SUN Hua,ZHAO Xuefeng,HE Maoping.Analysis of Ecological Benefits of Side Slope Protection by Typical Vegetation Along the Highway in Southwest Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):6-11.
西南地区几种典型边坡植被的护坡效益分析
- Title:
- Analysis of Ecological Benefits of Side Slope Protection by Typical Vegetation Along the Highway in Southwest Areas
- 分类号:
- S157.2
- 摘要:
- 植被对边坡防护有着非常重要的作用，但其防护效果易受配置模式及建植年限的影响。以西南地区5种典型边坡植被配置模式为对象，比较了不同配置模式的护坡性能及建植年限等因素所致的年际间差异。坡上设景观过渡带（株行距分别为0.5 m×0.5 m，0.05 m×0.1 m的小乔木、地被植物），坡下为不同配置的坡面防护带（喷播密度为10 g/m2的灌木、草本植物）：M1为慈竹—野牛草，M2为小冠花—紫羊茅，M3为苜蓿—狗牙根，M4为小冠花—黑麦草，M5为黄荆—狗尾草。测定了成渝高速永川段2012—2014年各植被配置模式在自然降雨条件下的产流、产沙特征。结果表明：（1）建坪初期，狗尾草所在群落（M5）生长快、成坪早，在2012年汛期即呈现较强的护坡性能：蓄水、保土能力分别达到59.14%，96.22%，产流量、产沙量（61.2 mm，52.0 g/m2）也明显低于其他小区（p < 0.05）；狗牙根、黑麦草等多年生草本所在群落成坪迟、生长慢，护坡性能普遍较差。（2）2013年汛期，M1—M4的护坡性能较2012年明显提高，以M3，M4最为显著。（3）2014年汛期，具有发达根系的狗牙根所在群落护坡性能最强：蓄水、保土能力分别达到80.03%，98.49%；M5的护坡性能最差，其产流量、产沙量（62.1 mm，150.33 g/m2）也明显高于其他观测区。相同降雨条件下，边坡植被的护坡性能与群落结构有关，即建坪初期与地上生物量大小正相关，之后与根系重量正相关。
- Abstract:
- Using localization shrubs to reconstruct plant communities plays a very important role in superhighway side slope ecological protection, but its protection effect is easily affected by the configuration mode and reconstructing years. In this case, five typical vegetation modes composed by landscape transitional zone (ornamental arbors with 0.5 m×0.5 m of spacing + ground-cover plants with 0.05 m×0.1 m of spacing inthe rows) and slope protection zone (shrubs + herbages with 10 g/m2 of planting density), including Neosino calamus affinis—Buchloe dactyloides (M1), Coronilla varia—Festuca rubra (M2), Medicago falcate—Cynodon dactylon (M3), Coronilla varia—Lolium perenne (M4) and Vitex negundo—Setaria viridis (M5), reconstructed. Chengyu expressway in Yongchuan were taken as the example and foundation, their characteristics of runoff and erosion sediment in rainy seasons in the years from 2012 to 2014 were investigated, and the annual fluctuation of their ecological slope protection capacity was analyzed. Results showed that:(1) the annual herbaceous plants in the grass-shrub community, i. e., Vitex negundo+Setaria viridis grew rapidly, which turf-establishment stage (65 d) was transitory, its capacity of soil and water conservation (80.03% and 98.49%, respectively) were higher than other modes in the first growing season after turf-establishment (2012), and among five vegetation modes, its runoff and sediment yield (61.2 mm and 52.0 g/m2, respectively) were the lowest(p < 0.05). However, the perennial herbs (e.g., Cynodon dactylon, Lolium perenne and so on) in the grass-shrub communities grew tardily with more laggardly turf-establishment stages, and their outstanding capacities of soil and water conservation only showed in the second or third growing season after turf-establishment; (2) in the rainy seasons in 2013, ecological protection benefits of the grass-shrub communities (M1—M4) including perennial herbs improved apparently, which were especially outstanding in Coronilla varia+Lolium perenne (M4) and Medicago falcate+Cynodon dactylon (M3); (3) in the third growing season (2014), performance of artificial vegetations Medicago falcate+Cynodon dactylon (M3) was the most excellent in slope protection by means of developed root system of Bermuda grass, its capacity of soil and water conservation were 80.03% and 98.49%, respectively, its runoff and sediment yield were no more than 32.40 mm and 17.67 g/m2, respectively, and in contrast, that of M4 was the worst in the slope plot experiments where artificial vegetations were planted. Therefore, it can be seen that ecological protection benefit of artificial vegetation was closely related to their community characteristics, there was a positive correlation between the aboveground biomass of vegetation and their capacity of soil and water conservation in initial succession with determination coefficient (R2) more than 0.987, and did so between root biomass and these capacity in latter succession(R2≥0.998) when there were the same side slope conditions, seed quantity and planting measures.
参考文献/References:
[1] Luarcet R. Plant species diversity and polyploidy in islands of natural vegetation isolated in extensive cultivated lands[J] Biodiversity and Conservation,1997,6(4):591-613.
[2] 邓洪亮,孙丽霞,廖丹,等.复杂地质条件下岩石边坡的稳定性分析[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2008,6(1):45-48.
[3] Cary R F, Slaback R D. Plant materials and establishment techniques for vegetation of California desert highways[J]. Transportation Research Record,1983,969:24-26.
[4] 肖蓉,高照良,宋晓强,等.高速公路边坡植被特征分析及护坡模式优化研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):90-94.
[5] Cary R H, Sotir R B. Biotechnical stabilization of highway cut slope[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineer, ASCE,1992,118(9):1395-1409.
[6] 徐洪亮,满秀玲,盛后财.大兴安岭不同类型落叶松天然林水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):92-96.
[7] 李妮,陈其兵,谭昌明.高速公路边坡乡土灌木建植模式水土保持效益[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(1):67-71.
[8] 王青杵,王改玲,石生新,等.晋北黄土丘陵区不同人工植被对水土流失和土壤水分含量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):71-75.
[9] 王川,孙铁军,金洪,等.人工植被建植对坡地水土流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):29-33.
[10] 李佳,张小咏,杨艳昭.基于SWAT模型的长江源土地利用/土地覆被情景变化对径流影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):119-126.
[11] Zhou Z C, Shangguan Z P, Zhao D. Modeling vegetation coverage and soil erosion in the loess plateau area of China[J]. Ecological Modelling,2006,198:263-268.
[12] 潘声旺,何茂萍,杨丽娟,等.先锋植物丰富度对公路边坡植物群落生长发育及护坡效益的影响[J].林业科学,2013,49(11):24-31.
相似文献/References:
[1]杨秉珣,刘泉,王彬.嘉陵江流域不同类型植被多样性与土壤养分和酶活性的关系[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):45.
YANG Bingxun,LIU Quan,WANG Bin.Relationships Between Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activity and Plant Diversity of Different Types of in Jialing River Basin, Sichuan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):45.
[2]陈三雄,沈义.黄浦江源头区主要植被类型土壤入渗特征及模拟分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):59.
CHEN Sanxiong,SHEN Yi.Simulation Analysis on Soil Infiltration Characteristics Under Main Vegetation Types in Huangpu River Source Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):59.
[3]陈振盛.泥岩边坡植生技术研究[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(03):68.
Cheng-sheng Chen.Study on the vegetation Techniques for Hillslopes of Mudstone Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1995,2(04):68.
[4]张志国,吴普特,汪有科.人为活动对渭河沙质土土壤肥力的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):110.
ZHANG Zhi-guo,WU Pu-te,WANG You-ke.Artificial Activity Influence on Fertility of Sandy Soil by the Weihe River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(04):110.
[5]谭少华,汪益敏.高速公路边坡生态防护技术研究进展与思考[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):81.
TAN Shao-hua,WANG Yi-min.Research Progress and Thinking of Bioengineering Techniques for Slope Protection in Expressway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(04):81.
[6]叶建军,许文年,鄢朝勇,等.边坡生物治理回顾与展望[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):173.
YE Jian-jun,XU Wen-nian,YAN Chao-yong,et al.Review and Prospect of Slope Vegetative Treatment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(04):173.
[7]赵志星,严明,王宝国.土质边坡稳定性极限分析[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):187.
ZHAO Zhi-xing,YAN Ming,WANG Bao-guo.Stability Analysis of Soil Slopes Using Limilt Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(04):187.
[8]田耀武,田国行,苏金乐,等.高速公路不同边坡土壤保持措施对土壤侵蚀速率影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):80.
TIAN Yao-wu,TIAN Guo-hang,SU Jin-le,et al.Analysis on the Influence of Soil and Water Conservation Means on Soil Erosion Rate of Freeway Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):80.
[9]于春堂,杨晓辉,李朝生.沙漠-河岸过渡带不同天然植被群落类型防风效应评估[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):118.
YU Chun-tang,YANG Xiao-hui,LI Chao-sheng.Effect Evaluating of Reducing Wind Velocity of Different Natural Vegetation in Desert-Riverside Ecotone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):118.
[10]徐湘涛,汪家林,王运生,等.紫萍铺水利枢纽引水发电洞进水口边坡预应力锚索锚固效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):200.
XU Xiang-tao,WANG Jia-lin,WANG Yun-sheng,et al.Analysis for Anchoring Effect of Prestress Anchors in Intake Slope Located at Diversion Cave of Zipingpu Hydroproject[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):200.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-11-10;改回日期:2015-01-08。
基金项目:重庆市水利局重大科研专项“重庆市水利工程水资源涵养及水生态修复植物应用研究与推广”（渝水科201306号）
作者简介:孙华(1983-),女,重庆江津人,硕士,主要从事环境生态,园林生态研究。E-mail:5927282@qq.com
通讯作者:何茂萍(1971-),女,四川成都人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化治理研究。E-mail:hemp1971@cdu.edu.cn