[1]于水潇,赵瑞东,赵青,等.基于能值分析和生态用地分类的河北省生态补偿研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):324-329,336.
　YU Shuixiao,ZHAO Ruidong,ZHAO Qing,et al.Study on the Ecological Compensation of Hebei Province Based on Emergy Analysis and Ecological Land Classification[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):324-329,336.
点击复制

基于能值分析和生态用地分类的河北省生态补偿研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年04期 页码: 324-329,336 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-08-28
Title:
Study on the Ecological Compensation of Hebei Province Based on Emergy Analysis and Ecological Land Classification
作者:
于水潇1, 赵瑞东2, 赵青3, 夏书培1, 郭年冬1, 许皞1,3
1. 河北农业大学 资源与环境科学学院, 河北 保定 071000;
2. 河北农业大学 商学院, 河北 保定 071000;
3. 河北农业大学 国土资源学院, 河北 保定 071000
Author(s):
YU Shuixiao1, ZHAO Ruidong2, ZHAO Qing3, XIA Shupei1, GUO Niandong1, XU Hao1,3
1. College of Resources and Environment Science, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China;
2. College of Land and Resources, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China
关键词:
能值; 生态用地; 生产总值; 生态补偿
Keywords:
emergy; ecological land; gross product; ecological compensation
分类号:
S156.4
摘要:
为促进河北省发展及生态环境建设，基于国内外相关研究方法，引入地貌类型空间尺度，将河北省划分为8个主要地貌类型区，应用生态补偿优先级模型，对河北省108个县的生态系统生产总值及生态补偿优先级进行测算，并从整体、地貌类型区、县3个空间尺度分析了河北省生态补偿的优先领域。结果表明：河北省生态补偿优先级总体较高，平均生态补偿优先级为0.221。空间上呈由北至南逐渐递减的趋势，山地丘陵区的生态补偿优先级大于平原地区。平原地区中，沿海平原的生态补偿优先级高于内陆平原地区。不同县、市的生态系统生产总值差异明显，因此生态补偿优先级也存在差异，有需要迫切补偿的围场、丰宁、黄骅、唐海、乐亭等地区，同时也存在应率先支付生态补偿的内陆平原县。将结果与经济补偿强度模型进行比较，既实现了河北省各地区生态补偿的迫切度的量化，又反映出河北省生态经济之间的关系，为促进京津冀的协调发展与生态环境保护发挥着重要的作用。
Abstract:
In order to promote the development and construction of ecological environment in Hebei area, based on the summary of the domestic and foreign related research methods, the introduction of landform spatial scale, Hebei Province can be divided into 8 landforms, GDP and the ecological compensation priority of 108 counties in Hebei Province were calculated by using ecological compensation system of ecological priority model, and priority areas of ecological compensation in Hebei Province were analyzed on the spatial scales of province, landform types, and counties. The results showed that ecological compensation priority of Hebei Province was generally high, the average ecological compensation priority was 0.221, showing the gradually decreasing trend from north to south in space; the ecological compensation priority in hilly area was larger than the plain area, however, in the plain area, the ecological compensation priority of the coastal plain was higher than inland plains. Gross ecosystem production differences among counties were obvious, resulting in the different ecological compensation priority, urgent compensation in the northeast and the southeast coastal areas of Fengning, Huanghua, Weichang, Tanghai, Leting and other counties should be carried out, but also should take the lead in the payment of ecological compensation in the middle east, central and southern regions of the inland plain counties. The comparison of results and the economic compensation intensity model can not only achieve the urgent degree of quantization of the ecological compensation the area of Hebei Province, but also better reflect the relationship between the ecological economy in Hebei Province, and play an important role in promoting the coordinated development of Beijing, Tianjin, environmental protection and efficient use of land resources.

参考文献/References:

[1] Semwal R L, Nautiyal S, Sen K K, et al. Patterns and ecological implications of agricultural land-use changes:A case study from central Himalaya, India[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2004,102(1):81-92.
[2] 吴大千,刘建,贺同利,等.基于土地利用变化的黄河三角洲生态服务价值损益分析[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(8):256-261.
[3] Costanza R, d’Arge R, deGroot R, etal. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6230):253-260.
[4] 李文华.生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[5] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[6] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(9):911-919.
[7] 熊鹰,王克林,蓝万炼,等.洞庭湖区湿地恢复的生态补偿效应评估[J].地理学报,2004,59(5):772-780.
[8] 蔡邦成,温林泉,陆根法.生态补偿机制建立的理论思考[J].生态经济,2005(1):47-50.
[9] 虞依娜,彭少麟.生态系统服务价值评估的研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(9):2246-2252.
[10] 张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1918-1926.
[11] 王女杰,刘建,吴大千,等.基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿:以山东省为例[J].生态学报,2010,30(23):6646-6653.
[12] 杨正勇,杨怀宇,郭宗香.农业生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(5):1045-1050.
[13] 郑德凤,减正,孙才志.改进的生态系统服务价值模型及其在生态经济评价中的应用[J].资源科学,2014,36(3):584-593.
[14] 欧阳志云,朱春全,杨广斌,等.生态系统生产总值核算:概念核算方法与案例研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(21):6747-6761.
[15] 蓝盛芳,钦佩袁,陆宏芳.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
[16] 金丹.矿山生态系统物能流核算[D].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2012.
[17] 金丹,卞正富.基于能值和CEP的徐州市生态文明核算方法研究[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(10):88-94.
[18] Odum H T. Handbook Engineering Sciences, of Emergy Evaluation Folio2:Emergy of Global Processes. Cainesville:Center for Environmental Policy[J].Environmental University of Florida, 2000.34(9):9-13.
[19] 喻锋,李晓波,张丽君,等.中国生态用地研究:内涵、分类与时空格局[J].生态学报,2015,35(14):1-15.
[20] 喻锋,李晓波,王宏,等.基于能值分析和生态用地分类的中国生态系统生产总值核算研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(6):5-10.
[21] 郭年冬,李恒哲,李超,等.基于生态系统服务价值的环京津地区生态补偿研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(11):1473-1480

相似文献/References:

[1]李秀花,郭凯,师庆东.基于相图法的新疆精河县大农业系统可持续性能值评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):121.
　LI Xiu-hua,GUO Kai,SHI Qing-dong.Evaluation on the Sustainability of General Agricultural System in Jinghe County of Xinjiang Based on Ternary Diagram[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):121.
[2]范学忠,李玉辉,角媛梅.昆明市生态红线区非生态用地转变前后生态效益分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):179.
　FAN Xue-zhong,LI Yu-hui,JIAO Yuan-mei.Ecological Benefits Analysis of the Ecology Red-line Areas in Kunming District Before and After Changing the Non-ecological Use Lands into Ecological Ones[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(04):179.
[3]欧维新,赵丽宁,李冉.协调生态环境压力的区域生态用地需求模拟——以江苏省为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):274.
　OU Wei-xin,ZHAO Li-ning,LI Ran.Simulation on Regional Ecological Land Demand Based on Coordination of the Eco-environmental Stress—A Case Study of Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):274.
[4]戴云哲,李江风.洞庭湖区生态用地生态服务价值时空演化的地形梯度效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):197.
　DAI Yunzhe,LI Jiangfeng.Terrain Gradient Effect of Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Land and Ecosystem Service Value in Dongting Lake Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):197.
[5]蒋好雨,陈荣蓉,杨朝现,等.西部平原区生态用地时空动态特征及环境效应[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):203.
　JIANG Haoyu,CHEN Rongrong,YANG Chaoxian,et al.Characteristics of Spatiotemporal Dynamic Change in Ecological Land and Environment Effect in Western Plains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):203.
[6]张亦清,赵 翔,潘雨飘,等.湖北省2009—2019年主要生态用地的时空演变特征及驱动因素[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):417.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.001.]
　ZHANG Yiqing,ZHAO Xiang,PAN Yupiao,et al.Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Major Ecological Lands in Hubei Province from 2009 to 2019[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):417.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.001.]
[7]侯会延,李 彤,贾宝全,等.黄土高原沟壑区生态用地空间格局变化分析——以陕西省洛川县为例[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(02):321.
　Hou Huiyan,Li Tong,Jia Baoquan,et al.Analysis on Spatial Pattern of Ecological Land in the Highland and Ravine Region of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):321.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-09-25;改回日期:2016-10-09。
基金项目:资助河北省政府财政预算项目“河北省典型地区未利用地调查与多宜性评价及利用对策”（2014995161）
通讯作者:许皞(1963-),男,河北定兴人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土壤与土地资源持续利用研究。E-mail:xuhao22003@yahoo.com.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01