ZHAO Jian-sheng,WANG Yong-ming,YANG Xin-bing.Hydrological Effects of Forest Soil in Mountain Area of Northern Hebei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):201-205.
冀北山地森林土壤水文效应研究
- Title:
- Hydrological Effects of Forest Soil in Mountain Area of Northern Hebei
- 分类号:
- S715
- 摘要:
- 森林土壤水文效应是森林生态水文功能的基础。从森林土壤的容重、孔隙度、持水能力和入渗能力等方面，研究了冀北山地6种典型森林的土壤水文效应。结果表明：土壤容重方面，落叶松纯林最大（1.21 g/cm3），白桦纯林最小（1.00 g/cm3）；土壤孔隙度方面，白桦纯林总孔隙度最大（50.75%），油松蒙古栎混交林总孔隙度最小（42.58%）；土壤持水能力方面，油松纯林的有效持水量最大（241.00 t/hm2），落叶松纯林的最小（57.75 t/hm2）。土壤入渗能力方面，油松纯林的稳渗速率最大（15.00 mm/min），落叶松纯林的稳渗速率最小（0.68 mm/min）。
- Abstract:
- Hydrological effects of forest soil are the foundation of the ecological and hydrological functions of forest. The hydrological effects of forest soil were studied based on soil bulk density, porosity, soil water holding capacity and infiltration capacity in six typical forest types of the mountain area, Northern Hebei, China. The result showed that the highest and lowest mean bulk densities were 1.21 g/cm3 and 1.00 g/cm3 in soils of Larix principic-rupprechtii pure forest and Betula platyphylla pure forest, respectively; the highest and lowest total porosity values were 50.75% and 42.58% in soils of B. platyphylla pure forest and Pinus tabulaeformis-Quercus mongolica mixed forest, respectively. The soil water holding capacity of P. tabulaeformis pure forest was the most powerful and amounted to 241.00 t/hm2, and L. principic-rupprechtii pure forest was the worst and the value was 57.75 t/hm2. As for soil infiltration capacity, the highest and lowest steady infiltration rates were 15.00 mm/min and 0.68 mm/min in soils of P. tabulaeformis pure forest and L. principic-rupprechtii pure forest, respectively.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张雷燕,刘常富,王彦辉,等.宁夏六盘山地区不同森林类型土壤的蓄水和渗透能力比较[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(1):95-98.
[2] 赵世伟,周印东,吴金水.子午岭北部不同植被类型土壤水分特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(4):119-122.
[3] 张光灿,夏江宝,王贵霞,等.鲁中花岗山区人工林土壤水分物理性质[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):44-48.
[4] 李德生,张萍,张水龙,等.黄前库区经济林土壤水文效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(1):141-143.
[5] 郑郁善,郭海涛,徐凤兰,等.福建含笑杉木混交林水源涵养功能差异研究[J].福建林学院学报,1997,17(2):126-130.
[6] 王光玉.杉木混交林水源涵养和土壤性质研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(S1):15-20.
[7] 邓艳,蒋忠诚,李先琨,等.广西弄岗不同演替阶段植被群落的小气候特征[J].热带地理,2004,24(4):364-367.
[8] 田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地不同海拔蒙古栎林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):221-226.
[9] 李军,田超,杨新兵.河北省木兰林管局典型森林类型枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):192-196.
[10] 李淑春,张伟,姚卫星,等.冀北山地不同林分类型林冠层降水分配研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):124-127.
[11] 潘明亮,访军,谭伟,等.贵州西部四种典型林地土壤水文特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):139-143.
[12] 黄进,杨会,张金池.桐庐生态公益林主要林分类型的土壤水文效应[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(3):1094-1099.
[13] 刘敏,王玉杰,赵洋毅,等.重庆缙云山水源涵养林地土壤水文效应[J].中国水土保持,2010(5):41-44.
相似文献/References:
[1]鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同海拔人工油松林枯落物及其土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):54.
LU Shao-wei,CHEN Bo,PAN Qing-hua,et al.Hydrological Effects of Forest Litters and Soil in Pinus Tabuliformis Plantations at the Different Altitudes of Mountains of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):54.
[2]刘忠玲,刘建明,吕跃东.倭肯河上游两种林型枯落物和土壤持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):235.
Characteristics of Litter and Soil Water-Holding of Two Types Forest Stand in Upstream of Woken River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):235.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2012-06-15;改回日期:2012-11-06。
基金项目:林业公益性行业科研专项课题“冀北山区典型森林生态系统健康经营技术研究与示范”（200804022F）
作者简介:赵建生(1973-),男,河北承德市人,本科,林业工程师,主要研究方向:林业生产与管理。E-mail:bds3030655@126.com
通讯作者:杨新兵(1978-),男,河北涉县人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向:水土保持、森林健康经营。E-mail:hbyxb2008@126.com