YANG Jun-jun,GAO Xiao-hong,LI Qi-jiang,et al.SWAT Model Construction and Uncertainty Analysis on Its Parameters for the Huangshui River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):82-88,93.
湟水流域SWAT模型构建及参数不确定性分析
- Title:
- SWAT Model Construction and Uncertainty Analysis on Its Parameters for the Huangshui River Basin
- Keywords:
- sensitivity analysis; uncertainty analysis; PSO algorithm; SWAT-CUP; SWAT model
- 分类号:
- TV121
- 摘要:
- 敏感性分析和不确定性分析是分布式水文模型参数校准和模型构建的先决条件。以位于青藏高原与黄土高原过渡地带的青海湟水流域为例，基于SWAT模型的拉丁超立方和单次单因子（LH-OAT）采样方法和SWAT-CUP程序的拉丁超立方采样方法进行模型参数敏感性分析，同时以SWAT-CUP的P因子和R因子进行模型不确定性分析，最终结合手动调参和自动率定算法，构建湟水流域分布式水文模型。结果表明：湟水流域日尺度模拟中，率定期模型平均确定系数为0.7，平均效率系数为0.68；验证期平均确定系数为0.65，平均效率系数为0.53，可以满足应用要求；PSO算法在水文模型率定中总体表现良好；基于SWAT模型和SWAT-CUP程序的单次率定用时分别为3.5 min和2.2 min，SWAT-CUP程序明显快于SWAT；分析结果还表明：模型不确定性和模型率定结果精度并不一致，但模型不确定性决定着模型验证期的结果精度，为确保验证期精度，必须降低模型不确定性；模型自动率定中，相同迭代次数下，SWAT模型对于流量较大的子流域率定效果较好。
- Abstract:
- Sensitivity analysis(SA) and uncertainty analysis(UA) are prerequisites for parameter calibration and distributed hydrologic model development. Taking the Huangshui River basin located in Qinghai—Tibetan Plateau and Loess Plateau as a case, firstly, based on SWAT model and SWAT-CUP program, sensitivity analysis was carried out by combing Latin-Hypercube(LH) and One-Factor-At-a-Time(OAT) sampling with Latin hypercube sampling; secondly, uncertainty analysis was conducted by using P-factor and R-factor of SWAT-CUP program; finally, parameter calibration and distributed hydrologic model building for the Huangshui River basin were performed by the coupled method of manual and auto-calibration. The results showed that the average determination coefficient was 0.7 and the average Nash-Sutcliff was 0.68 for the calibration. The average determination coefficient was 0.65 and the average Nash-Sutcliff was 0.53 for the validation, the result could meet the application requirements. PSO algorithm had a good performance in the model calibration. The time for per calibration was 3.5 min and 2.2 min for SWAT model and SWAT-CUP, respectively, obviously the SWAT-CUP’s calibration time was shorter than that of SWAT model. Uncertainty analysis results were not always accordance with the calibration result precision, but it determined the validation precision of the model. So for the validation of the model, the uncertainty of the model should be cut down. Under the same times of the model calibration, SWAT model had a better runoff simulation value for the larger subbasin than the smaller one.
参考文献/References:
[1] Abbaspour K C, Johnson A, van Genuchten M T. Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure[J]. Vadose Zone Journal,2004,4(3):1340-1352.
[2] 左其亭,王中根.现代水文学[M].郑州:2版.黄河水利出版社,2006.
[3] 黄清华,张万昌.SWAT模型参数敏感性分析及应用[J].干旱区地理,2010,33(1):8-15.
[4] 王中根,朱新军,夏军,等.海河流域分布式SWAT模型的构建[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(4):1-6.
[5] Mansour T, Saeid M, Seyyed A A, et al. Uncertainty analysis in sediment load modeling using ANN and SWAT model[J]. Water Resour Manage,2010,24(9):1747-1761.
[6] Yang J, Abbaspour K C, Reichert P, et al. Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to Chaohe Basin in China In review[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2008,358(1/2):1-23.
[7] 姚允龙,吕宪国,王蕾.流域分布式水文模型SWAT空间输入数据的不确定性研究[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2009,25(4):470-475.
[8] 陈德胜,丁爱中,潘成忠,等.基于SWAT模型的沣河流域径流模拟不确定性分析[EB/OL].中国科技论文在线.(2011-03-14)[2011-6-19). http://www.paper.edu.cn/index.php/default/releasepaper/content/201103-581.[9] 薛晨.基于SWAT模型的产流产沙模拟与模型参数不确定性分析[D].北京:华北电力大学(北京),2011.
[10] 陈强,苟思,秦大庸,等.一种高效的SWAT模型参数自动率定方法[J].水利学报,2010,41(1):113-119.
[11] Web Page Eawag Aquatic Research. http://www.eawag.ch/forschung/siam/software/swat/index.
[12] Fontaine T A, Gruickshank T S, Arnold J G, et al. Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool(SWAT)[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2002,262(1/4):209-223.
[13] 余建英,何旭宏.数据统计分析与SPSS应用[M].1版.北京:人民邮电出版社,2004.
[14] Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, Srinivasan R, et al. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Documentation Version 2009[EB/OL]. Texas A&M University System College station, Texas 77843-2118,2011,365.
[15] Schmalz B, Fohrer N. Comparing model sensitivities of different landscapes using the ecohydrological SWAT model[J]. Advances in Geosciences,2009,21:91-98.
[16] Abbaspour K C. SWAT-CUP2 SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs Version 2[R]. Eawag:Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology,2011.
[17] Griensven A V, Meixner T, Grunwald S, et al. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2006,324(1/4):10-23.
[18] Abbaspour K C, Yang J, Maximova I, et al. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,333(2/4):413-430.
[19] Zhang X, Srinivasan R, Zhao K, et al. Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model[J]. Hydrological Processes,2008,23(3):430-441.
[20] Motovilov Y G, Gottschalk L, Engeland K, et al. Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,1999,98/99:257-277.
相似文献/References:
[1]杨光,李庆和,孙保平.基于GIS的不同精度DEM提取地形指标误差分析——以盐池县南部山区为例[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(05):57.
YANG Guang,LI Qing-he,SUN Bao-ping.An Uncertainty Analysis of Terrain Features Derived from DEM with Different Precision Based on GIS-Taking the South Mountain Areas of Yanchi County as Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):57.
[2]瞿思敏,嵇海祥,包为民,等.基于抗差估计方法的流域水文模型的不确定性分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(02):63.
QU Si-min,JI Hai-xiang,BAO Wei-min,et al.Uncertainty Analysis of Xinanjiang Hydrological Model Based on Robust Estimation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):63.
[3]李进鹏,王飞,穆兴民,等.延河流域土地利用变化对其生态服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):110.
LI Jin-peng,WANG Fei,MU Xing-min,et al.Impacts of Landuse Change on Ecosystem Services Value in the Yanhe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(01):110.
[4]庞靖鹏,刘昌明,徐宗学.基于SWAT模型的径流与土壤侵蚀过程模拟[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):88.
PANG Jing-peng,LIU Chang-ming,XU Zong-xue.Streamflow and Soil Erosion Simulation Based on SWAT Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):88.
[5]朱红雷,史晓亮,李英臣,等.基于SWAT模型的TRMM降水数据径流模拟适宜性评价[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):105.
ZHU Honglei,SHI Xiaoliang,LI Yingchen,et al.Evaluation of Runoff Simulation Using TRMM Precipitation Data Based on SWAT Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):105.
[6]杨云松.基于土地利用的甘州区生态系统服务价值研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(05):163.
YANG Yunsong.Study of Ecosystem Service Values Based on Land Use Change of Ganzhou District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):163.
[7]李凤欢,罗潋葱,翟海涛,等.SWAT对大沙河水库流域径流模拟研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(02):87.
LI Feng-huan,LUO Lian-cong,ZHAI Hai-tao,et al.Simulation of Runoff Parameters with SWAT in Dashahe Reservoir Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):87.
[8]梁钊雄,王兮之,王军.SWAT模型在粤北连江流域的应用研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):140.
LIANG Zhao-xiong,WANG Xi-zhi,WANG Jun.Study on the Application of SWAT Model to Lianjiang Basin in Northern Guangdong[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):140.
[9]郭文召,刘亚坤,徐向舟,等.水蚀风蚀交错区黄土抗剪强度敏感性分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):23.
GUO Wenzhao,LIU Yakun,XU Xiangzhou,et al.Sensitivity on Shear Strength of the Loess in the Ecotone of Wind-Water Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):23.
[10]刘燕,刘友存,边晓辉,等.江南丘陵地区湿润指数变化特征及敏感性分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(02):263.
LIU Yan,LIU Youcun,BIAN Xiaohui,et al.Variation Characteristics and Sensitivity Analysis of Wetness Index in Jiangnan Hilly Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):263.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2012-01-12;改回日期:2012-07-11。
基金项目:国家自然基金项目（40861022）；中国科学院“西部之光”项目（科发人教字[2006]378号）
作者简介:杨军军(1984-),男,陕西渭南人,硕士研究生,主要从事遥感与地理信息系统应用研究。E-mail:junjun_yang@126.com
通讯作者:高小红(1963-),女,陕西人,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事遥感与地理信息系统应用研究。E-mail:xiaohonggao226@gmail.com