[1]李晶,高照良,张小娟,等.宝牛高速公路路域植被恢复效果调查分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):100-104.
　LI Jing,GAO Zhao-liang,ZHANG Xiao-juan,et al.Investigation and Assessment on Vegetation Restoration along the Baoniu Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):100-104.
点击复制

宝牛高速公路路域植被恢复效果调查分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 19 期数: 2012年06期 页码: 100-104 栏目: 出版日期: 2012-12-20
Title:
Investigation and Assessment on Vegetation Restoration along the Baoniu Highway
作者:
李晶1, 高照良1,2, 张小娟1, 田红卫1
1. 西北农林科技大学 资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌 7121002;
2. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
LI Jing1, GAO Zhao-liang1,2, ZHANG Xiao-juan1, TIAN Hong-wei1
1. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
高速公路; 植被恢复; 多样性指数; 地上生物量
Keywords:
highway; vegetation restoration; species diversity; aboveground biomass
分类号:
Q143
摘要:
为探讨高速公路路域植被恢复效果,以宝牛高速公路路域植被为研究对象,对比分析了路基、路堑、路肩平台、渣场和取弃土场5种不同位置的植被群落特征、多样性及草本植物地上生物量等恢复情况.结果表明:(1) 宝牛高速公路路域的植物种类较为丰富,而且极大部分植物种是自然入侵的乡土植物,各位置的植物种生活型都以草本植物为主,该路域植被恢复还处于初期阶段.(2) 不同路域位置的丰富度表现为自然>路肩平台>渣场=取弃土场>路基>路堑,从Shannon-Weiner指数、Simpson指数和Pielou均匀度指数来看,路域植被之间以及和自然植被之间的变化都不显著.(3) 在路基护坡中,拱形骨架护坡模式的植被恢复效果较好;路堑护坡中,效果最好的是土工格室护坡.(4) 对于渣场而言,建议人工种植苜蓿提高土壤肥力,并且在恢复植被前尽量覆土,从而为植被生长提供较好的物质基础.
Abstract:
In order to assess the effect of vegetation restoration along the highway, a case study was conducted on the revegetated land along the Baoniu highway by investigating the characteristics of vegetation communities, species diversity and aboveground biomass on the embankment, cutting, residue field, shoulders, dug field. The results showed that: (1) Species diversity of Baoniu highway was abundant, and most of which were native grass species, indicating that it was still at the initial stage of vegetation restoration. (2) Plant species richness in five sites ranked as: natural>shoulders>residue field=dug field>embankment>cutting. No significant difference was found between road area vegetation and natural vegetation on indices of Shannon-Weiner, Simpson, and Pielou. (3) The framework seeding was the best model for embankment restoration while the geocel seeding is best for the cutting. (4) For the residue field, alfalfa should be planted to improve soil fertility, and to provide the sufficient nutrients for plants, covering with soil was necessary before planting.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈辉,李双成,郑度.青藏公路铁路沿线生态系统特征及道路修建对其影响.山地学报[J],2003,21(5):559-567.
[2] 黄锦辉,李群,刘晓丽.河南周口至省界段高速公路建设对生态环境的影响.生态学杂志[J],2002,21(1):74-79.
[3] Forman R T T, Sperling D, Bisson ette J A, et al. Road Ecology:Science and Solutions[M]. Washington DC: Inland Press,2002.
[4] 董世魁,崔保山,丁宗凯,等.大保高速公路老营段路域植被生态恢复[J].生态学报,2008,28(4):1483-1489.
[5] 李洪远,鞠美庭.生态恢复的原理与实践[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
[6] 孙书存,包维楷.恢复生态学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
[7] 王建国,樊军,王全九.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区植被地上生物量及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(3):556-564.
[8] Martin L M, Wilsey B J. Assessing grassland rest oration success: relative roles of seed additions and native ungulate activities[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2006,43(6):1029-1043.

相似文献/References:

[1]祝遵凌,崔利杰,王飒.路基边坡土壤重金属污染特征及评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):127.
　ZHU Zun-ling,CUI Li-jie,WANG Sa.Characteristics and Assessment on Heavy Metal Pollution of Soils in Embankment Slope of Expressway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):127.
[2]田红卫,黄志荣,高照良,等.高速公路路域土壤特性分析及其质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):59.
　TIAN Hong-wei,HUANG Zhi-rong,GAO Zhao-liang,et al.Assessment of Soil Properties and Quality of the Freeway in Road Area of Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):59.
[3]毛正君,杨晓华,王晓钟.乌鞘岭地区高速公路沿线地质灾害发育特征及防治措施[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):202.
　MAO Zheng-jun,YANG Xiao-hua,WANG Xiao-zhong.Study on Prevention Measures and Development Characteristics of Geological Hazards along the Expressway in the Wushaoling[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):202.
[4]查轩,唐克丽,白红英.植被恢复对土壤抗侵蚀特性影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):37.
　Zha Xuan,Tang Keli,Bai Hongying.The Effect of Vegetation Restoration on Properties of Soil Resistance in Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(06):37.
[5]郑粉莉,张科利,唐克丽,等.植被破坏与恢复对坡面浅沟侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):54.
　Zheng Fenli,Zhang Keli,Tang Keli,et al.Impact of Vegetation Destruction and Restoration on Shallow Gully Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(06):54.
[6]郭晓敏,牛德奎,刘苑秋,等.江西省红壤侵蚀劣地植被恢复技术及综合治理效果研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(02):108.
　Guo Xiaomin,Niu Dekui,Liu Yuanqiu,et al.Restoring Technique of Vegetation on Eroded Red Soil in Jiangxi and Benefits From Its Comprehensive Harnessing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(06):108.
[7]吕态能.东川严重水土流失区植被恢复对策[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):134.
　LU Tai-neng.Countermeasures for Vegetation Recovery in Dongchuan Region with Serious Soil Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(06):134.
[8]刘震.利用生态的自我修复能力防治水土流失[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):13.
　LIU Zhen.To Prevent and Harness Soil and Water Loss Using the Self-recovering Capability of Ecosystem[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(06):13.
[9]王改玲,白中科.安太堡露天煤矿排土场植被恢复的主要限制因子及对策[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):38.
　WANG Gai-ling,BAI Zhong-ke.Main Limiting Factors for Re-vegetation and Measures of Dumping Site in Antaibao Opencast Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(06):38.
[10]卓慕宁,李定强,贺新良,等.论高速公路建设中的水土保持生态恢复[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):209.
　ZHUO Mu-ning,LI Ding-qiang,HE Xin-liang,et al.Discussion on Ecological Restoration with Water and Soil Conservation in Highway Construction[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(06):209.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2012-4-30;改回日期:2012-5-25。
基金项目:"十二五"农村领域国家科技计划课题"农田水土保持关键技术研究与示范"(2011BAD31B01)
作者简介:李晶(1987- ),女,内蒙古包头人,硕士,主要从事工程开发建设与高速公路边坡防护研究.E-mail:lj72hours@126.co
通讯作者:高照良(1969- ),男,河南灵宝人,博士,副研究员,主要从事土壤侵蚀与荒漠化研究.E-mail:gzl@ms.iswc.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01