[1]侯兰功,肖洪浪.额济纳绿洲草地蒸散系数研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):126-129.
　HOU Lan-gong,XIAO Hong-lang.Study on Evapotranspiration Coefficient of Grassland during the Growing Season in the Ejina Oasis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):126-129.
点击复制

额济纳绿洲草地蒸散系数研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 19 期数: 2012年05期 页码: 126-129 栏目: 出版日期: 2012-10-20
Title:
Study on Evapotranspiration Coefficient of Grassland during the Growing Season in the Ejina Oasis
作者:
侯兰功1, 肖洪浪2
1. 滁州学院, 地理信息与旅游学院, 安徽, 滁州239000;
2. 中国科学院, 寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 兰州730000
Author(s):
HOU Lan-gong1, XIAO Hong-lang2
1. College of Geographic Information and Tourism, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou, Anhui 239000, China;
2. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
关键词:
额济纳绿洲; 生长季; 蒸散系数; 蒸散发
Keywords:
Ejina oasis; the growing season; evapotranspiration coefficient; evapotranspiration
分类号:
S718.5
摘要:
联合国粮农组织推荐的蒸散计算方法中，蒸散系数是计算实际蒸散必不可少的参数。本文从蒸散系数的定义出发，在2005年额济纳绿洲生长季连续观测的基础上，运用波文比能量平衡法计算额济纳绿洲草地的实际蒸散量，利用FAO 56 Penman-Monteith模型计算草地的参考蒸散，将实际蒸散与参考蒸散相除即得到额济纳绿洲草地的蒸散系数。通过研究发现：生长季草地的蒸散量(ETc)为446.96 mm，从生长季初期开始，草地的蒸散量开始增加，在6月后半月达到最大值6.724 mm/d，此后蒸散量开始快速下降，在生长季末期达到最低值1.215 mm/d；蒸散系数(Kc)呈现出与蒸散量(ETc)相同的变化趋势，自生长季初期开始蒸散系数快速上升，在6月后半月达到生长季最大值0.623，之后随着草地生长减缓，蒸散系数快速下降，直至生长季末期草地停止生长。对额济纳绿洲草地蒸散系数的计算可以为该地区准确估算草地生态需水量提供依据。
Abstract:
According to works of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, evapotranspiration coefficient is essential parameter to calculate actual evapotranspiration. Based on the definition of evapotranspiration coefficient and successive observation, evapotranspiration(ETc) of grassland in the Ejina oasis of northwest China was estimated by application of Bowen ration-energy balance method(BREB), and reference evapotranspiraiton was calculated by using FAO 56 Penman-Monteith model during the growing season in 2005. Then, according to the definition, the evapotranspiration coefficient of grassland was given in the Ejina oasis. During the growing season, total ETc was 446.96 mm. From the beginning of growing season, the ETc increased gradually, and reached its maximum value of 6.724 mm/d in the last fifteen days of June. Hereafter the ETc dropped rapidly, and reached its minimum value of 1.215 mm/d at the end of growing season. The variation pattern of crop coefficient(Kc) was similar to that of ETc. From the beginning of growing season, the Kc value increased rapidly, and reached its maximum value of 0.623 in the last fifteen days of June. Afterward, with slowing growth of grassland, the value dropped rapidly at the end of growing season. The evapotranspiration coefficient is helpful to estimate accurately ecological water demand of grassland in the Ejina oasis.

参考文献/References:

[1] 韦东山, 张秋良, 王立明, 等.额济纳地区草地可持续经营策略[J].内蒙古科技与经济, 2003(5):26-28.
[2] 肖洪浪, 程国栋.黑河流域水问题与水管理的初步研究[J].中国沙漠, 2006, 26(1):1-5.
[3] 周茂先, 肖洪浪, 罗芳, 等.额济纳三角洲地下水盐特征与植被生长的相关研究[J].中国沙漠, 2004, 24(4):431-436.
[4] 李佳陶, 余伟莅, 李钢铁, 等.不同地下水位胡杨蒸腾速率与叶水势的变化分析[J].内蒙古林业科技, 2006(1):1-4.
[5] Fritschen L J. Evapotranspiration rates of field crops determined by the Bowen ratio method[J]. Agron. J., 1966, 58(3):339-342.
[6] Malek E, Bingham G E, McCurdy G D. Evapotranspiration from the margin and moist playa of a closed desert valley[J]. J. Hydrol., 1990, 120(1/4): 15-34.
[7] Wight J R, Hanson C L, Wright J L. Comparing Bowen ratio-energy balance systems for measuring ET[C]//Allen R G, Van Bavel C M U. Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems, Integrated Perspectives. New York: Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 1993.
[8] Cargnel M D, Orchansky A L, Brevedan R E, et al. Evaptranspiration measurements over a soybean crop[C]//Camp C R, Sadler E J, Yoder R E. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling. Proceedings of the International Conference, San Antonio:Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI, 1996.
[9] Malek E, Bingham G E. Growing season evapotranspiration and crop coefficient[C]//Allen R G, Van Bavel C M U. Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems, Integrated Perspectives. New York:Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 1993.
[10] Grant D A, Meinzer F C. Regulation of transpiration in field-grown sugarcane: evaluation of the stomatal response to humidity with the Bowen ratio technique[J]. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1991, 53(3):169-183.
[11] Malek E, Bingham G E, McCurdy G D. Continuous measurement of aerodynamic and alfalfa canopy resistances using the Bowen ratio-energy balance and Penman-Monteith methods[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1992, 59(1/2):187-194.
[12] Alves I, Perrier A, Pereira L S. Penman-Monteith equation: how good is the ‘big leaf’[C]//Camp C R, Sadler E J, Yoder R E. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling. Proceedings of the International Conference, San Antonio: Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph MI, 1996.
[13] Ortega-Farias S O, Cuenca R H, English M. Hourly reference evapotranspiration by Bowen ratio and Penman methods[C]//Allen R G, Van Bavel C M U. Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems, Integrated Perspectives. New York: Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 1993.
[14] Farahani H J, Bausch W C. Performance of evapotranspiration models for maize-bare soil to closed canopy[J]. Trans. ASAE, 1995, 38(4):1049-1059.
[15] Todd R W, Klocke N L, Arkebauer T J. Latent heat fluxes from a developing canopy partitioned by energy balance-combination models[C]//Camp C R, Sadler E J, Yoder R E. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling. Proceedings of the International Conference. San Antonio:Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph MI, 1996.
[16] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. FAO 56 Penman-Monteith model. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, 1998.
[17] Walter I A, Allen R G, Elliott R, et al. ASCE’s Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation[C]//Proceedings of the 4th National Irrigation Symposium, 2000.
[18] Temesgen B, Eching S, Davidoff B, et al. Comparison of some reference evapotranspiration equations for California[J]. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE, 2005, 131(1):73-84.

相似文献/References:

[1]罗芳,肖洪浪,齐善忠,等.额济纳三角洲地下水现状分析[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):56.
　LUO Fang,XIAO Hong-lang,QI Shan-zhong,et al.Changeable Characteristics of Groundwater and Salt in Erjina Oasis, Arid Northwestern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):56.
[2]席海洋,冯起,司建华,等.分水对额济纳绿洲浅层地下水水化学性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):135.
　XI Hai-yang,FENG Qi,SI Jian-hua,et al.Hydrochemistry of Shallow Groundwater Changes in Ejina Oasis of the Lower Reaches of the Heihe River After Its Water Import[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):135.
[3]马燕,李志萍,曹希强.近200年来额济纳绿洲土地荒漠化进程及其驱动机制[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(05):158.
　MA Yan,LI Zhi-ping,CAO Xi-qiang.Study of Land Desertification and Its Driving Mechanism in Ejina Oasis During Recent 200 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(05):158.
[4]杨会蒲,韩冰.黄土丘陵区油松人工林温度效应的研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):151.
　YANG Hui-pu,HAN Bing.Effect of Artificial Chinese Pine Stands on Temperature in Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(05):151.
[5]贾文雄,陈京华.1982-2014年祁连山植被生长季NDVI变化及其对气候的响应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(02):264.
　JIA Wenxiong,CHEN Jinghua.Variations of NDVI and Its Response to Climate Change in the Growing Season of Vegetation in Qilianshan Mountains from 1982 to 2014[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):264.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2012-3-1;改回日期:2012-4-22。
基金项目:安徽高校省级自然科学研究项目(KJ2012B124);安徽省高校省级优秀青年人才基金项目(2012SQRL158);安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1208085QD73);滁州学院科研启动基金(2011qd04)
作者简介:侯兰功(1979- )，男，安徽淮南人，博士，主要从事生态水文与水资源管理研究。E-mail：soundskyhlg@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01