ZHANG Wei-qiang,ZHANG Wei-hua,PAN Wen,et al.Effects of Eucalypt Plantation and Conifer-Broadleaved Forest on Plant Biodiversity[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):122-128.
桉树林和针阔混交林对植物多样性的影响比较
- Title:
- Effects of Eucalypt Plantation and Conifer-Broadleaved Forest on Plant Biodiversity
- Keywords:
- eucalypt plantation; conifer-broadleaved forest; plant biodiversity; southern subtropical region
- 分类号:
- S718
- 摘要:
- 为了系统评价桉树林和针阔混交林对生物多样性的影响，采用立地条件控制及空间代替时间法，对南亚热带桉树林（2代和1代）和针阔混交林（10～11 a生和5～7 a生）乔木层、灌木层和草本层生物多样性进行了比较。结果表明，针阔混交林Ⅰ（10～11 a生）有68种植物，隶属38科62属，桉树林Ⅱ（桉树2代）有41种，隶属26科39属，针阔混交林Ⅲ（5～7 a生）有53种植物，隶属30科48属，桉树林Ⅳ（桉树1代）有55种植物，隶属33科51属。针阔混交林乔木层重要值较大的科为杉科、樟科、金缕梅科、大戟科、山茶科、木兰科和楝科，灌木层为五加科和大戟科，草本层以禾本科、鳞始蕨科和乌毛蕨科为主。桉树林乔木层重要值较大的科为桃金娘科、芸香科、樟科、大戟科和漆树科，灌木层为冬青科、樟科、大戟科和芸香科，草本层以禾本科和里白科为主。4种试验林间乔木层、灌木层和草本层物种丰富度指数（S）、Shannon-Wiener指数（H’）、Simpson优势度指数（D）、Pielou均匀度指数（E）差异不显著（P > 0.05）。针阔混交林Ⅰ乔木层和灌木层H’指数、D指数及E指数显著高于草本层（P < 0.05），桉树林Ⅱ乔木层、灌木层和草本层间H’指数、D指数及E指数均存在显著差异（P < 0.05）。针阔混交林乔木层均匀度指数（E）均大于桉树林。与针阔混交林Ⅲ相比，针阔混交林Ⅰ乔木层物种S，H’，D及E指数呈上升趋势，而灌木层和草本层呈下降趋势。与1代桉树林Ⅳ相比，2代桉树林Ⅱ灌木层和草本层S，H’和D指数呈下降趋势。研究结果为桉树人工林物种多样性保护和可持续经营提供科学依据。
- Abstract:
- A comparative study was conducted on the plant biodiversity of tree layer, shrub and herb layers in eucalypt plantation (the second-generation and the first-generation) and conifer-broadleaved forest (10-11 years old and 5-7 years old) in southern subtropical region to understand the effects of eucalypt plantation and conifer-broadleaved forest on the plant biodiversity by using the methods of site condition control and space instead of time. The present results showed that there were 68 species belonging to 38 families and 62 genera in conifer-broadleaved forest (10-11 years old), and 41 species belonging to 26 families and 39 genera in eucalypt plantationⅡ (the second-generation of eucalypt), 53 kinds of plants, belonging to 30 families and 48 genera in conifer-broadleaved forest Ⅲ (5-7 years old), and 55 species belonging to 33 families genera 51 in eucalypt plantation Ⅳ(the first-generation of eucalypt). The large important values of families of tree layer were Taxodiaceae, Lauraeeae, Hamamelidaeeae, Euphorbiaceae, Theaceae, Magnoliaceae and Meliaceae, those of shrubs were Araliacea, Euphorbiaceae, and those of herb layer were Graminaceous, Lindsaeaceae and Blechnacea in conifer-broadleaved forest. The large important values of families of tree layer were Myrtaceae, Rutaceae, Lauraeeae, Euphorbiaceae, Anacardiaceae, and those of shrubs were Aquifoliaceae, Lauraeeae, Euphorbiaceae, Rutaceae, and those of herb layer were Graminaceous and Gleicheniaceae in eucalypt plantation. The species richness (S), Shannon-Wiener index (H’), Simpson dominance index (D), Pielou evenness index (E) of tree layer, shrub layer and herb layer were not significant (P > 0.05) among four kinds of experimental forests. The index of H’, D and E of tree layer and shrub were significantly higher than those of herb layer (P < 0.05), the index of H’, D and E were significantly different (P < 0.05) among tree layer, shrub and herb layer in eucalypt plantationⅡ. The evenness index (E) of conifer-broadleaved forest was greater than that of eucalyptus forest. The index of S, H’, D and E of tree layer in conifer-broadleaved forestⅠincreased, while those of the shrub and herb layers decreased compared with the conifer-broadleaved forestⅢ. The indexes of S, H’ and D of shrub and herb layer in eucalypt plantationⅡ(the second-generation of eucalypt) declined in varying degrees compared with the eucalypt plantation Ⅳ(the first-generation of eucalypt). The results provided a scientific basis for species diversity conservation and sustainable management of eucalypt plantation.
参考文献/References:
[1] 杨尚东,吴俊,谭宏伟,等.红壤区桉树人工林炼山后土壤肥力变化及其生态评价[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7788-7797.
[2] 时伟伟,彭晚霞,宋同清,等.不同林龄尾巨桉人工林土壤养分与微生物的耦合关系[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(7):1452-1458.
[3] 刘平,秦晶,刘建昌,等.桉树人工林地土壤养分和重金属现状分析与评价[J].环境工程学报,2011,5(3):649-656.
[4] 李燕燕,樊后保,刘文飞,等.不同林龄尾巨桉人工林生态系统生物量的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2011,33(4):28-32.
[5] 刘文飞,吴建平,樊后保,等.连续年龄序列枝树人工林碳库[J].生态环境学报,2013(1):12-17.
[6] 时忠杰,徐大平,张宁南,等.桉树人工林水文影响研究进展[J].林业科学,2009,45(11):135-140.
[7] 向仰州,徐大平,杨曾奖,等.海南省两种人工林林下物种多样性与土壤水分物理性质的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):37-41.
[8] 张丹桔,张健,杨万勤,等.一个年龄序列巨桉人工林植物和土壤生物多样性[J].生态学报,2013,33(13):3947-3962.
[9] 平亮,谢宗强.引种桉树对本地生物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(7):1765-1774.
[10] 叶绍明,温远光,杨梅,等.连栽桉树人工林生产力和植物多样性及其相关性分析[J].西北植物学报,2010(7):1458-1467.
[11] 朱宏光,温远光,梁宏温,等.广西桉树林取代马尾松林对植物多样性的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2009(6):149-153.
[12] 刘振学,任广鑫,康冰,等.辛家山不同坡向次生林群落物种多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):197-202.
[13] 薛立,傅静丹,郑卫国,等.3种人工幼林的土壤微生物和酶活性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报:自然科学版,2008,28(4):98-100.
[14] 何友均,梁星云,覃林,等.南亚热带人工针叶纯林近自然改造早期对群落特征和土壤性质的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2484-2495.
[15] 王芸,欧阳志云,郑华,等.南方红壤区3种典型森林恢复方式对植物群落多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(4):1204-1211.
[16] 短轮伐期巨桉人工林生态系统[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2008.
[17] 刘平,秦晶,刘建昌,等.桉树人工林物种多样性变化特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(8):2227-2235.
[18] Calvi?o-Cancela M, Rubido-BaráM, van Etten E J B. Do eucalypt plantations provide habitat for native forest biodiversity[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2012,270:153-162.
[19] Carneiro M, Fabi?o A, Martins M C, et al. Effects of harrowing and fertilisation on understory vegetation and timber production of a Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantation in Central Portugal[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,255(3):591-597.
相似文献/References:
[1]郭晋川,梁宏温,潘伟,等.两种森林集水区径流量及其径流过程初步分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):55.
GUO Jinchuan,LIANG Hongwen,PAN Wei,et al.Preliminary Study on the Runoff and Its Processes of Two Kinds of Forest Watersheds[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):55.
[2]肖文娅,周琦,董务闯,等.苏州太湖流域2种水源涵养林空间结构特征与枯落物持水特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):21.
XIAO Wen-ya,ZHOU Qi,DONG Wu-chuang,et al.Spatial Structure Characteristics and Litter Water Holding Characteristics of Two Water Conservation Forests in Taihu Lake Watershed of Suzhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):21.
[3]时钟瑜,李婕.长白山不同林型土壤水源涵养功能特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):158.
SHI Zhongyu,LI Jie.Characteristics of Water Conservation Functions of Soils in Different Forest Types in Changbai Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(06):158.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-05-04;改回日期:2014-05-27。
基金项目:林业公益性行业科研专项（201104003-04）；广东省林业科技创新专项项目（2010KJCX013-02）；佛山市生态景观林培育技术研究与推广示范和广东东江源森林生态站联合资助。
作者简介:张卫强(1976-),男,山西清徐人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事森林水文与植物生理生态。E-mail:happyzwq@sina.com
通讯作者:张卫华(1977-),女,河北定兴人,博士,教授级高工,主要从事林木遗传育种研究。E-mail:zwh523@sinogaf.cn