[1]侯淑艳,曲晓晶,刘建新,等.基于综合评价法的天津市主要排污河流水质评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):61-64.
　HOU Shu-yan,QU Xiao-jing,LIU Jian-xin,et al.Water Quality Evaluation of Tianjin Main Blowdown River Based on Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):61-64.
点击复制

基于综合评价法的天津市主要排污河流水质评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 18 期数: 2011年04期 页码: 61-64 栏目: 出版日期: 2011-08-20
Title:
Water Quality Evaluation of Tianjin Main Blowdown River Based on Comprehensive Evaluation Method
作者:
侯淑艳1,2, 曲晓晶3, 刘建新2, 朱金兆1
1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院教育部水土保持与荒漠化防治重点实验室, 北京 100083;
2. 黑龙江省水土保持科学研究所, 黑龙江宾县 150400;
3. 吉林市农业科学院, 吉林吉林 132101
Author(s):
HOU Shu-yan1,2, QU Xiao-jing3, LIU Jian-xin2, ZHU Jin-zhao1
1. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combing of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Binxian, Heilongjiang 150400, China;
3. The Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Jilin City, Jilin, Jilin 132101, China
关键词:
天津市; 综合评价法; 水质评价
Keywords:
Tianjin city; comprehensive evaluation; water quality evaluation
分类号:
X824
摘要:
为了研究天津市主要排污河流的水质污染情况，利用综合评价法对天津市的5条主要排污河流：津河、南运河、海河、北运河、子牙河2009年12个月的水质监测数据进行了监测和评价。结果表明：从单项污染指数来看，海河的污染指数总磷>氨氮>总氮>化学需氧量>氟化物>1，说明海河的富营养化比较严重；海河的综合污染指数为12.15最高，津河和南运河的综合污染指数较低分别为2.76和2.37；污染分担率方面看，海河的总氮污染分担率也较高，达到了16.62%。最终水质污染程度（P）分析表明，海河P>0.5属于中度污染，其他4条河流P<0.5属于轻度污染。
Abstract:
In order to study the situation of the Tianjin main blowdown rivers’water contamination, we used comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the water quality of five main blowdown rivers in Tianjin, Jinhe River, South Canal, Haihe River, North canal and Ziya River. In 2009, we processed the monitoring and evaluation for water quality data. The results showed that:judging from single pollution index, Haihe Rivers’pollution index was in the order of total phosphorus>ammonia nitrogen>total nitrogen>chemical oxygen demand>fluoride>1, indicating that the eutrophication in Haihe Rivers was severe;The comprehensive pollution index of Haihe River was 12.15, which indices in Jin River and South canal were lower 2.76 and 2.37, respectively than in Haihe River, the rate of pollution contribution, the total nitrogen of Haihe River was 16.62%. Finally water pollution degree (P) analysis shows that, P>0.5 in Haihe River belongs to moderate pollution and P<0.5 in other four rivers belongs to light pollution.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘帅.天津市农村水资源开发利用分析[J].海河水利, 2006(6):16-18.
[2] 胡群, 宗涛.天津市水环境污染综合整治思路[J].天津建设科技, 2005, 15(2):42-44.
[3] 国家环保总局, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局.G B3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S].2002.
[4] 国家环保总局.H J/T 91-2002地表水和污水监测技术规范[S].2003.
[5] 王立林, 王鸿雁, 杜玉凤.于桥水库水环境质量现状评价及趋势分析[J].海河水利, 2007(3):18-20.
[6] 冯利红, 侯常春.天津市农村饮用水水质现状调查[J].职业与健康, 2003, 19(6):88-89.
[7] 王鑫, 庞金钊, 杨宗政.永定新河污染水体处理试验[J].工业水处理, 2006, 26(3):39-41, 55.
[8] 王振杰.独流减河水生态和环境修复问题初探[J].海河水利, 2006(2):26-27.
[9] 佟玉洁, 朱琳.天津津河营养状况综合评价及防治对策[J].城市环境与城市生态, 2003, 16(2):46-47.
[10] 孙学明, 文威, 孙淑娟, 等.天津海河氮磷营养盐和CODCr等污染现状研究[J].现代农业科技, 2008(11):362-366.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈波,鲁少波,李少宁,等.天津市不同污染梯度树木吸滞重金属及硫能力分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):175.
　CHEN Bo,LU Shaobo,LI Shaoning,et al.Analysis of Heavy Metal and Sulfur Absorption Ability of Trees Under Different Pollution Gradients in Tianjin City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):175.
[2]张贞,高金权.天津市土地利用变化和生态系统价值空间差异分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):193.
　ZHANG Zhen,GAO Jin-quan.Study on Land Use Change and the Spatial Differences of Ecosystem Service Value in Tianjin City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):193.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2010-12-22;改回日期:2011-3-3。
基金项目:水利部公益性行业科研专项经费项目（2010332030）
作者简介:侯淑艳（1980- ），女，吉林省梅河口市人，博士研究生，主要从事水土保持与荒漠化方面的研究。E-mail：houshuyan2007@126.com
通讯作者:朱金兆（1944- ），男，教授，主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究。E-mail：jingfeng@bjfu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01