[1]赵晓春,刘建军,任军辉,等.贺兰山4种典型森林类型凋落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):107-111.
　ZHAO Xiao-chun,LIU Jian-jun,REN Jun-hui,et al.Study on Water-holding Capacity of Litter in Four Forest Types of Helan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):107-111.
点击复制

贺兰山4种典型森林类型凋落物持水性能研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 18 期数: 2011年02期 页码: 107-111 栏目: 出版日期: 2011-04-20
Title:
Study on Water-holding Capacity of Litter in Four Forest Types of Helan Mountain
作者:
赵晓春1,2, 刘建军1,2, 任军辉1,2, 刘斌1,2, 母吉君3
1. 西北农林科技大学 林学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
2. 宁夏贺兰山森林生态站, 银川 750021;
3. 内蒙古巴彦淖尔市水土保持站, 内蒙古 巴彦淖尔 015000
Author(s):
ZHAO Xiao-chun1,2, LIU Jian-jun1,2, REN Jun-hui1,2, LIU Bin1,2, MU Ji-jun3
1. College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Helan National Nature Reseve Authority, Yinchuan 750021, China;
3. Inner Mongolian Bayannor Conservation of water and soil station, Bayannaoer, Inner mongolia 015000, China
关键词:
贺兰山; 凋落物; 持水量; 持水率; 吸水速率; 有效拦蓄量
Keywords:
Helan Mountain; litter; water-holding capacity; water-holding rate; water-absorption rate; modified interception
分类号:
S715.3
摘要:
采用野外实地观测与室内浸提法，对贺兰山4种典型森林类型（油松青海云杉混交林、油松山杨混交林、油松纯林和青海云杉纯林）林地凋落物的储量、持水量、持水率和吸水速率进行了研究。结果表明：4种类型的林分凋落物储量大小依次为青海云杉纯林>油松云杉混交林>油松纯林>油松山杨混交林；油松纯林、油松云杉混交林、青海云杉纯林和油松山杨混交林的凋落物最大持水量分别为38.46，40.11，46.78，36.35 t/hm2；最大持水率分别为152.56%、150.79%、144.43%和184.14%，各林分凋落物的持水量和持水率都随着浸泡时间的增加按照对数方程增加；吸水速率呈现油松山杨混交林>油松云杉混交林≥油松纯林>青海云杉纯林，且各林分的凋落物吸水速率随浸泡时间的增长按幂函数方程下降。有效拦蓄量林型间变化范围为10.7~15.73 t/hm2，油松山杨混交林最大，为15.73 t/hm2，油松纯林（14.05 t/hm2）和油松云杉混交林（11.98 t/hm2）次之，青海云杉纯林最小，仅为10.7 t/hm2。
Abstract:
By the methods of field investigation and soaking extraction, the storage, water-holding capacity, water-holding rate, and water-absorption rate of the litter in the mixture of Pinus tabulaeformis and Picea crassifolia, the mixture of Pinus tabulaeformis and Populus davidiana, pure Picea crassifolia, and pure Pinus tabulaeformis plantations in Helan Mountain were studied. The results showed that the litter storage in the four vegetation types decreased in the order of pure P. crassifolia (32.39 t/hm2)>the mixed of P. tabulaeformis and P. crassifolia (26.6 t/hm2)>pure P. tabulaeformis (25.21 t/hm2)>the mixed of P. tabulaeformis and P. davidiana (19.74 t/hm2). The total water-holding capacity of pure P. tabulaeformis, the mixture of P. tabulaeformis and P. crassifolia, pure P. crassifolia and the mixture of P. tabulaeformis and P. davidiana were 38.46, 40.11, 46.78t, 36.35 t/hm2, respectively. The proportional water-holding capacity as a percentage of the litter dry weight in pure P. tabulaeformis, the mixture of P. tabulaeformis and P. crassifolia, pure P. crassifolia and the mixture of P. tabulaeformis and P. davidiana were 152.56%, 150.79%, 144.43% and 184.14%, respectively. The water-holding capacity and water-holding rate of the litter changed logarithmically with soaking time. The order of the water-absorption rate of litter was the mixture of P. tabulaeformis and P. davidiana>the mixture of P. tabulaeformis and P. crassifolia≥pure P. tabulaeformis>pure P. crassifolia. The water-absorption rate of four plantations decreased according to equation with increasing time immersed in water. The modified interception of the mixture of P. tabulaeformis and P. davidiana (15.73 t/hm2) was the largest among the four plantations, followed by pure P. tabulaeformis (14.05 t/hm2) and the mixture of P. tabulaeformis and P. crassifolia (11.98 t/hm2), and the smallest was pure P. crassifolia (10.7 t/hm2).

参考文献/References:

[1] 苏志尧, 陈北光, 古炎坤, 等.广州白云山风景名胜区几种森林群落枯枝落叶层的持水能力[J].华南农业大学学报, 2002, 23 (2):84-85.
[2] 薛立, 何跃君, 屈明, 等.华南典型人工林凋落物的持水特性[J].植物生态学报, 2005, 29 (3):415-421.
[3] 申卫军, 彭少麟, 周国逸, 等.马占相思与湿地松人工林枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].生态学报, 2001, 12 (5):846-850.
[4] 庞学勇, 包维楷, 张咏梅.岷江上游中山区低效林改造对枯落物水文作用的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 20 (4):119-122, 155.
[5] 程金花, 张洪江, 史玉虎, 等.三峡库区几种林下枯落物的水文作用[J].北京林业大学学报, 2003, 25 (2):8-13.
[6] 王佑民.中国林地枯落物持水保土作用研究概况[J].水土保持学报, 2000, 15 (4):108-113.
[7] 何亚平, 费世民, 蒋俊明, 等.四川长宁竹林凋落物的蓄水功能研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2006, 26 (5):35-40.
[8] 高人, 周广柱.辽宁东部山区几种主要森林植被类型枯落物层持水性能研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2002, 33 (2):115-118.
[9] 饶良懿, 朱金兆, 毕华兴.重庆四面山森林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报, 2005, 27 (1):33-37.
[10] 常雅军, 曹靖, 马建伟, 等.秦岭西部山地针叶林凋落物持水特性[J].应用生态学报, 2008 (11):2346-2351.
[11] 曹鹤, 薛立, 梁丽丽, 等.3种生态公益林凋落物的持水特性[J].土壤通报, 2009, 40 (1):54-57.
[12] 赵鸿杰, 谭家得, 张学平, 等.南亚热带3种人工松林的凋落物水文效应研究[J].西北林学院学报, 2009, 24 (5):54-57, 139.
[13] 刘尚华, 冯朝阳, 吕世海, 等.京西百花山区6种植物群落凋落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持学报, 2007, 22 (6):179-182.
[14] Valachovic Y S, Caldwell B A, Cromack K, et al. Leaf litter chemistry controls on decomposition of Pacific Northwest trees and woody shrubs[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 34:2131-2147.
[15] Moore T R, Trofymow J A, Prescott C E, et al. Patterns of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decom-posing foliar litter in Canadian forests[J]. Ecosystems, 2006, 8:1-18.
[16] Parton W, Silver W L, Burke I C, et al. Global-scale similarities in N release patterns during l-ong-term decomposition[J]. Science, 2007, 315:361-364.
[17] 任向荣, 薛立, 曹鹤, 等.3种人工林凋落物的持水特性[J].华南农业大学学报, 2008, 29 (3):47-51.
[18] 李倩茹, 许中旗, 许晴, 等.燕山西部山地灌木群落凋落物积累量及其持水性能研究[J].水土保持学报, 2009, 24 (2):75-78.

相似文献/References:

[1]崔鸿侠,张卓文,李振芳.巴东县不同森林类型林下灌草和凋落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):203.
　CUI Hong-xia,ZHANG Zhuo-wen,LI Zhen-fang.Studies on the Shrub, Herbage and Litter Hydrological Effect Under Different Forest Type in Badong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):203.
[2]刘骄,黄义雄,叶功富,等.福建沿海主要防护林树种的生物量、凋落物及其对林下土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):146.
　LIU Jiao,HUANG Yi-xiong,YE Gong-fu,et al.Research on Biomass and Undergrowth Soil Nutrient of Main Tree Species for Shelterbelt along Fujian Coastal Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):146.
[3]马瑞,马维伟,李广,等.尕海湿地不同植被退化阶段凋落物分解及其有机碳动态[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):29.
　MA Rui,MA Weiwei,LI Guang,et al.Litter Decomposition and Dynamics of Organic Carbon in Degraded Vegetation of Gahai Wetland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):29.
[4]谢育利,陈云明,唐亚坤,等.地表凋落物对油松、沙棘人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):52.
　XIE Yuli,CHEN Yunming,TANG Yakun,et al.Impact of Aboveground Litterfall on Soil Respiration in the Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides Plantations[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):52.
[5]何琴飞,郑威,彭玉华,等.珠江流域中游主要森林类型凋落物持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):128.
　HE Qinfei,ZHENG Wei,PENG Yuhua,et al.Water-holding Characteristics of Litter Under Main Forest Types in the Middle Reaches of Pearl River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):128.
[6]张凤英,杜芝芝,和加卫,等.紫茎泽兰凋落物提取液对自身种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):291.
　ZHANG Fengying,DU Zhizhi,HE Jiawei,et al.Effects of Eupatorium adenophorumii Litter Aqueous Extract on Its Seed Germination and Seedling Growth[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):291.
[7]王冬,杨政,郝红敏,等.黄土区退耕草地凋落物-土壤界面水分过程特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):80.
　WANG Dong,YANG Zheng,HAO Hongmin,et al.Hydrological Processes of Litter-Soil Interfacial Systems in Restoration Grasslands of the Loess Plateau，China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):80.
[8]成文浩,陈林.贺兰山油松林根系空间分布特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(01):89.
　CHENG Wen-hao,CHEN Lin.Analysis on Spatial Distribution of the Pinus Tabulaeformis Carr. Root in Helan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(02):89.
[9]陈进,徐明,邹晓,等.贵阳市不同林龄马尾松林凋落物储量及持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(06):146.
　CHEN Jin,XU Ming,ZOU Xiao,et al.Litter layer Reserve and Water Holding Capacity of Pinus massoniana in Different Successional Stages in Guiyang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):146.
[10]蒲嘉霖,刘亮.亚热带森林凋落物分解特征及水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):165.
　PU Jialin,LIU Liang.Hydrology Functions and Decomposition Characteristics of Litter in Subtropical Forest[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(02):165.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2010-12-24;改回日期:2011-1-24。
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业专项“陕西宁夏省区森林生态系统服务功能定位观测与评估技术”（200704005/wb06）
作者简介:赵晓春（1984- ），女，在读硕士研究生，主要从事森林生态学研究。E-mail：zhaoxiaochun513@163.com
通讯作者:刘建军（1962- ），男，教授，博士，博士生导师，主要从事森林生态学研究。E-mail：Ljj@nwsuaf.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01