[1]宗萍萍,杨吉华,史秀娟,等.不同旱作保水措施对龙廷杏梅园地土壤水环境调控效应的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):169-173.
ZONG Ping-ping,YANG Ji-hua,SHI Xiu-juan,et al.Study on Water Content of Long-ting P.Simonii Carr. with the Technique of Dry Farming and Water Retention Covering[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):169-173.
点击复制
《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P]
卷:
16
期数:
2009年03期
页码:
169-173
栏目:
出版日期:
2009-06-20
- Title:
-
Study on Water Content of Long-ting P.Simonii Carr. with the Technique of Dry Farming and Water Retention Covering
- 作者:
-
宗萍萍1, 杨吉华2, 史秀娟1, 耿焱3
-
1. 山东省水利科学研究院, 济南 250013;
2. 山东农业大学 林学院, 山东 泰安 271018;
3. 博兴县水利局, 山东 滨州 256500
- Author(s):
-
ZONG Ping-ping1, YANG Ji-hua2, SHI Xiu-juan1, GENG Yan3
-
1. Water Conservancy Research Institute of Shandong Province, Ji’nan 250013, China;
2. Foretry College of Shandong Agriculture University, Tai’an, Shandong 271018, China;
3. Boxing Water Authority, Binzhou, Shandong 256500, China
-
- 关键词:
-
龙廷杏梅; 旱作保水措施; 水环境调控效应
- Keywords:
-
Long-ting P.Simonii Carr.; measures of dry farming and water retention covering; water content
- 分类号:
-
S157;S152.7
- 摘要:
-
对龙廷杏梅树盘进行不同材料及不同组合方式的覆盖处理,结果表明:多重处理由于保水剂吸附土壤径流,覆草增加土壤贮水量,覆膜阻隔水分蒸发,蓄水保墒效果最好,其次是双层处理,而单一处理较差。覆膜处理下土壤水分都有向表层聚集的现象;各深度测定点都以多重处理的土壤水分含量最高。不同覆盖物由于保蓄水分的能力不同,对下层土壤水分的影响差异较为明显,各处理比对照平均增产12 027.27 kg/hm2,平均增加净收入21 649元/hm2,产量与土壤含水量在0.05水平上显著相关(r=0.689),不同旱作保水措施对龙廷杏梅园地具有良好的土壤水环境调控效应,经济效益显著。
- Abstract:
-
The experiments of different materials were carried out on the Long-ting P.Simonii Carr. orchard soil with different cross patterns. The results showed that super absorbent polymer can adsorb soil runoff, mulch with grass can improve soil water-holding, mulch with veil can cut off moisture content evaporation, water storage and retention of multiple treatments was the best; and the next was dual treatments, single treatment was worse. The soil water of mulch with veil had run to supper crust, the soil water of multiple treatments were higher in different depth. Different mulching had different ability of water storage and retention, the effect on soil water content in deeper levels was comparatively obvious. The average yield of each treatment was 12 027 kg/hm2 higher than the contrast, the average net income increased 21 649 yuan/hm2.Yield and soil water content at the 0.05 level was significant correlation (r=0.689). Different dry farming and water retention covering had better effectiveness of soil water content, and had better economic benefits.
参考文献/References:
[1] 蔡典雄, 王小彬, Keith Saxton.土壤保水剂对土壤持水性及作物出苗的影响[J].土壤肥料, 1999(1):13-16.
[2] 刘建新.覆草对杏园土壤物理性状、肥力及果实产量与品质的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(2):183-185.
[3] 杨吉华, 李卫国, 高伟.石灰岩丘陵桑园土壤保水技术试验[J].蚕业科学, 2001, 27(1):61-65.
[4] 王劲松, 张一鸣, 靳建军, 等.旱地苹果园不同覆盖栽培技术研究[J].宁夏农林科技, 1999, 3(11):11-13.
相似文献/References:
[1]刘克长,任中兴,李申安,等.不同覆盖措施下龙廷杏梅园地小气候效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(05):145.
LIU Ke-chang,REN Zhong-xing,LI Shen-an,et al.Area Climate Effect on Long-ting P.simonⅡ Carr. with the Different Mulching Measurements[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):145.
更新日期/Last Update:
1900-01-01