WANG Tao,ZHOU Qigang,MAO Yongfa,et al.Study on Ecological Compensation Zoning and Measurement in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Carbon Revenue and Expenditure[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):394-403.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.017.]
基于碳收支的三峡库区生态补偿分区及测度研究
- Title:
- Study on Ecological Compensation Zoning and Measurement in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Carbon Revenue and Expenditure
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)04-0394-10
- Keywords:
- ecological compensation; carbon revenue and expenditure; compensation zoning; compensation measurement; Three Gorges Reservoir Area
- 分类号:
- X321
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]揭示三峡库区碳收支的动态变化规律,划定碳收支的生态补偿分区,丰富生态补偿量化测度依据,完善生态补偿标准,进而为三峡库区相关部门制定生态补偿政策提供理论参考。[方法]以三峡库区26个区县为研究尺度,运用标准显性比较优势指数法、K-means聚类分析法和空间叠加分析等方法,基于三峡库区碳收支核算差异和库区地理位置,划分生态支付区和受偿区,测算了三峡库区生态补偿额度。[结果](1)2010—2017年三峡库区碳收支量总体结果均为正值,呈现先下降后上升的“√”型波动上升趋势。(2)将三峡库区生态补偿分区重构为8种类型,分为4个一般受偿区、11个重点受偿区、10个一般支付区和1个重点支付区。(3)2010年、2012年、2014年和2017年三峡库区生态补偿总额度为20.26亿元、16.74亿元、21.17亿元和25.20亿元,总体呈现上涨的趋势,其中生态补偿以区内补偿为主,区内补偿占比为80%以上。[结论] 2010—2017年三峡库区碳收支量均为正值且呈现上涨趋势,研究以碳收支为依据,结合全方位多角度因素构建生态补偿体系,实现生态补偿分区,为库区各区县的横向生态补偿提供量化依据,对促进区域协调可持续发展具有重大意义。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to reveal the dynamic changes of carbon revenue and expenditure in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, delineate the ecological compensation zones of carbon revenue and expenditure, enrich the quantitative measurement basis of ecological compensation, improve the ecological compensation standard, and then provide theoretical reference for the relevant departments in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area to formulate ecological compensation policies. [Methods] This study takes 26 districts and counties in the Three Gorges Reservoir area as the research samples, and uses the standard dominant comparative advantage index method, K-means cluster analysis and spatial overlay analysis to divide ecological payment areas and compensation areas based on the differences in carbon revenue and expenditure accounting in the Three Gorges Reservoir area and the geographical location of the reservoir area, and to measure the ecological compensation amount in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. [Results](1)The overall results of carbon revenue and expenditure in the Three Gorges Reservoir area from 2010 to 2017 were all positive, showing a ‘√' type fluctuating upward trend of first decreasing and then increasing.(2)The ecological compensation zoning of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area was reconstructed into eight types, divided into four general compensation-receiving zones, 11 key compensation-receiving zones, 10 general payment zones and one key payment zone.(3)The total amount of ecological compensation in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2017 was RMB 2.026 billion, RMB 1.674 billion, RMB 2.117 billion and RMB 2.520 billion, respectively, showing an overall upward trend, with ecological compensation being dominated by compensation within the area, with compensation within the area accounting for over 80%. [Conclusion] From 2010 to 2017, the carbon revenue and expenditure in the Three Gorges Reservoir area were positive and showed an upward trend. The study takes carbon revenue and expenditure as the basis, combines all-round and multi-faceted factors to construct an ecological compensation system, realizes ecological compensation zoning, and provides a quantitative basis for horizontal ecological compensation in each district and county of the study area, which is of great significance for promoting coordinated and sustainable regional development.
参考文献/References:
[1] 贾卓,陈兴鹏,善孝玺.草地生态系统生态补偿标准和优先度研究:以甘肃省玛曲县为例[J].资源科学,2012,34(10):1951-1958.
[2] 郑苗壮,刘岩,彭本荣,等.海洋生态补偿的理论及内涵解析[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(11):1911-1915.
[3] 刘菊,傅斌,张成虎,等.基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):577-585.
[4] 赖敏,陈凤桂.基于机会成本法的海洋保护区生态保护补偿标准[J].生态学报,2020,40(6):1901-1909.
[5] 宋蕾,李峰.矿山修复治理保证金的标准核算模型[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(1):78-83.
[6] 王怀毅,李忠魁,俞燕琴.中国生态补偿:理论与研究述评[J].生态经济,2022,38(3):164-170.
[7] 朱媛媛,文一惠,谢婧,等.京津冀跨区域生态补偿机制探讨[J].环境保护,2021,49(15):21-26.
[8] 顾丹丹,彭鹏,赵椿溪,等.纳入健康损失的生态补偿额度测算:基于省域尺度[J].经济地理,2021,41(9):193-203.
[9] 张宜红.集中连片特困地区农户对生态补偿扶贫的满意度及其影响因素研究:基于罗霄山片区3县的调研[J].生态经济,2021,37(12):128-134,169.
[10] 杨欣,尚光引,李研,等.农户农田生态补偿方式选择偏好及其影响因素研究:基于农户分化视角的实证[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(10):131-137.
[11] 谢慧明,毛狄,沈满洪.流域上游居民接受生态补偿意愿及其偏好研究:以新安江流域为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(16):6633-6643.
[12] 李国志,张景然.矿产资源开发生态补偿文献综述及实践进展[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(2):525-540.
[13] 蔡志坚,华国栋.对我国发展森林碳补偿贸易市场的相关问题探讨[J].林业经济问题,2005,25(2):68-71,76.
[14] 戴洁,黄蕾,胡静,等.基于区域一体化背景下的长三角环境经济政策优化研究[J].中国环境管理,2019,11(3):77-81.
[15] 赵荣钦,刘英,丁明磊,等.区域二元碳收支的理论方法研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(5):554-568.
[16] 余光辉,耿军军,周佩纯,等.基于碳平衡的区域生态补偿量化研究:以长株潭绿心昭山示范区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(4):454-458.
[17] 费芩芳.旅游者碳补偿支付意愿及碳补偿模式研究:以杭州西湖风景区为例[J].江苏商论,2012(12):89-91.
[18] 周嘉,王钰萱,刘学荣,等.基于土地利用变化的中国省域碳排放时空差异及碳补偿研究[J].地理科学,2019,39(12):1955-1961.
[19] 曹俊文,陶强强.长江经济带农业碳补偿修正测算及分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(4):693-698.
[20] 陈儒,邓悦,姜志德.基于修正碳计量的区域农业碳补偿时空格局[J].经济地理,2018,38(6):168-177.
[21] 夏四友,杨宇.基于主体功能区的京津冀城市群碳收支时空分异与碳补偿分区[J].地理学报,2022,77(3):679-696.
[22] 赵荣钦,张帅,黄贤金,等.中原经济区县域碳收支空间分异及碳平衡分区[J].地理学报,2014,69(10):1425-1437.
[23] 张巍.陕西省重点生态功能区碳汇/碳源核算与生态补偿研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(10):191-194.
[24] 沈田华.三峡水库重庆库区生态公益林补偿机制研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
[25] 陈儒,姜志德.中国省域低碳农业横向空间生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(4):87-97.
[26] 万伦来,林春鑫,陈艺.基于相对碳赤字的中国省际碳补偿时空格局研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(12):2572-2583.
[27] 茹凯丽.基于土地利用的福建省碳排放与县域碳补偿研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2020.
[28] 孟浩斌,周启刚,李明慧,等.三峡库区生态系统服务时空变化及权衡与协同关系研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(5):566-575.
[29] 黄磊,吴传清,文传浩.三峡库区环境:经济—社会复合生态系统耦合协调发展研究[J].西部论坛,2017,27(4):83-92.
[30] 王刚,张华兵,薛菲,等.成都市县域土地利用碳收支与经济发展关系研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(7):1170-1182.
[31] 高奇,师学义,王子凌,等.深圳市碳收支与土地利用变化的协整分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):277-283.
[32] 杨俊闯,赵超. k-means聚类算法研究综述[J].计算机工程与应用,2019,55(23):7-14,63.
[33] Yu R, Cai J C, Leung P S. The normalized revealed comparative advantage index[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2009,43(1):267-282.
[34] Balassa B. Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage[J]. Manchester School, 1965,33(2):99-123.
[35] Zhai T, Wang J, Fang Y, et al. Integrating ecosystem services supply, demand and flow in ecological compensation: a case study of carbon sequestration services[J]. Sustainability, 2021,13(4)1-19.
[36] 周健,官冬杰,周李磊.基于生态足迹的三峡库区重庆段后续发展生态补偿标准量化研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(11):4539-4553.
[37] 丁佳佳,蔡庆,丁磊,等.基于生态价值核算的重庆市区域生态补偿策略研究[J].环境生态学,2022,4(2/3):23-30.
[38] 官冬杰,龚巧灵,刘慧敏,等.重庆三峡库区生态补偿标准差别化模型构建及应用研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(11):4218-4227.
[39] 孙盼盼,尹珂.基于农户意愿的三峡库区消落带弃耕经济补贴标准估算及影响因素分析[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(29):115-119.
[40] 赵旭,池辰,何伟军.基于选择试验法的三峡屏障区居民生态补偿支付意愿研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(1):101-112.
相似文献/References:
[1]孙贤斌,黄润,王升堂,等.安徽省省会经济圈水源地生态补偿环境调查分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):164.
SUN Xian-bin,HUANG Run,WANG Sheng-tang,et al.Investigation on Rural Residents and Their Willingness to Accept Eco-compensation in Water Source Areas of Provincial City Ecology Circle[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):164.
[2]张燕,张洪.以生态补偿实现水土资源开发的帕累托最优[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):109.
ZHANG Yan,ZHANG Hong.Achieving Pareto Optimality in Exploitation of Water and Land Sources by Green Compensation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(04):109.
[3]杨志平.基于生态足迹变化的盐城市麋鹿自然保护区生态补偿定量研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):261.
YANG Zhi-ping.Analysis of the Ecological Compensation Based on Ecological Footprint Change in Elk Nature Reserve of Yancheng[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):261.
[4]魏晓燕,夏建新,吴燕红.基于生态足迹理论的调水工程移民生态补偿标准研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):214.
WEI Xiao-yan,XIA Jian-xin,WU Yan-hong.Ecological Compensation Criteria for Ecological Migrations of Water Transfer Projects Based on Ecological Footprint Theory[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):214.
[5]赵艺学.退耕还林还草工程生态补偿主要关系构建与工程持续运行的对策研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(06):272.
ZHAO Yi-xue.Study on the Tactics of Continued Move and Its Primary Relation Construction of the Ecological Compensation for Returning the Farmland to Forestland or Grassland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):272.
[6]张来章,党维勤,徐成.水土保持补偿机制中存在问题及其建议与对策[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):184.
ZHANG Lai-zhang,DANG Wei-qin,XU Cheng.Proposals and Measures in Problems of Soil and Water Conservation Compensation Mechanism[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):184.
[7]林秀珠,李小斌,李家兵,等.基于机会成本和生态系统服务价值的闽江流域生态补偿标准研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):314.
LIN Xiuzhu,LI Xiaobin,LI Jiabing,et al.Research on Ecological Compensation Standard in Minjiang River Basin Based on Opportunity Cost and Ecosystem Service Values[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):314.
[8]郭荣中,申海建.基于生态足迹的澧水流域生态补偿研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):353.
GUO Rongzhong,SHEN Haijian.Studies on Ecological Compensation Based on Ecological Footprint in Lishui River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):353.
[9]于水潇,赵瑞东,赵青,等.基于能值分析和生态用地分类的河北省生态补偿研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):324.
YU Shuixiao,ZHAO Ruidong,ZHAO Qing,et al.Study on the Ecological Compensation of Hebei Province Based on Emergy Analysis and Ecological Land Classification[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):324.
[10]孙贤斌,黄润.基于GIS的安徽省会经济圈区域生态补偿优先等级研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(01):152.
SUN Xian-bin,HUANG Run.Study on Priority Sequence of Regional Ecological Compensation for the Capital City Economic Circle of Anhui Province Based on GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):152.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-05-30 修回日期:2022-07-24
资助项目:重庆市自然科学基金(cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0493); 重庆市技术创新与应用发展重点研发项(cstc2018jszx-zdyfxmX0021); 重庆市基础研究与前沿探索项目(cstc2018jcyjAX0497); 重庆工商大学研究生创新型科研基金(yjscxx2022-112-41)
第一作者:王陶(1997—),女,重庆沙坪坝人,硕士研究生,研究方向为环境规划与管理。E-mail:1034368199@qq.com
通信作者:周启刚(1976—),男,重庆铜梁人,博士,教授,主要从事环境规划与管理研究。E-mail:827055619@qq.com