[1]鲍玉海,郭丰,胡保生,等.西南干旱河谷区水库消落带柳树造林效果评价[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(05):216-219.
　BAO Yuhai,GUO Feng,HU Baosheng,et al.Assessment on the Effect of the Afforestation With Willow Along the Reservoir Riparian Zone in the Dry Valley Area of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):216-219.
点击复制

西南干旱河谷区水库消落带柳树造林效果评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 25 期数: 2018年05期 页码: 216-219 栏目: 出版日期: 2018-09-06
Title:
Assessment on the Effect of the Afforestation With Willow Along the Reservoir Riparian Zone in the Dry Valley Area of Southwest China
作者:
鲍玉海1, 郭丰2, 胡保生3, 王建华3, 贺秀斌1, 张淑娟1,4
1. 中国科学院 水利部 成都山地灾害与环境研究所 山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室, 成都 610041;
2. 四川省水土保持局, 成都 610041;
3. 凉山州大桥水电开发总公司, 四川 西昌 615000;
4. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
Author(s):
BAO Yuhai1, GUO Feng2, HU Baosheng3, WANG Jianhua3, HE Xiubin1, ZHANG Shujuan1,4
1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Soil and Water Conservation ureau of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China;
3. Daqiao Hydropower Developing General Corporation of Liangshan Prefecture, Xichang, Sichuan 615000, China;
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
关键词:
消落带; 植被恢复; 柳树; 生长表现
Keywords:
reservoir riparian zone; revegetation; willow; growth performance
分类号:
S727.26;S157.2
摘要:
适宜耐淹抗旱植物的遴选是消落带植被恢复的关键。为探讨柳树在西南干旱河谷区消落带植被恢复中的可行性和实际效果，以凉山州大桥水库消落带柳树栽植试验区为研究对象，通过栽植当年和经历1个消落带淹水-出露过程的柳树林地每木调查，定量评价了柳树栽植的成活率和保存率，并对比分析了不同下垫面下的柳树树高、胸径、冠幅等生长表现。同时，利用简易水土流失观测样方对土壤基质保育措施的水土保持效应进行了观测分析。结果表明：（1）柳树能较好地适应大桥水库消落带环境，当年成活率达到98%，第2年保存率为96%。（2）大桥水库消落带不同土壤条件的柳树生长表现为棕壤 > 黄棕壤 > 红壤。（3）柳树生长表现随着淹水深度的增加而降低，大桥水库消落带淹水深度低于5 m的区域柳树生长表现最好。（4）石坎筑台较适宜大于15°的陡坡区造林使用，可有效防止柳树栽植穴土壤基质的流失和破坏，减蚀效益达到75%。
Abstract:
The selection of suitable plants is the key point to revegetation in the reservoir riparian zone. In order to assess the feasibility and effect of the afforestation with willow along the reservoir riparian zone in the dry valley area of southwest China, a case study was conducted on the revegetated land along the riparian zone of Daqiao reservoir in Liangshan prefecture by investigating the survival rate, preserving rate, and growth performance in the different site conditions. Meanwhile, the effect of soil conservation measures was monitored by the technique of erosion pins. The results showed that:(1) willow had a higher survival rate and preserving rate in the different site conditions of the Daqiao reservoir riparian zone, which were 98% and 96%, respectively; (2) the growth performance of the willow was affected by the soil conditions, which ranked brown soil, yellow-brown soil, and red soil; (3) the growth performance of willow decreased with the increase of submerge depth, and the willow had best growth in the area inundated less than 5 meters; (4) stone barricade was more suitable for the steep slope with more than 15 degrees. It prevented the soil loss from the planting hole, and had an erosion reduction efficiency of 75%.

参考文献/References:

[1] Bao Y, Gao P, He X. The water-level fluctuation zone of three gorges reservoir:A unique geomorphological unit[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2015,150:14-24.
[2] Gregory S V, Swanson F J, McKee W A, et al. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones[J]. Bioscience, 1991,41(8):540-551.
[3] Capon S J, Chambers L E, Mac Nally R, et al. Riparian ecosystems in the 21 st century:hotspots for climate change adaptation[J]. Ecosystems, 2013,16(3):359-381.
[4] Owers K A, Albanese B, Litts T. Using aerial photography to estimate riparian zone impacts in a rapidly developing river corridor[J]. Environmental Management, 2012,49(3):543-552.
[5] 鲍玉海,贺秀斌,钟荣华,等.三峡水库消落带植被重建途径及其固土护岸效应[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(6):171-174.
[6] 钟荣华,贺秀斌,鲍玉海,等.狗牙根和牛鞭草的消浪减蚀作用[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(2):133-140.
[7] Sarneel J M, Geurts J J M, Beltman B, et al. The effect of nutrient enrichment of either the bank or the surface water on shoreline vegetation and decomposition[J]. Ecosystems, 2010,13(8):1275-1286.
[8] 谢德体,范小华,魏朝富.三峡水库消落区对库区水土环境的影响研究[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2007,29(1):39-47.
[9] 陈芳清,郭成圆,王传华,等.水淹对秋华柳幼苗生理生态特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(6):1229-1232.
[10] 程瑞梅,王晓荣,肖文发,等.消落带研究进展[J].林业科学,2010,46(4):111-119.
[11] 董德友.浅析长江防浪林特点与树种密度效应[J].防护林科技,2008(1):53-54.
[12] 钟彦,刘正学,秦洪文,等.冬季淹水对柳树生长及恢复生长的影响[J].南方农业学报,2013,44(2):275-279.
[13] 毛文韬,李堂中,辜夕容,等.三峡库区消落带不同高程柳树林地养分特征[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2016,38(3):1-7.
[14] 杨斌,石培贤.刘家峡水库柳树固岸林防护效应试验[J].水土保持通報,2006,26(4):44-47.

相似文献/References:

[1]李晶,高照良,张小娟,等.宝牛高速公路路域植被恢复效果调查分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):100.
　LI Jing,GAO Zhao-liang,ZHANG Xiao-juan,et al.Investigation and Assessment on Vegetation Restoration along the Baoniu Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):100.
[2]查轩,唐克丽,白红英.植被恢复对土壤抗侵蚀特性影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):37.
　Zha Xuan,Tang Keli,Bai Hongying.The Effect of Vegetation Restoration on Properties of Soil Resistance in Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(05):37.
[3]郑粉莉,张科利,唐克丽,等.植被破坏与恢复对坡面浅沟侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):54.
　Zheng Fenli,Zhang Keli,Tang Keli,et al.Impact of Vegetation Destruction and Restoration on Shallow Gully Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(05):54.
[4]郭晓敏,牛德奎,刘苑秋,等.江西省红壤侵蚀劣地植被恢复技术及综合治理效果研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(02):108.
　Guo Xiaomin,Niu Dekui,Liu Yuanqiu,et al.Restoring Technique of Vegetation on Eroded Red Soil in Jiangxi and Benefits From Its Comprehensive Harnessing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(05):108.
[5]王改玲,白中科.安太堡露天煤矿排土场植被恢复的主要限制因子及对策[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):38.
　WANG Gai-ling,BAI Zhong-ke.Main Limiting Factors for Re-vegetation and Measures of Dumping Site in Antaibao Opencast Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(05):38.
[6]梁杰明,林建平,陈海平,等.珠海建设迹地岩土坡植被恢复的生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):175.
　LIANG Jie-ming,LIN Jian-ping,CHEN Hai-ping,et al.Study on Ecological Effect by Revegetation on Rock/Soil Slope Left by Project Construction in Zhuhai[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(05):175.
[7]陈浩,蔡强国,周金星,等.黄河中游侵蚀产沙环境要素临界与交互作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):54.
　CHEN Hao,CAI Qiang-guo,ZHOU Jin-xing,et al.Research Progress of Interactive Influence and Thresholds of Geographic Environmental Elements on Sediment Yield of Drainage Basins in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(05):54.
[8]马祥华,焦菊英.黄土高原植被恢复与土壤环境相互作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):157.
　MA Xiang-hua,JIAO Ju-ying.Research Progresses in Interaction Between Vegetation Restoration and Soil Environment in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(05):157.
[9]马祥华,焦菊英,温仲明,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植被恢复中土壤物理特性变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):17.
　MA Xiang-hua,JIAO Ju-ying,WEN Zhong-ming,et al.The Changes of Soil Physical Properties in Abandoned Lands During Vegetation Restoration in Hilly and Gully Regions on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):17.
[10]安韶山,黄懿梅,刘梦云,等.宁南宽谷丘陵区植被恢复中土壤酶活性的响应及其评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):31.
　AN Shao-shan,HUANG Yi-mei,LIU Meng-yun,et al.The Responses and Evaluation of Soil Enzymatic Activities to Plant Rehabilitation in Ningxia Loess Hilly-gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):31.
[11]钟荣华,鲍玉海,贺秀斌,等.三峡库区消落带几种草地根系分布及土壤养分变化[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):151.
　ZHONG Ronghua,BAO Yuhai,HE Xiubin,et al.Root Distributions of Several Grasslands and Soil Nutrient Variation in the Riparian Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):151.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2017-09-26;改回日期:2017-12-06。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目（41571278）；中国科学院科技服务网络STS计划项目（KFJ-SW-STS-175）；国家留学基金委项目
作者简介:鲍玉海(1981-),男,山东成武人,博士,副研究员,主要从事消落带土壤侵蚀与生态修复研究。E-mail:byh@imde.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01