[1]陈晓林,杨忠,熊东红,等.昌都地区生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):156-158,162.
　CHEN Xiao-lin,YANG Zhong,XIONG Dong-hong,et al.The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Changdu, Tibet[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):156-158,162.
点击复制

昌都地区生态系统服务功能价值评估

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 15 期数: 2008年01期 页码: 156-158,162 栏目: 出版日期: 2008-02-20
Title:
The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Changdu, Tibet
作者:
陈晓林1,2, 杨忠1, 熊东红1, 周红艺1, 鲜纪绅1,2
1. 中国科学院 成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都 610041;
2. 中国科学院 研究生院, 北京 100049
Author(s):
CHEN Xiao-lin1,2, YANG Zhong1, XIONG Dong-hong1, ZHOU Hong-yi1, XIAN Ji-shen1,2
1. Institute of Mountain Hazard and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Water Conservancy, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
关键词:
昌都地区; 生态系统服务; 价值评估
Keywords:
Changdu district; ecosystem services; valuation
分类号:
X171.1
摘要:
生态系统服务功能是生态学、生态经济学研究的热点问题，对于促进生态系统可持续管理具有重要作用。昌都地区属于青藏高原的一块典型高原生态脆弱区，对其进行生态系统价值评估有利于其生态和经济的可持续发展。运用谢高地等人制定的中国陆地生态系统的价值评估方法，对昌都地区的生态系统服务功能价值进行评估。结果表明：该区各类生态系统的总价值为105435.12×106元，是当年GDP的37倍。各生态系统类型中林地价值最高，其次是草地。直接利用价值（包括食物生产、原材料生产、娱乐文化功能）每年约为13567.38×106元，间接利用价值（包括气体调节、气候调节、土壤形成与保护等）约为59412.5×106元，间接利用价值远远大于直接利用价值，说明间接利用价值对人类的贡献和作用与提供产品本身一样重要。
Abstract:
The study of ecosystem services and their valuation is a hot-pot issue in ecology, which plays an important role in boosting sustainable ecosystem management.Changdu is a typical ecological frangible district in tableland of Tibet.Ecosystem valuation is in favor of the strategy of sustainable development of economy and environment in the region.This article valuates the ecosystem services in Changdu district by using the methods of valuation of land ecosystem in China which established by Xie Gaodi et al.The results indicated that ecosystem services value of Changdu is some 105 435.12×106 Yuan annually, which is 37 times than the GDP in the same year of the region.The woodland is the most valuable type in ecosystem and grassland in the next place.The direct values including food and raw materials manufacture along with tourism are 13 567.38×106 Yuan annually, the indirect values in terms of climates adjusting, pneumatic control and soil formation and protect are 59 412.5×106 Yuan annually, the conclusion which indirect values higher than direct values indicates that indirect values have the same contribution and effect with the manufacture itself.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J].生态学报, 2001, 21(11):1918-1926.
[2] 联合国.千年生态系统评估报告[EB/OL].http://www.millenniumassessment.org.
[3] Daily, 等.Nature’s Service:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystem[M].1997.
[4] Daily G C, et al.Ecosystem Service:Benefits Supplied to Human Societies by Natural Ecosystems[R].1999.
[5] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁.资源科学[C]//全球生态系统服务价值研究进展.2001.
[6] UNEP.Guidelines for the Preparations of Country Studies on costs, Benefits and Unmet needs of Biological Diversity Conservation Within the Frameworke of the Planned Convention on Biological Diversity[M].Niobe, United National Environmental program.1991.
[7] Costanza R, Darge R, Groot R, et al.The value of the world’ secosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature, 1997, 387:253-260.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁春玲,谷胜利.南四湖湿地生态系统能值分析与区域发展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):185.
　LIANG Chun-ling,GU Sheng-li.Analysis on Energy Value of Wetland Ecosystem of Nansi Lake in Shandong Province of China and Regional Development[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):185.
[2]王伟林,黄贤金,钟太洋.区域土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应——以南京市为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):212.
　WANG Wei-lin,HUANG Xian-jin,ZHONG Tai-yang.Area Land Use Change Responses to the Ecosystem Service Value—A Case Study of Nanjing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):212.
[3]郭兵,姜琳,孙彩红,等.基于多源数据的岷江上游生态系统服务价值动态评估[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):131.
　GUO Bing,JIANG Lin,SUN Caihong,et al.Dynamic Evaluation on Ecosystem Service Value of the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on Multi-Source Data[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):131.
[4]吴丹,邵全琴,刘纪远,等.中国草地生态系统水源涵养服务时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):256.
　WU Dan,SHAO Quanqin,LIU Jiyuan,et al.Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Water Regulation Service of Grassland Ecosystem in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):256.
[5]阿依努尔·艾尼,玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,等.利益相关者对塔里木河下游荒漠河岸林生态系统服务的认知度分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):205.
　Ayinuer·Aini,Umut·Halik,Tayierjiang·Aishan,et al.Analysis of Stakeholders’ Cognition on Desert Riparian Forest Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):205.
[6]杜国明,孙晓兵,刘彦随.延安市退耕对生态的影响及其人文驱动因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):233.
　DU Guoming,SUN Xiaobing,LIU Yansui.Analysis of Ecological Restoration on Ecosystem Services and Its Human Driving Factors in Yan’an City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):233.
[7]王敏,阮俊杰,姚佳,等.基于InVEST模型的生态系统土壤保持功能研究——以福建宁德为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):184.
　WANG Min,RUAN Jun-jie,YAO Jia,et al.Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model—A Case Study of Ningde City, Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):184.
[8]周涛,李天宏.陕西省退耕还林(草)前后LUCC对生态系统服务的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):246.
　ZHOU Tao,LI Tian-hong.Influence of Land Use/Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Province before and after Returning Farmland to Forest/Grass[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):246.
[9]牛志君,周亚鹏,王树涛,等.县域土地利用变化对碳储量的影响与评价——以黑龙港流域巨鹿县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):292.
　NIU Zhijun,ZHOU Yapeng,WANG Shutao,et al.Influence and Evaluation of Land Use Change on Carbon Storage on County Scale—A Case Study of Julu County in Heilonggang Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):292.
[10]陈万旭,李江风,姜卫,等.豫西山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(01):376.
　CHEN Wanxu,LI Jiangfeng,JIANG Wei,et al.Impacts of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Values Based on RS and GIS in Western Mountainous Area of He’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):376.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2006-9-24
作者简介:陈晓林（1980- ），女，研究生，主要从事生态环境、水土保持研究。

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01