[1]温晓君,陈辉,白军红.基于模糊矩阵的衡水湖水环境质量评价及分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):292-296.
　WEN Xiaojun,CHEN Hui,BAI Junhong.Evaluation and Analysis on Water Environmental Quality of Hengshui Lake Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):292-296.
点击复制

基于模糊矩阵的衡水湖水环境质量评价及分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 23 期数: 2016年02期 页码: 292-296 栏目: 出版日期: 2016-04-28
Title:
Evaluation and Analysis on Water Environmental Quality of Hengshui Lake Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method
作者:
温晓君1, 陈辉2, 白军红1
1. 北京师范大学 环境学院, 水环境模拟国家重点实验室, 北京 100875;
2. 河北师范大学 资源与环境科学学院, 河北省环境演变与生态建设实验室, 石家庄 050024
Author(s):
WEN Xiaojun1, CHEN Hui2, BAI Junhong1
1. State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
关键词:
环境科学; 水质评价; 模糊矩阵; 主要贡献污染物; 衡水湖
Keywords:
environmental science; Hengshui Lake; water environmental quality; fuzzy matrix; major contribution of pollutant
分类号:
X822;S181.3
摘要:
运用模糊综合评价法评价了衡水湖三个主要监测站点（洼内、小库和冀县）在2000—2007年水环境质量的变化过程。研究结果表明2001—2005年衡水湖整体水环境质量没有得到明显的改善，2006年后，衡水湖洼内和冀县监测站点水环境质量有了改善，基本满足Ⅲ类用水标准。三个监测站点的主要贡献污染物也有所差异。2006年洼内监测站点水环境主要贡献污染物为氨氮，贡献率为0.621。其余年份均为高锰酸盐指数，2000—2005年及2007年贡献率为0.5左右。小库监测站点水环境的主要贡献污染物2003年，2004年，2005年，2007年均为总磷。2000年，2001年，2002年，2006年为氨氮且2000年和2006年贡献率分别达到0.58，0.838。冀县监测站点水环境主要贡献污染物2000年，2001年，2002年，2006年为氨氮，但2001年，2002年贡献率不到0.4，相较于2000年和2006年较低。2003年为总磷，贡献率为0.38。2004，2005，2007为高锰酸盐指数，贡献率分别为0.61，0.50，0.38。并在水环境质量分析的基础上剖析了衡水湖水环境污染的原因，给出衡水湖今后保护和管理的建议。
Abstract:
The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was applied to evaluate the water environmental quality of three main monitoring sites (i.e., Wanei, Xiaoku and Jixian) of Hengshui Lake during the period from 2000 to 2007. The results showed that water environment quality of Hengshui Lake had not been improved during the period from 2001 to 2005, however, water environment quality of both Wanei and Jixian monitoring sites had been improved after 2006, and basically met class Ⅲ criteria of water quality. The main contribution ratios of these pollutants at three monitoring sites also differed each other. As for Wanei site, the major pollutant in 2006 was ammonia nitrogen with a contribution rate of 0.621 and permanganate index was the major pollutant in the rest years. From 2000 to 2005, the contribution rates were 0.52, 0.48, 0.44, 0.46, 0.66, and 0.70, respectively and it was 0.45 in 2007. At Xiaoku site, the major pollutant in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2007 was total phosphorus, the respective contribution rate was 0.56,0.46,0.38, and 0.42, respectively, however, the major pollutant was ammonia nitrogen in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2006, the respective contribution rates were 0.58 (2000), 0.36 (2001), 0.43 (2002), and 0.838 (2006), respectively. In contrast, the major pollutant at Jixian site was ammonia nitrogen with the contribution rates of 0.60 (2000),0.38 (2001),0.39(2002), and 0.583(2006) and it was total phosphorus with contribution rate of 0.38 in 2003, whereas it was permanganate index in 2004, 2005 and 2007 with the respective contribution rate of 0.61,0.50, and 0.38, respectively. On the basis of water environmental quality analysis, the reasons for the water environment pollution of Hengshui Lake were analyzed and some suggestions for the ecological conservation and water quality management of this lake were also put forward.

参考文献/References:

[1] Kallio K, Koponen S, Yl?stalo P, et al. Validation of MERIS spectral inversion processors using reflectance, IOP and water quality measurements in boreal lakes[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015,157:147-157.
[2] 张燕萍,黄江峰,余智杰,等.基于模糊综合评价法的太泊湖水环境质量评价[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(25):8733-8735.
[3] 王维,纪枚,苏亚楠.水质评价研究进展及水质评价方法综述[J].科技情报开发与经济,2012,22(13):129-131.
[4] 毛飞剑,何义亮,徐智敏,等.基于单因子水质标识指数法的东江河源段水质评价[J].安全与环境学报,2014(5):327-331.
[5] 徐彬,林灿尧,毛新伟.内梅罗水污染指数法在太湖水质评价中的适用性分析[J].水资源保护,2014,30(2):38-40.
[6] 张永祥,蔡德所,黄展案.改进的AHP法在南宁内河水质评价中的应用[J].广西水利水电,2012(3):11-13.
[7] Do?a C, Chang N B, Caselles V, et al. Integrated satellite data fusion and mining for monitoring lake water quality status of the Albufera de Valencia in Spain[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2015,151:416-426.
[8] 江春波,张明武,杨晓蕾.华北衡水湖湿地的水质评价[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2010(6):848-851.
[9] 李艳利,李艳粉,徐宗学.浑太河流域水环境质量综合分析与评价[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):173-178.
[10] 官冬杰,苏印,何政春.基于模糊数学模型的城市生态系统健康动态变化评价[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):150-156.
[11] 张彦增,尹俊岭,崔希东,等.衡水湖湿地恢复与生态功能[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2010.
[12] 江春波,张明武,杨晓蕾.南水北调工程对衡水湖水环境的影响预测[J].水力发电,2010,36(8):19-21.
[13] 张学知.衡水湖水面蒸发量计算[J].水科学与工程技术,2014(2):20-23.
[14] 李亚楠,孙宝盛,张燕.海河流域水质评价与预测[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(2):177-181.
[15] 国家环境保护总局.地表水环境质量标准[S].GB3838-2002.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[16] Gu K, Liu J, Wang Y. Relationship between economic growth and water environmental quality of Anshan city in Northeast China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2009,19(1):17-24.
[17] Zhao H, You B, Duan X, et al. Industrial and agricultural effects on water environment and its optimization in heavily polluted area in Taihu Lake Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2013,23(2):203-215.
[18] 翟玉荣.衡水湖污染现状及防治对策[J].衡水学院学报,2010,12(1):69-71.
[19] 刘振杰.河北衡水湖湿地水环境分析及综合防治对策[D].北京:中国农业大学,2004.
[20] 康立新,戴乙,郭林.海河流域水生态综合治理浅谈[J].海河水利,2014(5):18-20.
[21] 周林飞,钟倩,董福君.石佛寺人工湿地水体富营养化评价与分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):299-304.

相似文献/References:

[1]周林飞,赵崭,孙佳竹,等.基于模糊模式识别的浑河水质评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):163.
　ZHOU Lin-fei,ZHAO Zhan,SUN Jia-zhu,et al.Assessment on Water Quality of Hun River Based on Fuzzy Pattern Recognition[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):163.
[2]王百群,张卫,邢大韦.神府─东胜煤田大柳塔矿区水质及其污染评价[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(04):100.
　Wang Baiqun,Zhang Wei,Xing Dawei.An Assessment for Water Quality of Daliuta Coal Mine Zone in the Shenfu-Dongsheng Coal Field[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(02):100.
[3]南忠仁,杨苏才,徐文青,等.黄河白银段水污染成因分析及防治对策[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(06):123.
　NAN Zhong-ren,YANG Su-cai,XU Wen-qing,et al.Analysis of the Cause of Water Pollution and Its Control Strategies in Baiyin Reach of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):123.
[4]杨威,卢文喜,李平.因子分析法在伊通河水质评价中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(01):113.
　YANG Wei,LU Wen-xi,LI Ping.Application of Factor Analysis Method to the Water Quality Evaluation of Yitong River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):113.
[5]付金沐,刘敏,史志刚,等.涡河干流水污染时空分布特征与水质动态评价[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(04):82.
　FU Jin-mu,LIU Min,SHI Zhi-gang,et al.Temporal-spatial Distribution Characteristics of Water Contamination and Dynamic Evaluation for Water Quality in the Guohe River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):82.
[6]成庆利,朱铁群.丹江口水库库区水环境质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):202.
　CHENG Qing-li,ZHU Tie-qun.Water Environmental Assessment for the Danjiangkou Reservoir[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):202.
[7]刘登峰,齐实,韩小杰,等.缙云山不同土地利用类型地表径流水质评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):126.
　LIU Deng-feng,QI Shi,HAN Xiao-jie,et al.Surface Runoff Quality Evaluation of Several Land Uses in Jinyun Moutain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):126.
[8]侯淑艳,曲晓晶,刘建新,等.基于综合评价法的天津市主要排污河流水质评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):61.
　HOU Shu-yan,QU Xiao-jing,LIU Jian-xin,et al.Water Quality Evaluation of Tianjin Main Blowdown River Based on Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):61.
[9]李静,朱永明,张慧,等.北戴河新区景观生态安全格局源地动态识别[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):340.
　LI Jing,ZHU Yongming,ZHANG Hui,et al.Dynamic Recognition of Source Area of Landscape Ecological Security Pattern in Beidaihe New District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):340.
[10]李静,张莹莹,朱永明.基于景观安全格局的北戴河新区生物多样性保护研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):305.
　LI Jing,ZHANG Yingying,ZHU Yongming.Research on Biodiversity Conservation of Beidaihe New District Based on Landscape Security Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):305.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2015-03-16;改回日期:2015-04-16。
基金项目:霍英东项目基金，国家重点基础研究973计划课题（2010CB951002）
作者简介:温晓君(1992-),女,河北省衡水市人,硕士,研究方向:湿地生态过程。E-mail:wxjun0405@163.com
通讯作者:白军红(1976-),男,河北省石家庄市人,教授,博士,研究方向:湿地生态过程。E-mail:junhongbai@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01