[1]秦纪洪,武艳镯,孙辉,等.彭州市龙门山不同地震裸地次生演替初期土壤酶活性研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(03):55-59.
　QIN Ji-hong,WU Yan-zhuo,SUN Hui,et al.Study on the Soil Enzyme Activity Dynamics under Different Ecological Restoration Models on Earquake-Induced Bareland in Mt. Longmen, Pengzhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):55-59.
点击复制

彭州市龙门山不同地震裸地次生演替初期土壤酶活性研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 20 期数: 2013年03期 页码: 55-59 栏目: 出版日期: 2013-06-28
Title:
Study on the Soil Enzyme Activity Dynamics under Different Ecological Restoration Models on Earquake-Induced Bareland in Mt. Longmen, Pengzhou
作者:
秦纪洪1, 武艳镯2, 孙辉2, 王琴2
1. 成都大学 城乡建设学院环境工程系, 成都 610106;
2. 四川大学 环境科学与工程系, 成都 610065
Author(s):
QIN Ji-hong1, WU Yan-zhuo2, SUN Hui2, WANG Qin2
1. Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Urban and Rural Construction, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China;
2. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
关键词:
汶川地震; 次生演替; 生态恢复; 土壤酶活性; 龙门山
Keywords:
Wenchuan earthquake; secondary succession; ecological restoration; soil enzyme activities; Mt. Longmen
分类号:
S154.2
摘要:
地震形成的次生裸地的生态恢复包括植被和土壤的结构与功能恢复两个方面。选取彭州龙门山地震崩塌地、泥石流冲积扇、滑坡体等震后形成的三个典型次生裸地恢复3 a后，对表土（0—30 cm）有机碳、水溶性氮、有效磷和土壤酶活性等性质进行了研究，以评价恢复初期不同次生裸地的土壤恢复状况。结果显示，自然恢复3 a，土壤有机碳恢复到原生样地的27%~42%，可溶性碳恢复至原生样地的25%~46%，可溶性氮恢复至原生样地的6%~14%，有效磷恢复至原生样地的21%~83%。土壤酶中，过氧化氢酶活性恢复较快，达到对照样地过氧化氢酶活性的70%以上，而脲酶、蔗糖酶、碱性磷酸酶活性恢复较慢，分别为对照样地的5%~19%，6%~48%，6%~26%，因此地震形成的次生裸地上土壤肥力质量与土壤酶活性的恢复是一个长期的过程。
Abstract:
Ecological restoration on those secondary bareland induced by earthquake generally includes restoration of vegetation and soil structure and function. Topsoils (0-30 cm) were sampled from three typical sites of secondary bareland caused by 5·12 Wenchuan Earthquake, i.e., earthquake collapse, debris flow alluvial fan, and landslide site in Mt. Longmen, soil enzyme activities, soil organic carbon, dissolved N, and available P were examined to determine soil restoration status after 3 years of earthquake. Results showed that after three years of natural restoration of vegetation, soil organic carbon, dissolved organic C, dissolved nitrogen, available phosphorus have been recovered to 27%~42%, 25%~46%, 6%~14%, 21%~83% of those in control plots, respectively. For soil enzymes, catalase activity was restored to more than 70% of that undisturbed plots, while activities of urease, sucrase, and alkaline phosphatase restored slowly, only were restored to 5%~19%, 6%~48%, and 6%~26% of those in undisturbed plots respectively, which indicated that restoration of soil fertility and soil enzyme activity is a long-term process for those secondary bare lands induced by earthquake.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张庆费,宋永吕,由文辉.浙江天童植物群落次生演替与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报,1999,19(2):174-178.
[2] 蒋金平.黄土高原半干旱丘陵区生态恢复中植被与土壤质量演变关系[D].兰州:兰州大学,2007.
[3] 姜发艳,孙辉,林波,等.川西亚高山云杉人工林恢复过程中表层土壤碳动态变化[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(11):2581-2587.
[4] 杨万勤,钟章成,韩玉萍.缙云山森林土壤酶活性的分布特征,季节动态及其与四川大头茶的关系研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,1999,24(3):318-324.
[5] Bandick A K, Dick R P. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities[J]. Soil Biololgy & Biochemistry,1999,31(11):1471-1479.
[6] Groffman P M, Mc Dowellb W H, Myersc J C, et al. Soil microbial biomass and activity in tropical riparian forests[J]. Soil Biololy & Biochemistry,2001,33(10):1339-1348.
[7] Yang W Q, Zhong Z C, Tao J P. Study on relationship between soil enzymic activities and plant species diversity in forest ecosystem of mountain Jinyun[J]. Sci Silvae Sin.(林业科学),2001,37(4):124-128.
[8] 张刘东,李传荣,孙明高,等.沿海破坏山体周边不同植被恢复模式的土壤酶活性[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):112-116.
[9] 安韶山,黄懿梅,刘梦云,等.宁南宽谷丘陵区植被恢复中土壤酶活性的响应及其评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(3):31-34.
[10] 崔晓晓,王纪杰,罗惠宁,等.喀斯特峡谷区植被恢复过程中土壤酶活性的变化[J].南京林业大学学报,2011,35(2):103-107.
[11] 李媛媛,周运超,邹军,等.黔中石灰岩地区典型灌木林土壤酶活性与植物物种多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(3):245-249.
[12] 武艳镯,秦纪洪,孙辉,等.彭州市龙门山震后迹地植物群落生态恢复初探[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):140-146.
[13] 杨红露,刘冬梅,孙辉.地震的生态破坏及其恢复重建研究进展[J].四川环境,2009,28(4):97-101.
[14] 陈学华,周建中.基于GIS和RS的四川省彭州市土壤侵蚀敏感性评价[J].山地学报,2011,29(6):707-712.
[15] 司渤洋,第宝锋,张斌,等.基于GIS的汶川地震灾区小流域土壤侵蚀评价:以彭州龙门山区为例[J].山地学报,2011,29(4):433-441.
[16] 蔡柯柯,何政伟,倪忠云,等.基于RS和GIS的彭州市震毁土地信息提取及分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):43-45.
[17] Jones D L, Willett V B. Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38(5):991-999.
[18] Cambardella C A, Elliott E T. Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1992,56(3):777-783.
[19] 中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会.土壤农化常规分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.
[20] 周礼恺.土壤酶学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
[21] 和文祥,朱铭莪.陕西土壤脲酶与土壤肥力关系研究[J].土壤学报,1997,34(1):42-52.

相似文献/References:

[1]王树森,余新晓,班嘉蔚,等.华北土石山区天然森林植被演替中群落结构和物种多样性变化的研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(06):48.
　WANG Shu-sen,YU Xin-xiao,BAN Jia-wei,et al.Community Structure and Species Diversity Changes of Forest Vegetation with Succession in Rocky Mountain Area of North of China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(03):48.
[2]文卓立,周飞.缙云山典型植物群落次生演替中土壤抗冲性研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(02):13.
　WEN Zhuo-li,ZHOU Fei.Study on Soil Anti-Scourability in Secondary Succession of Typical Plant Communities in Jinyun Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):13.
[3]张健,刘国彬,许明祥,等.黄土丘陵区植被次生演替灌木初期土壤物理性质特征[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):101.
　ZHANG Jian,LIU Guo-bin,XU Ming-xiang,et al.Soil Physical Properties of Vegetation Secondary Succession on Early Shrub Stage in Loess Hill Gully[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):101.
[4]倪忠云,何政伟,赵银兵,等.汶川地震前后都江堰植被盖度变化的遥感研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):45.
　NI Zhong-yun,HE Zheng-wei,ZHAO Yin-bing,et al.Study on Vegetation Coverage Changes in Dujiangyan Before and After Wenchuan Earthquake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):45.
[5]魏斌,贾国梅,杨卓,等.鄂东南弃耕地自然恢复过程中微生物碳动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):159.
　WEI Bin,JIA Guo-mei,YANG Zhuo,et al.Dynamic Change of Microbial Carbon in the Process of Spontaneous Recovery of the Abandonment of Farmland in Southeast Hubei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):159.
[6]刘连中,刘洪江,朱怀方.汶川地震次生山地灾害危险性评价及震后减灾对策经济学分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):210.
　LIU Lian-zhong,LIU Hong-jiang,ZHU Huai-fang.Dangerous Evaluation for the Secondary Mountain Hazard of Wenchuan Earthquake and Its Economic Mitigation Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):210.
[7]蔡柯柯,何政伟,倪忠云,等.基于RS和GIS的彭州市震毁土地信息提取及分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):43.
　CAI Ke-ke,HE Zheng-wei,NI Zhong-yun,et al.Extraction and Analysis of Destroyed Land Information of Pengzhou Based on RS and GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):43.
[8]冯文凯,杜杰,石豫川,等.一颗印沟泥石流评价及震后预测[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(06):68.
　FEGN Wen-kai,DU Jie,SHI Yu-chuan,et al.Evaluation and Prediction After Earthquake of the Yikeyin Debris Flow[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):68.
[9]倪忠云,何政伟,赵银兵,等.汶川地震极重灾区土地损毁研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(03):198.
　NI Zhong-yun,HE Zheng-wei,ZHAO Yin-bing,et al.Study on Damaged Land in Heavy Disaster Area of Wenchuan Earthquake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):198.
[10]丁军,朱静,王磊,等.5·12汶川地震灾区茂县地质灾害危险性评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(05):12.
　DING Jun,ZHU Jing,WANG Lei,et al.Hazard Assessment of Geohazards in 5·12 Wenchuan Earthquake Hazard Area of Maoxian County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):12.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2012-10-12;改回日期:2012-11-16。
基金项目:成都市科技局项目（10YTYB130SF-023）；成都大学校基金（2010XJZ13）和中央高校基本科研业务费（2010SCU22007）
作者简介:秦纪洪(1981-),女,四川成都人,博士,讲师,主要从事环境变化背景下高寒生态系统效应方面的研究。E-mail:floodqjh@gmail.com
通讯作者:孙辉(1971-),男,四川南充人,副研究员,主要从事土壤退化过程及恢复生态方面的研究。E-mail:sunhuifiles@gmail.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01