for Evaluation on Priority of Rural Residential Land Consolidation in Chongqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):289.
[9]郭建英,李锦荣,刘铁军,等.退耕还林工程建设对吴起县土地利用/覆被变化及其土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):1.
　GUO Jian-ying,LI Jin-rong,LIU Tie-jun,et al.Effect of Conversion of Cropland to Forestland on Soil Water Erosion and Land Use/Cover in Wuqi County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):1.
[10]成思敏,王继军.退耕区域林草资源有效利用的思考——以安塞县为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):243.
　CHENG Simin,WANG Jijun.Strategies about the Efficient Utilization of the Forest and Grassland Resources in De-Farming Regions-A Case of Ansai County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):243.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2018-12-14;改回日期:2019-01-14。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（03010101，41871017）
作者简介:高磊(1994-),男,陕西榆林人,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态系统碳循环。E-mail:gaoliam@126.com
通讯作者:杨现坤(1981-),男,河南周口人,副教授,博士,主要从事水文遥感研究。E-mail:yangxk@gzhu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01