[1]王向栋,戴全厚,李翠莲,等.草海上游石漠化过程中土壤抗蚀性变化[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):13-18,23.
　WANG Xiangdong,DAI Quanhou,LI Cuilian,et al.Variation of Soil Anti-erodibility During Rocky Desertification in Upper Reaches of Caohai[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):13-18,23.
点击复制

草海上游石漠化过程中土壤抗蚀性变化

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年03期 页码: 13-18,23 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-06-28
Title:
Variation of Soil Anti-erodibility During Rocky Desertification in Upper Reaches of Caohai
作者:
王向栋1, 戴全厚1, 李翠莲1,2, 严友进1
1. 贵州大学 林学院, 贵阳 550025;
2. 息烽县林业绿化局, 贵州 息烽 551100
Author(s):
WANG Xiangdong1, DAI Quanhou1, LI Cuilian1,2, YAN Youjin1
1. College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2. Xifeng Forestry and Afforestation Bureau, Xifeng, Guizhou 551100, China
关键词:
土壤学; 土壤抗蚀性; 主成分分析; 石漠化; 草海
Keywords:
pedology; soil anti-erodibility; principal component analysis; karst rocky desertification; Caohai
分类号:
S157
摘要:
以草海流域上游的石漠化区为研究对象，研究不同等级石漠化条件下土壤抗蚀能力的差异，利用空间代替时间的方法，探讨草海上游区石漠化过程中土壤抗蚀性变化规律，为当地石漠化治理和湿地保护提供参考。通过实地调研，采集不同石漠化程度区的土样并进行室内指标测定，利用主成分分析方法选取了10个土壤理化指标对样地土壤抗蚀能力进行评价。结果表明：（1） 所选10项理化指标可以较为全面地综合评价不同石漠化程度土壤抗蚀能力，土壤团聚状况、分散率、分散系数、 > 0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量、 > 0.5 mm水稳性团聚体含量、结构破坏率、 < 0.05 mm粉黏粒含量这7项可以作为评价的优选指标，有机质含量、 < 0.001 mm黏粒含量、土壤团聚度这3项指标次之。（2） 无石漠化CK样地（2.19） > 轻度石漠化L样地（1.19） > 重度石漠化S1样地（0.85） > 中度石漠化M样地（-1.35） > 重度石漠化S2样地（-2.88），其中中度石漠化样地（M）和重度石漠化样地（S2）为负值，其余均为正值，差异明显。在石漠化过程中土壤抗蚀能力总体呈下降趋势，但是在石漠化发展后期，土壤抗蚀能力反而会有上升的可能。
Abstract:
We analyzed the differences between soil anti-erodibility under different rocky desertification conditions in karst rocky desertification region in upper reaches of Caohai. By using space instead of time, changes of soil anti-erodibility were investigated during rocky desertification in upper reaches of Caohai, aiming to provide reference for desertification control and wetland protection of Caohai. Soil samples from different karst rocky desertification level areas were taken according to field investigation. Soil physicochemical properties were tested in laboratory, and ten of them were selected to evaluate the soil anti-erodibility by principal component analysis with Spass 18.0. The results indicated that: (1) soil anti-erodibility under different rocky desertification conditions could be comprehensive evaluated by 10 indicators; the contents of silt/clay < 0.05 mm, reunion situation, dispersion rate, dispersion coefficient, water-stable aggregates > 0.25 mm, water-stable aggregates > 0.5 mm, structural damage rate were optimal indexes to evaluate soil anti-erodibility, and the indices organic matter, content of clay < 0.001 mm, reunion degree came next； (2) the order of anti-soil erosion degrees of different rocky desertification areas obtained by principal component analysis was: sample CK of non rocky desertification(2.19) > sample L of light rocky desertification(1.19) > sample S1 of intense rocky desertification(0.85) > sample M of moderate rocky desertification(-1.35) > sample S2 of intense rocky desertification(-2.88), the values of comprehensive anti-erodibility indexes of Sample M and Sample S2 were negative, others were positive, the differences were obvious. Soil anti-erodibility declined gradually during rocky desertification, but it could also increase in late stage of rocky desertification.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王世杰.喀斯特石漠化概念演绎及其科学内涵的探讨[J].中国岩溶,2002,21(2):101-105.
[2] 贺祥,熊康宁,陈洪云.喀斯特石漠化地区不同治理措施下的土壤抗蚀性研究:以贵州毕节石桥小流域为例[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,34(4):133-139.
[3] 郭培才,张振中.黄土区土壤抗蚀性预报及评价方法研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(3):48-51,58.
[4] 赵洋毅,周运超,段旭.黔中喀斯特地区不同岩性土壤的抗蚀抗冲性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(29):9311-9313,9317.
[5] 胡宁,傅瓦利,马志敏,等.岩溶石漠化山地不同退耕模式土壤抗蚀性及其与结构体分形关系研究[J].中国岩溶,2008,27(2):115-121.
[6] 陈佳,陈洪松,冯腾,等.桂西北喀斯特地区不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(1):105-110.
[7] 吴鹏,朱军,崔迎春,等.黔中杠寨小流域不同植被类型土壤抗蚀性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(8):64-70.
[8] 王佩将,戴全厚,丁贵杰,等.退化喀斯特植被恢复过程中的土壤抗蚀性变化[J].土壤学报,2014,51(3):806-815.
[9] 齐建文,李矿明,黎育成,等.贵州草海湿地现状与生态恢复对策[J].中南林业调查规划,2012,31(2):39-40,56.
[10] 中华人民共和国国家林业局. LY/T1840-2009.喀斯特石漠化地区植被恢复技术规程[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[11] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.
[12] 沈慧,姜凤岐,杜晓军,等.水土保持林土壤抗蚀性能评价研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(3):345-348.
[13] 刘淑娟,张伟,王克林,等.桂西北喀斯特峰丛洼地土壤物理性质的时空分异及成因[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(9):2249-2256.
[14] 史东梅,吕刚,蒋光毅,等.马尾松林地土壤物理性质变化及抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):35-39.
[15] 汪天祥,许士国,韩成伟.改进主成分分析法在南淝河水质评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(10):33-36.
[16] 章明奎,韩常灿.浙江省丘陵土壤的抗蚀性[J].浙江农业学报,2000,12(1):25-30.
[17] 张伟,陈洪松,王克林,等.种植方式和裸岩率对喀斯特洼地土壤养分空间分异特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(7):1459-1463.
[18] 王小彬,蔡典雄,张志田,等.土壤颗粒大小对水、肥保持和运移的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,1997,15(1):64-68.
[19] 周运超,王世杰,卢红梅.喀斯特石漠化过程中土壤的空间分布[J].地球与环境,2010,38(1):1-7.
[20] 盛茂银,熊康宁,崔高仰,等,贵州喀斯特石漠化地区植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):434-448.

相似文献/References:

[1]王忠林,李会科,贺秀贤.渭北旱塬花椒地埂林土壤抗蚀抗冲性研究[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(01):33.
　WANG Zhong-lin,LI Hui-ke,HE Xiu-xian.Study on Soil Anti-erosion and Anti-scour of Prickly Ash at Edges of Terraces in Drought Upland of Weibei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(03):33.
[2]雷俊山,杨勤科.土壤因子研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):156.
　LEI Jun-shan,YANG Qin-ke.Summarization on Soil Factor Researches[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(03):156.
[3]李鹏,任广鑫,杨改河,等.引进美国草种水保效果的对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(02):129.
　LI Peng,REN Guang-xin,YANG Gai-he,et al.Study on Soil and Water Conservation Benefits of Several US Introduced Grasses[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):129.
[4]林杰,李海东,张金池,等.基于GIS的小流域土壤抗蚀性空间变异特征[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(02):19.
　LIN Jie,LI Hai-dong,ZHANG Jin-chi,et al.Spatial Variability of Soil Anti-erodibility in a Small Watershed Based on GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):19.
[5]徐泉斌,傅瓦利,孙璐,等.三峡库区消落带土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):13.
　XU Quan-bin,FU Wa-li,SUN Lu,et al.Study on Soil Anti-erodibility for the Water Level-fluctuating Zone in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):13.
[6]付允,贾亚男,蓝家程.岩溶区不同土地利用方式土壤抗蚀性分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):5.
　FU Yun,JIA Ya-nan,LAN Jia-cheng.Analysis of Soil Anti-erodibility of Slope Farmland in Karst Mountain Area Based on Tillage Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):5.
[7]汤崇军,郑海金,谢颂华.不同土壤抗蚀性指标对侵蚀泥沙影响的灰色关联度分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):1.
　TANG Chong-jun,ZHENG Hai-jin,XIE Song-hua.Effects of Different Anti-erodibility Parameters on Soil Erosion Based on Grey Correlation Degree Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):1.
[8]谈正鑫,万福绪,张波.盱眙火山岩丘陵区不同林地土壤抗蚀性评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):7.
　TAN Zhengxin,WAN Fuxu,ZHANG Bo.Evaluation of Soil Antierodibility of Different Forests in Volcanic Hilly Land of Xuyi County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):7.
[9]王秋霞,丁树文,赵欣,等.花岗岩风化土不同土层抗蚀性差异分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):6.
　WANG Qiuxia,DING Shuwen,ZHAO Xin,et al.Studies on the Variation of Soil Antierodibility of Collapse Horizons of Weathered Earth in Granite Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):6.
[10]马海龙,金晓琴,刘国彬,等.黄土丘陵区不同农田类型土壤抗蚀性分异研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(02):5.
　MA Hai-long,JIN Xiao-qin,LIU Guo-bin,et al.Change in Soil Anti-erodibility of Different Farmland Types in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):5.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-10-04;改回日期:2016-11-05。
基金项目:国家重点研发计划课题（2016YFC0502604）；国家自然科学资助项目（41671275，41461057）；贵州省应用基础重大专项课题（黔科合JZ字[2014]2002）；贵州省重大专项（黔科合重大专项字[2016]3022号）
作者简介:王向栋(1986-),男,河南济源人,硕士研究生,助理工程师,主要研究方向:恢复生态学。E-mail:122673435@qq.com
通讯作者:戴全厚(1969-),男,陕西长武人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事水土保持与生态恢复重建研究。E-mail:qhdairiver@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01