WANG Nian-qin,XUE Yao-qiong,LI Shao-bing,et al.Debris Flow Lability Comprehensive Evaluation Model on Rough Set Theory[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(03):246-250.
基于粗糙集理论的泥石流易发性综合评判模型
- Title:
- Debris Flow Lability Comprehensive Evaluation Model on Rough Set Theory
- 分类号:
- P642.23
- 摘要:
- 泥石流灾害易发性判断是泥石流灾害性评价的重要组成部分，快捷、准确的评判对人类工程活动有着重要的指导意义。众所周知，流域中，形貌、地质、水文三大条件对泥石流灾害起决定性作用，是泥石流易发性的主要影响因素。这里基于对泥石流灾害的机理认识，将泥石流易发性分为高易发、中易发、低易发、不易发4个等级，在充分考虑泥石流灾害易发性影响因素贡献的基础上，给出各因素等级的确定标准，运用粗糙集理论获取各级评价指标的相对重要度，再依据专家经验确定主观权重，结合相对重要度和主观权重确定各因素的综合权重，进而利用模糊数学中多级模糊评判的理论和方法，建立了一种新的泥石流易发性多级模糊综合评判模型，并以陕西省凤县5条泥石流沟为例进行模型验证，结果表明这5条泥石流沟易发性从低到高的排序为：吴家沟泥石流沟、三台山泥石流沟、后沟泥石流沟、银铜梁泥石流沟、寺沟泥石流沟，结果与实际吻合良好。
- Abstract:
- The judgment of debris flow disaster liability is the important part of the debris flow disaster evaluation, and fast and accurate evaluation has important guiding significance of human engineering activity. As all as we know, topography and geomorphology, geological and hydrological conditions play a decisive role in the debris flow disaster, and are the main influence factors of debris flow lability. Based on mechanism of debris flow disasters, the debris flow lability can be divided into high lability, middle lability, low lability and not lability. Based on the full consideration of the contributions on debris flow lability factors, the factors’ determine standard was given, the relative important degree of each evaluation indexes was obtained according to the rough set theory, then based on expert experience method a subjective weight was determined, the comprehensive weight was determine by combining with the relative important degree and subjective weight, then, a new kind of debris flow lability comprehensive evaluation model of multilevel fuzzy assessment was set up based on the theory and method of fuzzy mathematics on multilevel fuzzy assessment, 5 debris flow gullies of Fengxian, Shaanxi were taken as the example to verify the model. The results show that the debris flow gully liability in 5 gullies follows the order of Wujiagou, Santaishan watershed, Hougou catchment, Yintongliang catchment, Sigou catchment. The results are in good agreement with the actual situation.
参考文献/References:
[1] 史正涛,祁龙.甘肃省文县关家沟泥石流综合治理[J].山地研究,1997,15(2):124-128.
[2] 谢洪,钟敦伦,韦方强,等.我国山区城镇泥石流灾害及其成因[J].山地学报,2006,24(1):79-87.
[3] 曾思伟,王得楷.泥石流研究与展望[J].甘肃科学学报,2003,15(S1):10-14.
[4] 匡乐红,徐林荣,刘宝琛,等.基于粗糙集原理的泥石流危险度区划指标选取方法[J].地质力学学报,2006,12(2):236-242.
[5] 刘勇健,刘义建.基于粗糙集的范例推理在泥石流危险性评价中的应用[J].山地学报,2008,26(2):223-229.
[6] 王念秦,姚勇.基于模糊数学和权的最小平方法的泥石流易发性评价方法[J].灾害学,2008,23(2):5-9.
[7] 李大鸣,罗浩,刘江川.基于粗糙集理论的泥石流危险度评价模型[J].中国农村水利水电,2012(6):34-39.
[8] 柳金峰,欧国强.泥石流危险性评价的耗散结构分析[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(1):123-125.
[9] 汪明武.基于神经网络的泥石流危险度区划[J].水文地质工程地质,2000,27(2):18-19.
[10] 孟凡奇,李广杰,李明,等.逐步判别分析法在筛选泥石流评价因子中的应用[J].岩土力学,2010,31(9):2925-2929.
[11] 侯兰功,崔鹏.单沟泥石流灾害危险性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(2):125-128.
[12] 吕学军,佘猛.泥石流堆积物粒度分维的讨论[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(4):105-108.
[13] Pawlak Z. Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1997,99(1):48-57.
[14] 曹秀英,梁静国.基于粗糙集理论的属性权重确定方法[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(5):98-100.
[15] 王洪凯,姚炳学,胡海清.基于粗集理论的权重确定方法[J].计算机工程与应用,2003,36(2):20-21.
[16] 薛喜成.西秦岭矿山泥石流发育规律与环境效应[D].西安:西安科技大学,2010.
相似文献/References:
[1]陈梓玄,李占斌,李鹏.陕北府谷新田煤矿开发建设项目生态修复效益动态评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):21.
CHEN Zi-xuan,LI Zhan-bin,LI Peng.The Dynamic Benefit Evaluation of Ecological Restoration on Construction Project of Xintian Coal Mine in Northern Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):21.
[2]王高峰,唐川,王洪德,等.初咱磨子沟泥石流特征及危险性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):234.
WANG Gao-feng,TANG Chuan,WANG Hong-de,et al.Characteristics and Hazard Assessment of Debris Flows in Chuzanmozigou Catchment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):234.
[3]田冰,王裕宜.基于功率谱分析的蒋家沟泥石流侵蚀输沙量准周期的探讨[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):244.
TIAN Bing,WANG Yu-yi.Power Spectral Analysis on Periodicity of Sediment Transport in Debris Flow in Jiangjiagou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):244.
[4]胡桂胜,陈宁生,邓虎.基于GIS的西藏林芝地区泥石流易发与危险区分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):195.
HU Gui-sheng,CHEN Ning-sheng,DENG Hu.Analysis of Debris Flow-prone and Dangerous Area in Nyingchi of Tibet Based on GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):195.
[5]李朝安,胡卸文,李冠奇,等.四川省“8·13”特大泥石流灾害成生机理与防治原则[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):257.
LI Chao-an,HU Xie-wen,LI Guan-qi,et al.Formation Mechanism of the ’8·13’ Catastrophic Debris Flow in Sichuan and the Principles of Controlling[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):257.
[6]张黎勇.皖南山区山体滑坡、泥石流的成因及其防治[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(01):171.
Zhang Liyong.The Cause and Prevention of Slideslope, Debris Flow in the Hilly Areas of Southern Anhui Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(03):171.
[7]李树德.中国滑坡、泥石流灾害的时空分布特点[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(04):33.
Li Shude.The Temporal and Spacial Distribution of Landslide and Debris Flow Disasters in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1999,6(03):33.
[8]吴正华.北京泥石流灾害及其降水触发条件[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(01):67.
WU Zhenghua.The Mud-rock Flow Disaster and Their Touch off Condition by Rainfall in Beijing Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(03):67.
[9]崔之久,冯金良.东川蒋家沟泥石流沉积亚相组合特征[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):2.
CUI Zhi-jiu,FENG Jin-liang.Combination Features of Depositional Sub-facies of Debris-flowon the Jiangjiagou Valley, Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(03):2.
[10]冯金良,崔之久,李庆辰.太行山区下瓦岔泥石流灾害实录[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):41.
FENG Jin-liang,CUI Zhi-jiu,LI Qing-chen.The Record of Xiawacha Debris-flow in Taihang Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(03):41.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2013-10-12;改回日期:2013-10-28。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目（41130753）；国家自然科学基金项目（40972174，41002101）
作者简介:王念秦(1964-),男,河南孟津人,教授,工学博士,主要从事岩土体稳定及地质灾害防治方面的教学、科研工作。E-mail:younglock@163.com