ZHANG Fengying,DU Zhizhi,HE Jiawei,et al.Effects of Eupatorium adenophorumii Litter Aqueous Extract on Its Seed Germination and Seedling Growth[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):291-296,303.
紫茎泽兰凋落物提取液对自身种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Eupatorium adenophorumii Litter Aqueous Extract on Its Seed Germination and Seedling Growth
- 分类号:
- Q793
- 摘要:
- 采用恒温培养法研究了不同浓度紫茎泽兰凋落物提取液对其种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响。结果表明：紫茎泽兰凋落物提取液对自身种子萌发与幼苗生长起到一定程度的抑制作用，并且浓度越高抑制作用越强；当提取液浓度低于0.05 g/ml时，种子萌发和幼苗生长过程中各指标与对照均无显著差异（p > 0.05）；提取液浓度高于0.05 g/ml时，种子发芽率、发芽势、发芽指数、胚根长、幼苗鲜重和干重随提取液浓度的增加急剧降低（p < 0.05），并且紫茎泽兰凋落物提取液延长了种子发芽时间，而对幼苗鲜重和干重影响不显著（p > 0.05）；高浓度（0.30 g/ml）紫茎泽兰凋落物提取液致使种子失活。统计相关检验表明，紫茎泽兰叶片丙二醛（MDA）含量、细胞膜透性均与提取液浓度呈显著的线性正相关（p < 0.001），叶绿素含量、根系活力（TTC）、保护性酶（POD，SOD，CAT）和非保护性酶（PPO，PAL）活性均与提取液浓度呈显著的线性负相关（p < 0.001）。综合以上结果表明紫茎泽兰凋落物提取液对其种子萌发和幼苗生长存在一定程度的自毒作用。
- Abstract:
- Seed germination and seedling growth of Eupatorium adenophorumii were measured under treatments of its litter aqueous extracts with the concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.30 gDW/ml under incubation. The results showed that the indexes of seed germination and seedling growth were significantly inhibited by the higher concentration of Eupatorium adenophorumii litter aqueous extract. When the concentration of aqueous extract was 0.05 g/ml, the indexes of seed germination and seedling growth was no significant difference with CK (p > 0.05). Seed germination rate, germination potential, germination index, radicle length, seedling fresh weight and dry weight were sharply reduced with the increase of the aqueous extract concentration (p < 0.05). At the same time, the seed germination time was delayed when the concentration of aqueous extract was higher than 0.05 g/ml, but the increase of seedling dry weight were not affected under the same concentration. The higher Eupatorium adenophorumii litter aqueous extract (0.30 g/ml) led to the seed deactivation. Correlation analysis showed that contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) and membrane permeability were a significant linear positive correlation with aqueous extract concentration (p < 0.001), respectively. The content of chlorophyll, root activity (TTC), protective enzyme (POD, SOD, CAT) and the activity of protective enzyme (PPO, PAL) had the significant linear negative correlation with aqueous extract concentration (p < 0.001). Comprehensive analysis indicated that the aqueous extracts from the litter of Eupatorium adenophorumii had autotoxicity on its seed germination and seedling growth.
参考文献/References:
[1] Villa P, Mousivand A, Bresciani M. Aquatic vegetation indices assessment through radiative transfer modeling and linear mixture simulation[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2014,30(9):113-127.
[2] Shamal S A M, Weatherhead K. Assessing spectral similarities between rainfed and irrigated croplands in a humid environment for irrigated land mapping[J]. Outlook on Agriculture,2014,43(2):109-114.
[3] 马明国,王建,王雪梅.基于遥感的植被年际变化及其与气候关系研究进展[J].遥感学报,2006,10(3):421-431.
[4] 马明国,宋怡,王旭峰,等.AVHRR,VEGETATION和MODIS时间系列遥感数据产品现状与应用研究进展[J].遥感技术与应用,2012,27(5):663-670.
[5] 刘睿,孙九林,张金区,等.中国北方草地覆被的HJ星NDVI校正研究[J].草业学报,2011,20(1):189-198.
[6] 祁建春,李洪建,李莘莘,等.HJ-1-CCD与MODIS数据的NDVI比较分析[J].遥感信息,2013,28(3):44-49.
[7] 徐涵秋,张铁军.ASTER与Landsat ETM+植被指数的交互比较[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2011,31(7):1902-1907.
[8] 李丽,顾行发,叶泽田,等.不同卫星载荷探测NDVI性能差异分析及变换参数确定[J].中国科学:地球科学,2012,42(2):238-245.
[9] Steven M D, Malthus T J, Xu H, et al. Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2003,88(4):412-422.
[10] 刘良明,梁益同,马慧云,等. MODIS和AVHRR植被指数关系的研究[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2004,29(4):307-310.
[11] Van Leeuwen W J D, Orr B J, Marsh S E, et al. Multi-sensor NDVI data continuity:Uncertainties and implications for vegetation monitoring applications[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2006,100(1):67-81.
[12] 陈拉,黄敬峰,王秀珍.不同传感器的模拟植被指数对水稻叶面积指数的估测精度和敏感性分析[J].遥感学报,2008,12(1):143-151.
[13] Kevin G, Lei J, Brad R, et al. Multi-platform comparisons of MODIS and AVHRR normalized difference vegetation index data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2005,99(3):221-231.
[14] 张宏斌,杨桂霞,李刚,等.基于MODIS NDVI和NOAA NDVI数据的空间尺度转换方法研究:以内蒙古草原区为例[J].草业科学,2009,26(10):39-45.
[15] 张戈丽,徐兴良,周才平,等.近30年来呼伦贝尔地区草地植被变化对气候变化的响应[J].地理学报,2011,66(1):47-58.
[16] 严晓瑜,董文杰,何勇.不同传感器数据在若尔盖湿地植被变化监测应用中的适宜性分析[J].遥感技术与应用,2008,23(3):300-304.
[17] 韩佶兴,王宗明,毛德华,等.1982-2010年松花江流域植被动态变化及其与气候因子的相关分析[J].中国农业气象,2011,32(3):430-436.
[18] 胡云锋,徐芝英,刘越,等.地理空间数据的尺度转换[J].地球科学进展,2013,28(3):297-304.
[19] 孙小芳.植被光谱及其尺度转换研究进展[J].遥感信息,2014,29(1):108-114.
[20] 张周威,余涛,孟庆岩,等.空间重采样方法对遥感影像信息影响研究[J].华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2013,47(3):426-430.
[21] 周觅,张杰林.遥感影像尺度转换及最优尺度选择探讨[J].世界核地质科学,2011,28(2):94-98.
[22] 栾海军,田庆久,余涛,等.基于分形理论的NDVI连续空间尺度转换模型研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2013,33(7):1857-1862.
[23] 胡云锋,徐芝英,刘越,等.空间尺度上推方法的精度评价:以内蒙古锡林郭勒盟土地利用数据为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(11):1961-1972.
[24] 王文丽,董治宝,胡光印,等.若尔盖高原近30年沙地变化趋势分析[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(4):617-621.
[25] 邓茂林,田昆,杨永兴,等.高原湿地若尔盖国家级自然保护区景观变化及其驱动力[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(1):58-62.
相似文献/References:
[1]郭宗锋,邓卿艳,魏琴,等.洪水对紫茎泽兰入侵繁殖的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):371.
GUO Zong-feng,DENG Qing-yan,WEI Qin,et al.Impact of Flood on Invasion of Eupatorium adenophorum[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(03):371.
[2]崔鸿侠,张卓文,李振芳.巴东县不同森林类型林下灌草和凋落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):203.
CUI Hong-xia,ZHANG Zhuo-wen,LI Zhen-fang.Studies on the Shrub, Herbage and Litter Hydrological Effect Under Different Forest Type in Badong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(03):203.
[3]刘骄,黄义雄,叶功富,等.福建沿海主要防护林树种的生物量、凋落物及其对林下土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):146.
LIU Jiao,HUANG Yi-xiong,YE Gong-fu,et al.Research on Biomass and Undergrowth Soil Nutrient of Main Tree Species for Shelterbelt along Fujian Coastal Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):146.
[4]赵晓春,刘建军,任军辉,等.贺兰山4种典型森林类型凋落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):107.
ZHAO Xiao-chun,LIU Jian-jun,REN Jun-hui,et al.Study on Water-holding Capacity of Litter in Four Forest Types of Helan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):107.
[5]马瑞,马维伟,李广,等.尕海湿地不同植被退化阶段凋落物分解及其有机碳动态[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):29.
MA Rui,MA Weiwei,LI Guang,et al.Litter Decomposition and Dynamics of Organic Carbon in Degraded Vegetation of Gahai Wetland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):29.
[6]谢育利,陈云明,唐亚坤,等.地表凋落物对油松、沙棘人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):52.
XIE Yuli,CHEN Yunming,TANG Yakun,et al.Impact of Aboveground Litterfall on Soil Respiration in the Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides Plantations[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):52.
[7]何琴飞,郑威,彭玉华,等.珠江流域中游主要森林类型凋落物持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):128.
HE Qinfei,ZHENG Wei,PENG Yuhua,et al.Water-holding Characteristics of Litter Under Main Forest Types in the Middle Reaches of Pearl River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):128.
[8]王冬,杨政,郝红敏,等.黄土区退耕草地凋落物-土壤界面水分过程特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):80.
WANG Dong,YANG Zheng,HAO Hongmin,et al.Hydrological Processes of Litter-Soil Interfacial Systems in Restoration Grasslands of the Loess Plateau，China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):80.
[9]陈进,徐明,邹晓,等.贵阳市不同林龄马尾松林凋落物储量及持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(06):146.
CHEN Jin,XU Ming,ZOU Xiao,et al.Litter layer Reserve and Water Holding Capacity of Pinus massoniana in Different Successional Stages in Guiyang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):146.
[10]蒲嘉霖,刘亮.亚热带森林凋落物分解特征及水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):165.
PU Jialin,LIU Liang.Hydrology Functions and Decomposition Characteristics of Litter in Subtropical Forest[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(03):165.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2015-12-04;改回日期:2015-12-23。
作者简介:张凤英(1971-),女,云南昆明人,讲师,主要从事植物学、植物生长与环境、树木学、植物生理学等课程的教学与研究。E-mail:ZHANGfy1971@126.com