WANG Hong-yi,WANG Zhi-hui,YANG Feng-jun,et al.Research for the Effect of Shallow-Tight Type Subsurface Drain Pipes on Improving Soda Saline-alkaline Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):269-272.
浅密式暗管排盐技术改良苏打盐碱地效应研究
- Title:
- Research for the Effect of Shallow-Tight Type Subsurface Drain Pipes on Improving Soda Saline-alkaline Land
- 分类号:
- S156.4
- 摘要:
- 为探索暗管排盐技术在苏打盐碱地治理中的适用性，选择大庆地区的苏打盐碱地进行田间试验，研究排盐暗管不同间距（5 m，10 m，15 m）与埋深（0.8 m，1 m，1.2 m）下的盐碱地土壤脱盐效果。结果表明：经3次灌溉淋洗，发现埋设暗管能显著降低耕作层土壤含盐量，暗管埋设间距、埋深越小，平均排水效率越高，排水矿化度越大，土壤脱盐效率越高，改土效果越好。间距5 m、埋深0.8 m的处理经淋洗后平均排水效率为2.08%，较其他处理至少提高了13.66%；土壤含盐量为0.16%，较其他处理至少降低了23.81%。由此建议大庆地区苏打盐碱土降渍脱盐的地下暗管工程最佳布设参数为间距5 m、埋深0.8 m，既可以有效排除土壤中盐分，又可以确保耕作层土壤脱盐均匀。
- Abstract:
- To study the practice of subsurface drain pipe for improving soda saline-alkaline land, A soda saline-alkaline land in Daqing was selected to carry out field experiment and investigate the leaching desalination of different drain pipe spacing (5, 10, 15 m) and burial depth (0.8, 1.0, 1.2 m). The result show that with use of three irrigation leaching and buried drain pipes, the plough layer soil salinity is significantly reduced; furthermore, the smaller the spacing and depth of covered pipe are, the higher the efficiency of the average drainage is; and the greater drainage salinity and the higher the efficiency of the soil desalination are, the better the soil improvement is. Under condition of 5 m spacing and 0.8 m depth after processing with leaching drainage, the average efficiency is 2.08%, increases by 13.66%; the soil salinity is 0.16%, decreases by 23.81%. The best laid spacing parameter of the soda saline-alkaline land down stains desalination is 5 m and the depth of 0.8 m, which can not only effectively exclude soil salinity, but also to ensure the uniformity of the plow layer soil desalination.
参考文献/References:
[1] 刘建红.盐碱地开发治理研究进展[J].山西农业科学,2008,36(12):51-53.
[2] 彭成山,杨玉珍,郑存虎,等.黄河三角洲暗管改碱工程技术实验与研究[M].河南:黄河水利出版社,2006.
[3] 张建锋.盐碱地的生态修复研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(4):74-78.
[4] Qadir M, Ghafoor A, Murtaza G. Amelioration strategies for saline soils:a review[J]. Land Degradation and Development,2000,11(6):501-521.
[5] 马凤娇,谭莉梅,刘慧涛,等.河北滨海盐碱区暗管改碱技术的降雨有效性评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(2):409-414.
[6] Ritzema H P, Nijland H J, Croon F W. Subsurface drainage practices:from manual installation to large-scale implementation[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2006,86(1/2):60-71.
[7] 李凯,窦森,张庆联,等.暗管排水技术及其在苏打盐碱土改良上的应用[J].吉林农业科学,2012,37(1):41-43.
[8] 刘玉涛,董智,李红丽,等.不同隔盐措施对滨海盐碱地白蜡光合作用日变化的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):126-130.
[9] 袁磊,雷国平,张小虎.大庆油田区土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):216-221.
[10] 高志昊,宋戈,张远景.石油城市经济转型背景下土地利用模式研究:以黑龙江省大庆市为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):162-167.
[11] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.
[12] 张金龙,张清,王振宇,等.排水暗管间距对滨海盐土淋洗脱盐效果的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(9):85-89.
[13] Chahar B R, Vadodaria G P. Steady subsurface drainage of homogeneous soils by ditches[J].Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management,2008,161(6):303-311.
[14] Youngs E G, Leeds-Harrison P B. Improving efficiency of desalinization with subsurface drainage[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2000,126(6):375-380.
[15] 刘永,王为木,周详.滨海盐土暗管排水降渍脱盐效果研究[J].土壤,2011,43(6):1004-1008.
[16] 李凤霞,王学琴,郭永忠,等.不同改良措施对银川平原盐碱地土壤性质及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):13-18.
[17] 刘小京,李向军,陈丽娜,等.盐碱区适应性农作制度与技术探讨:以河北省滨海平原盐碱区为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(4):911-913.
[18] 刘慧涛,谭莉梅,于淑会,等.河北滨海盐碱区暗管埋设下土壤水盐变化响应研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(12):1693-1699.
相似文献/References:
[1]李凤霞,王学琴,郭永忠,等.不同改良措施对银川平原盐碱地土壤性质及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):13.
LI Feng-xia,WANG Xue-qin,GUO Yong-zhong,et al.Effect of Soil Properties and Soil Enzyme Activity in Different Improvement Measures of Saline-alkali Soil in Yinchuan Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):13.
[2]孙雁君,景峰,朱金兆.滨海泥质盐碱地种基盘播种造林的应用研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):172.
SUN Yan-jun,JING Feng,ZHU Jin-zhao.Study on Seed-base Afforestation by Seeding in Coastal Argillaceous Saline-alkali Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):172.
[3]张建锋,张旭东,周金星,等.世界盐碱地资源及其改良利用的基本措施[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):28.
ZHANG Jian-feng,ZHANG Xu-dong,ZHOU Jin-xing,et al.World Resources of Saline Soil and Main Amelioration Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(03):28.
[4]范文波,李小娟,刘丽英.盐碱地人工种植芨芨草效益分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):56.
FAN Wen-bo,LI Xiao-juan,LIU Li-ying.Benifit Analysis of Planting A.s plendens in Saline-alkali Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):56.
[5]张建锋.盐碱地的生态修复研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):74.
ZHANG Jian-feng.Discussion on Ecological Rehabilitation of Salt-affected Soils[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):74.
[6]高金芳,周波,马涛,等.半干旱区不同土地利用方式下土壤呼吸特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):89.
GAO Jinfang,ZHOU Bo,MA Tao,et al.Soil Respiration Characteristics Under Different Land Use Patterns in Semi-arid Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):89.
[7]罗佳,盛建东,王永旭,等.不同有机肥对盐渍化耕地土壤盐分、养分及棉花产量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):48.
LUO Jia,SHENG Jiandong,WANG Yongxu,et al.Effects of Different Organic Fertilizers on Soil Salinity, Nutrients and Cotton Yield on Salt-Affected Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):48.
[8]李娟,韩霁昌,张扬,等.蓄排水条件下盐碱地土壤盐分运移特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):116.
LI Juan,HAN Jichang,ZHANG Yang,et al.Move Characteristics of Soil Salinity in Saline-Alkali Land Under Impounding and Draining Conditions[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):116.
[9]刘太坤,高 班,谢作明,等.人工藻结皮对河套平原盐碱土理化性质和酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):133.
LIU Taikun,GAO Ban,XIE Zuoming,et al.Effects of Artificial Algal Crusts on Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activities of Saline-Alkali Soil in Hetao Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):133.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2013-01-20;改回日期:2013-03-01。
基金项目:黑龙江省教育厅科学技术研究项目（11541255）
作者简介:王洪义(1978-),男,黑龙江省巴彦人,硕士,讲师,主要从事盐碱地土壤改良和园林绿化方面的研究。E-mail:why-4585@sohu.com