[1]蔡婷,李阿瑾,宋坤,等.黄浦江上游近自然混交林和人工纯林水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):36-40.
　CAI Ting,LI Ajin,SONG Kun,et al.Study on Water Conservation of Near-Natural Forest and Pure Forest in Upper Reaches of the Huangpu River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):36-40.
点击复制

黄浦江上游近自然混交林和人工纯林水源涵养功能评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 22 期数: 2015年02期 页码: 36-40 栏目: 出版日期: 2015-04-28
Title:
Study on Water Conservation of Near-Natural Forest and Pure Forest in Upper Reaches of the Huangpu River
作者:
蔡婷1, 李阿瑾1, 宋坤1,2, 达良俊1,2,3, 徐开钦4, 燕爱玲1
1. 华东师范大学 生态与环境科学学院, 上海 200241;
2. 浙江天童森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 浙江 宁波 315114;
3. 上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室, 上海 200241;
4. 国立环境研究所, 日本 筑波 305-8506
Author(s):
CAI Ting1, LI Ajin1, SONG Kun1,2, DA Liangjun1,2,3, XU Kaiqin4, YAN Ailing1
1. School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;
2. Tiantong National Station of Forest Ecosystem, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315114, China;
3. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Ecology of Urbanization Process and Eco-restoration, Shanghai 200241, China;
4. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan
关键词:
近自然混交林; 水源涵养; 林冠截留; 枯落物持水; 土壤物理性质
Keywords:
near-natural forest; water conservation; canopy interception; water-holding capacity of litter; soil physical properties
分类号:
S715
摘要:
以上海黄浦江上游水源涵养林为研究对象，选择近自然混交林、香樟（Cinnamomum camphora）人工纯林和无患子（Sapindus mukorossi）人工纯林，对比了地上部分、枯落物层、土壤层三个垂直层次的持水量，综合评价了其水源涵养功能。结果表明：地上部分持水量近自然混交林与香樟纯林持平，大于无患子纯林，分别为16.36 t/hm2，16.85 t/hm2，12.54 t/hm2；枯落物层最大持水量依次为近自然混交林（0.37 t/hm2） > 无患子纯林（0.004 t/hm2） > 香樟纯林（0.003 t/hm2）；土壤层最大持水量近自然混交林（2 657.02 t/hm2） > 无患子纯林（2 526.81 t/hm2） > 香樟纯林（2 474.80 t/hm2）。土壤层对森林涵养水源功能的贡献最大，但同时离不开地上部分及枯落物层三者间的相互依存和影响。综合评价得到不同类型林分的总持水量为近自然混交林（2 673.73 t/hm2） > 无患子纯林（2 539.35 t/hm2） > 香樟纯林（2 491.65 t/hm2）。由此可见，林分复杂、树种多样、林下植被丰富的近自然混交林涵养水源的能力最强，优于单一的无患子纯林，而香樟纯林最差。
Abstract:
This study focuses on water-holding capacity (WHC) of forest for conservation of water supply in upper reaches of the Huangpu River. Specifically, WHCs of canopy, litter layer and soil were compared with each other in the near-natural forest, the pure Cinnamomum camphora forest and the pure Sapindus mukorossi in the study region. The results showed that aboveground WHC of pure Cinnamomum camphora forest (16.36 t/hm2) was approximately equal to the aboveground WHC of near-natural forest (16.85 t/hm2), and was greater than the aboveground WHC of pure Sapindus mukorossi forest (12.54 t/hm2). Order of WHCs among different forest types was the near-natural forest (0.370 t/hm2), pure Sapindus mukorossi forest (0.004 t/hm2) and the pure Cinnamomum camphora forest (0.003 t/hm2) in terms of the litter layer, and the near-natural forest (2 657.02 t/hm2), the pure Sapindus mukorossi forest (2 526.81 t/hm2) and the pure Cinnamomum camphorar forest (2 474.80 t/hm2) with respect to the soil layer. The soil layer of the studied forest played the major role in the conservation of water supply, but it could not reach such a state without interactions with the aboveground and litter layers. The total water conservation is higher in the near-natural forest (2 673.73 t/hm2) than the pure Sapindus mukorossi forest (2 539.35 t/hm2), and is the lowest in the pure Cinnamomum camphora forest (2 491.65 t/hm2). These results consistently suggested that the near-natural forest with complex community structure and high species diversity had the highest WHC, followed by the pure Sapindus mukorossi forest and the pure Cinnamomum camphora forest.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘明.凤凰山林场小流域试验场森林土壤涵养水源效益研究[J].林业资源管理,1998(6):51-54.
[2] 白顺江.雾灵山森林生物多样性及生态服务功能价值仿真研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
[3] 陈东立,余新晓,廖邦洪.中国森林生态系统水源涵养功能分析[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(1):49-54.
[4] 蒋秋怡.林地地上部分的持水性能及其对林地水文学性质的影响[J].浙江林学院学报,1989,6(2):176-181.
[5] 莫菲,李叙勇,贺淑霞,等.东灵山林区不同森林植被水源涵养功能评价[J].生态学报,2011,31(17):5009-5016.
[6] 崔启武,边履刚,史继德,等.林冠对降水的截留作用[J].林业科学,1980,16(2):141-146.
[7] 郝占庆,王力华.辽东山区主要森林类型林地土壤涵蓄水性能的研究[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(3):237-241.
[8] 王佑民.中国林地枯落物持水保土作用研究概况[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(4):108-113.
[9] 彭明俊,郎南军,温绍龙,等.金沙江流域不同林分类型的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(6):106-109.
[10] 张伟,杨新兵,张汝松,等.冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):208-212.
[11] 张彪,李文华,谢高地,等.森林生态系统的水源涵养功能及其计量方法[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(3):529-534.
[12] 李海防,王金叶,刘兴伟,等.广西猫儿山主要林型水源涵养功能研究[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(1):50-53.
[13] 曾建军,史正涛,张华伟,等.滇中城市水源地不同林型水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):84-87,101.
[14] 侯鹏程,俞平高,曾蕊,等.上海松江耕层土壤有机碳空间分布及影响因素[J].西南农业学报,2012,25(1):208-211.
[15] 宋永昌.植被生态学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.
[16] 张林,罗天祥,邓坤枚,等.广西黄冕林场次生常绿阔叶林生物量及净第一性生产力[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(11):2029-2033.
[17] 杨同辉,达良俊,宋永昌,等.浙江天童国家森林公园常绿阔叶林生物量研究[J].浙江林学院学报,2005,22(4):363-369.
[18] 卢振龙,龚孝生.灌木生物量测定的研究进展[J].林业调查规划,2009,34(4):37-40.
[19] 李晓娜,国庆喜,王兴昌,等.东北天然次生林下木树种生物量的相对生长[J].林业科学,2010,46(8):22-32.
[20] 王哲,韩玉洁,康宏樟.黄浦江上游主要树种水源涵养林生态系统碳储量[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(8):1930-1935.
[21] 段兴凤,宋维峰,曾洵,等.湖南紫鹊界梯田区森林土壤涵养水源功能初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):157-160.
[22] 郭泺,夏北成,倪国祥.不同森林类型的土壤持水能力及其环境效应研究[J].中山大学学报:自然科学版,2005,44(B06):327-330.
[23] 何斌,秦武明,戴军,等.马占相思人工林不同年龄阶段水源涵养功能及其价值研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(5):5-8.
[24] 王燕,王兵,赵广东,等.江西大岗山3种林型土壤水分物理性质研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):151-153.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄琼彪,蔡满雄.林业经营与水土资源保育之互动[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(03):34.
　HUANG Qiongbiao,CAI Manxiong.The Interaction of Forest Management and Soil Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(02):34.
[2]朱继鹏,王芳,高甲荣.吉县蔡家川流域不同森林植被的林地水源涵养功能[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):111.
　ZHU Ji-peng,WANG Fang,GAO Jia-rong.The Function of Water Conservation of Different Forestlands in Caijiachuan Watershed of Ji County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):111.
[3]郑培龙,肖江伟,吴云,等.重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤贮水特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(02):195.
　ZHENG Pei-long,XIAO Jiang-wei,WU Yun,et al.Research on Forest Soil Water Retaining Properties of Typical Forests in Jinyun Mountain in ChongQing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):195.
[4]孟广涛,方向京,李贵祥,等.云南金沙江流域不同植被类型水源涵养能力分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(04):160.
　MENG Guang-tao,FANG Xiang-jing,LI Gui-xiang,et al.Analysis of Water Conservation Capacity of Different Vegetation Types in Jinshajiang Watershed of Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):160.
[5]黄承标,黄俊杰,谭学锋,等.大瑶山自然保护区森林涵养水源效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):268.
　HUANG Jun-jie,TAN Xue-feng,SU Yong,et al.Study on Water Conservation Benefit of Forest in Dayaoshan Natural Reseve[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):268.
[6]王春菊,汤小华.GIS支持下的水源涵养功能评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(02):215.
　WANG Chun-ju,TANG Xiao-hua.A GIS-based Study on the Function of Water Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):215.
[7]常志勇,包维楷,何其华,等.岷江上游辽东栎与川榛在模拟降雨过程中蒸散特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):78.
　CHANG Zhing-yong,BAO Wei-kai,HE Qi-hua,et al.Evapotranspiration Simulation of Quercus liaotungensis and Corylus heterophylla var.sutchuenensis.Franch During Rainfall Process in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):78.
[8]冯朝阳,高吉喜,韩永伟,等.京西门头沟区典型生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):230.
　FENG Chao-yang,GAO Ji-xi,HAN Yong-wei,et al.Representative Ecosystem Services and Their Valuation of Mentougou District, Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):230.
[9]徐学华,于树峰,崔立志,等.冀北山地华北落叶松人工林水源涵养功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):162.
　XU Xue-hua,YU Shu-feng,CUI Li-zhi,et al.Analysis on Water Conservation Function of Larix Principis-rupprechtⅡ Man-made Forest in North Mountain of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):162.
[10]聂忆黄,龚斌,衣学文.青藏高原水源涵养能力评估[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):210.
　NIE Yi-huang,Gong Bin,YI Xue-wen.Water Conservation Valuation of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):210.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2014-05-04;改回日期:2014-06-05。
基金项目:上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目（08DZ1203102）
作者简介:蔡婷(1990-),女,山东德州平原县人,硕士研究生,研究方向:城市生态学。E-mail:caiting1991@126.com
通讯作者:宋坤(1983-),男,安徽宣城市人,博士,研究方向:植被生态学。E-mail:seceek@gmail.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01