TANG Zhixiong,ZHOU Zixiang,BAI Jizhou,et al.Scale Seterogeneity of Ecosystem Service Trade-offs/Synergies in the Jinghe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):318-326.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.043.]
泾河流域生态系统服务权衡/协同关系的尺度异质性研究
- Title:
- Scale Seterogeneity of Ecosystem Service Trade-offs/Synergies in the Jinghe River Basin
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)04-0318-09
- Keywords:
- ecosystem services; trade-offs and synergy; SWAT model; CASA model; InVEST model; Jinghe River Basin
- 分类号:
- X171
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究泾河流域生态系统服务权衡/协同关系的尺度异质性,阐明权衡/协同关系在子流域尺度发生变化的主要原因,为黄土高原地区的生态保护和高质量发展提供科学参考。[方法]利用SWAT模型、CASA模型、InVEST模型等量化粮食供给、土壤保持、产水、固碳、生境质量5种生态系统服务,并采用空间相关性统计方法从全流域和子流域两个尺度上进行生态系统服务及两两之间权衡/协同关系的尺度异质性研究。[结果](1)泾河流域粮食供给服务在流域东南部较强; 土壤保持服务在流域北部、中部较弱,在西南部、东南部较强; 产水服务在流域西部、南部以及东南部较强,在北部、东北部及东部地区较弱; 固碳服务流域南部强于北部,东部强于西部; 生境质量以中值区和高值区为主,其高值区主要分布在流域东部、东南部及西部,低值区主要分布在建设用地。(2)从全流域尺度来看,粮食产量和土壤保持、产水量、NPP和生境质量以权衡关系为主; 土壤保持和产水量、NPP和生境质量以协同关系为主; 产水量和NPP是协同关系为主,和生境质量是权衡关系为主; NPP和生境质量是以协同关系为主。(3)泾河流域生态系统服务之间的权衡/协同关系在部分子流域发生改变,土地利用变化是其权衡/协同关系发生改变的重要原因。[结论]土地利用变化是泾河流域生态系统服务权衡/协同关系存在尺度差异性的主要性原因,未来应加强多尺度上的生态服务权衡/协同关系的研究。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The scale heterogeneity of ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies in Jinghe River Basin was investigated, and the main reasons for the change of trade-offs/synergies at sub-basin scale were elucidated, which could provide scientific reference for ecological protection and high-quality development in the Loess Plateau. [Methods] Soil and Water Assessment Tool(SWAT), Carnegie Ames-Stanford Approach(CASA)model, Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs(InVEST)model were used to quantify five kinds of ecosystem services(food supply, soil conservation, water yield, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality), and spatial correlation statistical method was used to study the scale heterogeneity of ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies at the whole basin and sub-basin scales. [Results](1)The food supply service in the Jinghe River Basin was stronger in the southeastern part of the basin. The soil conservation service was weaker in the northern and central parts of the basin, but stronger in the southwestern and southeastern parts of the basin. The water yield service was stronger in the western, southern and southeastern part of the basin, weaker in the north, northeast and eastern regions. The carbon sequestration service of the basin was stronger in the southern part than in the northern part, and in the eastern part than in the western part. The habitat quality was dominated by the median and high-value areas, and the high-value areas mainly distributed in the eastern part of the basin, southeast and west, low-value areas mainly distributed in construction land.(2)From the perspective of the whole basin scale, grain yield and soil conservation, water yield, NPP and habitat quality were mainly in trade-off relationship. Soil conservation and water yield, NPP and habitat quality were mainly in synergistic relationship. Water yield and NPP were mainly in synergistic relationship, and the trade-off relationship was the main one with the habitat quality. The NPP and the habitat quality were mainly based on the synergistic relationship.(3)The tradeoffs/synergies between ecosystem services in the Jinghe River Basin changed in some sub-basin, and land use change was the important reason for the changes in the tradeoffs/synergies. [Conclusion] Land use change is the main reason for the scale difference of ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies in the Jinghe River Basin. The research on ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies at multiple scales should be strengthened in the future.
参考文献/References:
[1] King R. Valuation of wildlife resources[J]. Regional Studies, 1966,3(1):41-47.
[2] Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C, Island Press, 1997.
[3] Toth F L. Ecosystem and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment[C]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2003.
[4] Rodriguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11:28-41.
[5] Martine M, Matthew G E M, Rebecca K R, et al. Towards a threat assessment framework for ecosystem services[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2017,32:240-248.
[6] Arico S, Bridgewater P, Elbeltagy A, et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-being[M]. World Health Organization, 2005.
[7] Pontius J, Schaberg P, Hanavan R. Remote Sensing for Early, Detailed, and Accurate Detection of Forest Disturbance and Decline for Protection of Biodiversity[M]. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020.
[8] Ran H, Li J, Zhou Z, et al. Predicting the spatiotemporal characteristics of flash droughts with downscaled CMIP5 models in the Jinghe River basin of China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2020,32:40370-40382.
[9] 杨洁,谢保鹏,张德罡.黄河流域生态系统服务权衡协同关系时空异质性[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(6):78-87.
[10] 白羽萍,王佳斌,刘恋,等.黑河流域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡分析:以张掖市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(13):1-13.
[11] 李晶,李红艳,张良.关中—天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].生态学报,2016,36(10):3053-3062.
[12] Turner K G, Odgaard M V, Bocher P K, et al. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark:trade-offs and synergies in a culturallandscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014,125:89-104.
[13] Bai Y, Wong C P, Jiang B, et al. Developing China's Ecological Redline policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning[J]. Nature Communications, 2018,9:3034.
[14] Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecologyand the Environment, 2019,7:4-11.
[15] 杨晓楠,李晶,秦克玉,等.关中—天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系[J].地理学报,2015,70(11):1762-1773.
[16] Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, et al. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: An integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany[J]. Ecology and Society, 2012,17(3):22-45.
[17] Zheng T, Zhou Z, Zou Y, et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal characteristics and spatial flow process of soil conservation service in Jinghe Basin of China[J]. Sustainability, 2021,13(4):1-17.
[18] 姚婧,何兴元,陈玮.生态系统服务流研究方法最新进展[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(1):335-342.
[19] 王嘉丽,周伟奇.生态系统服务流研究进展[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4213-4222.
[20] Hou Y, Lü Y H, Chen W P, et al. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of ecosystem service interactions: A case study on the central Loess Plateau of China[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2017,32:1201-1217.
[21] 余玉洋,李晶,周自翔,等.基于多尺度秦巴山区生态系统服务权衡协同关系的表达[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5465-5477.
[22] Bai J, Zhou Z, Zou Y, et al. Watershed drought and ecosystem services: Spatiotemporal characteristics and gray relational analysis[J]. International Journal of Geo-Information, 2021,10(2):43-64.
[23] Tang C, Li J, Zhou Z, et al. How to optimize ecosystem services based on a Bayesian Model: A case study of Jinghe River Basin[J]. Sustainability, 2019,11(15):1-18.
[24] Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part Ⅰ: Model development[J]. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998,34(1):73-89.
[25] 朱青,周自翔,刘婷,等.黄土高原植被恢复与生态系统土壤保持服务价值增益研究:以延河流域为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2557-2570.
[26] 刘婷,周自翔,朱青,等.延河流域生态系统土壤保持服务时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):93-100.
[27] Yu Y, Li J, Zhou Z, et al. Response of multiple mountain ecosystem services on environmental gradients: How to respond, and where should be priority conservation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,278:123264.
[28] Ren Z, Feng Z, Li P, et al. Response of runoff and sediment yield from climate change in the Yanhe Watershed, China[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2017,80(1):30-35.
[29] 余玉洋,李晶,曾莉.中国南北过渡带生态系统固碳服务及价值量空间格局[J].陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2020,48(1):11-20.
[30] Renard B, Kavetski D, Kuczera G, et al. Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling:The challenge of identifying input and structural errors[J]. Water Resources Research, 2010,46(5):1-22.
[31] Cla B, Wei S A,Man L C. Evolution of ecosystem service value in rural regions based on geographical scope of entities: A case study of Nanjing, China[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2021,64:101368.
[32] 孙彦旭,周自翔,米朝娟.基于土地利用覆被变化(LUCC)的人类活动与流域生物多样性灰色关联分析[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(6):1782-1792.
[33] 张文静,孙小银,周俊.南四湖流域关键生态系统服务的时空权衡关系[J].生态学报,2021,41(20):8003-8015.
[34] Abbaspour K C, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, et al. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,524:733-752.
相似文献/References:
[1]梁春玲,谷胜利.南四湖湿地生态系统能值分析与区域发展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):185.
LIANG Chun-ling,GU Sheng-li.Analysis on Energy Value of Wetland Ecosystem of Nansi Lake in Shandong Province of China and Regional Development[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):185.
[2]王伟林,黄贤金,钟太洋.区域土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应——以南京市为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):212.
WANG Wei-lin,HUANG Xian-jin,ZHONG Tai-yang.Area Land Use Change Responses to the Ecosystem Service Value—A Case Study of Nanjing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):212.
[3]陈晓林,杨忠,熊东红,等.昌都地区生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):156.
CHEN Xiao-lin,YANG Zhong,XIONG Dong-hong,et al.The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Changdu, Tibet[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(04):156.
[4]郭兵,姜琳,孙彩红,等.基于多源数据的岷江上游生态系统服务价值动态评估[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):131.
GUO Bing,JIANG Lin,SUN Caihong,et al.Dynamic Evaluation on Ecosystem Service Value of the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on Multi-Source Data[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):131.
[5]吴丹,邵全琴,刘纪远,等.中国草地生态系统水源涵养服务时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):256.
WU Dan,SHAO Quanqin,LIU Jiyuan,et al.Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Water Regulation Service of Grassland Ecosystem in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):256.
[6]阿依努尔·艾尼,玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,等.利益相关者对塔里木河下游荒漠河岸林生态系统服务的认知度分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):205.
Ayinuer·Aini,Umut·Halik,Tayierjiang·Aishan,et al.Analysis of Stakeholders’ Cognition on Desert Riparian Forest Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):205.
[7]杜国明,孙晓兵,刘彦随.延安市退耕对生态的影响及其人文驱动因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):233.
DU Guoming,SUN Xiaobing,LIU Yansui.Analysis of Ecological Restoration on Ecosystem Services and Its Human Driving Factors in Yan’an City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):233.
[8]王敏,阮俊杰,姚佳,等.基于InVEST模型的生态系统土壤保持功能研究——以福建宁德为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):184.
WANG Min,RUAN Jun-jie,YAO Jia,et al.Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model—A Case Study of Ningde City, Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):184.
[9]周涛,李天宏.陕西省退耕还林(草)前后LUCC对生态系统服务的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):246.
ZHOU Tao,LI Tian-hong.Influence of Land Use/Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Province before and after Returning Farmland to Forest/Grass[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):246.
[10]牛志君,周亚鹏,王树涛,等.县域土地利用变化对碳储量的影响与评价——以黑龙港流域巨鹿县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):292.
NIU Zhijun,ZHOU Yapeng,WANG Shutao,et al.Influence and Evaluation of Land Use Change on Carbon Storage on County Scale—A Case Study of Julu County in Heilonggang Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):292.
[11]朱殿珍,初 磊,马 帅,等.青藏高原生态屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(04):308.
ZHU Dianzhen,CHU Lei,MA Shuai,et al.Tradeoff and Synergistic Relationship Among Ecosystem Services[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):308.
[12]陈相标,丁文荣.石林喀斯特岩溶区生态系统服务时空演变及权衡协同关系[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(02):285.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.043]
CHEN Xiangbiao,DING Wenrong.Spatial-temporal Evolution and Trade-off Synergy Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Shilin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):285.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.043]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-01-13 修回日期:2022-03-30
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41771576,42071285); 国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目〔合作交流-NSFC-NRF(中韩)〕(41811540400); 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划资助项目(2018JM4010)
第一作者:唐志雄(1998—),男,湖南湘潭人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态系统服务研究。E-mail:tzx15675699729@163.com
通信作者:周自翔(1977—),男,陕西西安人,副教授,研究生导师,主要从事生态系统服务研究。E-mail:zzxcat@qq.com