[1]田美荣,李晓兵,李旭.内蒙古典型草原生态安全评估及影响因子分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(05):169-173,178.
　TIAN Mei-rong,LI Xiao-bing,LI Xu.Ecological Security Assessment and Analysis on Influencing Factors in Typical Steppe of Inner Mongolia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):169-173,178.
点击复制

内蒙古典型草原生态安全评估及影响因子分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 21 期数: 2014年05期 页码: 169-173,178 栏目: 出版日期: 2014-10-28
Title:
Ecological Security Assessment and Analysis on Influencing Factors in Typical Steppe of Inner Mongolia
作者:
田美荣1,2, 李晓兵1, 李旭1
1. 北京师范大学 资源学院 地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100875;
2. 环境保护部南京环境科学研究所, 南京 210042
Author(s):
TIAN Mei-rong1,2, LI Xiao-bing1, LI Xu1
1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEP, Nanjing 210042, China
关键词:
典型草原; 生态足迹; 生态安全; 主成分分析
Keywords:
typical steppe; ecological footprint; ecological security; principal component analysis
分类号:
X171.1
摘要:
内蒙古典型草原区处于全球变化的敏感区域，是我国重要的生态屏障区，由于地下蕴藏着丰富的矿产资源，被列为我国重要能源战略基地。为探讨内蒙古典型草原区经济社会发展对生态安全的影响，研究以阿巴嘎旗为例，在生态足迹理论的基础上，引入生态安全压力指数来判断生态安全状态，并运用主成分分析法评判影响因子的影响大小。结果表明：2001—2010年阿巴嘎生态足迹增长明显，生态承载力变化较小，因此，生态安全压力指数增长趋势明显，增长了近3.5倍，到2010年为生态不安全状态。主要影响因子人均GDP、人均化石能源消耗、工业产值占国内生产总值的比重、单位面积固定资产投资、城市化率与生态安全压力指数呈正相关，万人在校生数、草场载畜量和降雨量与生态安全压力指数呈负相关关系。研究结果可为典型草原区环境管理提供支撑。
Abstract:
The typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, which lies within sensitive area of the global change, is the important ecological barrier against sandstorms in China, and is one of the important energy strategies in China for the abundant mineral resources. In order to discuss the influence on the ecological security induced by economic and social development, this paper took Abag County as the research example. The pressure index of the ecological security was introduced on the basis of ecological footprint methodology, aiming at assessing the state of ecological security as well as the magnitude of each influencing factor by the principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that the pressure index of ecological security had grown up nearly 3.5 times higher with the obvious increase of ecological footprint and small change of biocapacity from 2001 to 2010; which led to a state of unsafe in terms of ecological security in Abag County in 2010. The principle influencing factors such as the per capita GDP, the per capita fossil energy consumption, the proportion industrial output value taking up total output value of production, fixed asset investment and urbanization rate are positively correlated to pressure index of ecological safety, meanwhile, the number students of ten thousand and pasture grazing capacity and precipitation showed a negative correlation. The results could be beneficial for providing the local government the references on typical steppe ecological management.

参考文献/References:

[1] 傅伯杰,周国逸,白永飞,等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(6):571-576.
[2] 叶笃正.中国的全球变化与可持续发展研究[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(4):317-318.
[3] 杨春红,张正栋,田楠楠,等.基于P-S-R模型的汕头市土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):209-214.
[4] 黄海,刘长城,陈春.基于生态足迹的土地生态安全评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):193-201.
[5] 兰叶霞.基于生态足迹的江西省生态安全时空动态定量研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2006.
[6] Collins, A, Flynn A, Wiedmann T, et al. The environmental impacts of consumption at a subnational level:the ecological footprint of Cardiff[J]. Ind. Ecol.,2006,10(3):9-24.
[7] Wackernagel M, Kitzes J, Moran D, et al. The ecological footprint of cities and regions:comparing resource availability with resource demand[J]. Environ. Urban.,2006,18(1):103-112.
[8] Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Erb K H, et al. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999:comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach[J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21(3):261-269.
[9] Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, et al. Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity:The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework[J]. Ecol. Indic.,2013,24:518-533.
[10] IPCC. Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)[R].Cambridge, UK.,2001.
[11] 任贤,张磊,王洋,等.基于生态足迹理论的银川市生态安全评价[J].广东农业科学,2010(6):207-210.
[12] 李中才,徐俊艳,姬宇.基于改进生态足迹的区域生态安全评价研究:以山东省长岛县为例[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2011,27(3):268-272.
[13] 俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.学术期刊综合评价数据标准化方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(53):136-139.
[14] Wackemagel M, Onisto L, Bello P,et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J].Ecological Economics,1999,29(3):375-390.
[15] 徐中民,张志强,程国栋,等.中国1999年生态足迹计算与发展能力分析[J].应用生态学报[J],2003,14(2):280-285.
[16] IPCC. Climate Change 2007:the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (R). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK,2007.
[17] Venetoulis J, Talberth J. Refining the ecological footprint[J]. Environ. Dev. Sustain.,2008,10(4):441-469.

相似文献/References:

[1]高标,崔凤午.吉林省生态足迹与生态承载力动态变化分析与预测研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):105.
　GAO Biao,CUI Feng-wu.Research on Dynamic Change Analysis and Prediction of Ecological Footprint and Ecological Capacity in Jilin Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):105.
[2]魏晓燕,夏建新,吴燕红.基于生态足迹理论的调水工程移民生态补偿标准研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):214.
　WEI Xiao-yan,XIA Jian-xin,WU Yan-hong.Ecological Compensation Criteria for Ecological Migrations of Water Transfer Projects Based on Ecological Footprint Theory[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):214.
[3]陈晨,夏显力.基于生态足迹模型的西部资源型城市可持续发展评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):197.
　CHEN Chen,XIA Xian-li.Assessment on Sustainable Development Status of Western Resources-based Cities Based on the Ecological Footprint Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):197.
[4]何京丽.北方典型草原水土保持生态修复技术[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):299.
　HE Jing-li.Idea and Measures of Soil and Water Conservation Eco-rehabilitation in North Typical Grassland Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(05):299.
[5]张正栋,周永章,夏斌,等.南方丘陵山区生态足迹计算和分析——以韩江上游梅江区为例[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(05):115.
　ZHANG Zheng-dong,ZHOU Yong-zhang,XIA Bin,et al.Analysis and Calculation on the Ecological Footprint in the Tropic and Subtropical Mountain Areas of South China——A Case Study in Meijiang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):115.
[6]李艳红,楚新正,金海龙.新疆艾比湖地区生态足迹与生态承载力动态变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(03):39.
　LI Yan-hong,CHU Xin-zheng,JIN Hai-long.Dynamic Change of Ecological Footprints and Ecological Capacity of Ebinur Lake Region in Xinjiang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):39.
[7]闵捷,张安录.大连市农地利用中的生态问题探讨[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(03):60.
　MIN Jie,ZHANG An-lu.Study on Ecological Problems of Farmland Resources Utilization in Dalian[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):60.
[8]王晓明,许玉,钱翌,等.土地开发整理的生态足迹评价——以浙江省淳安县为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(03):192.
　WANG Xiao-ming,XU Yu,QIAN Yi,et al.Ecological Footprint Evaluation of Land Reclamation——A Case Study in Chun’an County, Zhejiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):192.
[9]焦士兴,王安周.河南省1990～2003生态足迹动态分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):259.
　JIAO Shi-xing,WANG An-zhou.The Dynamical Analysis of Ecological Footprint of Henan Province in 1990～2003[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):259.
[10]张俊斌,孙明德,黄鼎超,等.小集水区生物多样性工程之设计[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(06):7.
　ZHANG Jun-bin,SUN Ming-de,HUANG Ding-chao,et al.The Design for Biodiversity Engineering Methods in the Small Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):7.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2013-11-22;改回日期:2014-01-13。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“内蒙古温带典型草原生态系统服务功能变化与区域生态安全”（41030535）；973课题（2014CB138803）
作者简介:田美荣(1981-)女,内蒙古鄂尔多斯人,博士,主要从事区域生态保护、区域生态安全研究。E-mail:tianmeirong007@163.com
通讯作者:李晓兵(1967-)男,内蒙古呼和浩特人,博士,教授,主要从事遥感、区域生态保护等研究。E-mail:xbli@bnu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01