[1]彭东海,侯晓龙,何宗明,等.金尾矿废弃地不同植被恢复模式群落特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):50-55.
　PENG Donghai,HOU Xiaolong,HE Zongming,et al.Community Characteristics of Different Vegetation Restoration Models in Gold Tailing Wasteland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):50-55.
点击复制

金尾矿废弃地不同植被恢复模式群落特征

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 23 期数: 2016年01期 页码: 50-55 栏目: 出版日期: 2016-02-28
Title:
Community Characteristics of Different Vegetation Restoration Models in Gold Tailing Wasteland
作者:
彭东海1, 侯晓龙1, 何宗明1, 刘露奇1, 蔡丽平1, 林静雯1, 江瑞荣2, 黄福才3, 钟均华3
1. 福建农林大学 林学院, 福州 350002;
2. 福建省林业科技试验中心, 福建 南靖 363600;
3. 紫金矿业集团股份有限公司, 福建 上杭 364200
Author(s):
PENG Donghai1, HOU Xiaolong1, HE Zongming1, LIU Luqi1, CAI Liping1, LIN Jingwen1, JIANG Ruirong2, HUANG Fucai3, ZHONG Junhua3
1. College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2. Experiment Centre of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, Nanjing, Fujian 363600, China;
3. Zijin Mining Group Company Limited, Shanghang, Fujian 364200, China
关键词:
紫金山; 植被恢复; 群落特征; 物种多样性
Keywords:
Zijinshan; vegetation restoration; community characteristics; species diversity
分类号:
X171.4
摘要:
为探讨矿山废弃地不同植被恢复模式的植被特征和物种多样性，以福建紫金山金矿废弃地为研究对象，对6种不同植被恢复模式群落的结构特征和数量组成进行样方调查，统计分析了不同植被恢复模式群落的物种组成、重要值和物种多样性，并与未被破坏的自然植物群落进行了比较分析。结果表明：人工植被恢复群落的丰富度指数、多样性指数和优势度指数呈现出相同的变化趋势。植被恢复9 a后，人工植被恢复群落物种组成仍以草本植物为主，五节芒、藿香蓟、艾草、三叶鬼针草和柳叶箬对废弃地有较强的适应能力，可作为乔、灌、草相结合治理模式的配置草种。不同植被恢复模式的群落特征和物种多样性存在差异，马尾松—枫香—本地河滩草模式物种多样性较高，植被恢复效果较好，其次为马尾松—邓恩桉—本地河滩草模式，马尾松—樟树—胡枝子—本地河滩草模式的植被恢复效果不明显。
Abstract:
Plant selection of re-vegetation is important in the mining wasteland. Different restoration patterns were studied to understand the characteristics of vegetation community at Zijinshan gold mine in Fujian Province, China. The community structure, species composition and diversity under different 6 vegetation types (Pinus massoniana—Lespedeza bicolor—local flood turf, P. massoniana—Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis—local flood turf, P. massoniana-Cinnamomum camphora-Lespedeza bicolor—local flood turf, P. massoniana-Vetiveria zizanioides—local flood turf, P. massoniana-Eucalyptus dunnii—local flood turf, P. massoniana-Liquidambar formosana—local flood turf) recovered since 2005 on slag wasteland were investigated in comparison with the undisturbed sites. The results showed that herbaceous plant is the dominant life forms in 6 different vegetation communities. Miscanthus floridulus, Ageratum conyzoides, Artemisia argyi, Bidens pilosa and Isachne globosa can serve as pioneer species during vegetation at preliminary succession. P. massoniana—Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis—local flood turf and P. massoniana—Eucalyptus dunnii—local flood turf species diversity were higher, the effect of vegetation restoration was better.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨修,高林.德兴铜矿矿山废弃地植被恢复与重建研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1932-1940.
[2] 王柏莉,仇昕昕,仇旭,等.我国石灰石矿山开采生态环境问题及环保对策建议[J].工程勘察,2011(4):48-51.
[3] 魏远,顾红波,薛亮,等.矿山废弃地土地复垦与生态恢复研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(2):107-114.
[4] Davies K W, Bates J D, Miller R F. Vegetation characteristics across part of the Wyoming big sagebrush alliance[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2006,59(6):567-575.
[5] 韩煜,赵延宁,陈琳,等.坡面植被恢复试验示范区植被群落特征初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):188-194.
[6] 王英宇,宋桂龙,韩烈保,等.京承高速公路岩石边坡植被重建3年期群落特征分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2013,35(4):74-80.
[7] 张笑培,杨改河,王和洲,等.黄土沟壑区不同植被恢复群落特征及多样性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(2):22-25.
[8] 罗双,孙海龙,刘冲,等.四川道路边坡自然恢复的植被多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):51-56,61.
[9] 徐远杰,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.伊犁河谷山地植物群落物种多样性分布格局及环境解释[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(10):1142-1154.
[10] 中华人民共和国林业行业标准.森林土壤分析方法[S].北京:国家林业局,1999.
[11] 康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(10):2479-2486.
[12] 余海龙,顾卫,江源,等.半干旱区高速公路边坡不同年代人工植被群落特征及其土壤特性研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(6):22-25.
[13] 张健,刘国彬.黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复模式对沟谷地植物群落生物量和物种多样性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(2):207-217.
[14] Cain M D, Shelton M G. Secondary forest succession following reproduction cutting on the upper coastal plain of southeastern Arkansas, USA[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2001,146(1/3):223-238.
[15] 王永健,陶建平,张炜银,等.茂县土地岭植被恢复过程中物种多样性动态特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1028-1036.
[16] Bradshaw A. Restoration of mined lands-using natural processes[J]. Ecological Engineering,1997,8(4):255-269.
[17] Sebastia M T, Casals P, Vojnikovi’c S, et al. Plant diversity and soil properties in pristine and managed stands from Bosnian mixed forests[J]. Forestry,2005,78(3):297-303.

相似文献/References:

[1]李晶,高照良,张小娟,等.宝牛高速公路路域植被恢复效果调查分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):100.
　LI Jing,GAO Zhao-liang,ZHANG Xiao-juan,et al.Investigation and Assessment on Vegetation Restoration along the Baoniu Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):100.
[2]查轩,唐克丽,白红英.植被恢复对土壤抗侵蚀特性影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):37.
　Zha Xuan,Tang Keli,Bai Hongying.The Effect of Vegetation Restoration on Properties of Soil Resistance in Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(01):37.
[3]郑粉莉,张科利,唐克丽,等.植被破坏与恢复对坡面浅沟侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):54.
　Zheng Fenli,Zhang Keli,Tang Keli,et al.Impact of Vegetation Destruction and Restoration on Shallow Gully Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(01):54.
[4]郭晓敏,牛德奎,刘苑秋,等.江西省红壤侵蚀劣地植被恢复技术及综合治理效果研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(02):108.
　Guo Xiaomin,Niu Dekui,Liu Yuanqiu,et al.Restoring Technique of Vegetation on Eroded Red Soil in Jiangxi and Benefits From Its Comprehensive Harnessing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(01):108.
[5]王改玲,白中科.安太堡露天煤矿排土场植被恢复的主要限制因子及对策[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):38.
　WANG Gai-ling,BAI Zhong-ke.Main Limiting Factors for Re-vegetation and Measures of Dumping Site in Antaibao Opencast Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(01):38.
[6]梁杰明,林建平,陈海平,等.珠海建设迹地岩土坡植被恢复的生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):175.
　LIANG Jie-ming,LIN Jian-ping,CHEN Hai-ping,et al.Study on Ecological Effect by Revegetation on Rock/Soil Slope Left by Project Construction in Zhuhai[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):175.
[7]陈浩,蔡强国,周金星,等.黄河中游侵蚀产沙环境要素临界与交互作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):54.
　CHEN Hao,CAI Qiang-guo,ZHOU Jin-xing,et al.Research Progress of Interactive Influence and Thresholds of Geographic Environmental Elements on Sediment Yield of Drainage Basins in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):54.
[8]马祥华,焦菊英.黄土高原植被恢复与土壤环境相互作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):157.
　MA Xiang-hua,JIAO Ju-ying.Research Progresses in Interaction Between Vegetation Restoration and Soil Environment in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):157.
[9]马祥华,焦菊英,温仲明,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植被恢复中土壤物理特性变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):17.
　MA Xiang-hua,JIAO Ju-ying,WEN Zhong-ming,et al.The Changes of Soil Physical Properties in Abandoned Lands During Vegetation Restoration in Hilly and Gully Regions on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):17.
[10]安韶山,黄懿梅,刘梦云,等.宁南宽谷丘陵区植被恢复中土壤酶活性的响应及其评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):31.
　AN Shao-shan,HUANG Yi-mei,LIU Meng-yun,et al.The Responses and Evaluation of Soil Enzymatic Activities to Plant Rehabilitation in Ningxia Loess Hilly-gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):31.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2015-06-15;改回日期:2015-06-23。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（41401364）；国家林业局林业公益性行业科研项目（201304303）；农业高校产学合作科技重大项目（2013N5002）；福建农林大学林学院院青年资助项目（6112C039J）
作者简介:彭东海(1988-),男,河南信阳人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:土地复垦及生态修复。E-mail:pdddonghai@163.com
通讯作者:侯晓龙(1981-),男,山西永济人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向:土壤侵蚀及生态修复。E-mail:lxyhxl@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01