Shi Dewei,Cheng Jinhua,Li Mingfeng.Characteristics and Attribution of Soil Preferential Flow of Typical Vegetation in the South of Yongding River Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(01):232-240.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.025]
永定河平原南部典型植被土壤优先流特征及其归因
- Title:
- Characteristics and Attribution of Soil Preferential Flow of Typical Vegetation in the South of Yongding River Plain
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)01-0232-09
- Keywords:
- Yongding River; preferential flow; bright blue dye tracing method; principal component analysis
- 分类号:
- S714.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]研究永定河平原地区的优先流现象,解析其形态特征和发育程度,明确影响优先流的主要因素,为该区域淡水资源保护以及生态环境恢复提供理论依据。[方法]以3种典型植被柳树、荆条和狗尾草为对象,在25 mm入渗水量下(大雨)通过野外亮蓝染色示踪试验获取原始土样和染色剖面图像,使用图像处理技术解析水分和溶质在土壤中下渗的形态规律,结合相关性分析和主成成分分析法研究不同土壤因子对优先流产生和发育的响应。[结果](1)柳树、荆条和狗尾草土壤优先流分别集中在10—40 cm处、10—40 cm处和10—30 cm处,最大染色深度分别为40.0 cm,44.8 cm,31.5 cm。不同植被类型垂直剖面上显示出染色面积比随土层深度的增加而下降。(2)优先流发育程度为柳树样地>荆条样地>狗尾草样地。柳树样地和狗尾草样地的染色面积比和长度指数差异显著(p<0.05),荆条样地与其他2种植被差异均不显著(p>0.05)。(3)黏粒、砂粒、粉粒含量对方差变异性的贡献率为24.824%,根重密度和有机质含量对方差变异性的贡献率为46.312%。[结论]永定河平原南部3种典型植被中柳树样地最早发生土壤优先流现象,形成优先流染色形态分化程度最高,优先流现象最明显,而狗尾草样地最不明显。随着入渗水量的增加,土壤水分运动表现出整体下移,加深了土壤水流形态分化界面深度,即0—20 cm土层染色形态表现为相对稳定。土壤机械组成与径级小于5 mm根系是影响优先流产生发育的重要因素,由于各样地中植被的生长发育状态不同,因此对土壤优先流的影响程度也不尽相同,存在一定的差异性。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to examine the preferential flow phenomenon in the Yongding River Plain, to analyze its morphological characteristics and development degree, to identify the main factors affecting preferential flow, and provide a theoretical basis for the protection of freshwater resources and the restoration of ecological environment in the region. [Methods] Willow, wattle and Setaria viridis of three typical vegetation were taken as objects. The original soil samples and dyed profile images were obtained by field brilliant blue dye tracing test under 25 mm infiltration water(heavy rain). Image processing technology was used to analyze the morphological rule of water and solute infiltration in soil, and combined correlation analysis and principal component analysis were used to study the response of different soil factors to the generation and development of preferential flow. [Results](1)The preferential flow of the willow, Jing, and dogtail soil concentrated at 10—40 cm, 10—40 cm, and 10—30 cm, respectively. The maximum chromosome depth was 40.0 cm, 44.8 cm, and 31.5 cm. Different vegetation types of vertical section showed that the chromosomal area decreased compared with the depth of the soil layer.(2)The degree of preferential development was a willow-like land>ine-like>dogtail-like land. The differential ratio and length index of the chromosomal area of the willow-like land were significantly different(p<0.05), and the differences between the two planting of the neither of the two planting of the tattoo(p>0.05).(3)The contribution rate of the content of the other party's variant was 24.824%, and the contribution rate of root weight density and organic content was 46.312%. [Conclusion] Among the three typical vegetation in the south of the Yongding River Plain, the first willow-sample of soil preferential flow occurred, forming the highest degree of preferential chromatization. The phenomenon of preferential flow was the most obvious, while the dogtail-like land was the least obvious. With the increase of the amount of water seepage, the soil moisture movement showed the overall downward movement, deepening the depth of the differential interface of the soil water flow, i. e., the dyeing of the 0—20 cm soil layer was relatively stable. Soil machinery composition and less than 5 mm root system are important factor affecting the development of preferential flow. Because the growth and development of vegetation in various places is different, the impact on soil preferential flow is not the same. There are certain differences in differentiation.
参考文献/References:
[1] 李洪宇,高阳,刘铁刚.土壤优先流路径研究进展[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(S1):254-258.
Li H Y, Gao Y, Liu T G. Progress in research on soil priority flow pathways[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015,34(S1):254-258.
[2] Johnson A C, Haria A H, Bhardwaj C L, et al. Water movement and isoproturon behaviour in a drained heavy clay soil:2. Persistence and transport[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1994,163:217-231.
[3] 曹顺爱.稻田土壤优先流及其对氮肥运移的影响研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2003.
Cao S A. Study on preferential flow of paddy soil and its impact on nitrogen fertilizer transport[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2003.
[4] 艾力夏提·库尔班,伊怀虎,韦自强,等.黑龙江省张广才岭樟子松人工林根系与优先路径的关系[J].西部林业科学,2022,51(4):134-140.
Ailixiati·Ku-Erban, Yi H H, Wei Z Q, et al. Relationship between root system and Priority Path of Pinus sylvestris var. Mongolic plantation in Zhangguangcailing, Heilongjiang province[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2022,51(4):134-140.
[5] 尤今,王树谦.土壤裂隙对农田土壤优先流的影响及其控制因子[J].节水灌溉,2022,325(9):71-75,80.
You J, Wang S Q. Impacts of soil fracture on cropland soil preferential flow and its controlling factors[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2022,325(9):71-75,80.
[6] 卢华兴,段旭,赵洋毅,等.滇中磨盘山典型林分土壤优先流特征及其归因分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2022,50(7):48-62.
Lu B X, Duan X, Zhao Y Y, et al. Characteristics and attribution analysis of soil preferential flow intypical stand of Mopan Mountain in central Yunnan[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition),2022,50(7):48-62.
[7] 姜波.耕作方式影响下的甘蔗地土壤优先流定量研究[D].广西桂林:桂林理工大学,2022.
Jiang B. Quantitative study on soil preferential flow in sugarcane fields under the influence of farming[D]. Guangxi Guilin:Guilin University of Technology, 2022.
[8] 秦梓城,陈晓冰,刘思佳,等.基于计算流体力学分析的蔗田土壤优先流运动过程研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2023,310(2):33-42.
Qin Z C, Chen X B, Liu S J, et al. Research on soil preferential flow movement process of sugarcane field based on computational fluid mechanics analysis[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2023,310(2):33-42.
[9] Maier F, Meerveld I V, Greinwald K, et al. Effects ofsoil and vegetation development on surface hydrologicalproperties of moraines in the Swiss Alps[J]. Catena, 2019,187:104353-104370.
[10] Tang Q, Duncan J M, Guo L, et al. On the controls ofpreferential flow in soils of different hillslope positionand lithological Origin[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2020,8(13):13883-13926.
[11] 孟红旗,赵同谦,徐华山,等.河岸带耕地降雨径流产流特征分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(4):749-754.
Meng H Q, Zhao T Q, Xu H S, et al. Research on the Characteristics of the Rainfall Runoff in Riparian Farmland[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009,28(4):749-754.
[12] 吕金波.简述北京永定河沿岸的地质背景[J].城市地质,2012,7(1):4-7.
Lv J B. Geological Background along the Banks of the Yongding River[J]. City Geology, 2012,7(1):4-7.
[13] 程天赦,杨文静,代鹏,等.永定河冲洪积平原南部QHJ01孔第四纪地层划分及其环境意义[J].华北地质,2021,44(4):47-54.
Cheng T S, Yang W J, Dai P, et al. Quaternary stratigraphic division and its environmental significance of Borehole QHJ01 in southern alluvial plain of the Yongding River[J]. North China Geology, 2021,44(4):47-54.
[14] 陈晓冰.重庆四面山4种土地利用类型土壤优先流特征研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
Chen X B. Study on the preferential flow characteristics of four land use types in Simian Mountain of Chongqing[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
[15] Aeby P, Forrer J, Flühler H, et al. Image Analysis for Determination of Dye Tracer Concentrations in Sand Columns[J]. Soil Science Society of America, 1997,61(1):33-35.
[16] Markus Flury, Hannes Flühler, William A, et al. Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water:A field study[J]. Water Resources Research, 1994,30(7):1945-1954.
[17] 李伟莉,金昌杰,王安志,等.土壤大孔隙流研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(4):888-894.
Li W L, Jin C J, Wang A Z, et al. Research progress in soil macropore flow[J]. the Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,18(4):888-894.
[18] 魏虎伟,程金花,张洪江,等.四面山2种林地大孔隙特征与优先流关系研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(4):263-268.
Wei H W, Cheng J H, Zhang H J, et al. Relationships between soil macropores properties and preferential flow about two kind of woodlands in Simian Mountains[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,28(4):263-268.
[19] 卢华兴,段旭,赵洋毅,等.滇南地区普洱茶树根系对土壤优先路径形成的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):80-87.
Lu B X, Duan X, Zhao Y Y, et al. Effect of root of Pu'er Tea on the formation of soil priority path in southern Yunnan[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(4):80-87.
[20] 程金花,张洪江,张晓晖,等.重庆四面山根系及土壤特性对优先路径分布的影响[J].世界科技研究与发展,2011,33(4):519-523.
Cheng J H, Zhang H J, Zhang X H, et al. Effect of roots and soil properties on preferential flow paths distribution in Simian Mountains, Chongqing[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D,2011,33(4):519-523.
[21] 王伟,张洪江,程金花,等.四面山阔叶林土壤大孔隙特征与优先流的关系[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(5):1217-1223.
Wang W, Zhang H J, Cheng J H, et al. Macropore characteristics and its relationships with the preferential flow in broadleaved forest soils of Simian Mountains[J]. the Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010,21(5):1217-1223.
[22] 侯芳,程金花,祁生林,等.重庆四面山不同林地类型优先流特征及染色形态定量评价[J].西南林业大学学报:自然科学,2021,41(2):107-117.
Hou F, Cheng J H, Qi S L, et al. Characteristics of preferential flow and quantitative evaluation of dyeing morphology in different forest types on Simianshan mountain in Chongqing[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Natural Sciences),2021,41(2):107-117.
[23] 王佩佩,苏雪萌,周正朝,等.黄土丘陵区典型植被群落坡面土壤优先流特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):16-23.
Wang P P, Su X M, Zhou Z C, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of soil preferential flow on slope of typical vegetation communities in Loess Hilly region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(5):16-23.
[24] 程竞萱,程金花,郑欣,等.不同植被覆盖下土壤优先流特征及影响因素[J].河南农业大学学报,2018,52(6):973-982.
Cheng J X, Cheng J H, Zheng X, et al. Characteristics of soil preferential flow and its influencing factors under different vegetation cover[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2018,52(6):973-982.
[25] 刘目兴,宋兴敏,卢世国,等.三峡库区不同植被覆盖坡地的土壤优先流运动特征研究[J].土壤学报,2022,59(5):1321-1335.
Liu M X, Song X M, Lu S G, et al. Research on the characteristics of preferential flow movement along varied hillslopes covered with different vegetation in the Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022,59(5):1321-1335.
[26] 陈晓冰,张洪江,李世友,等.紫色砂岩区不同植被类型土壤优先流特征及其影响因素[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(6):42-49.
Chen X B, Zhang H J, Li S Y, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of preferential flow in different vegetation types of purple sandstone regions[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,12(6):42-49.
[27] 牛健植,余新晓,张志强.优先流研究现状及发展趋势[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):231-243.
Niu J Z, Yu X X, Zhang Z Q. The present and future research on preferential flow[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006,26(1):231-243.
相似文献/References:
[1]王硕,王湛,张亮,等.永定河河滨绿化带土壤保墒技术研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):105.
WANG Shuo,WANG Zhan,ZHANG Liang,et al.Research for Preservation of Soil Moisture in Yongding Streamside Green Belt[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):105.
[2]梁淑娟,樊华,王利军,等.永定河生态护岸模式的适宜性观测研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):153.
LIANG Shu-juan,FAN Hua,WANG Li-jun,et al.Observational Study on the Suitability of the Ecological Riverbank Mode for Yongding River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):153.
[3]任竹叶,陈怀伟.依托重点治理 发展流域经济[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(03):43.
Ren Zhuye,Chen Huaiwei.Development of Small Watershed Economy Based on the Major Administration Projects[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(01):43.
[4]曹丹妮,邸涵悦,郭忠录,等.演替梯度下土壤优先流特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):99.
CAO Danni,DI Hanyue,GUO Zhonglu,et al.Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Preferential Flow in Different Succession Gradients[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(01):99.
[5]任泽莹,赵勇钢,吕银彦,等.汾河流域下游不同土地利用方式下优先流区与基质流区土壤团聚体稳定性分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(06):59.
REN Zeying,ZHAO Yonggang,Lv Yinyan,et al.Analysis on Soil Aggregate Stability of Preferential Flow and Matrix Flow Domains Under Different Land Use Types in the Lower Reaches of Fen River Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(01):59.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-10-23 修回日期:2022-12-12
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目“喀斯特地区土石二元结构下优先流对坡面水文过程的影响”(32071839)
第一作者:史德威(1998—),男,湖北武汉人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:shidewei258@163.com
通信作者:程金花(1979—),女,山东东阿人,博士,教授,主要从事森林水文与土壤研究。E-mail:Jinhua_cheng@126.com