YIN Jia-yi,WU Yong-qiu,WANG Yan-zai.Error Analysis of Gullies’ Measurement with Different Methods[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):12-16.
采用不同方法测量切沟的误差分析
- Title:
- Error Analysis of Gullies’ Measurement with Different Methods
- Keywords:
- gully; gullies’ measurement; error analysis
- 分类号:
- S157
- 摘要:
- 使用卷尺测量切沟的体积和面积是研究土壤侵蚀中最常用也是传统的测量方法，着重分析使用卷尺测量切沟时，测得切沟体积的误差。其误差主要包括由卷尺精度限制而导致的误差，以及由测量原理所造成的系统误差。运用误差传递公式计算由卷尺精度限制导致的误差，这种误差与测量相邻横截面的间隔长度无关，只与测量仪器即卷尺有关；对于不同的切沟，卷尺精度导致的误差占所测切沟体积的百分比也基本相同，不到2%。由测量原理造成的系统误差又可分为两种：由于横截面不规则造成的系统误差，最多可达到体积的2%；由于相临2个横截面之间形状不规则造成的系统误差。在野外测量的时候，每次测量距离保持在10m左右比较合适。卷尺测量与差分GPS测量的切沟体积的比较表明，单次测量误差较大，在10%左右，而两次测量的体积差，即两种方法所得的切沟体积的年际变化量相差不大，说明用卷尺测量切沟体积的年际变化是有效的。
- Abstract:
- The authors mainly study the error of the gullies’ volume when they are measured with tapes, since it’s a very traditional method to measure gullies’ volume and area with tapes in the research of gully erosion.The error is mainly caused by limited precision of tapes and mechanism of measurement.The error caused by limited precision of tapes can be calculated with error transfer formula, and it was found that this kind of error does not depend on the distance between two neighbouring cross sections, but only relate to the tapes we used.The ratio of the error to gullies’ volume is less than 2%, which is the same for different gullies.The system error caused by mechanism of measurement is comprised of two parts.One is due to the nonidentity of cross sections, which has maximum value of 2%; the other one is caused by irregularity of cross sections.In order to minimize the system error caused by the nonidentity of cross sections, it’s important to decrease the distance between two neighbouring cross sections, which was about 10 meters in our outdoor measurement.Additionally, we also compare the gullies’ volume measured with tapes and GPS.It’s found that the error of single measurement is about 10%, and that the annual variations of gullies’ volume measured with tapes and GPS are almost the same.Therefore, it’s an effective method to measure annual variation of gullies’ volume with tapes.
参考文献/References:
[1] 朱显谟.黄土区土壤侵蚀的分类[J].土壤学报, 1956, 4(2):99-15.
[2] 罗来兴.划分晋西、陕北、陇土黄土区域间沟和沟谷的地貌类型[J].地理学报, 1956, 22(3):201-221.
[3] Poesen J.Gully typology and gully control measures in the European loess belt in farm land erosion in temperate plains environment and hills[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Publishers, 1993:221-239.
[4] 陈棣.漫川漫岗区沟道侵蚀的预防治理[J]黑龙江水专学报, 1992(增刊):64-66.
[5] 张金福, 李喜奎, 刘绪军.黑龙江黑土区沟壑侵蚀的危害及其治理[J].水土保持科技情报, 1999(3):52-53.
[6] 程宏, 伍永秋.切沟侵蚀定量研究进展[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17(5):32-35.
[7] 李和信.忍看黑土付流波?:东北黑土区水土流失调查[N].人民日报, 2002-08-15.
[8] 伍永秋, 刘宝元.切沟、切沟侵蚀与预报[J].应用基础与工程科学学报, 2000, 8(2):134-142.
[9] 游智敏, 伍永秋, 刘宝元.利用GPS进行切沟侵蚀监测研究[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(5):91-94.
[10] 胡刚, 伍永秋, 刘宝元, 等.GPS和GIS进行短期沟蚀研究初探:以东北漫川漫岗黑土区为例[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(4):16-19.
[11] 曾贻伟, 龚德唇, 王书颖, 等.普通物理试验教程[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社, 1989:29-37.
[12] 沙定国.实用误差理论与数据处理[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社, 1993:103-114.
相似文献/References:
[1]秦高远,周跃,杨黎.切沟侵蚀研究初探——以云南省文山县新开田村为例[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):84.
QIN Gao-yuan,ZHOU Yue,YANG Li.Primary Research on Erosion of Gully——Taking Wenshan County in Yunnan Province as an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):84.
[2]李斌兵,黄磊.基于面向对象技术的黄土丘陵沟壑区切沟遥感提取方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(03):115.
LI Bin-bing,HUANG Lei.Study on Recognition of the Gully in Loess Hilly-Gully Region Based on Object-Oriented Technology[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):115.
[3]李斌兵,黄磊,刘大伟.黄土丘陵沟壑区切沟分布的遥感图像识别最优尺度研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):158.
LI Bin-bing,HUANG Lei,LIU Da-wei.Research for Optimal Scale on the Remote Sensing Image Recognition of Gully Distribution in Loess Hilly-Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):158.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2006-10-26
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展规划项目（2007CB407204）；国家科技攻关项目（2005BA517A06）
作者简介:尹佳宜（1982- ），女，在读硕士，主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。