LI Haifang,SHI Meirong,WANG Jinye,et al.Response of Soil Water Contents in Different Layers to Rainfall Under Phyllostachys pubescens Forest in Mao’ershan Mountain, Guangxi[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):120-123,128.
广西猫儿山毛竹林不同层次土壤含水量的降雨响应
- Title:
- Response of Soil Water Contents in Different Layers to Rainfall Under Phyllostachys pubescens Forest in Mao’ershan Mountain, Guangxi
- 分类号:
- S152.7;S715.3
- 摘要:
- 以漓江上游猫儿山典型森林植被毛竹林（Phyllostachys pubescens）为研究对象，对其0—20，20—50，50—80 cm共3个层次的土壤体积含水量进行了定位监测，分析了各层次土壤含水量的降雨响应。结果表明：（1）3个层次土壤含水量差异显著（p < 0.01），年均值分别为39.49%，41.17%，44.15%，表层0—20 cm土壤含水量最少，20—50 cm增加，50—80 cm最高。降雨与3个层次土壤含水量都呈极显著相关性。（2）从小雨到暴雨，土壤含水量对降雨的响应都可以分为平台期、上升期、峰值期和退水期；各层次土壤含水量对降雨的响应是比较复杂的。（3）在上升期，表层0—20 cm土壤含水量增加最快；退水期，50—80 cm土壤最快，这与前期土壤含水量及降雨强度有关系。该研究为揭示漓江上游森林植被对降水径流的调节作用，客观评估漓江上游水资源潜力，加强流域水资源管理和森林经营提供科学依据。
- Abstract:
- Changes of soil water content in different layers, including 0—20 cm, 20—50 cm and 50—80 cm under Phyllostachys pubescens forest were investigated in Mao’ershan Mountain in upper reaches of Lijiang River. The results showed that: (1) there were significant differences for soil water contents in three layers (p < 0.01) and annual average values were 39.49%, 41.17% and 44.15%, respectively, soil water content in 0—20 cm was the lowest, and increased in other two layers, significant relationships between precipitation and soil water content in three soil layers were also found; (2) soil water content changed synchronously with rainfall and there were always platform stage, rising stage, peak value stage and decreasing stage in the process, response of soil water content to rainfall was comparatively complicated; (3) at the rising stage, soil water content in 0—20 cm layer increased at the fastest rate and soil water in 50—80 cm layer declined quickly at decreasing stage which was related with initial soil water content and intensity of rainfall. This study would provide scientific basis for better understanding of the relationships between forest vegetation and its hydrological effects, helping to facilitate water resources and achieving wise forest management in upper reaches of Lijiang River.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王丽媛,王克勤,李太兴,等.红壤坡耕地烤烟生长季土壤水分动态变化特征[J].中国水土保持,2013(8):57-60.
[2] 汪春林,张金池,庄义琳,等.南京城郊不同植被类型土壤含水量变异规律[J].浙江农林大学学报,2014,31(6):911-918.
[3] 高红贝,邵明安.干旱区降雨过程对土壤水分与温度变化影响研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2011,30(1):40-45.
[4] 吴胡强,邵永昌,庄义琳,等.南京城郊麻栎林坡面土壤体积含水率与侧向流对降雨响应[J].浙江农林大学学报,2014,31(5):683-689.
[5] 段文军,李海防,王金叶,等.漓江上游典型森林植被对降水径流的调节作用[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):663-669.
[6] 李海防,王金叶,刘兴伟,等.广西猫儿山主要林型水源涵养功能研究[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(1):50-53.
[7] 赵明秀,樊亚明,史梅容,等.广西猫儿山典型植被林冠结构比较研究[J].西部林业科学,2015,44(1):125-128.
[8] 鲍彪,毕华兴,云雷,等.晋西黄土区刺槐林地土壤水分对降雨的响应[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(2):84-89.
[9] 倪广艳,赵平,朱丽薇,等.荷木整树蒸腾对干湿季土壤水分的水力响应[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):652-662.
[10] 李谦,郑锦森,朱青,等.太湖流域典型土地利用类型土壤水分对降雨的响应[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):6-11.
相似文献/References:
[1]张锦娟,王冉,陆芳春,等.不同配置模式毛竹林水土流失特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):92.
ZHANG Jinjuan,WANG Ran,LU Fangchun,et al.Characteristics of Soil and Water Loss on Bamboo Forest Lands[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):92.
[2]王意锟,金爱武,方升佐,等.浙西南不同经营强度下毛竹林土壤渗透性研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):41.
WANG Yikun,JIN Aiwu,FANG Shengzuo,et al.Soil Infiltration Characteristics of Phyllostachys edulis Forests with Different Management Intensities in Southwest Zhejiang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):41.
[3]杜 妍,庄家尧,周 勇.苏南丘陵区毛竹林林冠水文特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):308.
DU Yan,ZHUANG Jiayao,ZHOU Yong.Hydrological Characteristics of the Canopy of Phyllostachy edulis Forest in Hilly Areas of Southern Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):308.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2015-10-02;改回日期:2015-11-15。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（41261006，30860058）；广西猫儿山国家级自然保护区漓江源森林群结构与水源涵养监测项目；广西猫儿山国家级自然保护区典型森林生态系统服务功能评估项目
作者简介:李海防(1974-),男,山东莱阳人,博士后,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事景观生态学教学与科研工作。E-mail:373156070@qq.com
通讯作者:王金叶(1965-),男,甘肃民乐人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事森林生态水文和生态旅游研究。E-mail:wangjy66@sohu.com