[1]赵名彦,丁国栋,罗俊宝,等.沙地公路取土场植被恢复模式与效果分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):191-195.
　ZHAO Ming-yan,DING Guo-dong,LUO Jun-bao,et al.A Mode of Vegetation Restoration and Its Benefits Analysis in Sand Cutting Sites of Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):191-195.
点击复制

沙地公路取土场植被恢复模式与效果分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 16 期数: 2009年01期 页码: 191-195 栏目: 出版日期: 2009-02-20
Title:
A Mode of Vegetation Restoration and Its Benefits Analysis in Sand Cutting Sites of Highway
作者:
赵名彦1, 丁国栋1, 罗俊宝2, 王翔宇1, 朴起亨1, 崔利强3
1. 北京林业大学 教育部水土保持与荒漠化防治重点实验室, 北京 100083;
2. 内蒙古交通设计研究院有限责任公司, 呼和浩特 010010;
3. 内蒙古农业大学, 呼和浩特 010010
Author(s):
ZHAO Ming-yan1, DING Guo-dong1, LUO Jun-bao2, WANG Xiang-yu1, PARK KIHYUNG1, CUI Li-qiang3
1. Beijing Forestry University, Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Inner Mongolia Communications Design & Research Cooperation Limited, Hohhot 010010, China;
3. Inner Mongolia Agriculture University, Hohhot 010010, China
关键词:
浑善达克沙地; 高速公路; 植被恢复模式; 取土场
Keywords:
Otindag sandy land; highway; mode of vegetation restoration; sand cutting sites
分类号:
X171.1
摘要:
就浑善达克沙地高等级公路取土场采取的植被恢复与建设技术，提出了路域取土场植被恢复的优化配置和技术模式为平铺式砾石沙障+低立式菱形芦苇沙障+高立式沙柳沙障+樟子松造林。研究结果表明：取土场植被恢复技术模式的应用明显恢复了植被，樟子松成活率和保存率分别提高了30%和35%，植被覆盖度是流沙地的5倍，生物量增加了3.40~5.16倍，植被组成趋向于多样化、稳定化；取土场内的风速比是流沙的14.61%，输沙率减少了的91.7%，粗糙度是流沙的38.86倍，极大地减弱了近地表风速，减少了输沙量，改善了取土场下垫面的状况，改良土壤理化环境。
Abstract:
Refer to the vegetation restoration technology used in the sand cutting sites of the highway in Otindag Sandy Land, this paper provide an optimal allocation and technology mode of vegetation restoration in sand cutting sites of highway-gravel barrier & low rhombus reed sand-barrier & high salix sand-barrier & Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forestation. The study showed that the survival rate and preservation rate have increased 30 percent and 35 percent to comparing plots; coverage of vegetation 5 times more than barren sand, composing of vegetation tended to more diversified and stabilized. The wind speed decrease rate was 14.61 percent of barren ones, sand transport rate have reduced 91.7 percent, the roughness of surface have increased 38.86 times than original one. The mode was not only greatly weakening the intensity of wind near surface, but also reduced the sand transport, and improved the soil characters.

参考文献/References:

[1] 姜昌, 马德滋, 温凤玲.浅议宁夏高等级公路建设中的取土场及其植被恢复[J].宁夏农林科技, 2002(6):39-40.
[2] 马世震, 陈桂琛, 彭敏, 等.青藏公路取土场高寒草原植被的恢复进程[J].中国环境科学, 2004(2):188-191.
[3] 李玉娥, 杨华军, 余广川.洛三高速公路弃土场、取土场类型与防护措施[J].中国水土保持, 2003(4):29-29.
[4] 梁启英, 林建平, 梁杰明.采石、取土场植被恢复技术[J].林业实用技术, 2004(10):13-16.
[5] 束文圣, 蓝崇钰, 黄铭洪, 等.采石场废弃地的早期植被与土壤种子库[J].生态学报, 2003, 23(7):1305-1312.
[6] 程昊, 陈泽昊.青藏铁路山丘坡地取土场生态恢复措施探讨[J].铁道劳动安全卫生与环保, 2005, 32(3):133-135.
[7] 马世威, 马玉明, 姚洪林, 等.沙漠学[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社, 1998.
[8] 高永, 邱国玉, 丁国栋.沙柳沙障的防风固沙效益研究[J].中国沙漠, 2004, 3(24):365-370.
[9] 张瑞麟, 刘果厚, 崔秀萍.浑善达克沙地黄柳活沙障防风固沙效益的研究[J].中国沙漠, 2006, 26(5):717-721.
[10] 罗俊宝, 孙保平.207国道内蒙古段路域植被恢复技术及其效果[J].中国水土保持科学, 2006, 4 (增刊):22-26.
[11] 胥晓刚, 杨冬生, 胡庭兴.不同植物种类在公路边坡植被恢复中的适应性研究[J].公路, 2004(6):157-161.
[12] 江玉, 林杜娟.高等级公路生态环境保护问题与对策[J].公路, 2000(8):67-71.
[13] 巩和平, 霍志坚.浑善达克沙地环境演变及沙漠化防治对策[J].内蒙古林业调查设计, 1998(1):7-8.
[14] 蒋高明.浑善达克沙地退化生态系统恢复的对策[J].中国科技论坛, 2002(3):11-15.
[15] 李生宇, 雷加强.古尔班通古特沙漠公路扰动带植被恢复研究[J].新疆环境保护, 2002, 24(1):1-7.

相似文献/References:

[1]李晶,高照良,张小娟,等.宝牛高速公路路域植被恢复效果调查分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):100.
　LI Jing,GAO Zhao-liang,ZHANG Xiao-juan,et al.Investigation and Assessment on Vegetation Restoration along the Baoniu Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):100.
[2]祝遵凌,崔利杰,王飒.路基边坡土壤重金属污染特征及评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):127.
　ZHU Zun-ling,CUI Li-jie,WANG Sa.Characteristics and Assessment on Heavy Metal Pollution of Soils in Embankment Slope of Expressway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):127.
[3]田红卫,黄志荣,高照良,等.高速公路路域土壤特性分析及其质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):59.
　TIAN Hong-wei,HUANG Zhi-rong,GAO Zhao-liang,et al.Assessment of Soil Properties and Quality of the Freeway in Road Area of Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):59.
[4]毛正君,杨晓华,王晓钟.乌鞘岭地区高速公路沿线地质灾害发育特征及防治措施[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):202.
　MAO Zheng-jun,YANG Xiao-hua,WANG Xiao-zhong.Study on Prevention Measures and Development Characteristics of Geological Hazards along the Expressway in the Wushaoling[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):202.
[5]卓慕宁,李定强,贺新良,等.论高速公路建设中的水土保持生态恢复[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):209.
　ZHUO Mu-ning,LI Ding-qiang,HE Xin-liang,et al.Discussion on Ecological Restoration with Water and Soil Conservation in Highway Construction[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(01):209.
[6]许中立,张志平,张志豪,等.高速公路关庙休息站边坡保护工程之效果[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):220.
　XU Zhong-li,ZHANG Zhi-ping,ZHANG Zhi-hao,et al.The Effect of Highway Slope Stability Construction Methods at Kuan-miao Rest Station[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(01):220.
[7]卓慕宁,李定强,贺新良,等.高速公路边坡快速绿化技术的应用与水土保持效果[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):79.
　ZHUO Mu-ning,LI Ding-qiang,HE Xin-liang,et al.Investigation on Application of Quickly Greening Technique for Side Slope of Highway and Its Effects of Water and Soil Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):79.
[8]谭少华,汪益敏.高速公路边坡生态防护技术研究进展与思考[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):81.
　TAN Shao-hua,WANG Yi-min.Research Progress and Thinking of Bioengineering Techniques for Slope Protection in Expressway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):81.
[9]丰培洁.公路边坡防护与绿化对策[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):199.
　FENG Pei-jie.Protection Ways for Highway’s Slope and Afforestation Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):199.
[10]樊家荣,彭令发,蔡志洲,等.六安至武汉公路安徽段水土流失及其防治措施初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):180.
　FAN Jia-rong,PENG Ling-fa,CAI Zhi-zhou,et al.Research of Soil and Water Loss and Preventing Measures of Anhui Line of Luan City and Wuhan City Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):180.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2008-6-22。
基金项目:内蒙古交通建设科技项目；高等级公路路域生态环境建设试验示范研究（NJ200419）
作者简介:赵名彦（1982- ），女，内蒙古呼和浩特人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向：水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail：mingyanzhao99@126.com
通讯作者:丁国栋（1962- ），男，内蒙古赤峰人，教授，主要研究方向：水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail：dch1999@263.net

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01