TIAN Xiao,ZHOU Yun-chao,LIU Xiao-yun,et al.Effects of Hedgerow of Species Configuration on the Interception of Nutrition Elements in the Sloping Cultivated Lands[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):89-93.
物种配置植物篱对坡耕地营养元素拦截效应
- Title:
- Effects of Hedgerow of Species Configuration on the Interception of Nutrition Elements in the Sloping Cultivated Lands
- 分类号:
- S157.4+33
- 摘要:
- 通过坡耕地21个径流小区、1个空白对照、6个不同处理方式植物篱(Hedgerow)组合模式，探讨了不同物种配置植物篱对耕地营养元素的拦截效应。结果表明：灰毛豆×紫花苜蓿植物篱对坡耕地营养元素的拦截效果最明显，其中，氮相对拦截总量为181.82 g/hm2，相对拦截率为79.08%；磷相对拦截总量为84.81 g/hm2，相对拦截率90.31%；钾相对拦截总量11.37 g/hm2，相对拦截率83.84%。灰毛豆×黄花菜对氮的拦截效应最小，氮相对拦截总量为117.30 g/hm2，相对拦截率为51.02%；灰毛豆×香根草对磷、钾的拦截效应最小，磷相对拦截总量为55.43 g/hm2，相对拦截率59.02%；钾相对拦截总量6.62 g/hm2，相对拦截率48.86%。不同物种配置植物篱对坡耕地营养元素均具有明显的拦截作用，灰毛豆×紫花苜蓿组合模式的拦截作用最为显著。
- Abstract:
- Through 21 runoff plots in the sloping cultivated lands including a control treatment, six combination patterns of hedgerows of different treatments, the effects of hedgerows of species configuration on the interception of nutrition elements in the sloping cultivated lands were discussed. The results showed that the hedgerows of Tephrosia purpurea L. Pers. and Medicago sativa L., have the significant effects on interception of nutrition elements, of which relative interception of total nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium are 181.82 g/hm2, 84.81 g/hm2 and 11.37 g/hm2 and relative interception rates are 79.08%, 90.31% and 83.84%, respectively, which is the best combination pattern than others in terms of effects of interception of nutrition elements in the sloping cultivated lands. However, the hedgerow of Tephrosia purpurea L. Pers. and Hemerocallis citrina Baroni, total relative interception of nitrogen is 117.30 g/hm2 and relative interception rate is 51.02%, which is worse than others with regard to effect of interception of nitrogen element, and the hedgerow of Tephrosia purpurea L. Pers. and Vetiveria zizanioides L., relative interception of total phosphorus, potassium of is 55.43 g/hm2 and 6.62 g/hm2, and relative interception rates are 59.02% and 48.86%, which is worse than others in terms of effects of interception of phosphorus, potassium elements. The results also show that all hedgerows of species configuration are obvious on the interception of nutrition elements in the sloping cultivated lands, but the combination of Tephrosia purpurea L. Pers. and Medicago sativa L. is the best combination pattern.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张建锋, 单奇华, 钱洪涛, 等.坡地固氮植物篱在农业面源污染控制方面的作用与营建技术[J].水土保持通报, 2008, 28(5):180-185.
[2] 董有浦.南方丘陵山地不同植物篱处理下水土流失研究[D].合肥:安徽大学, 2009.
[3] 朱青, 王兆骞, 尹迪信.贵州坡耕地水土保持措施效益研究[J].自然资源学报, 2008, 23(2):219-228.
[4] 陈明霞, 查轩.生草覆盖和植物篱措施对红壤坡地土壤侵蚀调控效应研究[J].亚热带资源与环境学报, 2009, 4(1):32-37.
[5] 刘建香, 贾秋鸿, 田树, 等.种植和施肥方式对云南坡耕地氮素流失的影响[J].云南农业大学学报, 2009, 24(4):590-595.
[6] 郭忠录, 钟诚, 蔡崇法, 等.等高植物篱/大豆间作根系相互作用对生长和氮素吸收利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(1):59-64.
[7] 彭熙, 李安定, 李苇洁, 等.不同植物篱模式下土壤物理变化及其减流减沙效应研究[J].土壤, 2009, 47(1):107-111.
[8] 张洪生, 刘金铜, 刘慧涛, 等.植物篱模式下土壤水分特征变化研究[J].华北农学报, 2009, 24(增刊):173-175.
[9] 吴玉红, 蔡青年, 林超文, 等.地埂植物篱对大型土壤动物多样性的影响[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(10):5320-5329.
[10] 全国农业技术推广服务中心.土壤分析技术规范[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2006:40-67.
[11] 杨皓宇, 赵小蓉, 曾祥忠, 等.不同农作制对四川紫色丘陵区地表径流氮、磷流失的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2009, 18(6):2344-2348.
[12] 王卫国, 童根平, 徐温, 等.3种常见速生灌木吸收红壤氮磷能力的比较[J].浙江林学院学报, 2009, 26(3):346-350.
[13] 马礼平.不同物种植物篱对耕地营养元素的拦截作用[D].贵阳:贵州大学, 2011.
相似文献/References:
[1]宋玥,张忠学.不同耕作措施对黑土坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):14.
SONG Yue,ZHANG Zhong-xue.The Effect of Different Tillage Measures on Soil Erosion in Slope Farmland in Black Soil Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):14.
[2]康万利,揭雨成,邢虎成.南方坡耕地种植苎麻水土保持效果和经济效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):86.
KANG Wan-li,JIE Yu-cheng,XING Hu-cheng.Study of Soil-Water Conservation Effects and Economic Benefit of Ramie in South Slope Crop Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):86.
[3]吴素业.皖西南山区坡耕地水土流失防治措施[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(04):38.
Wu Suye.The Control Practice of Water and Soil Loss in Hillside Fields of Southwestern Mountain Area of Anhui Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1996,3(06):38.
[4]林永知.丘陵地区坡耕地水土流失动态监测分析[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(01):120.
Lin Yongzhi.Analysis on the Dynamic Monitoring of Soil and Water Loss of Slope Farmland in Hilly Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(06):120.
[5]高岚,王振颖.辽宁省坡耕地资源普查及成果分析[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(04):44.
Gao Lan,Wang Zhenying.General Survey of Hillyland Resources and Result Analysis in Liaoning Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(06):44.
[6]孙景华,杨玉阁,张本家,等.辽北低山丘陵区坡耕地水土流失规律研究[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(04):65.
Sun Jinghua,Yang Yuge,Zhang Benjia,et al.Hilly Field Erosion Regulation in Low Mountain Region of Northern Liaoning[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(06):65.
[7]庞小明.坡耕地地膜小麦栽培技术研究初报[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):62.
Pang Xiaoming.The Culture Technology of Plastic Film Wheat in Slope Field[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(06):62.
[8]彭珂珊.黄土高原水土流失区退耕还林(草)的基本思路[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(02):164.
PENG Keshan.Thinking for Returning the Grain Plots to Forest and Grass Lands in Soil and Water Loess Areas on Loss Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(06):164.
[9]李凤,张如良.坡耕地实行保土耕作的效益试验分析[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):184.
LI Feng,ZHANG Ru-liang.Experiment Analysis on Cultivation by Conserving Soil in Sloping Fields[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(06):184.
[10]张永涛,王洪刚,李增印,等.坡改梯的水土保持效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(03):9.
ZHANG Yong-tao,WANG Hong-gang,LI Zeng-yin,et al.Soil and Water Conservation Benefits of Terracing on the Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(06):9.
[11]姚志杰,张社朝,陈云明.黄土丘陵区红豆草和苜蓿植物篱对土壤颗粒组成的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):20.
YAO Zhi-jie,ZHANG She-chao,CHEN Yun-ming.Effect of Sainfoin and Alfalfa Hedgerow on Soil Particles in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):20.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2011-5-25;改回日期:2011-6-19。
基金项目:贵阳“两湖一库专项”项目([2009]筑科农合同字第3-042号)
作者简介:田潇(1987- )，男，贵州沿河人，学士，从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究。E-mail：xtian2008@163.com
通讯作者:周运超(1964- )，贵州兴仁人，教授，博导，从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究。E-mail：fc.yczhou@gzu.edu.cn