WANG Guangyue,WANG Yan,XU Ni.Test and Study on Erosion Characteristics of 3D Geonet Protection Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):79-83.
三维土工网防护边坡侵蚀特性的试验研究
- Title:
- Test and Study on Erosion Characteristics of 3D Geonet Protection Slope
- Keywords:
- 3D geomat; overland flow; soil erosion
- 分类号:
- TV131;S157
- 摘要:
- 为了揭示三维土工网防护坡面侵蚀规律，利用室内模拟放水冲刷试验，定量研究了不同坡度（5°，10°，15°，20°，25°，30°）、不同流量（1 m3/h，1.5 m3/h，2 m3/h）条件下，三维土工网防护坡面的侵蚀过程及侵蚀特征。结果表明：（1）累积侵蚀量随坡度和流量的增大而增大，且冲刷最初10 min内得到的侵蚀量占侵蚀总量的70%左右，而冲刷末期的坡面流含沙率仅在0.01～0.04 g/cm3内波动；（2）随着坡度增大，累积侵蚀量的贡献率增大，流量对累积侵蚀量起主导作用，在大流量冲刷的条件下，流量对累积侵蚀量的贡献率比流量较小时更加显著；（3）累积侵蚀量与坡度呈正相关的幂函数关系，相关性显著；（4）三维土工网防护边坡的坡面流为紊流，累积侵蚀量与雷诺系数的关系可以表示为：M=0.186Re0.672，相关系数R2=0.9429。
- Abstract:
- Aming to explore the erosion charateristic of 3D geonet protection slope, we quantitatively tested the erosion process and erosion characteristics of 3D geonet protection slope based on laboratory simulation runoff scouring experiments under the different slope gradients (5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, 30°) and the different flow discharges (1 m3/h, 1.5 m3/h, 2 m3/h). The experimental results show that: (1) cumulated erosion increases with the increase of slope gradients and flow discharges, at the same time, the amount of erosion occurring in the first 10 minutes takes up 70% of the total, while the sand content of overland flow fluctuates within 0.01～0.04 g/cm3 at the end of scouring period; (2) the contribution rate of cumulated erosion increases with the increase of slope gradient, while the flow discharge plays a leading role in the process; under the condition of large flow discharge, the flow discharge contribution rate of cumulated erosion is more significant than the small flow discharge; (3) the relation between cumulated erosion and slope gradients significantly follows the power function; (4) the overland flow pattern of 3D geonet protection slope is turbulent flow, and the relationship between cumulated erosion and Reynolds number can be described as: M=0.186Re0.672 (R2=0.9429).
参考文献/References:
[1] Ellison W D. Studies of raindrop erosion[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 1944,25(4):131-136.
[2] Nearing M A, Simanton J R, Norton L D, et al. Soil erosion by surface water flow on a stony, semiarid hillslope[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1999,24(8):677-686.
[3] 胡世雄,靳长兴.坡面流与坡面侵蚀动力过程研究的最新进展[J].地理研究,1998,17(3):326-335.
[4] 雷廷武,张晴雯,赵军,等.细沟侵蚀动力过程输沙能力试验研究[J].土壤学报,2002,39(4):476-482.
[5] 丁文峰,李占斌.坡面细沟侵蚀过程的水动力学特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3):72-75.
[6] 申震洲,姚文艺,李勉,等.不同下垫面对坡面侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(1):6-9.
[7] 蔡强国,王贵平,陈永宗.黄土高原小流域侵蚀产沙过程与模拟[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
[8] 夏卫生,雷廷武,张晴雯,等.冲刷条件下坡面水流速度与产沙关系研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(6):876-880.
[9] 吴长文,陈法扬.坡地土壤侵蚀机理研究进展与现状[J].中国水土保持,1996(11):21-24.
[10] 鲁克新.陡坡薄层水流侵蚀动力过程试验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2001.
[11] 田凯,李小青,申震洲,等.不同床沙下的坡面流水力学特性试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(2):70-73.
[12] 肖衡林,周锦华,刘晓路.边坡生物工程防护方法研究[J].中国水运:学术版,2007,7(5):55-57.
[13] 王广月,韩燕,王杏花.降雨条件下土工格室柔性护坡的稳定性分析[J].岩土力学,2012,33(10):3020-3024.
[14] 刘晓路,高强,肖衡林.基于三维土工网垫的植草护坡技术研究[J].长江科学院院报,2008,25(3):58-61.
[15] 陈人豪,彭泽仁.固土网垫应用研究:铁路边坡铺网垫植草被防护试验[J].天津纺织工学院学报,1999,18(2):21-24.
[16] 耿晓东,郑粉莉,刘力.降雨强度和坡度双因子对紫色土坡面侵蚀产沙的影响[J].泥沙研究,2011(6):48-53.
相似文献/References:
[1]赵海滨,曹京京,姚文艺,等.黄土坡面径流输沙过程试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):90.
ZHAO Hai-bin,CAO Jing-jing,YAO Wen-yi,et al.Experimental Study on Process of Sediment Transport and Overland Flow on the Loess Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):90.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-01-04;改回日期:2016-03-04。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“三维土工网防护边坡坡面流特性及侵蚀动力机制研究”（11372165）
作者简介:王广月(1963-),男,山东菏泽人,教授,主要从事土工合成材料应用及生态边坡坡面侵蚀动力机制研究。E-mail:wgyue@sdu.edu.cn