[1]刘洪江,韩用顺,江玉红,等.云南昆明东川区泥石流危险性评价[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):241-244.
　LIU Hong-jiang,HAN Yong-shun,JIANG Yu-hong,et al.Risk Assessment of Debris Flow in Dongchuan Area, Kunming,Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):241-244.
点击复制

云南昆明东川区泥石流危险性评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 14 期数: 2007年06期 页码: 241-244 栏目: 出版日期: 1900-01-01
Title:
Risk Assessment of Debris Flow in Dongchuan Area, Kunming,Yunnan Province
作者:
刘洪江1,2, 韩用顺2,3, 江玉红2, 张继2
1. 云南财经大学 统计与信息学院, 昆明 650223;
2. 中国科学院 成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都 610041;
3. 湖南科技大学 地球空间信息科学研究所, 湖南 湘潭 411201
Author(s):
LIU Hong-jiang1,2, HAN Yong-shun2,3, JIANG Yu-hong2, ZHANG Ji2
1. Statistics and Information School, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650223 China;
2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS, Chengdu 610041, China;
3. Institute of Geo-spatial Information Science, Hu’nan University of Science&Technology, Xiangtan, Hu’nan 411201, China
关键词:
泥石流; 危险性评价; 模型; GIS; 东川区
Keywords:
debris flow; risk evaluation; model; GIS; Dongchuan District
分类号:
P642.23
摘要:
根据泥石流危险度评价的5个层次：即泥石流灾害野外调查、泥石流暴发成因分析、危险度评价模型、灾害评价与减灾。根据泥石流的发生学原理，10个自然因子分别用于代表能量、物质和激发条件，以用于自然危险度评价，在评价时采用了权重模型和方根模型，野外泥石流调查资料用于模型检验，结果表明权重模型能更好地进行自然危险度区划；4个社会经济发展水平代表性因子用于经济状况评价。二者复合后得到该区域综合危险度评价。根据综合危险度评价结果最重度危险区面积为133.7 km2，79.0%的泥石流沟位于该区内；重度危险区面积580.6 km2，19.8%的泥石流沟位于该区内；中度危险区面积723.9 km2，有1.2%的泥石流沟位于区内；安全区面积119.0 km2，该区内无泥石流沟，表明分区结果符合实际泥石流分布。根据分区结果提出了该区内泥石流减灾方案。
Abstract:
Debris flow risk assessment can be divided into five levels/steps, i.e.the field survey, the background conditions analysis, the risk assessment, the evaluation of the situation of the hazard and the advise of the mitigation way.Ten factors, which represent the energy, the mass quantity and the trigging conditions of the debris flow, were put into the weight model and the square model to estimate the debris flow risk of nature backgrounds for the studying area.It has shown that the result of the weight model is better than that of the square model.Four factors, which represent the social and economy backgrounds, are used to evaluate the economic levels of the studying area.Then, we put them together to get the comprehensive risk assessment at last.The result has 4 levels.The most dangerous zone is about 133.7 km2 and about 79.0% of the total debris flow gullies of the studying area are located in this zone; the serious dangerous zone is about 580.6 km2 and it has 19.8% of the debris flow gullies; the middle (light) dangerous zone is about 723.9 km2 and about 1.2% of the debris flow gullies are located in this zone; the safety area is about 119.0 km2 and it has no debris flow gully.This result fits the field survey data fairly well, and it shows that the method used in this paper is reliable.Advice of mitigation way is also provided.

参考文献/References:

[1] John C D, Chang J C, Gregory C O.Two Models for Evaluating Landslide Hazards[J].Computers & Geosciences, 2006, 32 (8):1120-1127.
[2] Fausto G, Paola R, Francesca A, et al.Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models[J].Geomorphology, 2006, 81 (1):166-184.
[3] 韦方强, 胡凯衡, Lopez J L, 等.泥石流危险性动量分区方法与应用[J].科学通报, 2003, 48 (3):298-301.
[4] 韦方强, 谢洪, 钟敦伦.四川省泥石流危险度区划[J].水土保持学报, 2000, 14 (1):59-63.
[5] 唐川, 张军, 周春花, 等.城市泥石流易损性评价[J].灾害学, 2005, 20 (2):11-17.
[6] 刘希林, 王全才, 孔纪名, 等.都 (江堰) 汶 (川) 公路泥石流危险性评价及活动趋势[J].防灾减灾工程学报, 2004, 24 (1):41-46.
[7] 云南省统计局.2005年云南省人口统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2005.

相似文献/References:

[1]田冰,王裕宜.基于功率谱分析的蒋家沟泥石流侵蚀输沙量准周期的探讨[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):244.
　TIAN Bing,WANG Yu-yi.Power Spectral Analysis on Periodicity of Sediment Transport in Debris Flow in Jiangjiagou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):244.
[2]胡桂胜,陈宁生,邓虎.基于GIS的西藏林芝地区泥石流易发与危险区分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):195.
　HU Gui-sheng,CHEN Ning-sheng,DENG Hu.Analysis of Debris Flow-prone and Dangerous Area in Nyingchi of Tibet Based on GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):195.
[3]李朝安,胡卸文,李冠奇,等.四川省“8·13”特大泥石流灾害成生机理与防治原则[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):257.
　LI Chao-an,HU Xie-wen,LI Guan-qi,et al.Formation Mechanism of the ’8·13’ Catastrophic Debris Flow in Sichuan and the Principles of Controlling[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):257.
[4]张黎勇.皖南山区山体滑坡、泥石流的成因及其防治[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(01):171.
　Zhang Liyong.The Cause and Prevention of Slideslope, Debris Flow in the Hilly Areas of Southern Anhui Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(06):171.
[5]顾俊周.格拦坝在治理泥石流中的应用[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(01):187.
　Gu Junzhou.The Application of Grid Dam in the Treatment of Mud-rock Flow[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(06):187.
[6]崔之久.泥石流沉积与环境及其在防灾减灾上的意义[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(04):2.
　Cui Zhijiu.Debris Flow Deposit and Its Signification on Hazards Prevention and Reduction[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1999,6(06):2.
[7]李树德.中国滑坡、泥石流灾害的时空分布特点[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(04):33.
　Li Shude.The Temporal and Spacial Distribution of Landslide and Debris Flow Disasters in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1999,6(06):33.
[8]吕态能.东川严重水土流失区植被恢复对策[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):134.
　LU Tai-neng.Countermeasures for Vegetation Recovery in Dongchuan Region with Serious Soil Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(06):134.
[9]吴正华.北京泥石流灾害及其降水触发条件[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(01):67.
　WU Zhenghua.The Mud-rock Flow Disaster and Their Touch off Condition by Rainfall in Beijing Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(06):67.
[10]崔之久,冯金良.东川蒋家沟泥石流沉积亚相组合特征[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):2.
　CUI Zhi-jiu,FENG Jin-liang.Combination Features of Depositional Sub-facies of Debris-flowon the Jiangjiagou Valley, Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(06):2.
[11]王高峰,唐川,王洪德,等.初咱磨子沟泥石流特征及危险性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):234.
　WANG Gao-feng,TANG Chuan,WANG Hong-de,et al.Characteristics and Hazard Assessment of Debris Flows in Chuzanmozigou Catchment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):234.
[12]柳金峰,欧国强.泥石流危险性评价的耗散结构分析[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(01):123.
　LIU Jin-feng,OU Guo-qiang.Dissipative Structure Analysis on Debris Flow Hazard Assessment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(06):123.
[13]侯兰功,崔鹏.单沟泥石流灾害危险性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):125.
　HOU Lan-gong,CUI Peng.The Study on Assessment of Debris Flow Hazards in the Solo Channel[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(06):125.
[14]崔建凯,沈军辉,李永林,等.四川阎王曲二支沟泥石流危险性评价[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(01):141.
　CUI Jian-kai,SHEN Jun-hui,LI Yong-lin,et al.Hazard Assessment of Debris Flow in the Second Branch Ditch of Yanwangqu[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):141.
[15]郑达,赵华,邓辉.某水电站坝区泥石流危险性研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):16.
　ZHENG Da,ZHAO Hua,DENG Hui.Study On Debris Flow Hazard on the Dam of a Hydropower Station[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):16.
[16]铁永波,唐川,苏小琴.四川省九龙县石头沟泥石流动力学特征及其危险性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(05):168.
　TIE Yong-bo,TANG Chuan,SU Xiao-qin.Shitougou Debris Flow Dynamic Characters and Its Hazard Risk Assessment in Jiulong of Sichuan Provience[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):168.
[17]高立兵,苏军德.基于信息熵与AHP模型的小区域泥石流危险性评价方法[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):376.
　GAO Libing,SU Junde.Risk Assessment Method of Debris Flow in Residential Area Based on Information Entropy and AHP Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):376.
[18]李炫,杨本勇,范建容,等.基于流域单元的岷江上游泥石流危险性评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):335.
　LI Xuan,YANG Benyong,FAN Jianrong,et al.Assessment on the Hazard of Debris Flows in the Upper Min River Based on the Watershed Catchment-Unit[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):335.
[19]王春山,巴仁基,周洪福,等.四川省石棉县县城泥石流灾害风险评估[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):219.
　WANG Chun-shan,BA Ren-ji,ZHOU Hong-fu,et al.Risk Evaluation of Debris Flows in Urban Area of Shimian County of Sichuan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):219.
[20]高延超,陈宁生,葛华,等.康定市子耳沟泥石流的物源特征与危险区划[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(06):403.
　GAO Yanchao,CHEN Ningsheng,GE Hua,et al.Source Characteristic and Risk Zoning of Debris Flow in Zier Watershed of Kangding City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):403.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2007-1-17。
基金项目:中国科学院知识创新工程项目（KZCX3-SW-352）
作者简介:刘洪江（1971- ），男，重庆江津人，副教授，在读博士，主要从事环境遥感与土地退化研究。

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01