[1]王红营,郭中领,王仁德,等.河北坝上植被恢复措施对土壤性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):74-79,84.
　WANG Hongying,GUO Zhongling,WANG Rende,et al.Effect of Different Restoration Measures on Soil Properties in Bashang Area, Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):74-79,84.
点击复制

河北坝上植被恢复措施对土壤性质的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 23 期数: 2016年05期 页码: 74-79,84 栏目: 出版日期: 2016-10-28
Title:
Effect of Different Restoration Measures on Soil Properties in Bashang Area, Hebei Province
作者:
王红营1, 郭中领1, 王仁德2, 常春平1, 邱梦如1, 胡国云1
1. 河北师范大学 资源与环境科学学院 河北省环境演变与生态建设省级重点实验室, 石家庄 050024;
2. 河北省科学院 地理科学研究所, 石家庄 050011
Author(s):
WANG Hongying1, GUO Zhongling1, WANG Rende2, CHANG Chunping1, QIU Mengru1, HU Guoyun1
1. Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China;
2. Institute of Geographical Science, Hebei Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
关键词:
河北坝上; 植被恢复; 土壤性质; 采样分析
Keywords:
Bashang area of Hebei Province; vegetation restoration measures; soil properties; sampling analysis
分类号:
S153
摘要:
从土壤理化性质变化的角度探讨了不同植被恢复措施对当地土壤环境的影响。在河北坝上康保县选取了退耕还林还草、草地围栏封育、草地植树造林等15组样地，对每组样地进行了土样采集分析。结果表明：不同植被恢复措施均能不同程度地改善土壤性质。植被恢复区土壤团聚体稳定性增强，土壤孔隙增多，土壤容重减小；过度放牧则使土壤更加紧实；较高覆盖度荒地和草地能减少地表蒸发，使土壤含水量增加，乔木本身需水量大，发达的表层土壤根系会降低土壤水分；较高植被覆盖度能有效减弱土壤风蚀，但乔木林下植被稀疏、地表裸露和灌木林带间距过宽则会加剧风蚀。在不考虑施肥影响的情况下，植被恢复能不同程度增加土壤有机质、全N和全P含量，且对0—10 cm土壤层的增加效果大于10—20 cm土壤层；耕地由于施肥的影响，退耕后的区域土壤全N和全P含量有所下降。研究表明，对于改善土壤环境，退耕还荒草地、草地围栏封育是当地相对较好的植被恢复措施；灌木林地由于是当地物种，应该多加栽培，但需调整结构，也可结合乔木林种植，增大林下植被盖度，增强防风保土效果。
Abstract:
We discussed the effects of different vegetation restoration measures on local soil environment based on the changes of soil physical and chemical properties. We selected 15 sets of sample plots in Kangbao County of Bashang Area, which include the measures of the returning cropland to forest and grassland, enclosing grassland and planting trees on grassland etc. The results from analysis of soil samples show that different vegetation restoration measures can improve soil properties at different degrees. For the restoration plots, the soil aggregates, soil porosity increased while the soil bulk density decreased; overgrazing makes the soil more compact. The abandoned cropland and grassland with higher vegetation coverage could reduce surface evaporation, which can increase soil water content; the root system of the trees inside surface soil would lower the soil moisture because the trees consumed a large amount of water. The higher vegetation coverage could effectively reduce soil erosion by wind, but the sparse vegetation within high trees and the wide gap between the shrub-line would increase the wind erosion. In the absence of fertilization, vegetation restoration could increase the contents of soil organic matter, total N and total P at different degrees, and the effect of the soil layer of 0—10 cm is higher than that of 10—20 cm, the contents of total N and total P in the soil after the conversion of farmland decreased because of excessive fertilization of farmland. The result shows that returning farmland to grassland and enclosing grassland are the better vegetation restoration measures in the local environment; the shrub should be cultivated more because it is the local species, but it should be planted combining with the arbor to increase vegetation coverage in high forest to enhance the windproof efficiency.

参考文献/References:

[1] 黄晓强,赵云杰,信忠保,等.北京山区典型土地利用方式对土壤理化性质及可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):5-10.
[2] 刘世梁,傅伯杰,吕一河,等.坡面土地利用方式与景观位置对土壤质量的影响[J].生态学报,2003,23(3):414-420.
[3] Zucca C, Canu A, Previtali F. Soil degradation by land use change in an agropastoral area in Sardinia(Italy)[J]. Catena, 2010,83(1):46-54.
[4] 刘春利,邵明安.黄土高原六道沟流域不同土地利用方式下土壤水力特性及其对土壤水分的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(11):2400-2407.
[5] 袁金国,王卫,龙丽民.河北坝上生态脆弱区的土地退化及生态重建[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(2):139-143.
[6] 王仁德,常春平,彭帅,等.基于粒度对比法的坝上农田风蚀与粉尘释放量估算[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(21):108-114.
[7] 李玄姝,常春平,王仁德.河北坝上土地利用方式对农田土壤风蚀的影响[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(1):23-28.
[8] 胡云锋,刘纪远,庄大方,等.不同土地利用/土地覆盖下土壤粒径分布的分维特征[J].土壤学报,2005,42(2):336-339.
[9] Wu Q, Borkovec M, Sticher H. On particle-size distributions in soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1993,57(4):883-890.
[10] Rieu M, Sposito G. Fractal fragmentation, soil porosity, and soil water properties:Ⅱ. Applications[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1991,55(5):1239-1244.
[11] Perfect E, Kay B D. Applications of fractals in soil and tillage research:a review[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 1995,36(1):1-20.
[12] 杨培岭,罗远培,石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报,1993,38(20):1896-1899.
[13] 苏永中,赵哈林.科尔沁沙地农田沙漠化演变中土壤颗粒分形特征[J].生态学报,2004,24(1):71-74.
[14] 张晓霞,李占斌,李鹏,等.土地利用对陕北水土流失区土壤有机碳、水分的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(3):131-134.
[15] 王莉,张强,牛西午,等.黄土高原丘陵区不同土地利用方式对土壤理化性质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(4):53-56.
[16] 杨珊,何寻阳,苏以荣,等.岩性和土地利用方式对桂西北喀斯特土壤肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(6):1596-1602.
[17] 杨智杰,崔纪超,谢锦升,等.中亚热带山区土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响[J].地理科学,2010,30(3):475-480.
[18] 李新宇,唐海萍,赵云龙,等.怀来盆地不同土地利用方式对土壤质量的影响分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,18(6):103-107.
[19] 常庆瑞,安韶山.黄土高原恢复植被防止土地退化效益研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(4):6-9.
[20] 彭文英,张科利,陈瑶,等.黄土坡耕地退耕还林后土壤性质变化研究[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(2):272-278.
[21] 李品荣,孟广涛,李国昌.不同土地利用方式下土壤地力变化和水土流失状况研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):95-99.
[22] 赵锦梅,张德罡,刘长仲,等.祁连山东段高寒地区土地利用方式对土壤性状的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(2):548-556.

相似文献/References:

[1]李晶,高照良,张小娟,等.宝牛高速公路路域植被恢复效果调查分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):100.
　LI Jing,GAO Zhao-liang,ZHANG Xiao-juan,et al.Investigation and Assessment on Vegetation Restoration along the Baoniu Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):100.
[2]查轩,唐克丽,白红英.植被恢复对土壤抗侵蚀特性影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):37.
　Zha Xuan,Tang Keli,Bai Hongying.The Effect of Vegetation Restoration on Properties of Soil Resistance in Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(05):37.
[3]郑粉莉,张科利,唐克丽,等.植被破坏与恢复对坡面浅沟侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):54.
　Zheng Fenli,Zhang Keli,Tang Keli,et al.Impact of Vegetation Destruction and Restoration on Shallow Gully Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(05):54.
[4]郭晓敏,牛德奎,刘苑秋,等.江西省红壤侵蚀劣地植被恢复技术及综合治理效果研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(02):108.
　Guo Xiaomin,Niu Dekui,Liu Yuanqiu,et al.Restoring Technique of Vegetation on Eroded Red Soil in Jiangxi and Benefits From Its Comprehensive Harnessing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(05):108.
[5]吕态能.东川严重水土流失区植被恢复对策[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):134.
　LU Tai-neng.Countermeasures for Vegetation Recovery in Dongchuan Region with Serious Soil Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(05):134.
[6]刘震.利用生态的自我修复能力防治水土流失[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):13.
　LIU Zhen.To Prevent and Harness Soil and Water Loss Using the Self-recovering Capability of Ecosystem[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(05):13.
[7]王改玲,白中科.安太堡露天煤矿排土场植被恢复的主要限制因子及对策[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):38.
　WANG Gai-ling,BAI Zhong-ke.Main Limiting Factors for Re-vegetation and Measures of Dumping Site in Antaibao Opencast Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(05):38.
[8]冯学赞,张万军,曹建生,等.接坝地区沙地植被恢复与重建技术研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):73.
　FENG Xue-zan,ZHANG Wan-jun,CAO Jian-sheng,et al.Studies on the Technology of Restoration and Reconstruction of Vegetation in Sandlot Near Altiplano Bashang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(05):73.
[9]梁杰明,林建平,陈海平,等.珠海建设迹地岩土坡植被恢复的生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):175.
　LIANG Jie-ming,LIN Jian-ping,CHEN Hai-ping,et al.Study on Ecological Effect by Revegetation on Rock/Soil Slope Left by Project Construction in Zhuhai[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(05):175.
[10]陈浩,蔡强国,周金星,等.黄河中游侵蚀产沙环境要素临界与交互作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):54.
　CHEN Hao,CAI Qiang-guo,ZHOU Jin-xing,et al.Research Progress of Interactive Influence and Thresholds of Geographic Environmental Elements on Sediment Yield of Drainage Basins in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(05):54.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2015-09-16;改回日期:2015-11-11。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目（41330746）；河北省科技厅软科学基地重点项目（13454213D）
作者简介:王红营(1988-),女,河南卫辉人,在读硕士,研究方向为灾害防治与水土保持。E-mail:why1988hi@163.com
通讯作者:常春平(1969-),男,河北康保人,教授,硕士生导师,博士,主要从事水土保持、环境评价研究。E-mail:changchunping@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01