[1]李灵,张玉,江慧华,等.旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤质量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):56-62.
　LI Ling,ZHANG Yu,JIANG Hui-hua,et al.Effects of Tourist Activities on Soil Quality of Wuyishan Scenery District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(06):56-62.
点击复制

旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤质量的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 16 期数: 2009年06期 页码: 56-62 栏目: 出版日期: 2009-12-20
Title:
Effects of Tourist Activities on Soil Quality of Wuyishan Scenery District
作者:
李灵1,2, 张玉2, 江慧华2, 谢妤2, 杜洪庆2, 周艳3, 张洪江1
1. 北京林业大学 水土保持学院, 北京 100083;
2. 福建省绿色化工技术重点实验室, 武夷学院环境与建筑工程系, 福建 武夷山 354300;
3. 福建省武夷山景区管委会, 福建 武夷山 354300
Author(s):
LI Ling1,2, ZHANG Yu2, JIANG Hui-hua2, XIE Yu2, DU Hong-qing2, ZHOU Yan3, ZHANG Hong-jiang1
1. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Industry Technology of Fujian Province, Department of Environmental and Architecture Engineering, Wuyi College, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300, China;
3. Administration Committee of Wuyishan Scenery District, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300, China
关键词:
旅游活动; 土壤性状; 土壤质量; 武夷山风景区
Keywords:
tourist; activity; soil property; soil quality; Wuyishan Scenery District
分类号:
S153
摘要:
为探讨旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤质量综合影响的程度，2008年以5个核心景点区土壤为研究对象，采用土壤质量综合指数进行评价，结果表明：（1）景点土壤容重比对照点平均增加了43.0%，而土壤的非毛管孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、最大持水量、最小持水量及毛管持水量平均下降了31.4%、27.2%、28.7%、26.6%、26.9%及30.8%；（2）旅游干扰使一些景点的pH下降，另一些景点的pH增大，景点土壤有机质、全N、水解N及全P平均下降的比率较大，分别为46.05%、49.74%、56.71%及42.75%，全K、速效K和有效P则表现为增大或减少不定的变化趋势；（3）不同景点土壤质量综合指数表现为：大红袍（0.601）>水帘洞（0.382）>大王峰（0.327）>一线天（0.264）>天游峰（0.238）。旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤质量已产生了严重的影响，据此提出了旅游可持续发展的几点建议。
Abstract:
Topsoil (0-20 cm) properties of five core tourism-spots were studied in Wuyishan Scenery District in 2008. This paper researched effects of tourist activities on soil quality by the integrated soil quality index. The results showed that: (1) The bulk density averagely increases by 43.0%, but the noncapillary porosity, capillary porosity, total porosity, the max-water-holding, min-water-holding and capillary water-holding of all the samples averagely decrease by 31.4%, 27.2%, 28.7%, 26.6%, 26.9% and 30.8% in comparison with the contrasting spots. (2) Due to the impacts of tourist activities, the pH of soi1 increases in some samples and decreases in others; the decreased rates of soil organic matters, total nitrogen, available nitrogen and total phosphorus are relatively greater and respectively are 6.05%, 49.74%, 56.71% and 42.75%; the change rates of total potassium, available potassium and available phosphorus have not any significant regular, up or down. (3) The soil quality integrated indexes of different tourism-spots were ranked as follows: big-red robe (0.601)>water curtain cave (0.382)>king peak (0.327)>a line sky (0.264)>tian-you peak (0.238).The soil quality levels of tourism-spots are influenced by the intensity of tourist activities and some suggestions are proposed to realize the sustainable development of tourism.

参考文献/References:

[1] Lu Y T,Xiao C.Study on the quality of the ecological environments for tourists an d swallow in swallow cavern,Jianshui[J].Geographica Sinica,1998,53(6):198-203.
[2] Doran J W,Michael R Z.Soil health and sustainability:managing the biotic component of soil quality[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2000,15(1):3-11.
[3] 刘占锋,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.土壤质量与土壤质量指标及其评价[J].生态学报,2006,26(3):901-913.
[4] 颜雄,张杨珠,刘晶. 土壤肥力质量评价的研究进展[J].湖南农业科学,2008(5):82-85.
[5] Cilimburg A.Wildland recreation and human waste:A review of problems,practices and concerns[J]. Environment Management,1999,125(6):587-592.
[6] Eden T.Ricbard J R. Impacts of experimentally applied mountain biking and hikingon vegetation and soil of a decidous forest[J].Environmental Management,2001,27(3):397-409.
[7] 马建华,朱玉涛.嵩山景区旅游活动对土壤组成性质和重金属污染的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):955-965.
[8] 王忠君,蔡君,张启翔. 旅游活动对云蒙山国家森林公园土壤影响的初步研究[J].河北林业科技,2003(5):12-15.
[9] Lowery B,Swan J. Physical properties of selected soils by erosion class[J].Soil Water Conserv,1995,50:306-311.
[10] Joy T,Greg O H.Human impact on the ecosystem[M].Edinburgh:Oliver and Boyo1,1981:175-189.
[11] 管东生,林卫强,陈玉娟.旅游干扰对白云山土壤和植被的影响[J].环境科学,1999,20(6):6-9.
[12] Sun D,Walsh D.Review of studies on environmental impacts of recreation and tourism in Australia[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53:323-338.
[13] Douglas M C.Recreational impacts on erosion and runoff in a central Arizona riparian area[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,53(1):38-42.
[14] Cerman F. Agency for nature conservation,biodiversity and tourism[M].Berlin:Spring-Verlag,1997.
[15] Willian E H,David N C. Wildland recreation:ecology and management(2nd)[M]. New York:John Wiley and Sons,1998.
[16] 秦远好,谢德体,魏朝富,等. 土壤生态环境对游憩活动冲击的响应研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2006,20(3):61-65.
[17] 何东进,洪伟,胡海清,等. 武夷山风景区森林景观土壤物理性质异质性及其分形特征[J].林业科学,2005,41(5):175-179.
[18] 游秀花,蒋尔可.不同森林类型土壤化学性质的比较研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2005,27(3):357-360.
[19] 游秀花. 马尾松天然林不同演替阶段土壤理化性质的变化[J]. 福建林学院学报,2005,25(2):121-124.
[20] 尹刚强,田大伦,方晰,等.不同土地利用方式对湘中丘陵区土壤质量的影响[J].林业科学,2008,44(8):9-15.
[21] 庞学勇,包维楷,张咏梅,等. 岷江柏林下土壤物理性质及其地理空间差异[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(5):596-601.
[22] Chen C R,Condron L M,Davis M R,et al. Seasonal changes in soil phosphorus and associated microbial properties under adjacent grassland and forest in New Zealand[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2003,177:539-557.
[23] Fu B J,Wang J,Chen L D,et al.The efects of land use on soil moisture variation in the Danangou catchment of the Loess Plateau,China[J].Catena,2003,54:197-213.
[24] 罗姗,张昆,彭涛,等.旅游活动对高原湿地纳帕海土壤理化性质的影响研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(6):2391-2393.
[25] 冯学钢,包浩生.旅游活动对风景区地被植物:土壤环境影响的初步研究[J]. 自然资源学报,1999,14(1):75-78.
[26] 樊后保,李燕燕,黄玉梓,等.马尾松纯林改造成针阔混交林后土壤化学性质的变化[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):77-81.
[27] Ros M C,Garcia T,Hernandez M.Short-Term Effects of Human Trampling on Vegetation and Soil Microbial Activity[J].Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2004,35(11/12):1591-1603.
[28] 颜雄,张杨珠,刘晶. 土壤肥力质量评价的研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学,2008(5):82-85.
[29] 张庆费,宋永昌,由文辉. 浙江天童植物群落次生演替与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报,1999,19(2):174-178.

相似文献/References:

[1]韦大山,方凤满,杨仲元.黄山风景区步道土壤理化性质变化特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):175.
　WEI Da-shan,FANG Feng-man,YANG Zhong-yuan.Analysis on the Change of Soil Physico-chemical Properties of Trails in Huangshan Scenery District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):175.
[2]韩金发.风沙地引种厚荚相思的生长情况与土壤性状的关系[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):127.
　HAN Jin-fa.Relationship of Growing Situation of A.crassicarpa with Physicochemical Properties of Soil in Wind Sandy Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(06):127.
[3]陈戈.旅游活动对水土流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):84.
　CHEN Ge.Recreational Impacts on Erosion and Runoff[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(06):84.
[4]马富亮,符素华,罗广惠.东北典型黑土区坡耕地涝渍地土壤化学性状[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):51.
　MA Fuliang,FU Suhua,LUO Guanghui.Soil Chemical Characteristics of the Waterlogged Land on Slope Cropland in Typical Black Soil Region of Northeast China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):51.
[5]陈婷.旅游活动对香山公园草地生态环境的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):280.
　CHEN Ting.Effects of Tourist Activities on Grassland Ecological Environment in Xiangshan Park[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):280.
[6]曹丽娟.旅游干扰对河南云台山风景区土壤质量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):67.
　CAO Lijuan.Effects of Tourist Disturbance on Soil Quality in Yuntai Mountain Scenic Area, He’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):67.
[7]田愉琴,王 兵,汪建芳,等.黄土丘陵区典型草本根系特征对土壤抗剪特性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(03):153.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.013]
　Tian Yuqin,Wang Bing,Wang Jianfang,et al.Influence of Typical Herbaceous Root Characteristics on Soil Shear Properties in Loess Hilly Regions[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(06):153.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.013]

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2009-6-14;改回日期:。
基金项目:福建省科技厅重点项目（2008F5060）；福建省武夷山景区管委会资助项目（2008-03）
作者简介:李灵（1973- ），女，河南南阳人，在读博士，讲师，主要从事土壤与水体生态性评价方面的研究。E-mail：haodou_025@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01