RAN Da-chuan,ZHANG Zhi-ping,LUO Quan-hua,et al.More Comprehensive Analysis on Benefits of Flood & Sediment Reduction of Soil and Water Conservation Measures During 1970-2002 in Dali River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):17-23.
大理河流域1970-2002年水保措施减洪减沙效益深化分析
- Title:
- More Comprehensive Analysis on Benefits of Flood & Sediment Reduction of Soil and Water Conservation Measures During 1970-2002 in Dali River Basin
- Keywords:
- variations of runoff and sediment; flood and sediment reduction; effectiveness; Dali River Basin
- 分类号:
- S157
- 摘要:
- 根据实测水文资料，采用“水文法”和“水保法”两种方法，对大理河流域1970-2002年的水沙变化和水土保持综合治理减洪减沙效益进行了比较全面的计算和分析。大理河流域20世纪70，80，90年代降雨量、径流量和输沙量呈递减趋势，其中80年代减幅最大，70，90年代减幅接近。2000-2002年年降水量和汛期降水量分别比基准期增大了8.0%和9.3%，但径流、泥沙依然递减。“水文法”计算结果表明，1970-2002年大理河流域共计减少洪水10.114 5亿m3，年均减少洪水3 065万m3，其中水土保持综合治理年均减少洪水2 370万m3，占减少洪水总量的77.2%，年均减少洪水效益25.2%；共计减沙8.448亿t，年均减沙2 560万t，其中水土保持综合治理年均减沙1 940万t，占总减沙量的75.8%，年均减沙效益37.6%。“水保法”计算结果表明，1970-2002年大理河流域水土保持措施共计减少洪水7.524亿m3，年均减少洪水2 280万m3，年均减少洪水效益24.5%；水土保持措施共计减沙6.138亿t，年均减沙1 860万t，年均减沙效益36.6%。近期流域水土保持综合治理减洪减沙效益显著，水保措施减水减沙比依时序呈下降趋势。
- Abstract:
- According to hydrological data, using ‘Hydrology method’ and ‘soil and water conservation method’ made a more comprehensive calculation and analysis on Benefits of Flood & Sediment Reduction of Soil and Water Conservation Measures during 1970-2002 in Dali River Basin. Dali River Basin in the 20th century 70, 80, 90 era of rainfall, runoff and sediment discharge decreased gradually, maximum reduction was in 1980s, and 1970s, 1990s close. 2000-2002 precipitation and flood season precipitation compared with the base period increased 8.0% and 9.3%, but runoff, sediment is still decreasing. The results of ‘Hydrology method’ show that 1970-2002 Dali River Basin totally reduce 1.011 45×109 m3 flood, an average annual reduction of flood was 3.065×107 m3, soil and water conservation average annual reduction of flood 2.37×107 m3, accounting for 77.2% of the total flood reduction, accounting for 25.2% of average annual flood reduction; total of sediment reduction 8.448×108 t, annual sediment reduction 2.56×107 t, including soil and water conservation annual sediment reduction 1.94×107 t, of the total sediment reduction of 75.8%, 37.6% of annual sediment reduction benefit. The results of ‘soil and water conservation method’ show that 1970-2002 Dali River Basin totally reduce 7.524×108 m3 flood, an average annual reduction of flood was 2.28×107 m3, accounting for 24.5% of average annual flood reduction; total of soil and water conservation sediment reduction 6.138×108 t, annual sediment reduction 1.86×108 t, accounting for 36.6% of annual sediment reduction benefit. Recent soil and water conservation flood and sediment reduction benefits are remarkable, and flood and sediment reduction in chronological decline.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张志萍, 冉大川, 慕志龙.大理河流域降水资料插补方法探讨[J].人民黄河, 2006, 28(12):26-27.
[2] 冉大川, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等.大理河流域水土保持生态工程建设的减沙作用研究[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社, 2008.
[3] 张胜利, 于一鸣, 姚文艺.水土保持减水减沙效益计算方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1994.
[4] 王飞, 穆兴民, 李锐, 等. 河口镇到龙门区间水土保持措施减沙水代价分析[J].水土保持通报, 2005, 25(6):28-32.
相似文献/References:
[1]沈燕舟,张明波,黄燕.大通江、平洛河水保措施减水减沙分析[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):34.
SHEN Yan-zhou,ZHANG Ming-bo,HUANG Yan.Analysis of the Soil and Water Conservation Measures Reducing Runoff and Sediment in the Datong and Pingluo River Basins[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(01):34.
[2]冉大川,吴永红.泾河流域水土保持生态环境建设与治理方略刍议[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(02):58.
RAN Dachuan,WU Yonghong.Discussion on Controlling Guideline and Eco-environmental Construction of Soil and Water Conservation in Jinghe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(01):58.
[3]冉大川,王宏,刘斌,等.黄河中游地区林草措施减洪减沙作用分析[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):141.
RAN Da-chuan,WANG Hong,LIU Bin,et al.Analysis for the Roles of Sediment and Runoff Cutting by Biological Control Measures in the Upper and Middle Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(01):141.
[4]马元旭,来红州.荆江与洞庭湖区近50年水沙变化的研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(04):103.
MA Yuan-xu,LAI Hong-zhou.Research on the Variations of the Water and Sediment for Recent 50 Years in the Jingjiang River and Dongting Lake Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):103.
[5]张攀,姚文艺,冉大川.水土保持综合治理的水沙响应研究方法改进探讨[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(02):173.
ZHANG Pan,YAO Wen-yi,RAN Da-chuan.Research Methods Improvment and Discussion of the Soil and Water Conservation Comprehensive Treatment to Water and Sediment Responds[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):173.
[6]王小军,蔡焕杰,张鑫,等.皇甫川流域水沙变化特点及其趋势分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):222.
WANG Xiao-jun,CAI Huan-jie,ZHANG Xin,et al.Analysis of Changing Characteristics and Tendency of Runoff and Sediment Transport in Huangfuchuan River Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):222.
[7]魏艳红,焦菊英.皇甫川流域1955-2013年水沙变化趋势与周期特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):1.
WEI Yanhong,JIAO Juying.Variation Tendency and Periodic Characteristics of Streamflow and Sediment Discharge in Huangfuchuan Watershed from 1955 to 2013[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):1.
[8]蒋观滔,高鹏,穆兴民,等.退耕还林(草)对北洛河上游水沙变化的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):1.
JIANG Guantao,GAO Peng,MU Xingmin,et al.Effect of Conversion of Farmland to Forestland or Grassland on the Change in Runoff and Sediment in the Upper Reaches of Beiluo River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):1.
[9]王佳琦,贾燕锋.近60年大凌河中上游水沙变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):35.
WANG Jiaqi,JIA Yanfeng.Variation of Runoff and Sediment in the Middle and Upper Reaches of Daling River During the Past 60 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):35.
[10]宇涛,李占斌,陈怡婷,等.黄土丘陵第三副区典型淤地坝系结构特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(04):26.
YU Tao,LI Zhanbin,CHEN Yiting,et al.Analysis of Structural Characteristics of Typical Check Dam System in the Third Subregion of Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):26.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2010-6-23;改回日期:2010-11-30。
基金项目:黄河水利委员会“十五”重大治黄科技项目（2002SZ08）；“十一五”国家科技支撑计划重点项目（2006BAB06B01-04）
作者简介:冉大川（1964- ），男，甘肃省镇原县人，高级工程师，客座研究员，主要从事黄河中游水沙变化和水土保持科学研究。E-mail：xfrdc@sohu.com